tirsdag 31. mai 2016

No. 1230: Although Oslo police want to let themselves be used by mockery apostle Jan Aage Torp to stop the Heavenly blog, so let it not be implemented!

No. 1230:
Although Oslo police want to let themselves be used by mockery apostle Jan Aage Torp to stop the Heavenly blog, so let it not be implemented!

Ansgar Braut who has used the alias against me, my family, my employer, my wife's employer and others!

Torodd Fuglesteg has written the worst thing that the goal is get me to dangle from a gallows with a rope around his neck. I have five children and the names of my children public and everything else to frame me and my family have done nothing punishable?

But I have written a minimum this is a criminal offense?
We have, in other words with a police doing there Polti in Saudi Arabia or North Korea are small criminals against Manglerud police with the so-called Hatkrim group!

This is Norway in 2016, or the Stone Age? I just have to ask how much madness that will be possible! Before any sensible and prudent people intervenes and looks Polti and Jan Aage Torp crime !!!!

I have been asked what I was convicted of? To that I must reply that the whole thing is just a cabal and Christianity persecution !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is I who have been harassed, and my family! Here everything is turned on head and the guilty go free, but the innocent should be punished!

Unfortunately, ignoring Manglerud Polti completely proven what's what in this matter, but God will undoubtedly cause everything to victory for those who believe in his son's name!
Meanwhile, the farce is really over, as Jan Aage Torp who he is and represents is revealed to all and sundry in the past month.!

Photo of the Danish flag, Dannebrog - perhaps we put the Heavenly blog for? Who knows? I write perfect Norwegian, so now here in Norway itself from Denmark is not impossible? It now looks like the Heavenly blog has shaken the whole of Norway and everyone doing everything they can to stop this glorious heavenly message!

We have freedom of religion and freedom of speech as the so-called hate groups on Manglerud to influence hate crime online. Here is the act of proportionality me and my family at the worst possible way.

Sending emails and everything else, if it's my son's twitter account to threaten him that if he did not obey the, then write that he is gay etc. Something which has also been done, and, police accept this.
They send emails to my wife both in her private mail, work e-mail and to her superiors that she goes around with guns and it is getting huge campaigns with armed police.

I have received more than 20,000 hate speech against me the last 3 years online.

Jan Aage Torp, who has managed to stoop Polti with false accusations the police have secured their some. He himself has written ten times sharp against me than I meet him, this ignores Polti and the courts so far!

But in reality, they can never stop me online or others who have little resources and ingenuity.

I can just go to my native Denmark where I was born, have citizenship and own personal and absolutely everything that makes me to be Danish. There I can just create his own website and write as before. In reality, the entire trial against me a great big farce where everything will go as before if not even better, Hallelujah!

Final Comment:

As Danish, then I add one of my favorite groups when I was growing up. This song is for many the Danish national anthem:

Shu-bi-dua - Denmark

Related links:

mandag 30. mai 2016

No. 1229: Now it's the public prosecutor in Oslo that finally after 4 months. after mailing, received the petition for appeal, which will be forwarded Borgating Court of Appeal!

No. 1229:
Now it's the public prosecutor in Oslo that finally after 4 months. after mailing, received the petition for appeal, which will be forwarded Borgating Court of Appeal!


Now it is after all a happy day that Oslo police after 4 months. procrastination has sent an appeal by a lawyer Brynjar Meling on to the public prosecutor who will then forward it all to Borgating Court of Appeal!

The case is really settled when all revelations that have come in recent months. tells everyone that Jan Aage Torp has lied to the police, and for everyone else as it was my preaching that he hated so fervently !!!!!!!!

When concerning remarriage which the word of God clearly states is a sin and adultery. It was not least what was written on the Heavenly blog and Heavenly blog as did his with the high Google rankings I have!

Pray that the prosecutor keeps calm and let justice happen that Torp are accused of false accusations, and Norway's two largest grid roll charged with flaming today welcomed me and my family. This applies Ansgar Braut who writes constantly under fake profiles (he has about 20 to 20 names to at least online), and Torodd Fuglesteg. And that Searchlight by Sverre Andersen also being charged with complicity when it is he who has brought all this nettrolene write on his website!

Image of lawyer Brynjar Meling left and the criminal fool apostle Jan Aage Torp right!

Here's lawyer Brynjar Meling its appeal by writing:
The Court of Appeal

SUPPORT FACE-TO APPEAL OVER OSLO THINGS BROUGHT DOM¬ In ITEM NO ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬-15-073540MED-OTIR/02¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ Jan Kåre Christensen¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ against The Public Prosecution.
* *
Referring to the Oslo district court's judgment in case number 15-073540MED-OTIR / 02 dated 01/25/16 with so's judgment:
1. Jan Kåre Christensen, b. 08/03/1964 sentenced for violation of the Criminal Code of 1902 §3-90 a to a bid of 12,000 - twelve thousand - million going to sit in jail for 20 - twenty - days.
2. Jan Kåre Christensen acquitted of restitution claim.
3. Jan Kåre Christensen judged on to pay costs to the public by 3000 - three thousand - respectively.
The verdict is proclaimed by promoted preaching in Oslo District Court on Friday 29.01.16 at. 09:30. The verdict was appealed by the ministry. Support Written notification by appeal deadline. The appeal is therefore timely.

Anke object.
The appeal application of the law and evidence application the question of guilt.

The factual side
The facts are on the whole not disputed, however, that Christensen points out that he has not repeated the concepts to such an extent as indicated by the aggrieved party. It appears in his testimony before the district court that it is rebuttal from aggrieved to Torp and people who speak Torp case that things have been repeated and generated.
It is not disputed that Christensen comes with the statements reproduced in the indictment. The contested nor that this has been going on over time. The details of the period and scope has no bearing on the legal. The court has indiscriminately added Torp's explanation on this point basis and have focused on this in his guilt assessment. The correct according to Christensen is that he has referred the matters in significantly fewer times and in all material so this has come as a response to articles that affects Christensen.

Generally these statements
It noted that the terms used is normative and based on Christensen's perception rendered. It should be noted that the terms live in words, "immoral" and "prostitute" are terms used in Bible translations, as it was presented to the district court with specific Bible references.
It points out that the term "leper" is also a Biblical expression that denotes it to be unclean and thus be excluded from society.

The reason for the conflict
It also pointed out that an item that background that Christensen "went to 'attack' 'on Torp, is a relationship that Torp in court acknowledged, where a young person, as Christensen perceive as" easy prey "should have given Torp everything he owned and had in terms of selling their house and at this render a donation consisting of almost 1.5 million. This was funds that Torp received and spent in their Christian, evangelical activities.
Christensen is clear that he can not find Torp living in accordance with its interpretation of the Bible. He believes that when Torp live by a form of double standards, where the life and teachings mismatched.

Deficiencies in the District Court's judgment
It may on occasion preceding paragraph mentioned that a defect in the Court's judgment is that the court does not have sufficiently emphasized that Torp is a public person, and must therefore have a higher tolerance limit for what he will accept the attack on his activity .
Moreover, neither the court paid sufficient attention that Torp acknowledged in court that he has called Christensen for "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer" on a few occasions and has called him demon, light guide, rumor spreader, etc. Based on the principle of provocation retorsjon this in itself circumstances that would warrant an acquittal. Victim's contribution to the debate has in no way helped to reduce the level of conflict in the debate, so that the matter is the statements that contribute to raise what Torp must withstand the attack.

Of law appeal.
It is noted, however, that the central argument - and that principle by appeal - relates to the application of the 1902 Penal Code § 390 a. It is argued that to apply them at the blog, regardless how extensive a blog business is - in effect that the provision be subject for an expansive interpretation.
It is established law that the freedom of speech area rather must interpret a penal provision restrictively, if this provision conflicts with the Covenant obligations. In this case, the criminal code. § 390 a conflict with freedom of expression. In addition to being protected by the Constitution, further determine the Constitution. § 100, as is the Convention attached to the ECHR Art. 10 and SP art 18 and 19.
The court takes its decision a correct starting point by stating that the provision aimed at those who "by frightening or distressing behavior or other reckless behavior that infringes on another's peace."
The court uses the legislative history wrong. Proposition 41 (1954-55) pp. 20-55 is itself a legal argument in favor of acquittal with a conviction. Referring to the allegations mentioned above, together with the legislative history says "the decision must be made concrete and circumstances of time, place and the victim's individual circumstances will affect the assessment". Moreover, it appears in the legislative history that "under the term 'nuisance behavior' go such vexatious phone calls.
It is a key element in both the legislative history that the relevant case law, it is pointed out activities aimed directly against a person; meaning that one call, send messages, or seek out people or its local area. This has not Jan Kåre Christensen made.
As shown by the Rt. 2014 p. 669 paragraphs 17-18, the "mind integrity" as protected by the provision and "only serious violations affected." The court discusses on page 5-6 defender's allegations that blog is not affected because it is not aimed directly at Torp. The court will still p. 6 that the posts are published on the Internet and concludes that this does not preclude the application of § 390 a. This is a formulation that would in itself may question whether or not involves a expansive interpretation of the wording of strl. § 390 a) and thus already at this point. Infringes clarity principle ECHR 7 and legality in grl. § 96.
Difficult it becomes when the court finds support for its view in the case law. Neither the Oslo District Court decision in 2013-111-859, RG 208-1499 or THEDM 2004-3964 may be cited for applying the criminal code. § 390 a on the blog. It's in both of these decisions, talk about actions that have just aimed more directly at people.
When the court additionally highlights that blog posts are open available for everyone and indexed so that they get hits on Torps one on search engines like Google, it shows precisely that one is outside the private sphere. It is not so that one can understand and interpret it as when "affected" can be regarded to have received the message when it came to his knowledge - since the accused's activity has such a scope and intensity that Torp and Christensen's case.
Here are making the right not only an expansive interpretation of the penal provision but they are "enough" is also the fact, which can be an equally strict violation of the principle of legality. The court uses RG 2008 p. 1499 as the basis for its position without any discussion or in any way argue why this is relevant. From here noted that in RG 2008 p. 1499 had convicted hung hundred posters in the victim's community, where the victim was named and given information that he was convicted. The fact of the matter is therefore - unlike the present case - that the defendant has sought aggrieved community and hung him out in public bulletin. This is nothing but adding this openly in a blog.
Here it may be noted that the court has disregarded in the fact that Torp's own activities have helped to disseminate information. It may on that occasion declared that the first mentioned Oslo district court's judgment against Christensen was Torp in his blog. It shows that there is no privacy Torp is committed to protecting by reporting Christensen but he does this as part of their "struggle". It is argued here that the judiciary should be careful not to let himself be used. That is why isolation right when the police have dismissed Christensen reviews from Torp, but it is thus wrong to maintain other way.
The court also brings into matters related to Torp's spouse. As pointed out by the defender in court would possibly Torp spouse privacy had a greater right to protection than Torp itself. Torp's spouse is not a public person, it is Torp. This is, however, beyond the fine.
Relationship to free speech protection in the Constitution. § 100 and ECHR. 10, SP art 18 and 19 are not properly considered by the Oslo District Court. The court refers to LB - 2015-24004 which states that "it is certainly clear that utterances in isolation are not punishable, may under the Penal Code 390 a. The condition is that they occur in a number and at times makes it particularly distressing for the recipient ".
This shows once again that basically incorrect. When Borgarting Court of Appeal in the case points out the number and times that make it "particularly troublesome" shows once again that the basic premise is that the inquiries must abide directly against a person. Reference to Rt. 2010, p. 845 in the relevant Court of Appeal judgment shows that it concerns direct contact. In Rt. 2010, p. 845, we are facing a case where the chairman of the Immigration Tribunal received repeated SMS messages with insulting and threatening content.

Further details on the legal

It follows from the criminal code. § 1, 2.ledd, that the criminal law applies to any restrictions imposed by agreements with foreign states or of international law in general. Christensen has therefore protection as well ECHR 10 SP art 18 and 19.
His statements are also protected by the Constitution § 100. It follows already of Gujrat Judgment Rt. 1976 p.1. that the constitutional provisions governing the individual's personal liberty must have impact that is significant.
It is argued that the District Court's interpretation of the statements, means that the judgment result is contrary to the principle of legality, clarity principle and judgment result violates Jan Kåre Christensen of religion and freedom of expression.
The Court has in several decisions highlighted that freedom of expression is one of the absolutely fundamental elements of the basis for a democratic society. It is emphasized that this freedom not only includes the right to submit statements that are favorably received or regarded harmless, or minor, but also statements that are offensive, shocking or disturbs.
In Oslo District Court decision is not the stringent requirements of the grounds for restriction of freedom of expression met. Although there is only one remedy matters, there is no proportionality between the procedure and the purpose of this.
After EMD practice must exceptions speech subjected to a restrictive interpretation, see. That it must be "necessary". A central element of necessity assessment is whether there is an urgent social need for the procedure - "pressing social need". Referring to the so-called "Spycatcher" judge, Serie A # 216, judgment paragraph 60, and 217, the judgment section 50.
In Christensen's case must be weighed against all of the adjudicated claims are his views on theological issues, or provocations made against either him or his faith.
When the Supreme Court majority in Kjuus Judgment Rt. 1997 s 1821 finds that the statements are not protected by freedom of expression, this ia based on the following:
"I can not see that the right to form a political party can be inferred that groups that do this, and dons their positions form of a manifesto, should be free to agitate for any vision, whatever interventions it had to involve over others people."
For Christensen - as sites of their right to make statements, protected as well religious freedom as freedom of expression, this is different. He advocates a view that - though it is rare now - has stood for centuries, and that is not expressed that "he dons his stances form of a religion".
It is also argued that the statements came as part of a public debate. A debate that whoever statements frames also participated in, and reciprocated. Such a debate is protected by freedom of speech under the Constitution L-100 which weighs very heavily. Allowing the utterances of a party and deprive the victim of his remarks, the right to speak out will in itself be contrary to freedom of expression
Should criminal code § 390 a used in this case, it will only be done by an expanding interpretation of the law - which is impossible, cf. Legality of the Constitution § 96.
It is clearly evident in jurisprudence that interpretation must not only be based on how the general belongs will perceive the statements, see. Plenary ruling in Rt-1997-1821 (Kjuus). but one
"Must also see the statements in light of the context in which they have emerged."
It appears here that the statements are normative, emerged in a blog debate between people who share faith, and with references to external's perception of a common creed.
On the interpretation of the statements says Eggen Norwegian Law Review 1998 p 263:
"For utters becomes jurisprudence as little predictability whether one" relaxes "the criminal liability conditions or interpreting utterances freely so that they are aligned with these terms. One of the main objectives behind legality in Norwegian law, and in allfall law requirement ECHR is to ensure predictability in the application of law.
He continues later on the same page:
"When legality sets limits on how far the contextual interpretation of the Criminal Code it is acceptable to go, it would be inconsistent if the courts were to stand freely in contextual interpretation of utterances"
The consideration of both legality and freedom of expression implies that there are clear limits to how far one can go in if interpretation meaning and circumstances of the statements that are not directly stated or acknowledged.
Straight Safety, particularly ensuring predictability, is accented in Rt. 2002, p. 1618. consideration to freedom of expression implies
"That no one should be able to risking criminal liability by the statement attributed to a meaning that is not expressly stated nor with reasonable certainty can be inferred from the context"
Reference is also made to Eggen, Law and 1998 s 264 which gives rise to another consideration:
"A free interpretation involves besides less predictability of law also greater opportunity for censorship from the Court file of speech they dislike, perhaps for reasons other than those behind the penal provision"
Interpreted as religious expressions and interpretations of the Bible's view of remarriage, can not utterances judged. When court excludes the interpretation option, then "pushes" one statement outside the core area of ​​the Constitution § 100 of free speech.
Rt 2002, p. 1618 Boot Boys judgment is thus relevant. "Boot Boys" was a neo-Nazi fighting organization, as a Saturday morning on the square in Askim performed an appeal with support for Hitler on the occasion of Rudolf Hess's 100th day.
"Every day rob, rape and kill immigrants Norwegians, every day our people and country are being plundered and destroyed by Jews, who suck our country empty of wealth and replace it with immoral and un-Norwegian thoughts." The appeal ended with "Sieg full- and Hitler greetings. "
Boot Boys' leader Terje Sjølie was acquitted. The statements were found to be derived from a political program rather than being specific threats. Several of those in attendance were dressed in finland hoods, and the demonstration was a militaristic combat fascist nature. The statements fell in front of immigrants who made their errands in Askim. Christensen's statements come in response to the actions that he believes is in dtrid with God's word. Statements fall in Blog where most statements are in response to charges from persons Christensen perceive as mouthpiece for Torp. . Sjølis statements fell unprovoked against innocent people.

clarity requirement
Whether expanding the wording of the law, or the meaning of that statement, you come in conflict with the clarity requirement and legality. The Supreme Court has the 02.08.2012 handed down a ruling in which clarity principle being discussed:
Clarity The requirement has been expressed in several decisions of the Supreme Court, including the decision in Rt-2011-469, in which the question was whether the provision in the Penal Code § 219 also applied in relation to former cohabitants, although the legal text only referred to former spouses. Section 9 states:
'Such an extension of the criminal liability, compared with what follows from the wording of § 219, must be authorized by law.
I refer to the Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7, ref. Rt-2009-780 Section 21. Penalties Dignity, or other real reasons that may justify to juxtapose previously cohabiting with former spouses, is not sufficient. '
Then comes something that is central to the Christensen case that are not sufficiently emphasized by the court
The Court of Appeal for its part, notes that the requirement for clear statutory basis for criminal liability not least will be significant in cases where penal provision implies a restriction of freedom of speech
Under section 18 comes the Supreme Court with his views.
As the Court of Appeal points out, have basically the assessment be a requirement for clear legal applicable in criminal cases, cf. The Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7. It appears to Rt-2011-469, section 9, quoted in the Court of Appeal ruling.
This is elaborated in Rt-2012-313 paragraph 29, which states:
"It is nevertheless not decisive what the legislature might have intended, when any legislator's intention has not been clearly expressed in the law. I refer to the law's requirement of the Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7, so this is understood partly in Rt-2011-469. Of particular interest are paragraphs 9 and 12 of the judgment, in which it emphasized that the criminality of need resulting from the law, and that a lack of support in the wording is not cured by that relationship is clearly worthy of punishment, and that the legislator undoubtedly wanted to frame it. "

Secondarily - restrictive interpretation of the provisions
It submits alternatively, that if the appellate court finds that the statements violate privacy, for a common interpretation of the legal provisions of the criminal code. § 390 A, and that the district court did not have extended interpretation of the statements in a way that is contrary to the ECHR 7 and Constitution. § 96, as follows from the criminal code. § 1, paragraph 2, that the interests of Christensen's rights - and our commitments - under ECHR and SP on the safeguarding of the individual's freedom of religion and freedom of expression, imply that the criminal code. § 390 a) in cases where religion and freedom of speech are violated, must be interpreted narrowly.

Emphasis for this down so
P to s t a n d:
Jan Kåre Christensen acquitted

Related links:

søndag 29. mai 2016

No. 1228: Many criticized me to warn against the "Pastor" and mockery apostle Jan Aage Torp - all have proved to be true, "none" so humble and apologize!

No. 1228:
Many criticized me to warn against the "Pastor" and mockery apostle Jan Aage Torp - all have proved to be true, "none" so humble and apologize!

Photo by Jan Aage Torp's daughter (we have censored it when we do not want her to be exposed to more abuse than she already went through) standing up with a story that shakes one. It says that all that I have also written and spoken mockery apostle January Aage Torp has been true down to the last milligram. Police want this to be punishable only says that Oslo police are far worse than the police in any country I know of. It is not possible to make a bigger blunder than Oslo police here do!

We put either the image of prevention at Manglerud which is soon the only defender, Jan Aage Torp has left? In my and arguably this "madness" Police!

From v. Inspector Monica Lille Bakken, police officers Stian Barmo and Lena Fjalestad and police attorney Oda Karterud.

Some have prayed and acknowledged that they were mistaken. But the vast majority have just quietly pulled away without acknowledging that they took completely wrong and I was right!
Heth No, bullying and lies against me and my family have now at least "dried" almost out!

Luke 16 8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely; for children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light. (1930 translation.)

The Lord gave the dishonest manager praised because he had acted prudently. For children of this world arrange themselves wiser with each other than the children of light does. (2011 translation.)

I grew up in a sports environment, and there is man actually much more humble and realize the facts many times than among believers on death and life to always be right! Therefore Jesus says that many times is the religious people of far inferior "art" than those who are not religious, although it should be the opposite!

When I played football, so we taught ourselves something very important. It was that we could not always win but also lose it belonged.
So it is here between me and Jan Aage Torp should all acknowledge?
Christensen family has won and Torp and his lackeys and poodles have lost, and it thoroughly! In a fight there are two actors, a loser and a winner. Here there is an obvious winner, and an even clearer loser!

Then no losers herein Torp and those who were with him, not treat me and the family Christensen winning? There was a possible output of the match after Torp went with her to the police and initiated the fight. For me it is completely unbiblical and I could never under any circumstances to reviewed some, as this is directly ubibelskt (1 Cor. 6).
As well, that as a believer, then it is the Lord who will fight for me, no one else! Here it is evident that God has and still fights for the family Christensen, while January Aage Torp and his straw men, God has never stood bi or are bi!

Could never under any circumstances dreamed Torp should be to the point revealed by inter alia it has been in every newspaper about Torp where he has become the synonym of a bad shepherd. Across Norway today so I think 99-100% of all Christians look at Jan Aage Torp that the absolute poorest shepherd and father Christian Norway has fostered ?!
He is on a decidedly low point with his manner towards his family first and foremost. Secondly to all other people he has been in contact with. He holds the "Jumbo Square!" Therefore, it is also entirely set with criticism against me, today know anyone who is reasonably honest against God and themselves.

Jan Kåre Christensen had just warned against Torp clearer and better than anyone else! Was the first who saw this and publicly repudiated in from the manipulator and mockery apostle January Aage Torp.

It's like a get the impression that Jan Aage Torp is that Satan himself by what others write and have formulated themselves regarding January Aage Torp! It's really others now taking "severe" in than I did! Therefore, the police charges against me pure idiocy! The thing between me and Jan Aage Torp is really today a "Balderdash" case! I was right, Torp and police are completely out on the sidelines!
The thing is really over, Torp and police have "dritte the dragon." The victory is won, Torp is the one who has lied and tried to get the Heavenly blog and Heavenly blog shut down and lock. But it's the goal he had in mind that accrued to him. Whoever digs a pit for others, falls himself up in it. Rarely has a Bible quote more appropriate and more in than right here!

There is not a single public preacher who has defended January Aage Torp and his misdeeds, on the contrary. That's all I know of that has drawn even more from Jan Aage Torp. All "know" that Torp is a child molester, criminal and a fool apostle who is honest against himself, God and the truth!

We also look at all Facebook comments, blog comments and online forums that day, Debate and around. So simply constants that I was saying too little from?
It was worse off with Jan Aage Torp than anyone could have imagined, even me! Torp is the synonymous of a poor shepherd and an unfit preach been following what's been uncovered, come forward and which is now open to all!

If we include VGTV that I had almost forgotten, then the testimony saying that I had more than straight, overwhelming and huge!

Almost forgot really what kids his writing, both his daughter and son. Then what I have written and spoken, like a firecracker up against everyone else who has now come forward with their outrageous and frightening stories about Jan Aage Torp.

Why are there so few who first denounced me, and now in retrospect have been a peep?
A small greeting sadly, I was ripped off by Jan Aage Torp's smile and eloquence or something? It could and should have than expected ?! But okay, we in the family Christen living well that it is not so, but perhaps there are some who will pray for forgiveness and say that they missed? Today everybody knows that will and are honest against himself and the truth, I was right!

I had been out in the "world" and athlete, I am convinced that here had been much more humble and said approximately the following:

Jan Kåre, you won and was right. Jan Kåre, we acknowledge defeat and congratulate you! Jan Kåre, you saw things that we saw, but now we see and realize that you had more than just brother!

I expect nothing of any but nice had it been that anyone and everyone who before warned against me and the Heavenly blog had realized that they were completely wrong. Admitted it and wished me good luck and God bless!

Humility always pays. Praise others always pays, face facts always pays. Koste other some good words, it always pays!

I quoted the words of Jesus: "For children of this world arrange themselves wiser with each other than the children of light."

That said, why is it in religious and Christian communities so bad to realize a defeat? It is based on dt we realize this and can work further. For me, I could never, under any circumstances dreamed that all this has happened in the past, and reached to happen. Here is just soon the evil people on Manglerud Polti in my view, standing with Jan Aage Torp. Each false Smyrna blog and the nefarious website Searchlight. It is the rabble really and the only ones defending January Aage Torp in his sin and misery!

It should have been written a book between this battle between me and Jan Aage Torp that would have been used as a textbook in it to expose a psychopath and a mockery apostle. It comes perhaps? It is certain, however, that the harassment against me and my family have now slowed very. Although the two largest and worst web roll, Ansgar Braut and Torodd Fuglesteg. January Aage Torp obedient poodles and lackeys have now stopped writing about me and my family something I am very happy!

I have not had any kind of conspiracy or coordination with all those who have revealed and discovered that what I've written and spoken about Jan Aage Torp was true down to the last milligram! At Polti led away by Torp, it says that he is a good liar and scoundrel!

It was the enormous hate me and my two blogs that did that Jan Aage Torp went to that step to report me. In other words, the entire case is based on false accusations.

He continues to lie, now it's not what I've written, but the amount that he has "hung" up in. It is the only straw they have to get me field in appellate court. Talk about being crooks, Jan Aage Torp and the so-called Hatkrim group at Manglerud Police Station here in Oslo. Everything will fabricate to leave in January Aage Torp's false accusations pass and Torp hatmeldigner against me that surpasses me a ten-fold. We take with Jan Aage Torp's straw men, not least Ansgar Braut and Torodd Fuglesteg, so we are talking about people living in a category of online proportionality which is completely beyond. That these are not punished, charged and tried in court is so ridiculous and such a rotten game of cops that even the police in North Korea or Saudi Arabia are not as bad as Polti at Manglerud. But we can hope, believe and pray that sooner or later justice and truth will come out, as it really happened now between me and Jan Aage Torp!

Taking ultimately what January Aage Torp's daughter wrote, when her voice is almost lost in all this. Here's her article and what some have commented. Has taken away the names of those who have commented on her article. It tells me one thing, had the truth about Jan Aage Torp each revealed before, he had certainly not been raised an only child.

Neither he or his early wife Ann-Christin Torp as she was then called. It tells me that every word I have written has been more than true! At Polti want me punished for this, explains just how rotten a police we are dealing with in my and probably everyone else's perception and opinion ?!

Just want to say, that it is not I, but Jan Aage Torp themselves have added to this game after he went to the police with his fictional review, and the bet for the temptation of this child molesters (after what his own children writing), manipulator and mock the apostle January Aage Torp!

NB! We have been really very kind to Torp here at the Heavenly blog. Had we unfolded really all that has emerged about Jan Aage Torp in recent months. Then it would have been so much and extensive, with so powerful words and opinions, we obviously had to do with a dangerous cult leader! My main focus has been that he is re-married as believers, it is what has disqualified him as a pastor and shepherd. Now it has emerged that there are a thousand things to, not least how he treated other people. There actually his children who have been hardest hit by this man!
What Torp and his poodles and lackeys have done for me and my family, it's like nothing raining though Torp has written against me on various forums.
His poodles and lackeys have written against me and my family through emails to many people. And they have written endless messages on the nefarious website Searchlight and the false Smyrna blog. All to frame me and my family, this is obviously a crime. That we have a police force that completely proven overlook this, it tells just how evil people that are working in the Oslo police. But I and my family serve a God who is above all and all, he has full control and responsibility for everything in His time and in His way will justice judgment be made and fulfilled.
We must all deal with, we will get back to what we sow, that we reap!

Look here:


"I am a God soldier, kill me if you want."

The quotation is taken from Christine Josephine Andreassens story about his upbringing in a Christian environment she would later to deplore. Through meeting with YMCA-YWCA, and a different way to express and experience faith, she comes to a new conclusion: "I will create a safe space for people to grow. I will show love and care. "This is the story of a girl who against all odds is studying to become a priest ...

- I am a God soldier, kill me if you want.

The words rang still in my head occasionally. I was barely 11 when I was sent on Father house summer camp in Denmark. Big brother was tortured and I was taught to hide me, sacrifice their lives for the cause and save those who were kidnapped.

The summer camp was to prepare us for the end of time and to fight the battle for Jesus. The leaders were convinced that the time was near. We therefore had to be trained to become soldiers. I was in the group for the youngest. At midnight we were awakened by screaming and yelling that one of the participants had been kidnapped. We did not even have a flashlight we alone were sent into the woods to look for the participant who had been kidnapped.

Furthermore, we learned how to hide in order to not be seen by those who came to "take us Christians". At camp I was taught to a worldview that said the world would do us harm.

One day we were lined up in a line. The authoritarian leaders told us with strong words that if we were ever kidnapped, we should die for the cause. We would die for Jesus. "I am a God soldier, kill me if you want." We should say. We rehearsed it together. The leaders asked us one by one, and we had to respond with straight clearers. I was ready. Eleven year old, I was ready to die for the cause.

A little later my dad happy home from Zambia. He was excited and engaged; exorcism was on schedule for Oslo Church. Mom tried to get me to stay home, said I could not miss school, but we all knew that two weeks school is not meant so much for a skoleflink 7. Classing.

The journey was long, and suddenly I was sitting alone in a room with a dirt floor and an African lady. She asked me to breathe in newspaper rolled up like a cornet. I heard screaming and wailing everywhere, but did as I was told. I breathed and cried. I was afraid. I shivered. When we finished she crossed on a list of various demons I had in me, jealousy was one of them. She said I had to come back for more exorcism. Mamma averted it.

When I went out I met the sight of a screaming African lady who ran out of space and tore off their clothes. When I walked through the hallways so I people I thought I knew from Oslokirken behave like other people. They were violent, eyes rolled and cried.

Some time later I broke out. I had gone to one of my brothers to be there for a while; I was too scared daddy. I would not be with anymore. I would not be driven out demons by. I would not be forced to meetings and prayer meetings every week. I was afraid.

One evening mom beside me. She saw that I never managed to lower your shoulders; constantly tense. She looked at me and said, "Christine, do you want us to move out?". I felt the pressure ease and said yes. For years afterwards I awoke from the nightmare in a cold sweat. I thought I saw demons. Everywhere. I never felt safe.

It took almost three years before I ended up in the emergency room. Big brother suspects a punctured lung, it proved to be a panic anxiety attacks. I did not understand what happened. I could not breathe, I was hurting and I was scared. Just before panic anxiety arrived I had seen an African.

It took me four years before I stopped going by bus every time I saw a person of African origin. I was afraid they would throw curses at me. Afraid they would attack me. I had PTSD, also known as posttraumatic stress disorder. I was treated at NKVTS, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress.

I did not think anymore. I would not believe. I did not understand that God was love. I did not understand that Christianity is not referred shame, shame, fear of failure and suffering. I did not understand love perspective.

Slowly but surely I began to understand. I started in Ten Sing through YMCA-YWCA and was given the opportunity to develop as a human being without being afraid of stepping errors. I sang in the choir. I was with made dramas. I was creative. I began to find out who this is Christine. And who this God is.

In recent times I have met people who looked parish life I was part of the outside. They saw me at school and among friends. They have said that they understood what happened was not good, and I'm glad they understood. But why was nothing done? What does it take for teachers, parents, friends, kindergarten teachers, nurses etc. In our society today is actually going to say when they happen something they think is good? This is not only about religion either, this is on a general basis.

We have to learn to speak up.

It is not okay that children should be afraid of the shadow of the desk chair at night because my dad said I saw demons. It will not happen. We must learn to dare to use our voice. Dare to speak up. I challenge schools, politicians, imams, pastors, priests, deacons, youth workers - the list is long - to dare to speak up. For either to speak up once too often than once too little.

Children should be allowed to be children.

My brother, Anders Torp, has released the book Jesus soldier. I've been contributor and proud little sister. I support him in what he has said and done, believe prudent. My faith is still firm, despite all that has happened. I think it's about that I found an environment where I could learn about God in a new way. A God who holds the whole person and not based on shame or fear. As a child I was afraid of hell, demons and the pitfalls. My father was my idol, and my feet tried as best they could to follow his footsteps.

I am thankful that I currently do not follow his footsteps. I make my own.

Now I second year in a Bachelor of Youth, Culture and Christian education in Theology. I will be a priest in the Norwegian Church. I shall create a safe space for people to grow. I will show love and care. I will not judge others to hell, make them ashamed or force them under me. I want to show others that despite an upbringing in extremely charismatic Christianity one can find a way to a healthy faith later.

Comments, but the names have been removed:

- Glad you got further chissà 🙂 -JL
- Thank you for a strong and incredibly important chronicle! What you describe is an upbringing with neglect, who had no children and young people experience. Good to hear that you have kept the faith in a good God, despite everything you've experienced. There is much honor to deal with his own father, but from what you beskriver- was necessary. He is sadly astray.

- "They have said that they understood what happened was not good, and I'm glad they understood. But why was nothing done? What does it take for teachers, parents, friends, kindergarten teachers, nurses etc. In our society today is actually going to say when they happen something they think is good? "

I am first and foremost totally agree. But I have to ask whether, in such cases had helped. Had it not primarily been black that you were persecuted, you had freedom of religion, that it was _der_ who had the right faith, and consequently could not hear us wrong believers, that we had been possessed by demons, or even been demons?
- I understand your point, but it's not worth trying? Is not it worth trying to speak in hopes of getting children who are experiencing gross neglect from such an environment?

- I think that all people regardless of life situation who experience neglect'll try to be rescued. I think it is so important that I would try again and again and again rather than thinking that it would not gone.

Many religious in environments like this feed on the idea that they are being persecuted as something positive, yes, it is perhaps especially the one should try to get out? Whatever the cost will?

One of my biggest focus as a Christian and as a priest coming is that I would rather say from once too often than once too little. I'm going to fight for every man and children I see living in unhealthy religious communities.

- Thank you so much for sharing your story. It made an impression. Really sad that you have experienced this in your church. Totally agree that it was unhealthy. Good to hear that you have kept the faith and you get to be in God's embrace with all you. Continued success as a priest. The Norwegian Church need priests like you! God bless you on !!

- Christine Josephine Andreassen says:

Hi Bettina!

 I understand what you say, but remember that this is a little clip of my childhood, and there are many, many more details and parts of my life here does not arrive. You write what you do I can have an understanding, but this is a very complex situation. To hear more about what I think you can send me an email to: christineandreassen@gmail.com.

Alternatively, you can buy my brother's book "Jesus Soldaten" and can hopefully get a better picture of exactly why I can not have contact with my father.

Related links:

torsdag 26. mai 2016

No. 1227: It's just a play that Åge Åleskjær altered doctrine - it has always been the same, complete and full freedom for the old man!

No. 1227:
It's just a play that Åge Åleskjær altered doctrine - it has always been the same, complete and full freedom for the old man!

Image of liar man and the false prophet Åge Åleskjær.

Åge Åleskjær is a qualified teacher, and a good teacher!

Here he bluffs the Norwegian Christianity that he has changed!
Hehe! He's the same old bløffmakeren he has always been, and certainly going to remain? Nothing new under the sun!

What is the gospel? The essence of the gospel is Galatians 2 where I am crucified with Christ, and live no longer for yourself.

See my commentaries for Galatians:


What is faith preaching and Åge ÅLESKJÆR preaching about? Always the same whether there are Kenneth Hagin, Kenneth Copeland, Joyce Meyer, Jan Hanvold, Jornstrand, Jan Aage Torp or whoever it happens to be!


The Gospel is turned upside down, it is I AND ME IN THE CENTER!
Not the word of God and Jesus Christ!

Jesus is not Lord, but even being Lord. Jesus is coming in the distance, but even being great and super!

The basic understanding of what the gospel is and why you need God and His salvation is gone!
Well as, a promise always a revival that never comes. It's keeping the effort and generosity up!

Here are some article I have written about Åge Åleskjær and OKS:

There is one who has written about OKS and Åge Åleskjær on Debate which is very readable, comprehensive and true. Look here:

Written by Torgeir Tønnesen
The problem with your father Åges ÅLESKJÆR preaching is no. 1 that he would never participate in a debate. I even heard him say a hundred times that he did not have a "discussion-spirit", read day or other Christian newspapers and look at criticism as a "spirit". This is otherwise entirely consistent with his mentors Kenneth Hagin and Kenneth Copeland's teachings.

The thing is, that when your father Åge realized it started to go bad with religious movement, so he took a new twist: he introduced "grace doctrine". Åge realized that people were tired promises of revival that never came. Your father has prophesied revival in Norway since 1983, and before that time. The revival never came and why he changed tactics and introduced grace doctrine: Now should any claims be removed in religious movement, everything would be relaxed and he opened for ecumenism at the Pentecostal charismatic reason. Basically, this is this what you refer to in your article.

What you perhaps too young to remember (You were a little kid when I went on OKS conferences) is that Åge says one thing but practice something else. He says there is no requirement for tithing, but in reality nag him constantly about money and tenth how blessed it is to give. He says it is not a biblical claim to serve in a church, but teaching still about subordination, pastor hierarchy and the blessing of "obedience" and to have its own place in the congregation. He sees the church as pastor own, and naturally it was his own son Thomas who took over his position as Pastor. Åge speak warmly of democracy and lederstrukturerer ward, but even shuns his elders that he would consider old-fashioned legalistic nonsense. He handpicked even their elders in his time as pastor. No despised other traditions and Lutheran relationships that your father has done. Do take urgent distance everything old in his heart, but even he goes happily up an old Pentecostal hymn to come forward as credible. False alibi.

I find it sad that you David must stand up and defend your father.

Luneborg, this is Åge ÅLESKJÆR problem, his Bible-principal and mentor Kenneth Hagin.


I have no faith in the freedom that you see in this video. If this is what is meant by full freedom, then I would rather put me under legalistic Lutheran law and bid-Christianity.

Åge has never renounced Hagin and Copeland (who nowadays runs ecumenism with the Pope)

"Full freedom" book as Åge wrote, I consider that one settlement with his time in the mission communications, as he himself has said hurt him with laws and commandments and regulations. Åge would in my view have no legalistic strung down his head, and therefore he uses the term "full freedom".

David Åleskjær invited to a debate on his father's settlement with just this and that.

Can you and deal with it, whimsical castle?

Or do you cavil and use superlatives about me?

David Åleskjær've probably also need to clarify Åleskjær his relationship with Hagin?

Then you may well comment on You-tube video with Hagin not 1983, but from the 90s and possibly also 2000's. Do not make me a liar.

Return to Start - and try and tell me if you consider the garden as an anointed prophet of this video.

Is this man Åges spiritual mentor, or was he?


So you've seen the video of Kenneth Hagin, Åge ÅLESKJÆR mentor, where Hagin goes around and hisses like a boa.

So you say this is a Pentecostal manifestation ala Peter and the guys had at Pentecost?

One thing is certain Wara, we may not both.

I call this mass demonic possession. You call it the Spirit of God. We can not be right both.

If you are right then I am obsessed.


See for yourself, -if you dare, gaze and see if this is the right person to be a mentor for Norwegian preachers.

I'm glad you agree with me, but I think you have slept an hour as many others unfortunately do. But I see that you are "new-saved" in 1996, then you are excused. 20 are small-)

Hagin's Åge ÅLESKJÆR spiritual father, in his own words. His mentor and teacher.

Here are Hagin.

I myself in my past carried Living Word Bible. I was cell group leader for many years and knows the religious movement in and out, since the 1980s. I was rescued in 2003 after ten years, because I had a Lutheran background and did not lose salvation I had when I walked in.

OKS was started on the basis that Åge Åleskjær traveled to the United States where he received a so-called renewal of Rhema environment by Kenneth Hagin. I've been to hundreds of meetings with Ulf Ekman, Åge Åleskjær and Fleet and his fellow preachers.

I contend that both Ulf Ekman and Åge Åleskjær builds all its teachings on Kenneth Hagins preaching. Primarily A-Pastor on top doctrine, hierarchy and subordination doctrine disease is satanic teachings so and reap the teachings of Jesus spiritual death doctrine, Hagin -the spriritual-man (The anew-born new creature can live and do everything Jesus could), subordination of church doctrine, and the doctrine that God has abandoned the old churches (if they are not renewed with the "new God does"), God makes you rich and happy teaching ......

I could continue indefinitely in this subject if I had not bothered. While the response is so lackluster that I moderate my activities as the years pass. It shall be as Jesus himself said: Let the blind lead the blind, then they both wild and in the trench. Bible teachings that all this religious movement is the great delusion to come over all the earth. Millions will be deceived and lose heaven and salvation. This fallacy is the antichrist (religious movement and other deluded) that sits in the temple. (Church) and allows himself to be God.

I've got 0 likes 1500 views. There are hard facts to me. But I think I'm right, - The vast majority takes sadly mistaken. My task is to try and avradikalisere people who unfortunately believe in fairy tales about revivals, healings and a golden time for the church in the world. I do not think that's the way it is. I wonder if he can find faith on the earth, in its coming?

Get to be saved, it is written. But many have come home to Jesus. God has enough and have full control.

Åge has not taken any settlement with anything that has to Hagin to do. On the contrary he promote and advocate Hagins learn today.

Åge preach often on Credo's Church in Bergen. What do you think he preaches? Lutheran dåpslære?

No, he preaches success in the Christian life, great faith, joy, and economic progress in all areas of life and a healthy body in a saved soul, which he used to speak.

There is no basic difference in teaching Åge Åleskjær, Hanevold or Kenneth Hagin or any other faith preaches. The idea, philosophy, theology, the methods are the same and have the same goals -statment lie revival that never comes.

Last reply:

Eirik Flikke

@ Tønnesen is not at all far out when he ties a "link" between Kenneth Hagin and Åge Åleskjær.

When Åleskjær wrote op-ed "My silent exit", published in our country in July 2006, it was relatively clear voice in the introductory preamble which reads:

"I think there has been much regrettable in the wake of a misguided belief preaching, and I ask forgiveness that I may not have been clearer in my criticism of these aspects of the religious movement."

But towards the end of the chronicle are therefor not Hagin in this settlement when Åleskjær writes:

"There is no doubt that religious preaching has missed! For me it's neither Jesus, Peter, Paul Kenyon, Hagin or Osborn's to blame for this! There are enough other communities and individuals in the wake of Faith movement which has gone far beyond the textbook said. "

And so it appears it all as something strange - when just Hagin, which by many is considered religious movement's father - not part of the warning lights that Åleskjær teeth.

Related links:

onsdag 25. mai 2016

No. 1226: The Christian church has always been against female pastors - remarriage and homosexuality!

No. 1226:
The Christian church has always been against female pastors - remarriage and homosexuality!


Photo by Jan Aage Torp, who is divorced and lives with a new woman as God's word says is adultery. What has become so bad that makes apostasy is spreading more and more. It is that this has been a pattern of Christendom today that accept either style implied or defending remarriage.

Today accept a the same regarding female pastors and homosexuality / lesbians couples, then dropout rate is at an end! Now it's really no more "countries" to adopt for dark longer, it all has been dark.
Jesus warned against this time, and now the soon come ?!

Aina Lanton to be Torp's new wife also lends itself out to be pastor and shepherd, the dropout rate is as disastrous and darkness reigns supreme!

Joh.e. 9. 3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him. 4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day; night comes when no man can work.

Seeing that there are many, many people who can not bear, or would even want more regarding the Norwegian Church. This is fully understandable!

But if we see homosexuality questions separated, as we see with myopia and narrow lenses that makes us really all wrong. And we will get the wrong answers, here there is a deeper, wider and wider context that underlies.

2 Pet. 2. 8 For if these things are yours and abound, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ; 9 for he who has not these things is blind, short-sighted, having forgotten that he was purged from his old sins. 10 Wherefore, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: 11 For so will be richly supplied to you the entrance of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's eternal kingdom.

This blindness is so councils today are scary!

God's word says that there will be a revolt, and it has already arrived and is spreading more and more!

2 Thess. 2. 3a Let no one deceive you in any way! for falling away first,

What we see today that soon we are heterosexual nothing more to say, when a small group in society soon govern all Christendom. They can now dictate a lot, not least within its the Norwegian Church.

I choose to see "leg" down into three parts that belong together, it is the following:

1) Female Pastors
2.) Remarriage
3.) Homosexuality

Why are these three truths so attached close to each other? It affects the most significant with God, that He is the creator of all life. These three truths belong under the actual creation and change them. So stingrays one really at the very foundation of our Christian faith.

I can take a tons of Bible verses that support this. Explain, expound and warn against. But for the sake of brevity, I take only a verse for every truth.

1) Female shepherds:

2. Tim. 2. 11 A Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to be the man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve, 14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression 15 but she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Notice that the apostle Paul goes back to creation, how Eva seem to fool. Although the man - Adam was the main culprit, it was Eve's interference and "guidance" that made sin entered among us humans and all creation was made subject to this.

2.) Remarriage.

Matt. 19 7 They said to him: Why commanded Moses to give his wife a certificate of divorce and divorce her? 8 He said to them, For your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it was not so. 9 But I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Notice what Jesus says, and refers to creation, "but from the beginning it was not so."

Here again violates remarriage with the actual creation, that God created man to a man and a woman for life. Only and alone death nullify a marriage.

3.) Homosexuality and lesbian love and life.

Room. 2. 20 For his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature, visible from the creation of the world, being understood by his deeds, that they are without excuse, 21 Because that, when they knew God, they did not glorify or thanks to him as God, but became poor in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 As they did themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the imperishable glory of God away from a likeness of an image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 Therefore God gave them over to shameful lusts; for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also left men the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with males working shame, and receiving in themselves the exchange for his error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not approve of having God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a mind that no pigeons, so they did it immodest:

Here there is a continuous sin list where it all culminates and ends up in love totally derailed and there a man does not lie with a woman. But a man with a man and a woman with a woman. When exactly is sin register fully and judgment awaits!

Final Comment:

There are those heterosexuals who have "blamed", they could have stopped developing when it all came to question whether regarding female pastors or remarriage. But nothing fik the heterosexual to a halt with his sin and disobedience to God's word and Jesus' commandment.

When start almost denigrate and accountability they homosekuelle and lesbians, is really to miss the mark.

It all began with the acceptance of female pastors and teachers. Secondly remarriage.

So it all ended out in the men worked with men and women with women! Synder goal is full, now it's just judgment of God church that we can expect if than repent.
Wake up, repent and confess our sin!

Daniel 9. 3 Then I turned my face to the Lord God, to seek by prayer and petitions, with fasting, sackcloth and ashes. 4 And I prayed to the Lord my God and confessed and said, O Lord, great and awesome God who keeps covenant and extend kindness to those who love you and keep your commandments! 5 We have sinned and done wrong and acted wickedly and rebelled against thee; we have turned aside from your commandments and your laws. 6 We have not hearkened unto thy servants the prophets, who spoke in thy name to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people in the country. 7 Thine, O Lord, belongs righteousness, but to us confusion of face, as it is this day - us, the men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem and all Israel, those near and those far away, in all the countries thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee. 8 Lord Us belongs confusion of face, to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, because we have sinned against thee. 9 To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgiveness. For we have rebelled against him, 10 and we have not obeyed the Lord our God and followed his laws, which he set before us by his servants the prophets; 11 Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law and turned aside and did not hear your voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us the curse which he had sworn to send, and is written in the law of Moses the servant of God; for we have sinned against him, 12 and he has confirmed the word that he had spoken against us and against our judges that judged us, and he made such great disaster on us that it is not under the whole heaven has happened something such as the as has happened in Jerusalem. 13 As it is written in the law of Moses, all this evil is upon us; but we besought not Jehovah our God by turning from our iniquities, and understand thy truth. 14 Therefore hath the Lord watched upon the evil, and brought it upon us; for the Lord our God is righteous in everything he does, but we did not hear his voice. 15 And now, O Lord our God, you who brought your people out of Egypt with a mighty hand and made thee a name, as it is this day! We have sinned, we have done wickedly. 16 Lord! Leave after all your righteous acts of your anger and wrath turn away from thy city Jerusalem, thy holy hill; For because of our sins and iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and thy people are become a reproach to all those around us. 17 Hear now, O our God, the prayer of your servant and his petitions and cause thy face to shine upon your sanctuary that is desolate - for your own sake, O Lord! 18 Turn, O my God, thine ear, and hear; Open your eyes and see our ruins and the city which is called by your name! For not for our righteous acts are we causing our petitions we bear before thy face, but on your great mercy. 19 Lord, hear! Lord, forgive! Lord, give heed and do not delay - for your own sake, my God! For thy city and thy people are called by your name. 20 While I was speaking and praying and confessing my sin and my people Israel sin and my supplication my God the holy mountain of the Lord my God.

Related links:

No. 1225: Oslo police standing on the strong their side - will have the weak and helpless doomed!

No. 1225:
Oslo police standing on the strong their side - will have the weak and helpless doomed!

Looking at how Oslo Polti acting, not least through the group at Manglerud calling himself preventive. The so-called Hatkrim group at Oslo police do the forunderligste pranks, which they unfortunately get Oslo District Court on their in my estimation quite beyond decisions !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They take indictments against several who already lying down and is the weaker party.

One of these is Christian Rosland who after only one utterance is judged. This is really bad when we know that this Christian Rosland's even been harassed separates worse than what he has said in public. And that here is a person who needs more guidance and dredging, but punishment!

Now there are several that have begun so-called clergy for what he was convicted of. Having written a sentence against a dark-skinned lady who already has over Norway in their backs!

I have already written about Christian Rosland here, read for yourself:


Now there are others who have called harassed as Christian Rosland and gone 100-1000 times longer. But this is so-called gifted people, what about them? Will they be punished and get a lawsuit against them? Here there is obviously no equality before the law, but Polti do as they like and think is "right!"

See here what others have written and done the same "street!"

Can not bear to publish their article, but the links to the entire (maybe I'm being punished and those who have written this goes free, he he ??????????????).
Here there is obviously no equality before the law.
Taking your first article I have written about Polti at Manglerud so until finally there are links that you can look at to find what some have written and drawn, far exceeding both what I and Christian Rosland has written and spoken.

As Hatkrim group at Oslo police after my review simply makes a bad evaluation and mistakenly it is possible to do!

No. 1103:
Photo of Pinocchio as Torp similar, except he does not get big nose because he has a conscience or scruples for some of what he does and says affects other than themselves. Are you a super egoist, so tread one of everything and everyone, only one even gets benefits from it.

I believe that Jan Aage Torp has come with a fictional review of me when the entire case is about my views on marriage - divorce and re-married.
But so did Torp something "wise" believe him. He found some words and phrases I've written against him, went to the police and said that this is "harassment" but he has harassed other people throughout his life, even his own family, and the public.
But okay, all I have written about Torp also outside this with remarriage, I stand for. That he is a fool apostle, adulterer, psychopath and a few other words.
But what Torp written about me? Far worse and stronger words. Why ignore the police this?
Here are some:
And what is worst of all, is the what his "henchmen" and "" poodles "has written.
Here are some:
If what I have written and spoken is "punishable"? Then you have all these other things be, what then?
Here is the crux.
I will not repeat myself, but show up in Oslo District Court on Wednesday 20 January at. 09.00 Sal 416. Ask for the case.
And you will learn more about what these others have written about me, I've written in other article located at the Heavenly blog.
Oslo police lie and change your mind, too!
I was in conflict with the council Torp and where the offer I he to change certain words and expressions. But Torp said a flat no as he has only one purpose in this case. It's getting me convicted so he can go to Google with a final judgment and get me away from search engines.

Oslo police said that after this meeting they would not do anything more with the case but summon me and Torp to two separate meetings to tell what they think is acceptable to write and speak. This promise they have not kept, but runs sake welcomed me and speak at least two tongues. And they operate as they do in a dictatorship state. But I'm looking forward to the matter, I am confident that both Torp and police will suffer a crushing defeat to both Brynjar Meling and me!

Final Comment:

I think the last 1½ also be interesting when I've come a false apostle, even a fool apostle onto blade. Think I've never experienced such a rotten person who throughout his is a big, big ego. Could never dream gone back on a single word or phrase of what I have spoken and written.
Torp is far worse and a greater false Apostle than what I have been able to convey, he lives in adultery and operates with heresy. Have thoughts and opinions about himself that he is a "true" Apostle Paul, John, etc.
But he is in fact nothing else than Satan's servant who is as scripture says:
2 Cor. 11. 3 But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, your minds may somehow be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ. 4 For you tolerate it very well so when someone comes and preaches another Jesus than the one we preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted. 5 I believe that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles. 6 Even if I am unskilled in oratory, I am not without knowledge, and I have always and in all questions presented to you. 7 Was it a sin for me that I preached the gospel of God to you without payment, humbling myself to lift you? 8 Other congregations I have virtually looted; I got payroll of them to serve you. 9 When I was with you, I was not a burden to any of you when I needed something. For the brothers who came from Macedonia gave me what I was missing. In every way, I made sure to do without help from you, and I'll also do hereafter. 10 As the truth of Christ is in me, this honor will no throughout Achaia get take away from me! 11 Why? Because I do not love you? God knows I do. 12 But what I've done so far, I still do. For some would like to have bragging that they are like me, but the opportunity I will cut them off from. 13 These are false apostles, deceitful workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ. 14 There is no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15 And it is no wonder that his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. But in the end will be according to their works.
Links showing worse things than what I and Christian Rosland has written and spoken: