søndag 20. august 2017

No. 1578: Jan Aage Torp now tells on his own Facebook page that it was he who stood behind the verdict against me and the heavenly blog, which just tells me that the verdict against me is a disgrace in Norwegian legal history!

No. 1578:
Jan Aage Torp now tells on his own Facebook page that it was he who stood behind the verdict against me and the heavenly blog, which just tells me that the verdict against me is a disgrace in Norwegian legal history!
 Jan Aage Torp has notified me he is the victim, and he is also boasting over convicting me.
Who gets this? A man who will surpass the greatest scams and greatest gangsters in the world!
The judgment against me and the heavenly blog is nothing but a big big dad! Do not value the paper it is written on.
It only shows that the courts and the Torp and the police must be corrupt and fraudulent. When Torp himself writes that we have got Christensen convicted, which then shows that it was Torp who should have been convicted of false accusations!
Jan Aage Torp writes that we had sentenced me to both the district court, the court of law and the Supreme Court.
It tells us all that it is a plot against me and the heavenly blog that it was Torp, which says he is the "victim." But it was he who made me judge, he uses the word "we" who says he has helped to make me and the heavenly blog judged.
What is this? False accusations directed against me and the heavenly blog.
Jan Aage Torp goes out and praises himself (pictured) that he made me judged.



 
"Pastor" has obviously distorted the police and prosecution power, with false accusations lying in the bottom of it all, and Torp's own sin and break!
"Pastor" Torp has now openly said what his agenda is, it is two-fold:
Get me punished and removed the blog. He writes and says this now over and over again. Here from his own blog: I am very pleased with that. Nothing is better than if Christensen closes his downright blogs and ends with person jail, bullying, defamation and netness - against everyone.
From VL: - What do you expect from Christensen, Torp?
"I expect him to delete everything he wrote about everyone, I will turn to Google and request that they remove all of this material from their search engine. But then there must be a legitimate verdict.
(Quote ending).
Joh. E. 8. 44 You have the devil of father, and you will make your father's lusts; He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth; For truth is not in him. When he speaks falsehood, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and lie's father.
Who is behind such things like this? It should not be so difficult, the devil is not truthful and those who are allowed to use such things, they have wrong connections.
Has been challenged on this to state why it is a fictional review and fake charges brought by Jan Aage Torp!
Article 168 of the Criminal Code states:
"Anyone who, in the case of false accusation, review or explanation of court, paternity authority or other public authority or by misrepresentation or eradication of evidence or the provision of false evidence or against any other means, seeks to impose another sentence or conviction for a criminal offense , Or as a consequence of this, shall be punished if there is a crime, with imprisonment from 6 months to 8 years, and if there is a crime committed with imprisonment for 4 years. "
This is what Jan Aage Torp has done. He hated my preaching remembrance, especially that I was so "popular" with Google. Then he would settle in this relationship by getting a judgment against me and the heavenly blog, something he himself has often spoken both in our country and on searchlight. Notice the wording here that suits 100% on JAT: "The one who, in the case of false accusation, review, patronage against better knowing in another way, seeks another sentence or conviction for a criminal offense."
He himself has said that he has committed another sentence, etc. This only proves one thing we face a criminal detention!
Here I have a lot to say, but since I've written more than enough about Torp and the case, I'll stop here. This time it will only be this, that I have proved what Torp has done. And you can even read here what he counted to Our Country, which only proves that here we are doing one who himself has said that he has a different sentence, etc. It is me!
The first torpedo did was to account for both in our country and on search light that his goal was to get a legitimate verdict to go to google to delete me from the search engines. So the case itself is not based on Torp's alleged shaman where he surpasses me and most of me in chickens.
"Pastor" Torp tries to distort the police and prosecution against me, there are false accusations that lie in the bottom of it all, and Torp's own sin and break! - "Pastor" Torp has now openly said what his agenda is, it's two-fold: Get me punished and removed the blog. He writes and says this now over and over again. Here from his own blog: I am very pleased with that. Nothing is better than if Christensen closes his downright blogs and ends with person jail, bullying, defamation and netness - against everyone.
From VL: - What do you expect from Christensen, Torp? "I expect him to delete everything he wrote about everyone, I will turn to Google and request that they remove all of this material from their search engine. But then there must be a legitimate verdict. (Quote ending).
Final Comment:
Here, JAT admits that he is behind the judgment itself too!
Now, "Torp" watches over the verdict and that nobody defends me.
Do they do that as Vebjørn Selbekk did, defended me. Then they get rid of what Selbekk did online on Torp.
Look here:
Now Torp has both been notified and sentenced to me, something he writes openly online.
Then the case against me is a plot, a dad and an justice word, but it does not matter, so both glasses need an operation.

fredag 18. august 2017

No. 1577: Attorney Brynjar Meling's appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court!

No. 1577:
Attorney Brynjar Meling's appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court!
Fight is between me and fool Apostel Jan Aage Torp, photo.


Unfortunately, Torp's review was fictional (false accusations), as it was my view of upgraded Christians that made Torp a factory-made review.
Then I was charged with one thing, it was raised in court, and Meling argued for incorrect law enforcement. Something that of course was absolutely unnecessary, but we had lost anyway. Then I was sentenced for something completely different from what was in the trial and was raised in the court proceedings.
In fact, we had no opportunity because the matter against me is a plot and a regular right of justice. Then you can not defend yourself when you have not been presented what would be punishable and answer and respond to this which had been very easy.
When Torp himself and his disciples have written a lot, much more than me and verbally went on endlessly much longer. Such justism words can not be defended if one had the world's best lawyers.A lie is a lie like the whole thing against me and the heavenly blog is based on.
Of course, the snake is behind it all, nobody else!
STAVANGER OSLO MOUNTAIN
Advokatfirma Meling AS
A company in the law association Sjødin, Meling & Co.
St. Olavsgt. 13, PO Box 860, 4004 Stavanger - Tel: 51 84 20 60 - Fax: 51 84 20 61 - Mob 47 89 32 20/93 05 01 58
www.smco.no
.
Stavanger May 11, 2017
Our ref: 22375
Your ref: 16-086576AST-BORG / 02
Responsible lawyer: Brynjar N. Meling
Borgarting Court of Appeal
PO Box 8017 Dep
0030 OSLO
APPLICATION AND SUPPORT FOR THE HIGHWAY OF NORWAY IN THE COURT'S CASE NO. 16-086576AST-BORG / 02
Introduction
Borgarting Court of Appeals ruled on 27.04.2017 judgment in Case No. 16-086576AST-BORG / 02 with such unanimous verdict: 'The appeal is rejected'.
The verdict confirms the judgment of Oslo District Court of 25.01.2016 in case no. 15-073540MED-OTIR / 02, in which the ruling reads:
1. Jan Kåre Christensen, born on 03.08.1964, is convicted of violation of the Penal Code of 1902 §390 a to a fine of 12,000 - twelve thousand kroner, or alternatively imprisonment for twenty-twentieth days.
2. Jan Kåre Christensen is fired for the expulsion claim.
3. Jan Kåre Christensen is further ordered to pay costs to the public by 3,000 - three thousand kroner.
The verdict of the Court of Appeal is pronounced for convicted on 28.04.2017. This appeal and support letter is submitted in due time. The appeal applies to the Appeals Court's case-law and law enforcement. Appealing party assumes that there are two questions that both matter outside the current case.
Fact of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections of the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling error, provocation and retribution
As it appears at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his judgments had to be subjected to a penalty sentence or to be judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the accused's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to withstand in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to Provocation and rhetoric in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward from both sides, it is stated that the decision of the Court of Appeal is insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is insufficient in order to eliminate the meaning of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
From the majority of the characters through whom the convicted person has expressed the conduct of insults, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's way of life and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be in Contrary to the word of the Bible.
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others in such a way Publicly available basis is even more unusual than simply holding condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such issues are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - May be the basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "legitimate misery", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)?
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given that the special theological con text is both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is alleged to mean that the ruling grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
Wrong law enforcement, Strl. (1902) § 390a
As the court in the last paragraph on page 6 of the verdict correctly states, the Norwegian Supreme Court has not dealt with matters relating to strl. Section 1902 Section 390a (Repeated in section (2005) § 266) in relation to blog posts or other, widely available material on the internet.
It is stated that the law of law of the court of law is incorrect because, through the internet, making an omnipotence finds offensive accessible to a widespread and indefinite personal circle may be regarded as an offense of honor, not as "by unpleasant behavior or other reckless conduct having violated another's peace". Honorary violations are at the commencement of Strl. (2005) - contrary to the continuation of former section 390a - made penalty strain. Correct law enforcement would have resulted in impunity for the accused party, Strl. (2005) § 3, cf. Last section on page 5 of the Court of Appeal's judgment.
Strl. (1902) § 390a and strl. (2005) Section 266 intends, in its wording, to protect the "peace" of offenders, not his sense of honor. Strl. (1902) Section 246 struck the one who violated "another's sense of honor" section 247 the one who injured "another's good name and reputation" or expressed something that was appropriate "to expose him to hate, wrongdoing or loss of it for his position Or nutrition needed trust ". Both their own sense of honor and reputation in the eyes of others is, as the wording clearly shows, something different from being different from the "peace" of insults.
By Grl. §§ 96, first paragraph cf. 113 and EMK art. 7 follows a clarification requirement as regards the legal basis for punishment. The law of law of the Court of Appeal is based on a sense of punishment - characterized by being a strongly expanding interpretation of strl. (1902) § 390a. Ie A constitutional interpretation of the Criminal Code and the ECHR, used to be able to affect actions and issues previously affected by strl. (1902) Sections 246 and 247, after these were not continued in the new Penal Code, and according to the provision in section. (2005) Section 3 shall be subjected to penalties by the conviction of elderly relationships after the amendment.
Furthermore, both Grl. § 100 and EMC art. 10 principle of freedom of expression.
The abolition of the earlier penalties for erasion crimes must be seen in light of this: Also, expressions that are unacceptable, controversial, even offensive and hurtful shall, as the general and general starting point, be punishment. When the statements were not directed directly to the insulted - it was true that Pastor Torp had completely failed to read the blog of an obsessive party - and was not forced to him personally in any way, claiming to be a double constitutional and constitutional violation The expressions in Christensen's blog for criminal offenses without being protected by freedom of expression.
Thus, it is stated firstly that it is contrary to the clarity requirement to interpret strl. (1902) § 390a as the Court of Appeal does, and secondly, that the content of the comments Christensen has included lies within the scope of freedom of expression. Section 390a, however, may not mean that any perjury that may, but no longer be punishable as defamation, may be punished as an offense of another's peace. Such an approach becomes an utterance and a perpetuation of a clear legislative act, according to the appellant's view.
HR-2016-1015-A is not relevant to the case against Christensen. In HR-2016-1015-A, it was a completely different type of punishable relationship, where the wording of the relevant provision also clearly aims to cover a majority of imaginable modes, cf. blue. That the wording includes the effect of offended by third party ("his closest"). Rt. 2010 p. 845 applies to actions clearly within strl. § 390a, because it was (an exceptionally large amount) e-mailed direct to insulted.
The other judgment references in the Court of Appeal's judgment do not eliminate the need for a clear assessment of the correct application of justice through a precedent case by the Norwegian Supreme Court.
Controversial expressions about named people, as well as attack on life as a way of life, abound on the internet. The fact that expressions directed to the general public are also referred to as knowledge and may fall too heavily for the breast. Do not be circumvented to still be able to prosecute judgments - wisely or unwise - by adopting and enforcing a new penal code with a broad pen chosen to decriminalize.
Should such extravagances be re-punished, according to our legal order, a statutory commission may, if necessary, adopt new provisions for this, in compliance with the requirements of the Constitution, the ECHR and any other relevant conventions. That prosecutors and courts make other arrangements in order to strike something that - rightly or wrongly - finds punishable, is exactly what Rt. 1952 Page 989 - The Phone Challenge - does not mean to take place.
Finally, it is pointed out that as much as (1902) § 390a as Strl. (2005) § 266 is lacking in connection with a provocation and retribution, as in strl. (1902) in relation to sections 246 and 247, in the form of strl. (1902) § 250. Tough expressions of opinion - only two parties in between as in the public space, eg. The internet - often occurring in the form of expression and opposition, is a real consideration that shows how important it is that such conditions as the battle between Jan Kåre Christensen and Jan-Aage Torp are assessed according to balanced legislation intended to regulate precisely such conditions, and Not for a legal basis that has a completely different history. And not least (at least originally) a completely different purpose.
Claim and Processual
If the case is referred to the Norwegian Supreme Court and the court then the accused party is entitled in its view of the law enforcement as far as the scope of strl is concerned. (1902) § 390a, has incomplete judgment grounds in relation to possible grounds of impunity, no longer relevant. It is therefore closed so reverently
P ON STAND:
Principal: Jan Kåre Christensen is fired.
In the alternative, the judgment of 27 April 2017 in Borgarting Court of Appeal of Case No 16-086576ST-BORG / 02 is hereby repealed.
The case is considered by reference suitable for trial, and the appellant also wishes the undersigned defender appointed as his defendant (for trial) also for the Norwegian Supreme Court.
It is thought to be sufficient to set a trial for consideration of the case.
With regards
THE CERTIFICATE OF ASSOCIATION SJØDIN, MELING & CO
Brynjar N. Meling
Lawyer

No. 1576: Then Attorney Brynjar Meling is writing his enrollment to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg, and we need your prayers and support dear believer Jesus friends!

No. 1576:
Then Attorney Brynjar Meling is writing his enrollment to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg, and we need your prayers and support dear believer Jesus friends!

Illustrative image from terror action. In many ways, the same methods are used by the police and the appeal force has used against me and the heavenly blog.
They have laught my attorney's procedure on one thing, aimed at one thing that has been dealt with in court.
And judged me for something else that has not been discussed in court.
This is how criminal and tackile people operate.
We see it now with these terrorists who use a car, truck or semi-trailer against defenseless people.
Here's going to be a crude party, too, to judge me for something I have not had the opportunity to defend myself for. We see the similarities here scary!



Then we are in the process of appealing to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg.
This I have to pay for myself, but if we win and get back.
Then I get the money back. Do you want to join?
Counting on the amount to pay the unfair boat, pay attorney Brynjar Meling + all other things will be approx. 60,000, - kr.
There may be more and it may be less. However, if you wish to join, you can pay in here:
Here is the account number in DNB: 0535 06 05845
Be blessed in the Name of Lord Jesus Christ!
The possibilities are many, but then we must stand together and help each other in the future!
Here is the contract between me and my lawyer who shows that what I'm saying and writing is not taken out of the air. It's really, that's the money we need:
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
It is shown to the meeting at our office
As a member of the Law Society we are required to provide our clients with written confirmation of new assignments. The assignment confirmation shall be given at the same time as the commission is commenced or as soon as possible.
Attached is a confirmation of assignment, where the scope of the assignment is described in more detail. You will also find information on our website www.smco.no.
With regards
ADVOKATSAMARBEIDET SJØDIN, MELING & CO
Brynjar N. Meling
lawyer
MISSION STATEMENT 1
PART I
  1. An agreement has now been entered into regarding law assignments between
Law firm Meling AS and Jan Kåre Christensen
           
  1. Responsible lawyer: 2
Brynjar N. Meling
  1. The assignment is valid:
Send a complaint to the Strasbourg Human Rights Court for violation of Christianity's freedom of expression after EMC Art 10. The mission is estimated at approx. 12 hours of legal work.
  1. Duration of the assignment are not expected to exceed 6 m to months. - Appeals deadline expires from the Supreme Court's expulsion order.
  1. Salary and billing
Indicative hourly rate for the responsible attorney (excluding VAT) for this mission: kr. 2000
Guidance hourly rates for law firm employees (excluding VAT):
    • Partners Lawyers 2000
    • Permanent attorneys 1600
    • Authorizing Officer 1200
The work is billed in arrears every other month, with 10 days due.
  1. The assignment applies to the law firm's general terms, contained in Part II of the contract confirmation.
Stavanger, 10 August 2017
Final Comment:
As said, when the Norwegian Supreme Court rejected this appeal.
After my lawyer Meling's excellent and good ancestor, pointing out that what I'm convicted of is not being charged or has been dealt with by the court.
As well, it is very rotten to let Meling spend all his time working on wrong law enforcement.
There they agree and express themselves for coming forward with good arguments.
This puts the court - both in the district court and the court of law - over.
Judging for something that is only mentioned as a "page comment" and which has not been dealt with in court that a lot has been written about Torp.
He once again has come up with a fantasy number that is not documented.
It tells me that I think the police and Norwegian courts, like paralyzed and wretched people, poor say that I am!
This wrote my lawyer Brynjar Meling to the Norwegian Supreme Court, which rejects the verdict as a justice word.
Fact of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections of the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the ruling grounds in the judgment are insufficient.
This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
(Quote ending).
That said, this is what makes us spend so much time and money in this that the actual trial process against me and the Heavenly blog has been below the minimum target.
You can not hold on like this. Forgive me for one thing, debate it and the law enforcement in court and conclude that what I've written is not punishable.
Then one came to the conclusion that there was so much written about Torp that we must look at this as a persecution.
In reality, I and my family have been persecuted, this will not be discussed.
The process and judgment against me, I'm sure, I do not think it's a country in the world that had been in such a way. It is impossible to sink lower here than what Norwegian courts have done, impossible simply!
Stand with me and the heavenly blog in prayer and support dear believing Jesus friends, because for his name, this persecution is going on!

onsdag 16. august 2017

No. 1575: It is not lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake that we have lost the case and have to go to the Strasbourg Human Rights Court in France with the case of if possible to win and make me and the heavenly blog acquitted!

No. 1575:
It is not lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake that we have lost the case and have to go to the Strasbourg Human Rights Court in France with the case of if possible to win and make me and the heavenly blog acquitted!
Harald Heide Steen Jr. In the role of the fool in the «Journey to the Christmas Star».
This is how I think my lawyer Brynjar Meling has been treated in court here in Norway, which is why I am blamed for the defeat of the judges, not Brynjar.
Brynjar Meling has done a very solid job for me, who has written to the Norwegian Supreme Court to top it all.
It is probably the best ankeskrivet that has ever been written to the Norwegian Supreme Court and has been rejected.


The case against me and the heavenly blog looks more and more like a plot, not a rule of law and democracy worthy!
I am not guilty of attorney Brynjar Meling that we lost this case against Jan Aage Torp and the Oslo police.
This is something that my lawyer could not do anything for when he was really led behind the light and fired by both the Oslo police and the courts.
If you look at his ancestor to the Norwegian Supreme Court, have you never written a better letter?
It was phenomenally well written!
It was Torp, the police and the judiciary in Norway was shocked. That was one reason why the case was rejected by the Norwegian Supreme Court that Meling wrote "for good"! I think so, at least!
Oslo District Court and Borgarting Law of Law have, to some extent, held lawyer Brynjar Meling to fool as they have expressed the impression that they agree with his arguments. But in reality, that's the way it does not agree with him!
The judge in Oslo District Court, which was Malin Strømberg Amble, and her judges who were ordinary laymen and I do not mention that.
In Borgarting Court of Appeal there was judge Øystein Hermansen. Besides, it was team leader Bjørn Edvard Engstrøm and team leader Leiv Robberstad was a third man. These I name as they are public people.
All these judges, especially in Borgarting Court of Appeal, gave a clear impression to Brynjar Meling during the court hearing that they followed his reasoning.
But what are they doing?
That which is not in the trial and which has not been the subject of the discussion in court.
That it's written a lot, not a little. They base their judgment on me.
When Brynjar Meling argued for incorrect law enforcement. Spent all his time and all his procedure on this. And the judges expressed their agreement with this. Then, if they had been reasonably fair and fair.
Then they had expressed that they did not fully agree with him and went on to obviously have been important in this matter. That is why we have used so much space. But they do not, who only prove that in my eyes, the police, the court and Torp are three criminals who hold each other to take two righteous. In other words, the trial has revealed and shows that in reality, those who should have been convicted here have not become. It is above all, Jan Aage Torp, who came with a fictional review to stop me and the heavenly blog when we clearly proclaimed from the Bible to be ascended as a Christian and apostle. It is to live in horseback and sin after the Bible.
And asked me and he why it's written so much about fool Apostel Jan Aage Torp. Then they had got a clear answer, and the whole thing against me had not given me anything to judge.
The judges here in Norway appear to be rotten and fraudulent in my eyes when they proceed in this way.
It's perfectly fine that they had come to this end they had done, if they had done it in a fair and good way!
Mate Piece!
When I went to school I learned something that was very important.
Blue. In math as in life. It was not just right, but putting things up right. In mathematics it was important that one not only got the right answer, but set up the calculator correctly. Both parts should be right, and my math teacher said that he also gave half right if the mat piece was right set up right.
Here too with these cases we have gone through.
I have no problem getting fined for having written in favor of fool Apostel Jan Aage Torp. It's fine.
But when I have been convicted of writing in quantity has not been dealt with in court. Then it becomes and is a justice word and it is fabricated.
What was dealt with in court, especially during the court proceedings in Borgarting lagret. It was law enforcement, but this was just a game for the gallery when they judged me for something completely different. In other words, what was raised and which the judges nodded to acknowledge. It was just a game for the gallery and they judged me for what was not taken up in court.
This is a rule that Norway should be, that they are totally backed up and it is unworthy and primitive. It's in the dark, and like this I point out and am not afraid to write or talk disparaging about anyone. For such behavior is far below the minimum goal!
What should one do now?
Yes, really, this case should have been treated so far in the Norwegian Supreme Court. That's really the only thing, or we must take it to Strasbourg. To the human rights court there, what else can we do?
Final Comment:
In many ways this judgment and treatment are unworthy. Also facing Brynjar Meling who has put a lot of work and prestige into this.
Seems it's pretty fake what has been his main concern, which goes on law enforcement, though I'm wrongly used.
That the judges, especially in Borgarting lawyer ask questions to him and pretend that they are very agreed and impressed. We then believed in friejennelse, but got this horrible and erroneous judgment against us as in the face!
In Oslo district court this was not the subject of discussion, which again tells me when the sentence against me went on what I had written.
It was Jan Aage Torp's spiritual leprosy, a psychopath, fool Apostle, nasty and a wizard. All of this is true, and this, as I write here, is a child food in what is otherwise written daily online.
In other words, the sentence against me is also Christian persecution.
For it's only because I'm a Christian that they judge me.
Had I been a Muslim or regular prophet, no one had bothered!
In reality now afterwards, I can say that it's all just a game for the gallery, and they hold Attorney Brynjar Meling like a fool.
Such treatment is primitive and unclean in my opinion.
I get embarrassed in my mouth over the treatment itself, not first and foremost the result.
I can live by paying 15,000, - $ in order to write something untrue online if it had been correct. But here it is not, it's the opposite.
It is Jan Aage Torp and his allies who have written at least three times stronger in verbal words and expressions than me. As well as in quantity, much more.
They have not only written online, they have searched me and my family with loads of mailer, document falsifications and also written to our employers and others. In other words, the Christensen family is free!
This judgment if it is standing is unworthy, primitive and unfair!
Seems too bad of my lawyer who has been fooled, especially by Borgarting lagret and the Norwegian Supreme Court.
After Brynjar Meling's phenomenal and incredibly good appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court that this was rejected, I am a mystery.
It is ill unfair and when we know they did not justify it either.
So, the whole thing seems like we are more in Congo than in Norway!
The case against me and the heavenly judgment is worse than the judgment itself, it's the process of getting a judgment against me and the heavenly blog that makes the whole thing a big big father. It's keeping everyone crazy, not least my very good lawyer Brynjar Meling who has been working on wrong law enforcement.
Something that has proved to be something that the court did not care about a gram.
But what has not been addressed or as we have been asked. That has not been on the agenda, amount of writings.
It all builds on, this is, as said, a judgment calling North Korea than ala Norway and a Western, free democratic country!