torsdag 14. januar 2021

No. 1552: Strong coverage in Haugesunds Avis about Unibus' bullying of me!

No. 1552:

Strong coverage in Haugesunds Avis about Unibus' bullying of me!


Of course, the very best thing was that the liar Per Christian Bing and the arrogant and blackened Lawyer Johannes Straume had been able and gone in themselves, and pulled the dismissal against me!
But it is not easy for some who live in a narcissistic world where they themselves can lie, scold and otherwise do most things.
But when they get to know a little about their own "medicine", they are so hurt!
I have zero respect for such types of people as this, but it is then allowed to hope that they can also realize their own guilt !?

Here is the article:

https://www.h-avis.no/fikk-tilbud-om-a-slutte-pa-dagen-med-full-lonn-etter-betent-konflikt-viser-at-de-er-redde-for- a-mote-oss-i-en-rettssak / s / 5-62-1125930

Received an offer to end the day, with full pay, after inflamed conflict: - Shows that they are afraid to meet us in a lawsuit

 


Bus driver Jan Kåre Christensen played woeship at work. Now Unibuss has fired him.


The heated conflict between the bus driver Jan Kåre Christensen from Skudeneshavn and the employer Unibuss in Oslo did not come to a solution when the parties met for a negotiation meeting. The case appears to be against an employment law case.

The 56-year-old bus driver, who is originally from Skudeneshavn, has been fired from his job for what he believes is an unreasonable reason: because he plays Christian radio on the bus.

Unibuss denies this, referring to several customer complaints and that Christensen has played at too high a volume repeatedly.

Jan Kåre Christensen refers to a protocol they have written from the meeting where it appears he was offered to end the day with full pay until the notice period until 1 May.

"Unibuss offered Christiansen to be exempted from the obligation to work during the notice period, with full pay and the opportunity to take other work if he managed to obtain this. The offer is valid until 18.01.21. » it is stated in the protocol that Christensen has forwarded to Avisa Oslo (AO).

Bets on employment law case

- I think it is an unreasonable dismissal and that I have just done my job. I do not imagine that there is no good offer, says Jan Kåre Christensen.

- What do you do?

- I reckon that I will then focus on keeping the job and take an employment law case.

The offer is valid until January 18, but Christensen continues: "I can never imagine that it will be something good for me."

Common practice

Christensen's lawyer Josefine Wærstad, from whom he receives assistance through his membership in the Professional Traffic Association, says that the client has received an offer he must decide on, but points out that it is demanding to make an assessment of the offer itself.

She describes that similar offers are legal and common practice in working life.

- It is not unusual and there can be many different reasons why a company chooses to make an offer, says lawyer Wærstad.

- What does it tell you that you get such an offer, Christensen?

- It shows that they are afraid to meet us in a trial. I interpret it that way.

- This is a personnel matter, and we do not want to comment on what has been said in internal meetings between the parties, or the details of the offer. We think this is first and foremost a sad case, and we hope we can agree on a solution soon, answers Unibuss' communications manager Emilie Mejlænder.
- Performs poorly

- I think that the Unibuss management behaves in a very bad way towards me and tries to put me in a bad light, Christensen says.

- How do they do it?

- Customers complain about me, they say. But then it turns out that they have had an instructor out on the bus who indirectly says that my version is correct in that I do not play loud, but they try to keep it hidden.

He points out that an instructor report - a kind of random sample - written about his driving by an inspector from Unibuss on 31 August last year. Christensen says that he has fought for a long time to get this report out, which he is now passing on to AO.

About the radio play it says:

"He listens to the radio, sometimes there is singing and sometimes some talking, but I who was sitting right behind the barrier could hardly understand what was being said on the radio."

- I think it builds on Christensen's explanation that he is listening to the right volume. It supports his version, says his lawyer, Josefine Wærstad.

The bus driver claims that this report was withheld when the case was considered by the Discrimination Tribunal. There, Unibuss won unanimously, something they have also pointed out before.

Unibuss has not answered AO's questions about why they should have withheld this information, as Christensen claims.
Requests fact check of complaint

Christensen and his lawyer have now asked Unibuss to check more in the actual circumstances surrounding the latest complaint against the bus driver that came this autumn. It was he who triggered the process that led to the dismissal.

- We asked if it has been checked and if they have talked to that witness, for example where she was sitting in the bus. No fact check has been made on that complaint. We have requested that they contact the witness and get confirmation thathe has listened to the volume that they had agreed on earlier, says lawyer Wærstad.

- When you complain about public transport in Oslo, the complaints go directly to Ruter. If you want more information about how customer complaints are processed or "checked", I would recommend contacting them, says communications manager Emilie Mejlænder in Unibuss.

She has not answered follow-up questions about whether Unibuss should check up on the complaint more, given the conflict they are in.

The bus company also wants to point out:

- We reject that we "try to put him in a bad light", as you write. Nevertheless, we have had to correct some direct errors that have been quoted in the media. An example is the claim that the case is about religion, and that is wrong. The case is about the sound level on the radio during bus driving. Driving a bus is a service profession and we must of course take the complaints seriously.

But it is strange that they will not comment on the report from the instructor that they have tried to keep hidden. Talk about being liars, thugs and deceivers!

torsdag 31. desember 2020

No. 1551: New information sent to the Discrimination Tribunal regarding Unibuss!

No. 1551:
New information sent to the Discrimination Tribunal regarding Unibuss!


Inibus instructor Abdullah Kayabasi writes:
"He listens to the radio, sometimes there is singing and sometimes some talking but I who was sitting right behind the bar could hardly understand what was being said on the radio."
Nothing about loud noise at all.



Discrimination Tribunal case 20/420 and 20/42

Oslo 31 / 12.2020

Unibuss and Per Christian Bing have led you behind the light and the verdict against me is thus false.
Unibuss are obviously corrupt.

I repeatedly asked to get an instructor on the bus to verify these fake customer complaints.
This was overlooked and they would not do I was told.

Then it shows in retrospect that they have had an instructor on the bus who writes clearly that I do not play loud on the radio.
He's not even able to listen to what I'm playing.

The lies of Unibuss have been revealed.
This is to keep away essential and crucial information.

Date: 31.08.2020
Instructor: Abdullah Kayabasi Salary No: 29383
Name: Christensen Jan Kåre
Bus no .: 3062
Wagon race: 3712
Type of follow-up: Random
Garage:
Driving style: 4 - Satisfactory
Comment driving style:
Uniform: Good
Comment uniform:
Service: Good
Comment service:
Cleaning in the bus: Good
Comment cleaning:
Precise departure: Yes

Notes from instructor:
He listens to the radio, sometimes there is singing and sometimes some talking but I who was sitting right behind the bar could hardly understand what was being said on the radio.
Feedback leads:

Here it is clear, he can not even perceive what I play.
You are corrupt if you do nothing about the judgment, as it is false!

This follow-up was 31 August, just before the board meeting which was 17 September 2020.

That this has been withheld, or omitted and taken out even though I have requested it. And this was a fact that they had had an instructor, can be equated with false and incorrect explanation!

The verdict against me is then invalid, and Unibuss is corrupt and everyone who agrees and defends them!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Krokstien 2 c
0672 Oslo


fredag 25. desember 2020

No. 1550: Satan is our real enemy and adversary - not those who perform evil deeds, they are only an instrument in the Evil One's fight against good, us and God!

No. 1550:
Satan is our real enemy and adversary - not those who perform evil deeds, they are only an instrument in the Evil One's fight against good, us and God!


Norway's national coat of arms, and the shield in Norway's royal coat of arms, is on a red background an upright, crowned lion of gold, which in the front paws carries a gold-jawed ax of silver. former.
Having met the authorities in various contexts, it is with a certain mixed feeling. If I look at the national coat of arms with the lion, I think that I also see a predator that is inside the system.
Why not a lamb, cat or a pet?
Yes, there is probably also a certain part of the predator nature behind it all.
In any case, we see a duality, as discussed i.a. and the prophet Daniel.
As I write about a little further down in the article.

 


 



Room. 16. 17 But I beseech you, brethren, to watch over them which cause disobedience and offenses against the doctrine which ye have learned, and depart from them; 18 For these do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but his own belly, and by his sweet speech and his beautiful words the hearts of the simple fool. 19 For the word of your obedience has come to all; therefore I rejoice over you, but I want you to be wise to the good and pure to the evil. 20 But the God of peace will hasten to crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you!

As a believer, struggle is not uncommon, at least it should not be.
Job says:

Job 7. 1. Is not a man's life on earth a service of war, and his days as the days of a laborer?

Is not a person's life on earth a service of war?
This is the truth and reality of the one who walks with the Lord.

We as Christians experience a whole different and much more violent struggle on all levels in our lives than the children of the world who are, by and large, on the verge of perdition.
Jesus himself says the following.

Matt. 7. 13 Enter through the narrow gate! for the gate is wide, and the way that leads to perdition is wide, and many enter through it; 14 For the gate is narrow, and the way is narrow leading to life, and few find it.

Here we see what Jesus himself said, that there are two paths that we humans follow.
The "easy" path we all follow from birth. It is the way that does not lead, which Jesus calls the broad way.
Then we have the other way, the one that leads. As Jesus refers to as the narrow way. Jesus also uses the word gate to cross or narrow the narrow road. When it comes to the wide road, there is a road that one does not really need to do anything to be on.
Why? For that path we are all on from birth, but we must then leave this path to enter the path that leads to Jesus, heaven, the 1000 year kingdom and the new Jerusalem.

When we read in the basic text, it becomes much clearer that the narrow road is not really the narrow road, but the road.
While the wide road is the road that leads to destruction and annihilation!

We encounter this with the road, something as the first were called if they belonged to the road.

Ap.gj. 9. 1. But Saul was yet making a tumult and of murders against the disciples of the Lord: and he went to the high priest 2 and asked him for letters to Damascus, to the synagogues there, that he might find men who belonged to God, both men and women, he could then lead them bound to Jerusalem.

Notice what is written: "For if he found anyone who belonged to God, both men and women, he could bring them bound to Jerusalem."

Those who belonged to the road, which is like a parallel to what Jesus says about us Christians, that we walk on the road or the road that leads forward. The only way that leads, as the "other" way leads only to destruction and annihilation!

In the basic text it is clearer that those who were on the road.
In other words, one had to make an effort to both get on that road and be on that road.
"Fell" one down or did not come up the road, which was one not on the right path that led and leads forward.

In other words, there are two ways. A path that does not lead, but that leads to destruction and annihilation!
While the other is the very good and right path, which will ultimately make you reach the goal of our journey as humans on this earth.

It is clear and obvious that those who are on this path will be under attack.
Not least from the spirit army which aims that no one should and must travel on this road.

It is obvious that the enemy - Satan - and his spirit army will do everything he can for us who are on the road. Neither should we influence those who are on the "wrong" path, and we ourselves should get away from the "right" path.
The path that leads to life as Jesus himself said.

The Kingdom of God - The kingdom of Satan is two greatest opposites!

From My Bible Commentaries Colossians 1:13 For he has delivered us out of the power of darkness, and brought us into the kingdom of his beloved Son.

Once upon a time, we too were children of darkness and lived like them. We did not know better, at least dmost of us. But now we have been set free, and there has been a colossal upheaval, we are now placed in the beloved kingdom of the Son of God. What characterizes that kingdom is the opposite of the kingdom we were in before. Before darkness, now light. Before hate, now love. Before looseness, now the responsibility to follow Jesus and the word of God. Before anything is allowed, now we live under God's will and bound to Christ and God's word. Everything has become new, therefore we must live accordingly or it will be worse off with us than those who have never experienced this.
(end of quote.)

There are two kingdoms fighting against each other, where the kingdom of God is the strongest and the perfect.
But in this world it is not always so, as not all things are yet subject to the kingdom and dominion of God and Christ.

From my Bible commentaries Hebrews 2. 8 everything you have put under his feet. When it says: "put everything under him", then nothing is except; everything was to be subject to him. We still do not see that everything is under him.

But with Jesus, God the Father "bet" everything on him. Should there be salvation, redemption and we humans could have to do with God. Was everything related to whether Jesus passed the test and the Father would acknowledge it!

9 But we see that Jesus, who for a short time was lower than the angels, is crowned with glory and honor, because he suffered death. Thus, by the grace of God, he should taste death for all.

Jesus persevered as a human being and completed his work. But it was in the most bitter way. He was not spared anything, even death embraced him.

10 For God, who is the cause and origin of all things, would bring many children to glory. Then he had to let the leader who leads them to salvation reach perfection through suffering for the Son of God.

This is such a great paradox that we must take eternity for help to understand and get to the bottom of this. That God himself could allow and acknowledge that salvation had to and should go through humiliation, suffering and death.
(end of quote.)

Scripture also says the following that I want to include.

2 Cor. 4. 3 If then our gospel is hid, then it is hidden among those who perish; them.

Scripture says that the God of this world is none other than Satan!

We also read in Hebrews the following:
"Put everything under him," then nothing is excepted; everything was to be subject to him. We still do not see that everything is under him.

Jesus has all the power and authority of the scriptures, we read this, among other things. here.

Matt, 28. 18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

We all live in this zone of conflict, but first and foremost we believers are the object of this struggle as we are on the "wrong" side in relation to him who has temporary power on this earth; Satan, the Evil Serpent who seduced Adam and Eve and the entire human race!

Now there is a lot to say about this. But deep down, there are two opposites fighting. It is God and Satan, it is the dominion of Jesus Christ or the God of the world, Satan's dominion!

When e.g. people go against the word of God and believing people, then it is more or less affected by the negative forces!
When we as believers and we humans do things according to God's word and God's will, the scripture says that we partake of God's Spirit and really God himself!

Ap.gj. 5. 32 And we are his witnesses of these things, likewise the Holy Ghost, whom God gave unto them that obey him.

When we obey God, we partake of the Spirit of God and the Divine nature.
When we obey Satan, we share in the Spirit of this world and that which breaks down!

Scripture says of those who have not turned to the Lord and been saved the following:

Eph. 2. 2 in whom ye walked after the course of this world, after the prince of the powers of the air, the spirit which now worketh in the children of unbelief; 3 among whom also we all in the past walked in the lusts of our flesh, and we were by nature children of wrath like the others.

Closing comment:

In Daniel we see the kingdoms of the world in two ways. A way that people perceive, and a way that lies behind them of spiritual dimensions.
We read in Daniel 2 and in Daniel 7 where in Daniel 2 we get to see the outside world.
Then as a picture support, which has various alloys and metals that are and look like something very nice, beautiful and large.
But in Daniel 7 we meet the same world kingdoms as predators, and then it is the predator nature that is prominent, where there is also a form of complex predator nature that is described to illustrate these world kingdoms.
Now we will not go into this here, because it will be too extensive, but we see the difference.
What is clear in the word of God is that the one who is behind it all is none other than the old Serpent, Satan himself!

I have been and am also in battle. Who is behind these fights?

It is very easy for a believer to know, it is not God but Satan.
It may seem so "innocent", but when all the cases against me are built on lies and fabfalse lies and false accusations. Then we know with a good "safety margin" that it is Satan.

Joh.e. 8. 44 You have the devil as your father, and you will do the will of your father; he was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth; for truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of lies.

We as believers know where evil and lies come from, Satan.
We as believers know where the good and the truth come and go, God!
Therefore, it is important to be informed and ready for this battle, it is part of our spiritual armor that Ephesians 6 speaks of.
See my Bible commentaries on Ephesians.
http://janchristensen.net/bibelkommentar-hoved.php?side=bibelkommentarer-Paulus-brev-til-efeserne

torsdag 24. desember 2020

No. 1549: In all probability, there will be a labor lawsuit between me and Unibuss!

No. 1549:
In all probability, there will be a labor lawsuit between me and Unibuss!

This is logical thinking and most realistic, right?

At first I was a little unsure what to go for after I was fired or fired on November 20th.
What I was thinking about were several things, but after talking to several and considering what is right and best.
Then I came to the conclusion that as I see it, the whole resignation is a prank from beginning to end.
We will have a negotiation meeting on January 11 with me and my Lawyer Josefine Wærstad from YTF.
Where Unibuss has allied itself with the arrogant and foolish lawyer Johannes Straume and boss bully Per Christian Bing from Unibuss.

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/10/nr-2777-skal-mte-sjefsmobber.html

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/09/nr-2755-unibuss-driver-med-en-ren-og.html

The whole case is such that the dismissal is unfounded and foolish

I consider Unibuss to be bullies, harassment and persecution and discrimination!

Then we'll see where we end up and what the court says!

Unibuss has his views, and I mine. But what they are referring to is in their stomach the reason for the dismissal went on service charges they are referring to.

These my lawyer Josefine Wærstad has met very clearly, consistently and well.

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

There is a reference to service charges, it shows that Unibuss has engaged in bullying, harassment and persecution.

These service charges state, among other things: car washing as a problem. When I stand and wash the car with others, and this is embedded in the service indictment.
Then this is personal persecution!
It just shows that Unibuss is the worst thing in working life.
When it says that the following: "shows that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life."

Then this is a perfect description of the inferior management in Unibuss that creates a dysfunctional and destructive work environment!

I am looking forward, and I just hope that various agencies wake up to the in many ways criminal and degrading bus company Unibuss that one gets shaken up and removed many in the management and make other positive and good changes!

We finally show that Unibuss, with various instructors, has been on the bus with me and only given me positive and good feedback.
This only shows that it is only to look forward to a possible lawsuit against Unibuss!
My Lawyer Josefine Wærstad surpasses Unibuss' prank on Lawyer a thousand times.
Only Johannes Straume is interested in, and he is also bad at it.
It is to blacken others.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/09/nr-2757-det-er-bare-trist-at-unibuss.html

Given that we receive fair treatment, we will not be subjected to a murder as we were in the Discrimination Tribunal.

See here for feedback where I only get praise, and no one has anything to comment on when it comes to my radio play.
The fact that I play so-called loud radio is nothing but a lie!

The truth of the matter is that I drive a bus and do my job masterfully.
While the management with Abdullah Hatay, Andrej Peric, Per Christian Bing all act as one who bullies and engages in harassment.

If they had been interested and done their job!

Then they would have done everything differently. Not least verified these lies from some who claim that I play high Christian radio and have either confirmed or denied this.
If I had then played loud something I have never done.
Then they had asked me to mute the sound and see if I did this.
The whole case against me is nothing but fabricated lies!

 


 

fredag 18. desember 2020

No. 1548: Finally - after 1 month. came Unibuss by Advokat Johannes Straume with the reasons for the dismissal, this was really just nonsense, nonsense and slander!

No. 1548:
Finally - after 1 month. came Unibuss by Advokat Johannes Straume with the reasons for the dismissal, this was really just nonsense, nonsense and slander!


Here's what's the real reason I've listened to Christian radio programs on the radio.

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/nr-2788-sa-langt-jeg-forstar-er.html

The whole thing is a form of blurring and lying that Lawyer Johannes Straume comes up with as an "answer!"



Here is the justification and answer from Lawyer Johannes Straume:

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

We are facing an aggravation in working life that will not come up with answers why they fired me. This is really just nonsense, nonsense!

I wrote this letter to Attorney in response to this alleged response.

Hi again Josefine!

Think you have to answer this, because I did not break any internal rules or anything else.
This answer makes no sense, has no substance, it is blurring!

At the meeting we had, it only went on radio use. And allegations of high radio play.

They write:

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

What have I not adapted to?

What response have I given that is not right?

I have acknowledged that discussion / conversation is usually worse.
Therefore, I will either turn off or switch to another channel if any passengers complain that I listen to Christian radio programs.

As I see it, I should have been defended. But okay, it's not hard for me here to join.
Not interested in standing up for my rights, but being solution oriented.

What corrections do I not align myself with?

What rules of the game do I not conform to?

++++
This was no reason!

Svada! No sense in telling you now - I don't wanna ruin the suprise.

I can then not change when no instructors and others get on the bus and guide me more than the one time Andreja Peric was with me.
It is Unibuss who does not do their job, when they do not come out and guide me when I ask for guidance.
I ask about getting corrective and everything else they accuse me of not doing!

I mean they come up with false accusations and fabricate something that is not true.

I have ridden the bus exemplary, that they go to the step of kicking me is of baseless allegations.

I have always complied, when I have received complaints. For example. that I washed the car in the car wash, then I stopped with this. Although others washed the car and received no complaints.
Can not see anything that I have complained about, that I have not adjusted and changed.

The only thing that is difficult is radio play.
Since I have never listened to radio programs with loud sound. That some passengers have complained about loud noise, I can not do anything about it.
I have repeatedly asked to get an instructor to get on the bus, unannounced or unannounced, to possibly adjust me.
When I believe and am sure I do not play radio louder than others.
Should I, against all odds, do so, someone must come and guide me.
The truth is, I have had people on the bus from Unibuss, none of them have once pointed out that I play loud on the radio.
All the accusations that Straume makes, I can not find have any basis and hold in.
They are also, as I said, not concrete and relevant, how to understand Straume's accusations is very difficult.

Hear from you!

Regards
Jan Kåre

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/nr-2789-oppsagt-fra-unibuss-for-ha.html

Here is the termination:



søndag 29. november 2020

No. 1547: Unibuss meets itself in the "door" with dismissal, I look forward to the continuation!

No. 1547:
Unibuss meets itself in the "door" with dismissal, I look forward to the continuation!


When they come with e.g. that I have washed the car as something negative.
Then there is actually personal persecution when others are allowed to wash the car, but when I do, there is a basis for service prosecution!
I stood with others, for me this is once again proof that Unibuss engages in discrimination, personal persecution and discrimination!
 
When they come with me playing on the radio, as something reprehensible.
Then it is really personal persecution when others are allowed to do the same.
That some customers complain is not an objective truth, something my lawyer pointed out already in 2017.

Everything that Unibuss brings with it from accusations is also of a trivial nature.
Tell me then, is also illegal as it is only trivial matters that are behind it!
This in turn gives me a good opportunity to claim compensation, and it shows that Unibuss is a worst thing in working life.

I only want to do one thing, fight for redress and keep the job.
Here is the last email / letter from my lawyer to the furious Lawyer Johannes Straume who has only one agenda.
It's blackening me and finding fault with me, talk about a lawyer who is in the style of Unibuss. Straume is anything but fit to be a lawyer in my opinion.
That Unibuss and he have found each other, does that tell its story? Yes!!!!!!!

 



lørdag 28. november 2020

No 1546: As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 No 1546:
As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/no-1544-dismissed-from-unibuss-for.html
 

I do not mind Muslims or others, but it is sad that the Christian and the Christian message are so repressed in today's Norway that I have been fired for playing Christian radio programs with muted sound where someone has come up with false accusations. That I play with a loud sound.
I lost the case against Jan Aage Torp when he also made false accusations.
That is if the new slogan has become, false accusations and one arrives with it.
Norway has become a country where you go a long way in accusing others that you want to hit, this is bad.
Picture of Jesus, who also "lost" to false accusations against him.



But that Unibuss is trying to hang other things on me, it will probably fall back on themselves. For it will reveal that pursuing personal persecution!

Here are the minutes from when we meet Lawyer Johannes Straume and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing for § 15-1. discussions.

PROTOCOL

On Friday 6 November 2020, a discussion meeting was held in accordance with the Working Environment Act § 15-1 between Unibuss AS and Jan Kåre Christensen

Present:
Jan Kåre Christensen
lawyer Josefine Wærstad
Per Chr Bing, HR Manager
lawyer Johannes Straume


The background for the meeting was, as it appeared in the notice of 27.10.20, that there had been a new customer complaint of 14.09.20. The meeting was held via Teams and minutes are exchanged via email at the end of the meeting and are therefore signed electronically.

The complaint has come despite previous history such as contains a warning of 10.06.20 for the same condition. Unibuss has been of the opinion that Christensen's behavior shows that he neither can nor will change his behavior.

In response to this, Christensen has in an email to Bing of 29.10.20, among other things. expressed the following:

- "I do not like loud radio, do not play loud radio, it is solely your claims"
- "What a lie, there you are who can not change your behavior as you just keep bullying and lying both to and about me."
- "The accusations you have against me are also trivial, and you inflate it as something very"
- "You lie constantly, distort the truth and only make really trivial matters into something very.
You can not change, not me.
What should I change? Mention it specifically.
I can say what you need to change, but you do not want to. "


The employer asked if Christensen stood by these statements.

Christensen regrets that the e-mail was somewhat sharply worded, but points out that it must be seen in a larger context where a lot of frustration has built up. Christensen has not played higher than he did when he had Peric with him while driving in June. Christensen wants to get on a more constructive track.

Christensen says that lately he has thought a lot about why he gets complaints. He finds the meeting with the customers challenging, and feels that he loses no matter what he does. He has drawn the conclusion that he must try to handle the situation in another way, and will in the future turn off the radio if someone reacts negatively. He will continue to listen to the same volume that he and Peric agreed on in June.

The employer emphasizes that no one has asked him to turn off the radio, but that he is expected to behave decently.

Christensen asks for a clarification of what the employer means by decent, and asks for more specific instructions on what he should do differently. This with volume on the radio, he says that he has complied with since he received specific instructions in June.

The employer reads out statements from the blog to substantiate that they do not trust that Christensen, with the "attitudes" he expresses, has a will to improve. When asked, the employer denies that Christensen's attitudes or the content of the blog are the basis for convening a discussion meeting.

Christensen suggests that Unibuss should feel free to do unannounced spot checks to verify that he is telling the truth when he says that he does not listen to higher volumes than they agreed on in June. Alternatively, Unibuss "seals" the radio so that it is not possible to listen at higher volumes. He has been in contact with a workshop that says it is possible to do.

The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment. Christensen, apart from age, had no special social circumstances to state

For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.


Addition, it says here:
The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment.

Yes, I am on sick leave as my experience is that Unibuss bullies, harass and discriminate r meg.
My experience of how Unibuss handles the case is anything but good and professional.
What you think should be mentioned, I will leave up to you.
But I have an ambivalent and strained relationship with Unibuss and the management.
They probably have the same thing and clearly state that I am a bad bus driver who is unable to treat customers. That I have now realized and are trying to change this, they do directly the opposite of what a good management should do. It is to praise and encourage, but they are constantly trying to just put me in the worst possible light.

Furthermore, it says:
For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.

I answer this in an email to you. As I write the following:

But Johannes Straume is a little right that I have had a "Damascus" experience if he also had some fun at it at my expense.
But it's okay that he laughs a little at me if it can please him.
Have talked a lot with a lot of bus drivers and you.
It has made me realize that I must and need to change.
It has meant for me to be positive to discuss with some passengers if this has happened only a handful of times.
I do not intend to do this anymore, but either turn off the radio or switch to another channel.
Then I mean that I have changed as much as I can with the things that I can.
(end of quote.)

I have realized that it can be "wrong" to be in the way I have behaved in being able to believe that it will lead to good discussions.
It obviously has not been !!!!!!!!!!!

Will also include some of what a colleague wrote, which you can possibly include in the minutes:
Christensen has a very jovial demeanor, with both charismatic and outgoing features. This combined with his contemporary Karl-Marx beard makes him easily get in touch with people. We can not exclusively that contact-seeking people, and there are many of them on the bus lines that operate Oslo Inner City, have started a basically cheerful passenger who has gotten out of control due to. disagreement about, yes religion or politics. I have a whole register of such cases hidden behind the forehead.
 
This is a practice I do not recommend. 25 years of experience with Unibuss is that you maintain a dialogue with the public, or customers as they are correctly called tramway routes to an absolute minimum. Absolute minimum.

It's almost like feeding a hungry dog ​​who has an illness. It's a game of chance. Suddenly it bites as you want to help.
Then it is much better that I have decided to do in the future if customers complain.
Switch to another channel or switch off completely.

Another moment, which is important to me. It is that as long as the verdict from the Discrimination Tribunal stands, I unfortunately only have to accept that Unibuss can make a difference between me and e.g. Muslims.

I have to adjust to this.

Closing comment:

The agenda of Unibuss is to find something they can take me for.
This is how I see it, such a bad way to proceed as an employer it is possible!
Unfortunately, they are in part a worst thing in working life in creating such a poorly psychosomatic work environment !!!!!