lørdag 12. oktober 2019

No. 1466: Reply to the County Governor in Oslo and Viken!

No. 1466:
Reply to the County Governor in Oslo and Viken!

Oslo 12 / 10-19

Case number 201510929 - Construction case PBE here in Oslo
Their Ref. 2019/40980

Here is the letter we received from the County Governor in Oslo and Viken.


 


Hello again!

Thanks for the reply if it was very hollow, as expected (standard response) and bland!

You write the following: "The county governor, after reviewing the letter from you, can not see that there is a basis for amending our decision of September 19, 2019, which we ratify the Oslo municipality decision of May 13, 2019."

This is nothing but the goat that fits the oatmeal, when we lie for miles inside where exemption is justified. And if you do not give it, then there is little one can stand against obvious lies and distortions of truth.

This is as wrong and shallow an answer as possible, to mention a few points briefly. Fighting against you fits the saying "against stupidity even the gods fight in vain!"

Since we are not coming any way with you, and you will not listen to our arguments at all.

Then it is very important that one emphasizes the law, but when one rule means more than another. Why does one emphasize what matters least in the Building Act?
What matters most and is in our favor is totally overlooked?
Now we are not as rich as Kjell Inge Røkke on earthly goods and gold, that must be the only factual and only reason we find that we do not succeed with the County Governor and Marius Vamnes?

It is stated in the Planning and Building Act (Planning and Building Act)

There must be "clear excess weight for consideration" (cf. § 19-2). The considerations behind the provision that is dispensed from or the considerations behind the purpose of the Act must not be neglected significantly and the benefits of granting a dispensation must be clearly greater than the disadvantages after an overall assessment.

• should be especially emphasized by exemption from legislation / regulations: consequences for health, environment, safety and accessibility

• should be particularly emphasized when exempting from plans: state and regional frameworks and targets

• The municipality should not exempt from plans, the provisions of the Act on plans and the prohibition in § 1-8 (prohibition zones along the sea and watercourses) when a directly affected state or regional authority has made a negative statement on the application for exemption (cf. § 19-2, fourth paragraph).

The right to set exemption terms

Exemption may be granted on terms, cf. Section 19-2, first paragraph, of the Planning and Building Act. Exemption conditions must be designed to prevent, repair, mitigate or compensate for any negative consequences of deviating from the regulations or plan.
(quote at the end.)

In our case, it is actually very special. There are only positive things about giving us an exemption.

No one has come up with a single negative thing about our buildings that hold water. No agencies, no government agencies or anyone else. Why? It does not exist. No one has mentioned a specific thing, but we can name many.

1.) Our wall lies further in than our pre-sloped south-facing slope.

2.) Fire and ambulance come easier to our property with our wall and stairs.

3.) Our booth is almost not seen from the road, it is not noticed until one comes up to our property.

4.) Our wall does not stand out negatively and is not higher than others in our living area.

5.) We have got a nicer, flatter and larger outdoor area by our wall.

6.) None of what we have built creators disharmony or noticed to be anything different that breaks with other buildings.

7.) The stairs that we have built are a thousand times safer and better to get down and up from Stormyrveien in conditions that we had before when we lowered ourselves with ropes and hoisted us up immediately.

8.) That we should return the property to how the property was before and that should not cause any negative inconvenience. Of course, that's not true.

9.) It's the way we feel now, which is the very best. It is simply more like it says when dispensing is to be granted and granted. Implications for health, the environment, safety and accessibility should be emphasized, to our advantage, not disadvantage. Why? There is not a single negative thing about what we have built, only positive.

10.) That we do not receive an exemption must be Norway's largest and worst interpretation of the Planning and Building Act.

It is not just an overweight, as the law required with the benefits of giving exemption. That must be clearly greater than the drawbacks after an overall assessment.

With us, this is not only fulfilled, but overfilled.

It is like you have asked to get 100,000, - NOK for a car and get 1 Million.

This gives you, the Civil Ombudsman and the PBE here in Oslo no exemption and order for demolition.
Yes, so when the state institutions are full of evil and do not realize it themselves ?!

Have a nice day, because when you are rotten and imagine that you are doing something serious (what you are doing is just sad), you just have to keep going!
We do not believe a single word of what you write, nor what the Civil Ombudsman or PBE here in Oslo makes of his decisions.
For our cause, mileage is in from being an illegal case, but we're over probably live this too!
Even in kindergarten, the children are not as simple and bully the weak as you do.
You act in conjunction with the Civil Ombudsman and the PBE as the big nasty boy who bullies those he is stronger for himself he is really unhappy and the only way to assert himself is to abuse his strength, that is all he has.
Because there is regular abuse of power and authority you are doing.
We then have no opportunity to change the decisions and orders, even though they had fit perfectly into a totalitarian state not to give us the right and the dispensation we need and which we deserve to get!




Regards
Berit and Jan Kåre Christensen
Krokstien 2 c
0672 Oslo

tirsdag 8. oktober 2019

No. 1465: In fact, I have opposed Plan and the building department at all points in their unjustified charges, still they are just as difficult and relentless above us, this is bad!


No. 1465:
In fact, I have opposed Plan and the building department at all points in their unjustified charges, still they are just as difficult and relentless above us, this is bad!


Just as PBE and the public are above us, they are reminiscent of the old GDR.
This is not something to shout for.
Now I will not go into depth here, as one can be punished for doing this. Do not bother to write something that makes one get on the edge with the law.
Have more than enough with other examples. Picture of the flag of the GDR.



Must be honest enough to say that this fight and conflict with PBE has been difficult in many ways.

But I do not take self-criticism for rooting myself in people and situations I should not, all the blame here I lay solely on PBE and the state intuitions that have been in the picture.

One of the most difficult is without a doubt that I have been an amateur after all in many ways. But today I do not dare to say that.
They work on this daily and have their education in that direction.
I / we work daily with completely different things.
But still I read up, put myself into things. Received advice and guidance that I can say today I have been able to fix them in all things. Therefore, they no longer answer us what we ask, just dispense something to go "free!"

Here are some examples of how I have fixed and parried their rigid and evil decisions and orders.

1.) The first thing we were ordered to do by PBE and that became a huge issue. It was a distance from the road to the storeroom. We asked for a meeting and inspection to get guidance and clarification. They would not. But we found that since the house is closer to the road than the stall, the stall will not be affected by this.

2.) We have now been instructed in a new application to connect the City Environment Agency. When we met with them on April 11, 2019 - this year. Then, before application, we would have another meeting. Instead we get a cruel email where everything is really an email to make things most difficult for us in a new search process.

3.) When Nils-Henrik Henningstad claimed that we could not get an exemption etc. So I sent him that neighbor in Stormyrveien 9 c who has received an exemption 57 times more than us. Then he has not yet managed to respond constructively to this.

4.) When Nils-Henrik Henningstad claimed of our wall would present problems for, among other things. The urban environment, fire and rescue services were these fabricated difficulties. ambulance here visiting. They could not reach the yard in the Krokstien. They drove down and used our "illegal" stairs.

5.) Every time they throw something out, in meetings and on mailer. Then I am able to familiarize myself with the case (s). not always right away, but eventually.

6.) They write and jab that we have expanded into the roadway. We have paired this on several levels.

1.) Our wall is 20-30 cm longer inside now than before.

2.) It is sloped inwards, we can easily cut or cut some of it,

3.) The neighbor's sloped approved slope is only ½ meter from the road, but spring is 1 meter.

4.) The neighbor's over on the other side has a wall of warm 20 cm from the road.

7.) We can't help that the wall is higher than ½ meter. We called down to PBE and talked to Kaja Aubert Lange who said it was not compulsory to build our wall when we were building on the old wall. And if we built a wall not more than 2 meters with a fence of 1 meter then this would work well. We did as we were told, and in retrospect we see that this is true. The wall is no higher than the neighbor's and falls and fits perfectly into the terrain. And it fits perfectly and harmonizes with both our house and property.

8.) PBE claims that we have built a colossus for the wall etc. above when Attorney Knut Howlid. Above us they have said the same and much more. But that neighbor on the other side has a larger wall, another neighbor has a wall located in the roadway etc. This they will not answer, and the smallest of answers has been that their property is within another construction period. When I in meeting April 11 said that they received the last approval in March 2018, they were guilty of a reply and have refused to comment on this. Why? They have no answer to any of their statutes and orders when one goes closer to the seams and one responds to them. They act like "world champions, but if you answer them they have nothing to come by. They are, as the saying goes, "up like a lion and down like a skin trap."

9.) PBE claims they must be careful of cm so that the regulations do not erode. Yes it is important, but in reality it is getting rid of everyone who searches in a good way and they have not built something that is obstructive or dangerous. But with us none of this is relevant, yet they treat us in the harshest possible way.

10.) PBE says they must be careful about the legislation. But with us there is talk of minimal overruns. Where everything we have built is clearly tim more advantage than disadvantages. In fact, it's not a disadvantage, only benefits!

End Comment.

When I look back on this matter, this is a matter that should have been resolved a long time ago.
The fact was that everything worked fine between us and our then case manager Kaja Aubert Lange.
All of the case workers we have received in retrospect have been case managers "from Hell!"

tirsdag 1. oktober 2019

No. 1464: The case against us is obviously a spirit struggle!

No. 1464:
The case against us is obviously a spirit struggle!


An article has been posted on the Searchlight website regarding our case here:
https://www.sokelys.com/?p=26292#comments

Titled "" Be below my / our dignity and pay or obey such people, "blogs write about PBE's compulsory claims for unlawfully listed booths and walls."

There is a writer who noticed something I was not aware of. In an article I wrote 8 years ago I expect ?!

Here is the article: http://janchristensen.net/artiklerhoved.php?side= why-smyrna-oslo

Facsimile from the article "Why Smyrna Oslo?"



 

There, a person who calls himself "Mitt An Bud" writes the following:

This is what Mitt An Bud writes:
Read the following on the Oslo Bible Teaching Center's (formerly Smyrna Oslo) websites:
“I told the Lord before we moved that I wanted a house where I could accommodate a large terrace, trampeline and swimming pool. All that God has given us and more. Isn't God just good? "
Then you might understand better that this is actually prophesied and is thus not a material battle, but rather a spirit struggle where forces try to stop the preaching and conversion that JKC preaches for the city of Oslo.
(quote at the end.)

1.) This is a spirit match, nothing else. God is with, then Satan is against.

2.) My An Bud writes something that I do not remember that I had written, thanks for the information My An Bud, am glad you wrote what you wrote.

I wrote this long before this conflict, and then we see how Satan afterwards tries to explain what God has given us and blessed us with as a family.
Satan's foremost task we see here is to "deprive" believers of what God has blessed us with.

We see this with all that God does and has given His children and those who confess His name.

Look at Israel, which does not exclude the world community from living in their own land and calling Israel's territories as Judea and Jerusalem occupied areas.
It has only been Israel's territory 4000 years back in time. No one else sits, and Jerusalem captured King David and made it the capital of Israel forever and ever.

Here we see the same way the forces of darkness operate where they want what is built and is on our property to be removed. Of course, this is not God behind. We read about God and Satan's purposes.

Joh.e. 10. 10 The thief comes only to steal and murder and destroy; I have come that they may have life and have abundance.

Here we see that Satan and PBE here in Oslo operate in the same way as the Bible describes it. PBE will destroy the beautiful and aesthetic we have built, which is just for the benefit of all. While I wrote 8 years ago that God has blessed us.
This like did not reveal Satan, and then we see the result of.
We are persecuted, Israel is persecuted and all who call on the name of the Lord. But scripture has said that this is part of the "package" to follow the Lord, and therefore this Spiritual struggle.

Matt. 5. 10 Blessed are they that are persecuted for righteousness's sake; for the kingdom of heaven is theirs.

We have been 100% honest in this matter. Called PBE several times and they gave ready signal to build wall.

It is this law clause that should have been applied to us, and when neighbors are allowed to utilize the land as 57 times more than us. Then it is totally, completely incomprehensible that we are treated this way. It is sad and evil.

There are two conditions that must be met in order to receive an exemption:

1.) Exemption cannot be granted if the considerations behind the provision from which it is dispensed, or the considerations in the provision of the Act, are substantially breached.

2.) The benefits of granting a waiver must be clearly greater than the disadvantages of an overall assessment

1.) When e.g. Our wall is becoming more "legal" now than it used to be with a sloping plot of land and a mound that lay 70 - 80 cm from the road. While our wall is 1 meter from the road. In fact, it is the sloped plot that is most "illegal!"

2.) There are only benefits to what we have built. Then our projects lie miles in and out to give us an exemption, then an exemption should be given.

That no one will give us this, just shows what evil and injustice lies behind the fight you have been running against us that is completely, completely beyond all the justice and decency of the public to do!

Is it Spirit Fight when PBE lies, distorts the truth and wants us to tear down what I wrote about before PBE came into the picture that this was God's blessing?
We mean that, and others with us!

Final Comment:


At least this is not a coincidence. What we have legally acquired. Built on our own property, here, evil forces want to be removed. This is nothing more than how one progressed in former GDR and other totalitarian states!
It is these evil forces we are fighting against are pretty obvious!
Pray for victory in Jesus 'name and in Jesus' blood!
That we can keep what is ours! Both storage room, staircase, storage room and house!

mandag 30. september 2019

No. 1463: Will PBE and the public send my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!

No. 1463:
Will PBE and the public send my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!


The huge and unnecessary opposition from the public will result in them sending my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!



I do not think that all people experience PBE here in Oslo, or the public as difficult, rigid and unjust.
The reason for that is many, largely because, after all, PBE shows up from a far better side than we do.
We are one of the sure part? Many or few? I do not know, as we who have experienced similar things. Maybe we should gather?
I think that is not so easy, as most will just finish the case (s) and get on with life!

Our case is the classic where the phrase "the feather that turned into five chickens"

In the fairy tale "It's Admitted" by HC Andersen from 1852, a feather of a hen falls on the other side of town after she has peeled herself in the feathers.

"The more I take pills, the better I will be". But the hen next to the neighbor did not sleep and said to the next “there is a hen that will pick, to look good! If I were a rooster, I would despise her! ”

Then both owls and pigeons hear it all, fly over to the other side of town and say that "there is a hen, yes there are some who say that there are two who have picked all the feathers off, not to look like the others, thus attracting the male's attention, "

So, after the story had gone through cocks and bats, there had been “five chickens picking feathers off to show which of them had become the magician's best friend for the rooster, and then they chopped each other to blood and fell died down, to shame and disgrace to their family and to great loss to the owner! ”.

The hen who had lost the little feather she peeled off at the start of the story did not, of course, recognize her own story. And so a feather became five chickens.
(quote at the end.)

The truth of our case is that the public agency is lying, fabricating problems that do not excite and are downright evil against us as they were against Trude Strand Lobben.

Of course, it is much worse to be deprived of your child than to tear down a dead wall.
But the procedure is the same, here is a "criminal" state that can do most! The truth of our case is that the public agency is lying, fabricating problems that do not excite and are downright evil against us as they were against Trude Strand Lobben.
Of course, it is much worse to be deprived of your child than to tear down a dead wall.
But the procedure is the same, here is a "criminal" state that can do most!

We of course refuse to pay fines / fines of now 20,000 kroner and next to maturity on 15 October of 35,000 kroner, as they now also want to include stairs as an "illegality case" even though the municipality of Oslo is the "criminal" "And that is the cause of this conflict. Not least that it has become so "big". This could and should have been solved much earlier, but they would not even meet us for meetings. Far less come to fears that we have asked them repeatedly to meet them for a dialogue and have resolved this matter.

There are several mailers, but I see that in 2015 we asked for surveys and meetings several times. Without response and response. Here is an email in from 25.08.2015

Appeal against rejection of order for rectification / reversal -decision on forced fine -Krokstien 2 C

Hi!

Want to complain about rejection. It is okay that we have built as I understand it 18 cm outside the boundary. But EVERYTHING IS MADE IN GOOD FAITH WHEN WE WERE IN CONTACT WITH THAT PRESENT AND WE HAVE BUILT UP ON OLD WALL.

Secondly, the wall of other neighbors is almost out of the way. Our wall is set 1-2 meters from the road. The principle of equality for the law is enshrined in the Constitution. When others build only 20 cm from the road and we build over 1 m within the roadway, how is it that the municipality can believe that this wall is illegal?
We have built so that both the bus and the seagull in winter glide easily by. From a visual point of view, is it not possible for the municipality to meet us and help us to get an exemption for what is illegal?
This feels discriminatory against us by using so many paragraphs against us that we feel overrun instead of using some common sense and looking at the real situation that nothing prevents either traffic or visibility.

Getting to an inspection will also make everything much easier for all parties!
(quote at the end.)

Final Comment:

The only mistake we have made here is to build a slightly too large storage room, but it is to the benefit of everyone and for miles inside where PBE is required to grant us a waiver.

The wall is built in consultation with PBE, however orally.

A staircase was required when, before building a staircase, we went down and up with a rope,

Everyone complains from neighbors Roar Telje, Randi Kristine Lavik and Ragnhild Skramstad that the wall is gray and should not stand there. And what Roar Telje claims as his court argument that the brewing car would not come forward. And that it will solve problems with parking. It is true that there are problems with parking on Stormyrveien. But that's because Randi Kristine Lavik and Ragnhild Skramstad have really miserable conditions on their own property as they have to back out from their property as Roar Telje must too. And that the wall of Ragnhild Skramstad is obviously completely illegal as it is completely outside the road. Something that also our responsible applicants Ferdigattest AS wrote in our application to keep masonry, stairs and storage.

We read here what they wrote:

Regarding the wall has a negative impact on road traffic and maintenance: Reg. This point also seems to indicate that it is somewhat striking that a neighbor in Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 has signed these quotations. It is important to emphasize on this occasion that the project owner in this project does not in any way want to indicate his neighbors as he feels that some have done in this case, because he has misunderstood the regulations and erected the wall / building. But when all three neighbors Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 themselves have walls that are all adjacent to or within regulated road boundaries, it becomes difficult not to mention this. In addition, when there are several other walls in the area with a similar location, it must be said to be an established practice in the relevant area with walls up to - and indeed also in - regulated road boundaries. I fm. Both Stormyrveien 4 and 6 are also the walls all the way to the paved road. In Stormyrveien 5 is a garage and brick wall with approximately the same location in ft. the roadway as the measure now being applied for. We can hardly see that the wall in Krokstien 2c significantly affects the roadway significantly more than these measures. The fact that 2 neighbor (s) have a continuous exit of more than 20 m, and that none of the 3 neighbors has snooze on their own land, is otherwise considered to contribute significantly more negatively in terms of. traffic conditions than the right wall along the road that is being sought here. But as mentioned - it is not the task of the proprietor to hang up in neighboring circumstances. You just want to get your own situation settled. Mht. In addition, it is obvious that this wall, which is completely out of the roadway, has some influence on road engineering considerations. However, after an overall assessment, the wall is not considered to affect road engineering considerations to a significant extent. Mht. road traffic is affected to a limited extent as the visibility etc. of the right stretch is changed to a small extent. It is shown in this connection for past disclosure. Mht. maintenance then it is pointed out that the asphalt edge is still at a sufficient distance to the wall, and that there is a road shoulder in the area in question, so that you can store some snow here. By the way, there is a considerable area where the wall goes into terrain where snow has been stored in recent years. Initiatives have never experienced this as difficult. As far as we understand, the City Environment Agency has not registered a single complaint or incident in recent years, neither with regard to. that the areas in question are dangerous to traffic or maintenance problems. We note that the wall has been standing for a long time without the road authority in the municipality - which manages and maintains the road - has not registered any problems, neither in terms of. use or operation.
(quote at the end.)

In other words, in reality the problems in Stormyrveien are not with us. But it is with others and with the neighbors. Here, PBE does nothing even if we have pointed this out. This only shows their evil and rats against us. And that others have utilized the site 57 times more than us!

Here is an agency that is obviously criminal and that we are subjected to abuse and abuse of the law against us!

mandag 23. september 2019

No. 1462: The truth is that the public administration is in deep crisis here in Norway. our case and that the human rights court in Strasbourg is running a number of cases against Norway, which testifies that this is not a one-off case!

No. 1462:
The truth is that the public administration is in deep crisis here in Norway. our case and that the human rights court in Strasbourg is running a number of cases against Norway, which testifies that this is not a one-off case!


Picture of our wall as PBE we want to demolish. They believe it is too far off the road and the property should be traced back to the way it was before. Before that, our sloped plot lay farther out than what our wall does. Here we meet people who are full of lies and then act to the degree unrealistic and pathetic.

Now we have a wall that allows the fill mass to stay on our property, and we were fortunate enough to build on an old wall without searching.
We have done as PBE said, and everything is just fine and good, now.
Much better than we had it, the roadway is also "bigger" now than before.
We are going to tear down, here are people who are so lying and acting outright quarrelsome and difficult, even if they call themselves case managers, unit leaders, group leaders and others.
Unfortunately, even if the whole case is based on lies, fabricated problems and other things that contradict their decision and the way in which they apply laws and regulations, they run into each other.

We have infinitely greater honesty and truthfulness than the public, so we have also revealed them time and time again that they "know everything", but their folly is only becoming more and more apparent to everyone!

2 Tim. 3. 9 But they shall not prosper; for their disbelief shall be revealed to all, as also they were.

For anyone and everyone who intervenes in this matter, only their misunderstanding and folly will be revealed more and more. They want us to demolish a wall that works very well, and before we built the wall it was more muddy and the slope lay more in the roadway than it is with our wall.
Neighbor Roar Telje complained that the brewing car would not arrive because our wall, but there are no places in Oslo city that the brewing car arrives as easily as with us. The whole chorus against us has been revealed as a bunch of liars and who are just looking to make nausea and anxiety!



What we experience with PBE and in fact the entire public administration acting in such a way, that one must say that they do not proceed in a fair and reasonable way is unfortunately not a one-off case!

I also have my question marks with writing as I do!

One of them is that after all, having lived 50 years of my 55 years in Norway, all of Norway is a country with wonderful people and a fantastic nature and freedom!

But why and how can it be as wrong as it sometimes does. We saw, for example. now in the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg where Norway was convicted. This was a child welfare case, but the similarities to our case are strikingly similar.
One puts oneself on a pedestal, high above others. Attacking than this, it is something that no one else has anything to do with. The truth is what the state and the public have determined.

We read here about the verdict
In the Strand Lobben case, the judgment of the EMD particularly attacks the decision-making process up to the final adoption decision. The child welfare service is criticized for its lack of efforts in order to bring about a possible return and for how togetherness was carried out. The get-togethers had not been designed to promote close contact between mother and child, in light of possible reversion, but only as a goal was for the child to gain "knowledge" of their biological origin.

The verdict also raises sharp criticism that her mother's care skills were not re-examined after she had a new child without demonstrated concerns about mother's ability to care. The Child Welfare Service had not made any real attempts to improve the poor connection between the mother and the child.
(quote at the end.)

Here we see that it was the very process that Norway "stroked" on. What is this really?

Lack of maturity, that's what it says. In many ways, it is the same in the case between us and the City of Oslo / Norwegian State that they appear extremely clumsy, unprofessional, rational, immature and then one can say that one is not worth the task.

I played football until I was 40 years old.

It reminds me that Norway acts as if they are engaged in a sport other than football. It's like playing handball, or playing athletics, but not soccer.
Such is indeed the whole of public Norway.

I am Danish, as I said, and I think this could not have happened so easily in Denmark as in Norway. The reason for this is probably that there is a lack of maturity here in Norway that is noticeable!

Let me take an example of really what low plane PBE is moving on here in Oslo.

Similar issues where wall placement is an issue Unlawfulness case 201717539 in Tamburveien 10 also a wall has been erected on a regulated road surface. This cannot be approved either, and will also have to be removed through follow-up in the illegality case.

I answer them and have never answered this:

Eg. then I got a reply from Nils-Henrik Henningstad that there were several others who had to demolish walls etc. I went into the cases he brought with, and then the fire and rescue agencies and other agencies were in to impose demolition. I pointed this out and told us it was also an advantage for fire and ambulance, as well as other agencies as we have built. Did I get an answer then? Never, such is PBE, just full of cheating and lack of good folk to answer things.
(quote at the end.)

Comparing this case with ours only shows that you have not understood any of the world's things.
Here is the fire and rescue agency inside, and with us it is the opposite!
Blue. when our daughter became acutely ill they had to use our stairs which we have been ordered to tear down, which testifies that their decision is completely rigid and meaningless!

Final Comment:
I just find that there is something very little mature and one moves on a plane that testifies that they are not suited to the task they are assigned to. In other words, they lack competence and act proud and arrogant!
Unfortunately, this is something that, in part, permeates the entire public Norway.

søndag 22. september 2019

No. 1461: Sent this as a tip to some newspapers now - as our case is so unreasonable, wrong and completely extraordinary as others build at the same time as us and receive exemption for far less conditions than what we get rejected for!

No. 1461:
Sent this as a tip to some newspapers now - as our case is so unreasonable, wrong and completely extraordinary as others build at the same time as us and receive exemption for far less conditions than what we get rejected for!

Yes, but our case is probably more ala North Korea and Congo than is usual.
Remember, our differential treatment happens at the same time that others are allowed.
Therefore ours and many things are not completely comparable, although there are similarities, but more inequalities than similarities in my opinion!
After all, this is a very extra ordinal issue as we have been given verbal commitment by the City of Oslo to build. At the same time, others like us are building and in our living area. They get yes while we get no. This is as unreasonable as possible.

Picture of our estate as PBE has given us orders and fines for not tearing. As well as the wall and stairs. Can't understand that this is so bad when others in our tree area can use the land up to 57 times more than us!





Here is the tip sent to some newspapers, asking that they write about this horrible and very ugly and horrible case that we have come across completely innocent!

When the third state power fails, then the fourth state power is needed !?

Oslo 22 / 9-2019

Of course, our case is not the most important in Norway, but when the authorities fail so to the degrees they have done in our case. What?
Then the press needs to mention these ugly and incorrect conditions.
It is the "bad" conditions we need the press most, not the good and the good. They are happy and need no help? Which we really do when we have been exposed to abuse of authority and dimensions !!!!!!!!!!!!

Will also remind you that Norway is obviously so to the degrees outside to drive.

Only in the human rights courts does Norway suffer defeat time and time again and there are many cases in line. It is really impossible to relate to public Norway when they choose to sit on the "back legs." Then we need the press, which has time and time again given the authority to change its position. Unfortunately, I think this is relevant in our case. Since our neighbors have built at the same time as us and been given approval for far more violations and other things. In other words, here is such a big difference. At the same time, they always use the law against us, not for us! In many ways, our case is nothing more than a state and municipal abuse of power and government.

In our case, PBE has done as bad a job as it is possible to do. Yet they are supported by the Civil Ombudsman, the County Governor and the courts. Here it is a camaraderie that is so permeated poorly, rigid and dangerous.

When the case against us is built this way, I do not see that it is right to comply with these requirements that are not based on Norwegian law, nor what I think most people consider to be right and proper.

Look here for links that discuss our case:











Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo
Tel: 99598070



torsdag 19. september 2019

No. 1460: How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 2

No. 1460:
How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 2


In many ways, it can be said that God treats us according to the light we have. For more light, more responsibility. Therefore, God is "tougher" toward us believers than the children of the world. But in the end, all sin will lead us away from God, it creates a divide. Therefore, we must not let God's goodness fail us to take him seriously. God is not only love, but also our judge and eventual rewards.


The scriptures say:
Joh.e. 1 17 For the law was given by Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. Picture of Moses who came with the law, showing all people have fallen short of God's standard.



Deuteronomy 32. 35. I hear vengeance and retribution at the time when their feet tremble; for their day of adversity is at hand;

More recently, I or we have since this also includes my family. Really got to experience wrongdoing and lying people in "free dressage!"

Both believers and non-believers. In this article I will not go into these events too much. Rather focus on how to deal with these people and relate. What does the scripture say? What are the Bible's teachings and practices?

First, there are times when God also judges people "before" time. Still, I would also point out that even in the NT and the new covenant, God does the same as in the GT and the old covenant. He keeps judgment, reveals, and people are ashamed of God and His servants!

After all, God is the same in the NT as in GT, God or Jesus has not changed.

But as a rule, God allows people to "hold on" to what they want and want. Since he has to judge all people. But, nevertheless, we find more places in the NT and the new covenant that God holds judgment. As if we live in GT and the old pact. But then one can say that this is my exception to a rule. In the GT and the old pact it was not so.

In other words, God does not want us to wish the death, doom, or anything of any sinner! But still, all people will lead or later answer for their bread, sin, injustice and everything else they have done. Let's have this clear. But it is not us as believers anymore as in GT and the old covenant in the same way to pronounce judgment. But salvation, life, hope and restoration!

Here are some examples, that even in the NT and the new covenant that God keeps judgment, reveals and people have to pay for their bread before they have to stand before God with their lives.

Room. 1. 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel; for it is the power of God for salvation to every one that believeth, both to Jew first, and then to Greeks;

There is no doubt that God first both blesses and judges those closest to him. We read that it is first for a Jew, and then for Greeks or Gentiles. To that I would say that it is also a pattern, that God first judges us Christians, those who profess Jesus' name, then the world.

We read about the judgment given to the Jews in the year 70. Which Jesus had prophesied about when he went down here.

Matt. 24. 1. And Jesus went out of the temple, and departed, and his disciples came unto him to show him the buildings of the temple. 2 And he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, Here shall not be left stone upon stone that shall not be broken down.

The temple and the temple buildings were the pride of the Jews. But Jesus said that every stone should be removed literally. This happened in the year 70. from Wikipedia.

The destruction of the temple

The Roman triumph that carries the spoils of war from the Temple in Jerusalem, an image on the Arch of Titus in Rome.

In the year 66 AD the Jewish people revolted against the Roman Empire. Four years later, in the year 70, Roman legions under Titus had recaptured and then destroyed most of Jerusalem and the Second Temple. See the siege and destruction of Jerusalem

The Triumphal Arch in Rome, the Arch of Titus, built to celebrate the victory over the Jews and the destruction of Jerusalem, shows Roman soldiers guarding Menorá, the seven-armed candlestick used in the temple. Jerusalem itself was leveled to the ground by Emperor Hadrian at the end of the Bar Kokhba rebellion in 135 as he sought to establish a pagan city named Aelia Capitolina.
(quote at the end.)

Here we see that judgment first struck the Jews. And so powerful that they were spread all over the world for almost 2,000 years. Before they returned to their own land, they proclaimed Israel as an independent state on May 14, 1948.

In short, one can say that when a reader eg. John Revelation, then the judgment will hit the church first. As we find in John. Obvious. 2 - 3. Say the judgment will hit the world chapters 4 - 16. Furthermore, the names Christian and religious in John. Obvious. 17 - 18. In other words, God will judge everyone in his "order!"

Then it will take place also other judgments, where God will judge the nations, which we find among others. in Matthew 25. The judgment in front of the white throne, which we find in John. Obvious. 19. Then we also have the judgment or judgment of all believers before Christ's court in 2 Cor. 5. 10.

But in the meantime, especially in GT, but also sometimes in the NT and among us Gentiles, God holds judgment. This is discussed throughout the Bible, including in GT. Just take the time to read the prophets, not least the prophet Isaiah and the other prophets.

By and large, God lets judgment wait, but it will come. In the meantime, it happens from time to time that even in the present time God holds "judgment", and settles with sin, disobedience and unbelief.

The "knit" is longer in the new covenant than it was in the old covenant!

But the wages of sin is always death! This is an unmistakable act throughout the entire Word of God. We must never believe that God is different from what He was in the old covenant. It's just that Jesus has now atoned for sin, the debt is paid. God has decided that we humans need mercy. But we must not miss this grace as we read in God's Word that God will not tire or work with us humans in the infinite. One day, we have lost God's grace.

Genesis 6 3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not judge among men for ever; for its delusion is flesh, and its days shall be a hundred and twenty years.

I wrote in the headline the following:
“How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? ”

Of course, we should punish and point out injustice, sin, and keep the word of God. But above all in the new covenant we must pray for the people. in the Sermons on the Mount.

Matt. 5. 43 You have heard it said: You must love your neighbor and hate your enemy. 44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do well to them that hate you, and pray unto them that persecute you;

Furthermore, Scripture says that revenge is not ours, but Him.

Room. 12. 19. Do not avenge yourselves, my beloved, but give up wrath! for it is written, "The vengeance belongs to me; I will repay," says the Lord.

I myself have experienced sometimes that God has both judged, and given warnings to people who oppose him and his servants. This happens from time to time, but rarely would I say, because if this had happened as often as in the GT and the old pact, Norway and the world would not have looked the way it looks today. Unfortunately, humans have largely turned their backs on God and the Christian message to an extent that is truly disheartening and alarming.

Example 1:


I have experienced 2 times concrete that there are people who have died by opposing the Lord, and the Lord's words. This I do not want to write more than what I have done in this article. This is extremely extraordinary. But it happened in the days of the apostles, and it also happens in our days.
See here: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/06/nr-325-man-who-died-as-ananias-and.html

Example 2:

When we built a house in Karmøy, we came across a fraudulent contractor who had not done his job for which he was paid. I met him in the conciliation council and there he promised repentance and improvement. He did not keep this. Suddenly even though he had both money and resources to make up for himself. Something he didn't want, not least because that I was a believer was pretty obviously burning his house down completely.

The same happened in the same moment that I got the fine of 10,000, - kr as it was that the house of Pastor Jan Aage Torp's parents-in-law burned down.
This was the same, all this I consider as the warning finger of God that one cannot do as one would to believing people who serve the living God.
Sooner or later, God puts his "finger" down and says that enough is enough!