fredag 29. desember 2017

No 1636: Talked to a policeman who thought that Torp could not police me, but he could run a civil court lawsuit that he had to pay everything himself!

No 1636:Talked to a policeman who thought that Torp could not police me, but he could run a civil court lawsuit that he had to pay everything himself!
For more as Torp writes, talks about me, and shows his vision for me and the heavenly blog.Then we see the nature and poison of snakes come true!
Jan Aage Torp hates above all me, what I write and speak, and the heavenly blog.
That is why he tries to hit me and the Heavenly blog by attacking us at a point that will put us out of play. He is not so good and courageous that he verbally will meet me to converse and discuss God's word but with fictional stories and adventures to count. Is he attacking me and the heavenly blog with already making stories!This picture, which has been collected for the newspaper Norway today 10 years ago, Torp will have 150,000, - kr. Finn Jarle Sæle should also have money from me for exactly the same picture. The two killing rings are likely to flee others, even to go free!

If this is true, Torp does not get any way without using others.Then I think he may have to pay for the whole guild against me and the heavenly blog, which he hates so incredibly strongly!
Among other things, this typical situational image applies where the image of the person is less important than the image of the main content of the image.
I have done this and afterwards I have removed the image or the pictures if it has been desired. Claiming $ 150,000 for this and threatening reprisals is probably more punishable than postponing a tacky picture from 2009.
Situation images can, however, be published without the consent of the depicted as long as the images are harmless and are not in any way offensive to those pictured. Situation images can be defined as images where the actual situation or activity is the actual subject in the image. Exactly who is in the photo is less important than the main content of the image.The situation is that Torp has come up with a factory-reviewed review, and won with it, this is the situation. Therefore, the image of him is the misunderstanding of the situation!
What has happened? Just this, that I have used an old tacky image from the newspaper Norway today from 2009 as first Finn Jarle Sæle demanded payment from me. And now truly Jan Aage Torp claimed 150,000, - kr for the same picture.
Torp is a man who, of course, will not spend his own money on this, then this case will be lost. The $ 150,000 he wants, he can probably look forward to!
Final Comment:
I do not want a fight but peace. Although both Sæle and Torp claim copyright and money of the same image, I have in any case chosen to delete the mentioned picture or pictures.
Everything for me is that text, what I write is essential. A picture here means very little, so I never argue about pictures. I always remove current pictures on the whole and all!I try to use zero calories, have more than enough other things! Each. Photos and other things I always get what I need. And if not, I'll let the text speak for itself. That's what's important and important to me, and that's this narrator Torp hates me too too!
They call this revenge porn, etc. This has been on the English blog and I did not realize this. I immediately removed this, and the picture is a situation picture from the newspaper Norway today that Finn Jarle Sæle wanted to make money for. This did not work and everything is factory! For Torp hates me and the heavenly blog because we keep the word of God that it's not allowed for you to have Aina Lanton to your wife when you belong to another.
Here are some mailers between me and Jan Aage Torp. He writes in 3rd person and is Admin in
Jan Kåre Christensen:We note your repeated callbacks.The case will be forwarded to our lawyer for initiation of debt collection if you do not pay 150,000 NOK by 6th January 2018. Interest and fees will then accrue according to the law's rates.If you believe that you have a written agreement with Jan-Aage Torp directly, or with Restoration Oslo, about using our photographs, you must show this.We have agreements with certain media and with some players in social media, but these are done according to an assessment in each case. We know that we have never made such an agreement with you and we have proof that the photograph in question belongs to us.We remind you that our claim is seen in accordance with the unequivocal verdict against you in all jurisdictions for your harassment and persecution of the Torp parish couple, and that you have in no way assumed that your hospital business must cease. We are confident that the legal system will agree with our assessment also regarding the invoice for photography. In any event, the invoice must be paid in full by 6 January 2018, and in addition, your hospital business must immediately terminate completely.The administration in Restoration Oslo will remain unmanned until 3 January. We recommend that you immediately find

tirsdag 26. desember 2017

No. 1635: Jan Hanvold obviously thinks it's free to punch, grab and unwanted sex, just one forgiveness!

No. 1635:Jan Hanvold obviously thinks it's free to punch, grab and unwanted sex, just one forgiveness!

Faximile from the newspaper The day that first wrote about this.

In a post on the same platform, TV Vision Norway boss Jan Hanvold calls Giske for a "witch process" and encourages people to pray for and forgive the Ap politician during these Christmas times."Then our thoughts go to Trond Giske, which we pray for and lift up in the throne of grace. He needs our prayer, which is exposed to this great witchcraft process. He has been flat and apologized. Then everyone should forgive him and move on. Or is there no mercy? It is this, which is the message of Christmas, to accept forgiveness and forgiveness. Do not shout crucifixion, crucifixion. May the media show a bit of greatness, giving Trond Giske mercy. As Christians, we should surround him and the family with our prayers, "he writes on Facebook on Christmas Eve.(quote ending).Then it's free for everything. Just one praying forgiveness!Of course this is the totally absurd world as "apostle" Jan Hanvold leads us into!Look for you, you see a lady. She is really wildly crazy for Trond Giske's behavior and Jan Hanvold's advice, only you ask forgiveness, afterwards!It is not a question of forgiveness that repentance when taken is not the same as changing. If you abuse power or position, it must also have consequences if it turns out that you are unsuitable as a leader.When Hanvold believes this is just about asking forgiveness and that you can go on, he understands less than you could fear. Then it's almost a good idea to think that this comes from a man with both leadership and staff responsibility.Firstly, as leader and responsibility to other people. Then you are a model, even in a profane context. As a Christian in one at least. But what does the saying say?As you shed, such a man lies, one is closest to himself, etc., etc. Good old words that always vote.We see here that Hanvold is now using Trond Giske in his struggle to fully accept his own hearing! That he as a leader, hired, apostle and pastor may be re-enlisted and forgiven as Giske.No, the very best is that Giske, Hanvold and all others who do not live as a leader should and should do. To find something else and leave "the place" to someone else! 

Related links:

mandag 4. desember 2017

No. 1634: The case against me is manufactured, even in the old Soviet Union they would not have gone as far as the Norwegian authorities have done to me and the heavenly blog!

No. 1634: 
The case against me is manufactured, even in the old Soviet Union they would not have gone as far as the Norwegian authorities have done to me and the heavenly blog!
 Picture of the flag of the old Soviet Union.

No, the whole thing is a fader, I have not done anything in the wrong place.The case against me is manufactured, even in the old Soviet Union they would not have gone as far as the Norwegian authorities have done to me and the heavenly blog!Every word I've written is right, good and so 😁With the old Soviet Union it was exactly the way it is in Norway today regarding that judgment against me. Just not so bad, as in the old Soviet Union they always had an accused opportunity to say their opinion about what one was charged with and be convicted of!I am charged with a thing convicted of something completely different that I have not been able to defend myself for. As well as what I was convicted of, it's not punishable, the whole thing is fictional, lying and dark!I was sentenced to have written too much about Jan Aage Torp, but this is also a lie that this is punishable. What law do they judge me after? Yes, if I had searched Torp and had presented this to him repeatedly.What have I done? We have debated his life as a public person. When using the number is completely beyond!May end here.But what's written about me surpasses what I've written about Jan Aage Torp at least ten times in both crowd and scratch!Isaiah 5. 20 Woe to those who call evil and good evil, who make darkness to light, and light to dark, making bitter to sweet and sweet to bitter!

Related links:

lørdag 2. desember 2017

No. 1633: When the Christian people - especially those in the liberty - overlook reproductions but prolong the gays, then make a difference to people and bring themselves under God's judgment!

No. 1633:
When the Christian people - especially those in the liberty - overlook reproductions but prolong the gays, then make a difference to people and bring themselves under God's judgment!
 James 2: 8 If you follow the royal law after the scripture, you shall love your neighbor as yourself, then you are doing well; 9 But if you make a difference in people, you are doing sin, and the law is reckoning against you as a lawmaker. 10 For anyone who keeps the whole law, but stumbles in one thing, he has become guilty of all. 11 For he that said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, neither saith he, Thou shalt not kill. If you do not commit adultery but kill you then you have become a criminal offender. 12 Speak, and do as those who are to be judged according to the law of freedom! 13 For judgment shall be merciless to him that hath not mercy; But mercy rejoices against the judgment.We read clearly in the scripture that we should not make a difference to people.Have we violated one of God's commandments. Then we have violated all of them.It is so evident in the word of God that imprisoned Christians can not accept why? Because God's word says it's a shame.How to deal with gay and lesbian believers? In the same way, God's word says that living out his gay, it's a pity! Then it's a pity when the God of heaven says so!This is a hypocrisy without equal, and God will judge the people who make a difference to other people!This article I wrote for a while back, and it's more up to date than ever!

No. 926:

Hypocrisy what is it?

It is eg. that homosexuals should refrain from his love, while the remarriage should not, although the same Bible says that both remarriage and homosexual practice is a sin! We can not be against the homosexuals, that they should get practicing what the Bible says is sin. That they have sexual intercourse and possibly initiate a relationship. While those who are re-married, they are allowed, this is hypocrisy and double standards.

What scripture says?

James 2 10 For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one of the commandments, has been guilty of breaking them all. 11 For he that said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor.

Here we see, like so many other places in the word of God. That killing a human being, living as re-married, or steal. Everything is sin. Marriage Switches, drunkards, murderers, none that doeth sin, shall inherit the kingdom of God. Here are time after time all who live in sin ban from the kingdom of God if they are not there from the church

1 Cor. 6. 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Neither the sexually immoral, those who worship idols or adulterers, nor men who lie with men or who allow themselves to be with, 10 neither thieves, greedy, drunkards, revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 Such were some of you before. But now you are washed, you are made holy, you're done righteous in the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

No one makes the watch shall inherit the kingdom of God, this is the Bible clear and concise learning!

Here is an article I wrote a while back, which is more relevant than ever:

No. 815:
There are double standards being against gay, transgender etc., but at the same time accept remarriage among Christians!

I have to laugh at the Christian hypocrisy. "We must love the gays, but they must not go into any relationship, for it is the Bible that it is sin" When it comes to divorce and remarriage among Christians sounds "Christians are the most people and there are the forgiveness, do not be so judgmental .. "yes yes :)

Photo of Hans Inge Fagervik


My message is really simple and clear, according to the word of God to the letter in all areas. Do not overdo any place or overlook something. But who comes to God's word? All, but it's shepherds and those with leadership responsibilities we must ensure that they live accordingly.

I have no problems with that someone sits on the "last" unit and drugged, re-married, gay, transgender or whatever they are. But when they start to sit on the podium and to have management responsibilities, as it twists me.

I started with a statement I obtained from the web. It says the following:
I have to laugh at the Christian hypocrisy. "We must love the gays, but they must not go into any relationship, for it is the Bible that it is sin" When it comes to divorce and remarriage among Christians sounds "Christians are the most people and there are the forgiveness, do not be so judgmental .. "yes yes :) written by Judith Bjørsvik.

What words describe God who separates and remarries?

1) Marriage Breakers.
2.) adulterer or whore goats in good Norwegian.
3.) adulteress or hussy in well-Norwegian
4.) Sinners
5.) Switch marriage.
And he who has not been married before but marries a divorced fall under the same judgment as the one who remarries after a divorce.

What does the word of God on those who choose to live with a person of the same sex?

1) Hor.
2.) Sins against nature.
3) the natural use of the unnatural.
4.) Driver skjenselsverk.
5.) In GT referred to homosexuality as an abomination.

This is just to show the basis of the word of God as it is basically adultery and sin no matter what "form" one chooses to live outside of marriage. We can not "accept" a form of sin, but oppose one another, there are double standards and hypocrisy!

But who will prevail and be good examples? World? God's church?
Yes, God's church, but there are preachers and those with management responsibility to be good examples and role models. This teaches and speaks writing about.

Kyrre Vidar Simonsen We know what the Bible says about divorce! If one is to follow God's words or his own flesh? Pastors and leaders engaged to marry to stand has a lot to answer for, when those are helping to lead such children at the same rate, ie that it should in a way be approved and accepted divorce to marry several times, it is totally against God's word, God hates divorce, and there are not many reasons the Bible mentions as a reason for divorce! Christians, especially leaders have a huge responsibility in terms of signals emit them with their lifestyle. People stand the slightest cause for them, and be honest why? Æ has zero respect for Christian leaders who did not choose to follow God's word. By choosing to follow their own carnal desires and roads.
(end of quote).

1 Pet. 5. 2 Be shepherds of the flock of God which ye have with you! Have oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly, as God would, and not for lucre, but of the heart. 3 Do you not masters of those whom God has given you the responsibility, but set an example for the flock.

1930 translation, but so that I will be the pattern for the flock.

I will ask a simple question, is a pattern to the flock if one is divorced and marry again? No, I mean. That many believe differently than me gets to be their choice. But it comes very often that one does not stand preachers from "ordinary" people. God's word adds something completely different at Shepherds than other "Christian".

1 Tim. 5. 17 elders that leaders in the church, deserves double reward, especially those dealing with preaching and teaching.

Final comment:
This speaks well for itself? It is sin that creates separation between us and God, and minor and major sins are not of God. There are all sins "big" for it is sin that creates separation, but we make up our sin. Repent, leave the instance. spouse if one is re-married, or if one is homosexual then must leave their man or woman. Living with a person of the same sex is a sin, just as remarriage is. We can not accept sin and warns against another, such is the hypocrisy and double standards!

Related Links:

torsdag 30. november 2017

No. 1632: The appeal in Strasbourg in France, Norway's largest justice word becomes standing, now the case has been terminated in the most unfair manner!

No. 1632:
The appeal in Strasbourg in France, Norway's largest justice word becomes standing, now the case has been terminated in the most unfair manner!

Had the case been dealt with in the Norwegian Supreme Court, then this would have been a judgment and a matter of building. The Norwegian Supreme Court rejected this, they did so in France too!

Letter from France!

The whole trial and case against me appear like a good father!

Once we've lost in each court of law, I have to say that my lawyer Brynjar Meling has once pointed out the wrong law enforcement has not been heard. What Brynjar Meling has pointed out is that the law they have judged me is not a criminal offense section 390a on the violation of peace to another.

Here's an article I wrote for a time back that's more up to date than ever!

No. 1584:
Picture of the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg in France for which this case is being tested.
Since, in my view, this case has not been dealt with in Norwegian justice system in a worthwhile and good way, since the whole judgment against me and the heavenly blog is the way I see it a big big dad!

  1. Brynjar Meling is a conscientious man, therefore I am convinced that his fronting that it is wrong lovanv ending that is used against me.
That's something he thinks is legally correct, not to "win" forward. Meal is the way I see it, a man with great integrity and "love" jus. In other words, he is not lightweight, so it's sad to see how he has been treated my mind. He has been treated almost like a fool, it is abuse of power against another man and towards me and my family.
  1. He has f to tt full st ø support of many, including media law judge Jon Wessel-Aas.
  1. A dvokat Brynjar Meling who in my opinion have been used by the Oslo District Court and Court of Court of Appeal to make it look nice, although they have kept us for fun.
As I said, it is fairly sought as they hold on. What I have been convicted of has been used by the court for a minimum of minutes. But hours on everything else. And they have not asked me about anything in the judgment that I almost have a personal vendetta against Torp as far from the truth as it is possible to come.
Torp I have never impressed, just because he says he is a pastor and apostle, and lives just the way it suits him. Only thing I've had interest with Torp, it's his double standard or double, nothing else!
I have proved never to seek him or make personal contact with him in any way.
The whole assertion against me is ridiculous, fabricated and lying!
  1. After the session the Court of Appeal, cutting ø nth Brynjar Meling that we were f carr ied behind "the light" and wrote a too crass appeal letter to Norwegian H ø Supreme.
This is his inscription, and now he wrote that what I'm convicted of has not been dealt with in court. His "tunnel vision" of focusing on law enforcement was now gone, and other moments he emphasized. This he wrote:
Facts of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections in the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling error, provocation and retribution 
As stated at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his oppositions had to be subjected to punishment or to be judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the accused's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to withstand in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to provocation and rhetoric in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward from both sides, it is stated that the decision of the Court of Appeal is insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is insufficient in order to eliminate the meaning of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
From the majority of the characteristics through which the convicted person has expressed the conduct of insults, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's way of life and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be in contrary to the words of the Bible.
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others in such a way public opinion is eventually even more unusual than simply to hold condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such issues are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - may be the basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "justified harms", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)? 
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given that the special theological con text is both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is alleged to mean that the ruling grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
  1. Øystein Hermansen, Malin Str ø mberg Amble and all other judges holding really Brynjar Meling and me for a fool. Then I can not say that it was Meling's mistake that we lost. They left Meling mess for several hours, totally dribbling in what he says. What I say is blaming all the judicial authorities in.
Lets some unpublished statements from Jan Aage Torp, who I am in charge of, saying that the court must ignore this as it is undocumented and the claims are completely beyond. This puts Hermansen into account for the verdict, no one can blame Brynjar Meling. He can not because he is being fooled by Øystein Hermansen and everyone else.
  1. It is lawyer Brynjar Meling to take care of the appeal and, if necessary, continue negotiations with the Strasbourg Human Rights Court.
This tells me that Meling has a great deal of involvement in the matter, and he has gone all the way and continues. Although in my opinion he was fooled by the court here in Norway. They have simply drowned in what he has argued, even though he has great support, and lay on a lie-line. This is the court in Norway, or is it Congo or North Korea? That's how it feels like that! 
Final Comment: 
As said, one can not blame a man for whom the court has held "breath."
When he is done, they completely ignore what he brings, as they have "right to do." But it's fraudulent, and no one's way to go.
At least they could have asked both me and Brynjar Meling why I have discussed Torp as much as we have done.
That's because I've received a 30,000 hatred sign against me over the last 4 years.
And an approx. 300 blog posts addressed to me and the heavenly one that I have responded to. That it has become "big" amounts if not close to that Torp writes. First and foremost aimed at me and my family, much worse than what Torp has received. In other words, it also makes the verdict against me a super judicial sentence. The pure father and it is a disgrace in Norwegian legal history as a judgment that is so totally wrong and wrong it is possible to stay in all ways!
This is not Brynjar Meling's fault, but Jan Aage Torp, Oslo police and the courts!