tirsdag 21. november 2017

No. 1628: We do not need money anymore in our fight against the Oslo police and Jan Aage Torp when all is paid, but only your bones!

No. 1628:We do not need money anymore in our fight against the Oslo police and Jan Aage Torp when all is paid, but only your bones!
 The person who has been the investigator in this case has been Oda Karterud. She has, in my opinion, done such a miserable job and just a job it is possible to do. That's how I look so shameful. Everything I say and write should be strengthened as much as possible. What others do, even if it surpasses me ten times, it is allowed. It is a justism word as the case is now, but we hope, believe and pray for full liberation, and that the case goes through at the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg, France!Picture of the European Parliament by day in Strasbourg, France. Where the "crucial" battle between me and the narrator Jan Aage Torp will be held.




Receives inquiries where more and more people dislike Jan Aage Torp and who want to stand with us in our fight against him and the Oslo police, who unfortunately have taken this narrative post under their "wings"!Torp is nothing but a liar, deceiver and obvious criminal who has delivered a fictional review. Since it is his hatred against my preaching concerning divorce and reproach of believers like Torp hates something else!Jan Aage Torp also has its promises, as a disobedient and rebellious creature has it.Psalm 68. 6. God gives those single houses, leading prisoners to happiness; only the rebellious live in a dry country.2 Tim. 3 5 Who has the skin of godliness, but denies its power - and turn these away from you. 6 For to them are those who trespass themselves into the houses and capture women who are burdened with sins and are driven by many lusts 7 and always learn and never come to the knowledge of truth. 8 Like Jannes and Jambres, Moses opposed, so are these truths too, people who are corrupt in their minds and inexcusable in faith. 9 But they shall not prosper; for their iniquity shall be revealed to all, as they were.Jan Aage Torp shall live in a dry land, and his folly shall be revealed to all! This we see more and more with Torp, that his folly appears. He loves to push down other people, even their own children. Anyone who comes in his way, who does not agree with the "King," he tries to step down, poor man!We do not need your money anymore to Strasbourg and the Human Rights Court there.This is paid, we only need your prayers so that the appeal goes through and that I and the heavenly blog are acquitted!Need your funds and money for new projects and improvements for Smyrna Oslo and the Heavenly Blog.But there is something completely different from paying fines and lawyer fees, all of this is paid!Do you want to support and join?


Here is the account number in DNB: 0535 06 058



lørdag 18. november 2017

Nr. 1627: The whole judgment against me and the heavenly blog appears as "home secret" and fabricated, it will be exciting what lawyers, lawyers and judges say in Strasbourg in France!

Nr. 1627::
The whole judgment against me and the heavenly blog appears as "home secret" and fabricated, it will be exciting what lawyers, lawyers and judges say in Strasbourg in France!

The treatment I have received in the Norwegian judiciary and by the police at Manglerud, I would call it rough and pretty.I have never been convicted of punishment and believe in all of these things I am unconquered in such circumstances. Then should and should take it into account and helped me to explain myself in a good and clear way.Here the police and the court have almost decided how everything would be in advance, they acted like bullies and criminals in my eyes!I feel a bit like getting a bomb placed in my hand. Because I do not know what it is, I'm blamed when it's gone. As shown in picture. What I'm dead for, after all, Torp and his allies have gone a lot, much further than me in verbal words and expressions, also amount. That I am being judged, and not they. It shows that the case against me is a regular justice word and there are bullies that I will compare the Manglerud police and the courts with!



We look forward to the appeal being treated by people who hopefully are not only well educated, but righteous and able to see things from our point of view!Now the case between me / Brynjar Meling and the Manglerud police / Jan Aage Torp is in its final phase. Since the case has been sent to Strasbourg for 2 months. since waiting to be treated there.1.) First, the case must go through the needle eye, that is, it becomes a matter. If so, I think we have won half a victory!2.) Then the next step is that there will be a case where I and Torp really are "deleted" and there will be Brynjar Meling on his part who defends me against the lawyer or the prosecutor's attorney. That's how I understood this.If I get acquitted, then everything that has happened until now in the case "reset" became. The verdict will be invalid and I will receive £ 50,000 as the case has cost me a fine, costs and attorney fees.Ask dear believers Jesus friends that the matter comes up, I am acquitted and won over the Norwegian state, the Oslo police and Jan Aage Torp who have put this misery into a false review! It's my view of reverberation like Torp hater, everything else he cares for.Money I do not need first and foremost, everything is now paid, so it's your messenger I need most, the case goes through and I'm acquitted!



The fact that we as believers stand together against this Christian persecution, I am convinced, is of the utmost importance, money and economy are subordinate to the strength of standing together for the gospel. That one will no longer proclaim what God's Word says and learn about marriage - divorce and upbringing preachers and priests!

That said, there are two sides of the same thing you dear believing friends may ask for.
First and foremost that God gets his way and will, I may not win. Because this is a form of judgment how they treat a witness of the Lord in such a bad way. But my wish is that the case goes through and I am acquitted by the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg in France!

Here's an article I wrote for a while back:

Both judges, both in Oslo District Court, have not confronted me or asked me what they have sentenced me to.
This shows that they have not been fit for the job and should never have been judges as they simply are not geared to the job. This is the smallest one can demand from a judge and a judge collegiate, asking them what they think is punishable.
This has not happened in this case, so it is also the factual facts of the times. The whole thing is nothing else a fabricated from beginning to end!
As they do in Congo and North Korea, at that level is the whole thing, unfortunately!
Judge in Oslo District Court was an immature lady who called Malin Strømberg Amble, whom I see in retrospect, should never have been a judge in this case who could not ask for a single time why it was written so much about Jan Aage Torp. And judge me that I've written "too much" about him, this is an justice word!



Judge in Borgarting Lagmannsrett Øystein Hermansen was even worse, which after all was a good grown man. As also obviously, the failure failed to ask me and my lawyer. However, my lawyer kept in mind that he spent some hours on law enforcement. Talk about manipulator of the worst kind. 
What I was convicted of writing a lot about Torp. He used zero to reach zero seconds. This only shows that Øystein Hermansen did not manage to lead the negotiations in a way that was right worthy.


Have worked so much with people, should one get the truth out of them. May one ask them both one, and two and three times, at least.
Here I'm not asked about this once, nor my judge. It just tells me that Øystein Hermansen was not the right man to be the main judge in court. When the Norwegian Supreme Court also newspapers the appeal, this all matters to me to a father! A shame in Norwegian legal history, nothing else!
The problem is really that this case has not been dealt with here in court in a fulfilling and good way.
It comes from among others That the sentence says one thing. The mes discussion in court has not gone into what the sentence emphasizes.
Both in the district court and the court of law, it has not been discussed and elucidated why so much has been written about things against the false apostle Jan Aage Torp.
I have not been asked this once for neither the district court nor the court of law. Then one can not judge me and it will be a good and fair judgment. Here it is both neglected and reconstructed by the court that makes the case against me and the heavenly blog the justism words of time and a factual judgment! Do not really appreciate the paper it's written on, it simply does not match!
That's why I mean and there are also several other things. Blue. Wrong law enforcement as Brynjar Meling has pointed out. This has been very bad and foolish of the court to let him keep on the way he has done. And they did not really care about Meling's argument.
Then it is dishonest and rotten not to angular questions and discussion on what has become "felling" here in this case. Why is it written so much about the fake Shepherd and Pastor Jan Aage Torp.
It is quite simply that we have debated the miserable life of the false apostle Jan Aage Torp, and what I and others mean about his remorse and other things.
Blue. That he flew a person for 1.5 million and called him rather sick afterwards.
To keep them the 1.5 Millions and have them for themselves.
Then I challenged Torp and his friends to pay back the 1.5 Millions that he flew this Serber for.
This has not happened and that there has been a lot of back and forth in dictionaries, articles and more. Punishment for this without having been confronted with this in court tells me that the case against me is a regular justice word, nothing else!
Both judges who have sentenced me, respectively, in Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagmandrett have not even asked me why I have written such a volume of posts about fool Apostel Jan Aage Torp. 
Torp's credibility is in my eyes far lower than anyone else I've hit. When attaching a little to this man, it's really an impossibility. One must support his explanation with credible evidence and that others who are credible witness and say the same. This has not been followed in any of the cases, hence to say that something is a fact, etc. It is really to believe the lie rather than the truth.
Attorney Brynjar Meling's ancestry, I am very pleased with, as it puts both the judgment from Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting out of court.
This writes Brynjar Meling:
Facts of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections in the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling error, provocation and retribution
As stated at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his oppositions had to be subjected to punishment or to be judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the accused's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to withstand in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to provocation and retribution in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward from both sides, it is stated that the grounds of appeal of the Court of Appeal are insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is not sufficient to be able to determine the significance of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
From the majority of the characteristics through which the convicted person has behaved about the conduct of offenders, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's conduct and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be contrary to The word of the bible
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others on such a basis in full publicity in time is even more unusual than simply holding condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such issues are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - may be basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "legitimate misery", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)?
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given the special theological context of both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the ruling grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
(quote ending).
Here is the key issue:
"The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the grounds for the verdict are insufficient."
The verdict from Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagmannsrett builds both the same claim.
That I have written about Jan Aage Torp x the number of times both the one and the other.
Here are at least two factual errors!
  1. It is not at all documented what Jan Aage Torp p to st to r here:
"The circumstances the case applies to blog posts in the period January 2012 to March 2015. Torp has made a record of his posts and found that he has been mentioned in the blog over 3,000 times.His wife is mentioned around 900 times, including her name as a "whore" 167 times. Furthermore, Torp is referred to as an "old pig" over 30 times, "horebukk" over 110 times, "narcissist / narresist" over 30 times, "psychopath" over 200 times and "false pastor / prophet / apostle" over 400 times. The numbers are not contested, and the court is based on the evidence. The court further assumes that this is the total number of times Torp has been mentioned and that the figures need to be adjusted down somewhat to the time period the claim applies. The court nevertheless considers that Torp is featured on the blog very frequently in the current period, that the above characteristics are used frequently. In addition to this, Torp is repeatedly called "leprosy", that he "lives in horror" and is a "horkarl", "self-centered, nasty, rude and narcissistic", that he appears to be "sick, uncontrolled and depressed" that he is "blind and ruled by demons", that he is "an old pig who divorces and marries the nanny just like Todd Bentley" that people like Torp "are not led by God but by their flesh, And that the demons are given free space ", that Torp is a" sick man of power and acts as a reckless psychopath "and that he is a" loser ". Furthermore, the accused stated that "Should I get it if it had helped, I should take my shoes or work my shoes and kicked Hanvold, Torp and all the others in the middle of the step for what they are doing does not bring revival or progress with oneself. But their death and corruption! " Furthermore, he has posted a picture of a pig with wings and wrote that "Picture of pigs that aims at what people call a person marrying a lady who could have been his daughter. This is just an illustration of a relationship where one calls someone to be an old pig, but this is just an illustration. Even pigs can look "holy" but a pig is a pig! ". The above characteristics of the reviewer of Torp are derived from larger text entries that deal with Torp and various Biblical themes. Torp explained that in times it could be as much as 2-7 posts a week about him, while the average has been 1-3 posts. Intensity has increased after Torp reported the relationship in September 2014. Torp further explained that the massive negative mention of him, but also his wife and other family members, has been a great personal burden. "
Almost all of this is manufactured. For example, I have never mentioned his new wife to the extent that Jan Aage Torp claims. And the word horebukk is probably not mentioned, and everything else is only undocumented claims by Jan Aage Torp. Who is as little credible as a person who is notoriously criminal or charged in another way!
  1. What has been written against me and my family is not included. In other words, my verbal patron are as small to firecrackers against what Jan Aage Torp and his henchmen and poodles have come with.
Me and my family have had the last 4 to 5 years to receive anything from either Jan Aage Torp, or his disciples who have allied him.
There Norway's 2 biggest and worst online roles, has been completely fooled by the Apostle Jan Aage Torp.
There have been document fakes, countless personal mail to me, my wife, our parent, employer, my son, and also created my own blog to swear me and my family.
Consider that those who oppose me and the heavenly blog have written about 300 articles against me and my family. Posted somewhere between 20-30,000 hate messages +++ much, much more!
Final Comment:
The judges and the judges Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagret law show zero credibility, integrity and fairness.
Both judgments are based on a "fact" that Brynjar Merling writes as follows: "Whatever has been the extent to which abusive and suspicious opponents of the appellant's verbal assaults have been or what characteristics of the convicted person have had to withstand in return for their verbal attacks against Pastor Torp. »
In other words, here we are at the very core of the matter. And why then this is actually an attack on freedom of belief and expression.
Since the whole judgment against me is fabricated, ugly and shows the dark side of the Norwegian judicial system. That is bad at this point!
When both judges and two different judicial authorities are based on the same thing that has not been debated as attorney Brynjar Meling says. Then the whole thing against me and the heavenly blog will be a fake room! This just does not stand!

onsdag 15. november 2017

No. 1626: When "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp and "Apostle" Jan Hanvold warn against sexual sins, everything appears to be hollow, pathetic and ridiculous as they literally sit in the glue of being reprisaled as believers!

No. 1626: 
When "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp and "Apostle" Jan Hanvold warn against sexual sins, everything appears to be hollow, pathetic and ridiculous as they literally sit in the glue of being reprisaled as believers!
 Picture of Narreapostel Jan Aage Torp who warns everyone against all sins he is able to get on. But his own sin, he is silent about it!




Recently, these two and more others have stood up and warned against sexual sins. Not least this is because younger ladies "use" of sexual "services" to come up and forth in the community and in the workplace they work. Torp warns against other things too, which in themselves are correct. But when he pretends to be a "Christian" leader, shepherd and apostle but lives for the word of God in adultery. Then I really do not realize that more than me react!What is the problem with this? Can not God who is so gracious also accept and forgive someone divorces and marries again as believers?Scripture states that if one is divorced as a Christian, one has two choices. Either agree with his spouse or live single!1 Cor. 7. 10 I give the married, but I do not, but the Lord, that a wife shall not divorce from her husband; 11 But if she is divorced from him, she continues to be unmarried or divorced with her husband-and that a man should not divorce his wife.How long are you bound? Live out!Room. 7. 2 The married woman is bound by law by her husband as long as he lives; But if the man dies, she is loosed from the law that bound her to the man. 3 Therefore shall she be called a whirlwind about her, while the man lives, another man; But if the man dies, she is free from the law, so that she does not become a whore if she owns another man.The one who marries a divorce or is divorced and marries again lives according to God's word definition in hor.Luke 16 18 Whoever divorces his wife marries another woman, he is angry, and every one who marries a woman divorced from her husband is in charge of mischief.A preacher, shepherd or pastor is a model and a pattern for the flock.1 pet. 2 Beware of the flock of God that is with you, and oversee it, not by compulsion, but voluntarily, not for the sake of wickedness, but with willing heart, 3 neither as they that will rule over their churches, but that ye becomes a pattern for the flock;What does the scripture say about a supervisor and preach?1 Tim. 3 2 Therefore, an overseer shall be immaculate, one woman's man, precious, sincere, worthy, hospitable, diligent to teach others,


Final Comment:

 It is unworthy, disgusting and direct in accordance with Satan's will that a permit bears up to proclaim the word of God.It's as we allow Satan to operate freely in the church of God when these people are people who obviously live and walk in the dark!

Related links:

 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1624-jan-aage-torp-makes-case.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1622-torodd-birdsteg-will-appear-on.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1621-fake-smyrna-blog-and-torodd.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/10/no-1619-wizard-and-narrator-jan-aage.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/01/nr-231-pastor-and-apostle-jan-aage-torp.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/04/nr-291-cup-of-coffee-and-two-with_25.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-307-false-accusations-against-me.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/04/nr-284-pastors-and-preachers-who-are-re.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-311-pastor-torp-removed-all-posts.html

tirsdag 14. november 2017

No. 1625: Gustav Adolph Lammers, Norway's "forgotten" apostle who "redeemed" Hans Nielsen Hauge, who lived just before Lammers!

No. 1625:
Gustav Adolph Lammers, Norway's "forgotten" apostle who "redeemed" Hans Nielsen Hauge, who lived just before Lammers!Gustav Adolph Lammers actually has a lot of similarities with me. He, like me, Danish father and Norwegian Mother, had a really good combination.Picture of Gustav Adolph Lammers.




2 Tim. 2. 1. Then you, my son, be strong by the grace of Christ Jesus, 2 and what you have heard of me in the presence of many witnesses, surrender it to faithful people who are also able to teach others! 3 suffer evil with me as a good man of Christ Jesus!1 Cor. 12. 28 And God put in the church first the apostles, the second prophets, the third teachers, the mighty works, the gifts to heal, to help to rule, different kinds of tongues. 29a Are you all apostles?God has undoubtedly raised apostles before our time, even here in Norway.It says in the scripture: "God first put in the church some apostles".I think we can say that more who have gone before us have been apostles. To name a few as Hans Nielsen Hauge, Gustav Adolph Lammers, Erik Andersen Nordquelle, Thomas Ball Barratt, Aage Samuelsen and others.At the same time, I believe that we who are preachers of God's Word have "a little" of all the services in us that God can "bring" into us and it can come to fruition.This I write about here, among other things. http://blog.janchristensen.net/2010/10/nr-22.htmlBut then one has the positive side, God will guide us through revelation. And without revelation, one gets lost. Therefore, both the prophetic gift and the Prophetic service are of great importance and importance.How do these gifts work?The prophetic gift works by the Spirit of God, which communicates to a spirit-filled person who is open and able to be used by God and who desires and wants to be used by the Lord.1 Cor. 12. 4 There are various mercies, but the Spirit is the same. 5 There are different services, but the Lord is the same. 6 There are different powerful effects, but God is the same, He who works all in all. 7 In each one, the Spirit makes itself known so that it is useful. 11 All this works the same Spirit, which divides its gifts to each individual, as he wishes.As for the prophetic service, we read in Ephesus. 4 that the Prophetic service is one of five different ministries given to the congregation.My view of this is that a person who has a cold to work for God who does not necessarily proclaim is a pure Prophet but has part of the Prophetic service as part of his equipment. Some very much others almost not.

This I write about here, among other things. http://blog.janchristensen.net/2010/10/nr-22.htmlBut then one has the positive side, God will guide us through revelation. And without revelation, one gets lost. Therefore, both the prophetic gift and the Prophetic service are of great importance and importance.How do these gifts work?The prophetic gift works by the Spirit of God, which communicates to a spirit-filled person who is open and able to be used by God and who desires and wants to be used by the Lord.1 Cor. 12. 4 There are various mercies, but the Spirit is the same. 5 There are different services, but the Lord is the same. 6 There are different powerful effects, but God is the same, He who works all in all. 7 In each one, the Spirit makes itself known so that it is useful. 11 All this works the same Spirit, which divides its gifts to each individual, as he wishes.As for the prophetic service, we read in Ephesus. 4 that the Prophetic service is one of five different ministries given to the congregation.My view of this is that a person who has a cold to work for God who does not necessarily proclaim is a pure Prophet but has part of the Prophetic service as part of his equipment. Some very much others almost not.For my part, I feel that I have all the five different gifts in my ministry that proclaim, but I am not a distinguished Prophet. It's like it's 1 \ 5 of my gift. But for others, they are both 2 \ 5 and 3 \ 5 prophets.The Prophetic service is very often a part of the equipment one has proclaiming, not all that we see in the GT that some prophets had.I also have a part of the Evangelist, the Teacher, the Shepherd and the Apostle in me.I find that I have some of the services in me, but others have, for example. a lot of the evangelist in it and a little of the teacher in it. And some have a lot of the teacher in them and some of the evangelist. It varies from preachers and in certain situations as needed.We are different but all of us need more of God and the gifts he has laid down in us will serve and further develop to our benefit and the church's development and further guidance in the future.(quote ending).I think Gustav Adolph Lammers was like an apostle for the free-radical business here in Norway - or the layman movement!Here's a little from the Norwegian Norwegian lexicon.Gustav Adolph Lammers, born in Copenhagen, Norwegian priest. As a hospital priest in Trondheim, Lammers was influenced by the gentlemen (Brothers), and as a parish priest in Skien (from 1848) he led a significant revival. In 1853 he founded one of the first indigenous unions in Norway. Lammers became more and more disturbed by the church church practice practice and gained concerns about the absolute and childhood openings;
under the influence of S. Kierkegaards Moment, he cuts his job 1856.

Lammers reported himself out of the state church. He then founded the Free Church "The Free Apostolic Christian Church", which soon became a publisher elsewhere in the country, including in Kristiansand, where the local "The Free Apostolic Christian Church" gained a rather short-lived existence from 1862 to 1874.Andreas Hauge, the son of the more famous Hans Nielsen Hauge, then took over as a parish priest in Skien.Lammers had a short stay in the church, returning to the state church in 1860. Drawing skills and artistic interests gained more space in Lammer's life after this. He also publishes several salmon collections, including Christian Psalm Book (Skien 1852). He rests on Lie Cemetery in Skien.Final Comment:As said, the apostle breaks new lands and abilities to open doors where no one else has done it. Lammers was one of the ability to open up for free business without passing the state church.Apostle means "sending / sending out". The word comes from the Greek word apostolos (απόστολος) meaning "one that is transmitted".The word implies that one has been sent by proxy and acts with authority on behalf of the one who sent one.Paul is talking about making an apostle's sign. In other words, it is somewhat supernatural and especially that accompanies an apostle.2 Cor. 12. 12 An apostle's sign was done among you with all perseverance, both with signs and under and powerful works.There is something special and supernatural that comes with an Apostle.'As well, he has a call for a special deed and task.See here from my Bible commentary Galatians 2. 8 For he who by his power made Peter an apostle for the circumcision, he likewise made me an apostle for the uncircumcised.It was the same God and Lord who had called them both. They stood in an equal relationship with each other and thus complemented each other. I do not think Peter was disobedient, but the task needed to be shared. Therefore Paul became the Apostle of the Heath and Peter the Jews.

Related links:

 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1620-martin-luther-struck-500th.html
 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/10/no-1363-jeremy-hoff-clarification-of-my.html

mandag 13. november 2017

No. 1624: Jan Aage Torp makes the case between me and him as he has the "ultimate" truth, but reality is something completely different!

No. 1624:Jan Aage Torp makes the case between me and him as he has the "ultimate" truth, but reality is something completely different!

 Acts 23 Then Paul stuck to the council, saying, Brethren! With all good conscience, I have led my life to God until this day.24. 16 Therefore, I always make an effort to have an unconscious conscience for God and people.

Through all the things I have written and spoken, I have an unconscious and good conscience when I know that the case against me is nothing more than Christian persecution.Screenshot of Torps writes against me and the heavenly blog.






I will try to make the most objective presentation of what Jan Aage Torp puts out online as if he has the "ultimate" truth.Now I will not go through everything Torp writes, but for example. His last article where he writes about the feud between me and his.Torp writes as I reproduce something of here:https://torpblog.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/trippel-dommen-fastsetter-at-personforfolgelse-og-mengde-mobbing-er-ulovlig-og-straffbart/The Trippel ruling states that "persecution" and "crowd-bullying" are illegal and punishable!On 21 June, the Norwegian Supreme Court rejected the case against a blogger who had been "persecuted" by Aina & me since 2011. He was unanimously convicted on the 25th of January 2016 by Oslo Tingrett for violation of the Penal Code 1902, section 390a, to a fine of 12,000 - twelve thousand kroner, or, alternatively, prison for 20 - twenty days, and further to pay costs to the public by 3,000 - three thousand NOK. On 27 April 2017, this verdict was confirmed - and reinforced - by Borgarting Lagmannsrett. On 21 June, the Supreme Court rejected appeal proceedings. All the bodies were unanimous.The debt issue, the evidence and the law enforcement by the Police and the Public Prosecutor have always been waterproof.Both the term "persecution of persecution" and "bullying-bullying" was introduced in the statements of all 3 judicial authorities, for which we are grateful.We have learned that we will no longer accept bullying, harassment, and persecution of fake actors - neither in 1) anti-Christian forums, or 2) announcements in NRK, TV2, VG, Dagbladet, Our Country & other publishers and media even if untruths and bullying are conducted "indirectly". Persecution, frequent harassment and bullying, and invasion of the private sphere, will be reported and judged by Norwegian law. No one should ever take the chance that we let this pass. Media and publishers must adhere to the decency - and the rule of law.Oslo Tingrett, Borgarting Lagmannsrett and the Norwegian Supreme Court have definitely ruled - once and for all - that persecution is not allowed! The standard is set.(quote ending).1.) Call it a triple-dom is pretty sought after. It's actually misleading to call it a triple-dom. In Oslo district court there was a culprit based on which was somewhat debated. What was most debated was probably the use of law. Something like Meling held tight. When the verdict came, I was actually put out. What had not been the subject of discussion in court, the amount of writings. I was convicted of this, it was without doubt a clear justification that one may be convicted of something that one is not charged with and that has not been the subject of discussion in the court talks.2.) The appeal to Borgarting Court of Appeal was essentially purely wrongful use of law. This is what you can hear here in Borgarting Court of Appeal. There was law enforcement. Look here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnLmUHtMdB8&t=3834sThe amount that I was sentenced to in Oslo district court claims I am here completely, hear from Borgarting Court of Appeal:Even after this I was judged, and still this has not been the subject of discussion. Neither in Oslo District Court nor in Borgarting Court of Appeal. Then one must say that we are in the wrong judgment because it has not been discussed what I have been convicted of.3.) The appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court was a sad affair.Here is the letter written: http://blog.janchristensen.net/2017/08/nr-2048-advokat-brynjar-meling-sitt.htmlHowever, it was not addressed and did not argue why they would not treat this. To act like Torp and call it a 3 x 3 triple room will actually distort the truth.4.) Jan Aage Torp does not mention that it is now for 2 months. since sent to Strasbourg in France where this verdict and case will be finally settled.Only now is the matter in its decisive phase. Everything before this has been as an impediment to what will come down here in France.The Strasbourg court is responsible for all courts in Norway. And what will be the outcome here will be the FINAL!


5.) Jan Aage Torp repeats himself this with "crowd-bullying", this is partly driving readers behind the light when he fully proved does not bring the facts. Agree that there has been a lot of crowd, but that's because Torp himself and his allies have written about me, I count five times more than I've written. And that the police have not investigated anything else and produced what I have written. In other words, the police have also done such a miserable job against me. I would like to compare it with a judgment that could have been in Congo or another country that we consider as undemocratic and which we do not want to compare ourselves with.6.) I actually think what Even Gran wrote about the fake Smyrna blog fits. He has understood why the police are taking me, but nobody else. That's because they've done a mildly miserable job. Gran writes:"Nothing to shout hurts for and there is the matter. The blog that last week attracted many flirting for striking and funny Christianity, who even managed to trick at least one big newspaper, is also ... yes, should we go as far as saying ... a mob blog?Yes, I actually think so. The ridicule, humor, irony and sarcasm used to hit Christensen and the wife in some of the articles are infam. It must also be noted that Christensen, in his monomental condemnation of things that in his mind is not "biblical", is a single victim.The lesson may be that if you want to hang out someone online, you should not, like Christensen, go out under the full name, call out named persons and call them "horebukker", "old pigs" and such. Then you are easy to take and can quickly end up with a judgment in court.Then it's much better to protect yourself from a subtle interpretation of smart humor, satire, sarcasm and irony. That's something that every effective bully knows. Do not pick up people in the schoolyard. Cut a ugly ugly as the victim can not fault and say "you do not understand anything" if you are confronted. Also come with small regular stitches that are difficult to confront, but nevertheless hit without mercy. And if you use the web, you can enjoy the usability of anonymity.In other words, "Smyrna church Oslo" and "Arne Ulf Breen" mean even more than a mobly higher level than Christensen. But I definitely do not think it deserves anything more than such a sarcastic congratulations from my side.Are you so clever that you can write such fun and striking satire as part of what we find at "Smyrna Menighet Oslo", then you should also be so clever that you do not let go of harassing people. "7.) Also, Torp, in the name of Reason, had received several things here. That in the actual review and the sentence was not the amount mentioned. This was something that came into the verdict of Oslo District Court, which nobody was aware of when it was not raised in court that the amount was of crucial importance. I got so far I do not remember any questions about this with quantity. And at least it was not discussed as a matter of fact.8.) The case has been sent to Strasbourg, which will be final and decisive instance. What will be the outcome there will be the final result. This would have mentioned Torp in the name of reason, now I mean, or he leads the readers behind the light!

Final Comment:

 Of course it's easy to be upstairs, so Torp gives an impression of it.But soon, then, he is being treated unfairly, what then?I would, however, take other people's feelings, opinions and views far more in my mind. But it may be because Torp is simply a psychopath that he can not and can, I think so much.But others, they are unfortunately not much better!I think that's sad.If I had or had a fair and fair trial I had congratulated Torp on winning. Do not have any trouble to treat others a victory, but not here when it's actually a justice word!It is sad that he to those degrees does not try to produce this case also seen from my side.In fact, for the first time in 4-5 years, he said something to my advantage and objectively when asked by Even Gran regarding the fake Smyrna blog following:"Torp understands that Christensen reacts to some of what is there, saying that he had reacted very strongly if someone had written an anonymous blog that hung him the same way."

This was actually well done by Torp, that he realized that others than him were hit. Torp is after all self-inflicted, who has chosen to live a life of horror. To me and to others, it is the Christian prosecution that has been completely innocent in this!


Related links:
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1622-torodd-birdsteg-will-appear-on.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/11/no-1621-fake-smyrna-blog-and-torodd.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/10/no-1619-wizard-and-narrator-jan-aage.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/01/nr-231-pastor-and-apostle-jan-aage-torp.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/04/nr-291-cup-of-coffee-and-two-with_25.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-307-false-accusations-against-me.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/04/nr-284-pastors-and-preachers-who-are-re.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-311-pastor-torp-removed-all-posts.html