If Borgating come to an error in law what happens then? Will a decision by the court then could stand? No says lawyer Brynjar Meling!
Facsimile image where mockery apostle Jan Aage Torp writes about this matter that it goes against its end. More errors and misleading can not write.
First, about a good half a year coming up the matter in Borgating Court of Appeal.
The outcome of the case there will determine whether the case is over, then as a tragedy that it is not allowed to write and speak on its own website and blog the biblical truths that God has shown.
But fortunately, I have a good and capable lawyer Brynjar Meling as Jan Aage Torp has bullied and mocked on the Internet and called him all sorts of profanity it is possible to call someone as vile, Mullah Krekar defends +++ much, much more!
This writes the on Searchlight:
Local lawyers Searchlight spoke with say that it is likely that the District Court's judgment will not be enforceable if the appellate court finds that an error in law is applied.
Although the Court of Appeal should not look at the evidence or question of guilt, it is relatively small pieces of matter when Christensen under the District Court's treatment admitted authored blog posts where Pastor Torp was hung out repeatedly on the coarsest.
The most likely outcome is that the District Court's judgment rejected and that the case must be retried, says a local lawyer to Searchlight, Friday night.
(End of quote).
Kjell Andersen writes to me by mail the following:
I sat one day in court with another case, and during lunch break I came into a conversation with a couple of local lawyers, and I mentioned your case and asked a little about what's normal outcome if the appellate court finds that an error in law underlying the judgment. That's when these two came with such an assessment.
I can not give their names when they are not aware that they are rendered public.
Regards Kjell
(End of quote).
I then surely towards a new straight round in court, there Jan Aage Torp hopefully being indicted and convicted of false accusations. When it is my concern about divorce and remarriage as the basis for his fictional review.
And that Torodd Fuglesteg and Ansgar Braut being indicted and sentenced to persecute and harass me and my family, because they have really breaking Norwegian law.
Here's an article I've written about this topic before, and there are several other counterfeit article where I highlights that this is the largest miscarriage of justice if the sentence against me and the Heavenly blog had been standing!
Something I do not think it will appeal hearing in Borgating Court of Appeal will lead to either full acquittal. Or that it is sent back to the Oslo City Court when it is used an error in law welcomed me and the Heavenly blog, Hallelujah!
No. 1219:
That's what Jan Aage Torp has reviewed me for who is a criminal offense, not what he has written about it surpasses what I have written and spoken one ten-fold!
PS! Jan Aage Torp is a criminal because he has done a crime!
He hated my preaching about remarriage, it was his objection against me.
What did he do then? Arranged a fictitious review, and now he has changed it to be not what I wrote. But the amount of what I wrote, why?
As I've written 99 5 after his fictional review then omission of his name, why? Constantly to find a way to get taken me in and closed the Heavenly blog! Jo, Jan Aage Torp is and remains to be a criminal who should be punished for a fake review!
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/05/no-1216-give-jan-aage-torp-little.html
Photo by Jan Aage Torp who makes false accusations against me as it is my view of remarriage that is the "problem". Nothing else when he verbally have gone much, much longer than me to write and speak against me than I of him.
In the Penal Code § 168 states:
"Whoever by false accusation, review or explanation court, Paatalemyndigheden or candidate Public authority or by Mutilation or Away Clean Else af Evidence or Provision af false evidence or mod better Vidende paa candidate Maad seeking that forcing one candidate sigt or Fældelse for a strafbar Action or as accessory thereto, shall, if there are traded on a crime, with Fængsel from 6 months indtil 8 Aar and, if there are traded for a Misdemeanour, with Fængsel indtil 4 Aar. "
Here it is as Jan Aage Torp has done, and enticed the police and the courts to achieve this:
From VL: - What do you expect from Christensen, Torp? - I expect that he erases everything that he has written about all, I'm going to address to Google and request that they remove all this material from their search engine. But then there must be a final judgment. (End of quote).
Jan Aage Torp has called me for the ugliest, the ugliest thing. Blue. I'm Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer, supporter and fan. Hehe, it's so far from the truth it is possible to get, but it is his false accusations that are criminal. He has reviewed me to achieve that I should stop preaching against remarriage and mentioning him as a person who is an adulterer according to God's word.
Receives inquiries asking why I believe that as Jan Aage Torp has written and spoken about me is not punishable. But what I have written and spoken about him is punishable. For it is only to say that I look at nothing of what Torp has written about me as a criminal offense, although he surpasses me a ten-fold.
It's his review of mine who is a criminal, as there are false accusations. He builds his review of a thing, but it is to achieve another purpose which is the goal. Therefore he instructs both the police and everyone else, that he should have a judgment to go to google with. Then there's my preaching against remarriage which he hates, and it is actually on the English blog that he dislikes the strongest, the he has a hatred which is huge!
Jan Aage Torp has falsely accuse me as it is my view and preaching about remarriage that is the "problem". Not what I have called him or anything else, which surpasses he me many times. The review is fictional as it is to achieve something quite different than what he says. He lies and manipulates. Notice that he is now concerned only with one thing, the same as Polti. It is that I have not written and spoken anything criminal, but it is the quantity of it all. This lie is Torp, police now completely agreed. But that said, crime is at in my and many others' assessment.
Final Comment:
In this article it was only to clarify what I've reviewed in January Aage Torp, it's false accusations. Not what he has written and spoken about me if it is inferior and totally out of berry-picking.
This stands in judgment:
The defendant has further explained that Torp has been at least as bad in their characteristics by him and his family, and ascribe Torp statements made under other names, possibly pseudonyms, and statements on a blog defendant calls "the false smyrnabloggen". The false smyrnabloggen should be created in the defendant's name, but the defendant denied he was behind it. Torp has denied that he has written about the defendant under a pseudonym, or on the false smyrnabloggen. Torp has acknowledged that he has black defendants, and called him "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer" twice, that the blog is "idiocy", on one occasion referred to him as a "demon" called him "bright liar", the blogs of defendants is "shameful" that the defendant is a "rumor spreaders", the defendant has "lack of insight in English and Norwegian," that he is "naughty", "wicked and stupid" and that the blog is "a variant of social pornography."
The court believes after an overall assessment that it is not reasonable to award Torp pecuniary damage. The Court points out that Torp have contributed to escalate and prolong the conflict by his statements about the defendant and that he spent partly rough characteristics of the defendant himself. Court refers here also that he on several occasions has called him a Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer. Furthermore Torp aware that he is a familiar figure in the Christian community, and he has more followers who spins further on his statements and forward for sometimes coarse and insulting statements against the accused and his family.
Torp's behavior has probably helped to escalate and prolong the conflict, but this came as a response to the defendant eventually extensive writings about Torp and his spouse. The court has the assessment assumed that Torp as a public and prominent person in Christian-Norway have to endure more than a normal person would need. It must, however, a limit also for what public figures must tolerate, as the court thinks is violated in this case.
This, Jan Aage Torp written about me in many different forums and websites.
"Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer."
"Should they wanted a" dream opponent ", as Jan Kåre Christensen" perfected ".
Furthermore writes Torp like I'm dirt, stalker, totally unintelligent, a Nolde "hat blogger", idiot, demon, fancy lies, vile blogs, outcast who lack the mind of Christ, common judgment and social intelligence. The rumors JKC and the truth is his understanding of English and Norwegian rather limited too!
I get knocked on the low level JKC acting on .... "
About the Heavenly blog, "which is confused, cruel, vicious and stupid - through and through. It should be shut down, in short. He also writes this about the Heavenly blog: "Jan Kåre Christensen developing Heavenly blog!"
One should probably be able to call it a variant of social-pornography "+ Much, much more!
Related links:
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/05/no-1207-it-is-my-death-is-jan-aage.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/05/no-1207-it-is-my-death-is-jan-aage.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/08/no-1013-false-apostle-and-fool-tag-jan.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/06/no-979-jan-aage-torps-new-law-lost.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/06/no-977-arvid-bentsen-sick-because-he.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/04/nr-279-christian-people-of-norway-are.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/12/nr-152-dead-david-wilkerson-before-time.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/09/nr-60-david-wilkerson-died-tragically
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar