Nr. 67: Godhead!

Nr. 67:

Godhead!

The basic text says in the Greek and Hebrew spelling: holy spirit, note the spelling, lower case and without the personal pronoun in front.
It is a Catholic addition to that it would vote with the Emperor Constantine's trinity doctrine that he got through when the church was an institution and not a living church and the church of God.
The church should be truth and support the foundation. Constantine was an idolater all his life and used the church as a vehicle to retain its political power and to keep the Empire together. (The Roman Catholic Church was at first more uniform, first in the year 1054 it was divided between east and west.) Pope was the emperor when the Roman Empire went under, but the papacy grew strong and had power over Eastern Europe until 1054, ie Papacy survived the Roman Empire as a power factor. Yes, in fact up to the present time, the Catholic church considered the largest and most influential Christian community.
From early on it began a few ultra-special Christians to claim the Trinity doctrine, but they were a very few souls. When the first Christians were mostly Jews who did not believe in a trinity, and they won for the gospel was the same faith and doctrine. 1. and 2 generation of Christians had the same faith and teachings, even if the 2nd generation Christians were largely Gentile. It was in the 3rd and 4 generation of Christians that this delusion mind asserted itself. That Paul had also predicted would happen that apostasy would come, and new and unbiblical teaching would gain a large following his death, including Trinity, church hierarchy, eternal fiery hell, purgatory, prayer for the dead and saint worship etc.

When it comes to female elders and pastors, it has actually been unknown up to the present time, but now are also Christians who may be gay and lespisk reached. You have to back to the ancient pagan and Babylonian religions to find female priests, gay and lespisk who were involved in idolatry and the Trinity originates from the ancient pagan religions. This is apostasy ripe for Judgement, when all the apostate churches and congregations to go into the great whore described in Revelation 17-18.

The Holy Spirit is not a person, it is found out by allowing God's words speak for themselves. Not more difficult than that.

1) The Holy Spirit is not mentioned in scripture with their own name when he is God's power!

2) The Holy Spirit is not self-will, as he takes from Christ and giving to us!

3) The Holy Spirit is "Jesus." When the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Jesus Christ!

4) The Holy Spirit is part of God the Father, God the Father is Spirit!

5) God will you worship, but never the Holy Spirit when he is neither God nor a person.

6) The Holy Spirit has always been with God the Father because he is Spirit.

7) After the resurrection Jesus was the Spirit of the Father to give it to us.

8) We will never meet the Spirit in the sky as a separate person, but be filled with the Spirit where we need it here. (Then we'll all be Pentecostals in the heart).

9) Protestants can not explain about the Holy Spirit, therefore, one must only believe even if one can not explain and understand.

10) Catholics are slightly better, they can neither explain this, but they call it a mystery that they can not understand but must accept.

11) We can experience the Spirit, he is part of God and God is Spirit and it is through our Spirit and His Spirit, we humans can and must communicate and have fellowship.

12) Many have target vessel ran rejected the Trinity, but it has not been noticed.

This was a short twelve points which I will briefly explain a little about and around.

1) A person without a name, I will not believe is a separate person, but the Trinity asserts the opposite, just like Jesus, only the teachers do it.

2) We read through all of Scripture that the Holy Spirit acts as a servant when he never has its own will and agenda, but does it all as Christ and God the Father wants. God's Spirit is omnipresent and seems that he has come to, but forcing himself never on and forward. Ergo, the Spirit is God's power, wisdom and the way he, the Spirit of God, communicates itself to us.
Joh. 4:13 p.m., but when he, the Spirit of truth comes, He will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself, but what he hears, he will speak, and the things to come he will tell you. 14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and preach unto you. 15 All that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I that he shall take of mine and declare unto you.
Everyone has a spirit, but we humans can not send our spirits away, but it can Jesus and the Father as they are unlimited in time, space and place. Spirit's own will is not its own, it's Jesus and the Father's will. God's holy spirit is like a servant who is sent in God and Jesus' ministry. Why should not the Holy Spirit is worshiped, but the Father and the Son. We should not ask or command of the Holy Ghost but only in Jesus' name.
We receive the Spirit when we are obedient, Spirit pulls away when we are disobedient. It's like when we follow traffic rules, it goes well for us when we obey traffic rules and poor when we do not follow them.

We believe that the Spirit has a will and his own agenda when we read in 1 Cor. 12 on gifts. But we must understand it so that the Spirit knows the secret of human beings and, therefore, he shares out the gifts that fit best for us, not those we think we necessarily need and even want to have. We can not build a doctrine on one scripture, but on what scripture says overall about one thing, otherwise we come into the same errors as the Trinity and Jesus Only doctrine is built on!

3) We read in the commission of the Norwegian Bible is mistranslated concerning baptism, following. Matt. 28. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in as the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. But we read that the early Christians baptized people always to Jesus Christ. Spirit is linked to Christ in the New Covenant as he in the old covenant was linked to God the Father. We must also remember that the Spirit is in all the Bible stated that God's Spirit and the new covenant, it emerges that he is Jesus Christ's Spirit. The basic text is the following: Matt. 28. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in as to the character of God. It is the same as Paul says in Colossians. 2. 9 For in him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily. Who are all linked up to? Jesus, therefore baptized the first Christians that Jesus taught and said.


Here are the passages that show in the name of the first Christians baptized:
Ap.gj.2.38. Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, every one of you, that ye may receive forgiveness of sins, and ye shall receive the Holy Ghost.
Ap.gj.10. 48.Så he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to stay with them a few days.
Ap.gj.19.5. After hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord.

4) God is Spirit and God gives us of his Spirit. Ergo, the Spirit is part of the Father himself!
Taking a bucket of sea, so it is just as much left in the ocean, the ocean contains far beyond what we can understand with our intellect, likewise it is with God and his spirit, it is infinite. Pure Mathematics is the world's oceans a limitation, but God has no limit.

5) We read through all of Scripture that one should worship God the Father and of the new covenant we find that Jesus also worshiped after the resurrection when he has a name that is above every name because redemption work. It is a fact that the worship of the Holy Spirit was first introduced soon after the council of Sardica, 343 AD Otherwise discussed Catholics who they would take up in the Trinity if they were to take Mary and the Holy Spirit. The problem was that they could not accept a woman in the Trinity, so the choice fell upon the Holy Spirit. Then the Holy Spirit from being God's Holy Spirit to be a person of the Godhead. Mary was later taken up by the deity in the 1950's. For Catholics, there are 4 persons in the Godhead when Mary also born without sin and have eternal life in him just like Jesus. There is an errant teaching that we should not go more into here right now.
In addition, Pelle Karlsson was the one who introduced the worship of the Holy Spirit and prayer to the spirit when he visited Hedmarktoppen in the 70s among Pentecostals. Charismatics have then hung up. Before that it was unknown territory to pray or worship the Holy Spirit among Protestants. It was seen as Catholic delusion, but now they are united on this because they believe in the same unbiblical doctrine of the Trinity as a leader in the occult and into demonic activity!

6) God is Spirit, and on that basis it is fair to say that the Spirit has always been with the Father as a part of himself.

Joh. e. 4 24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.

For it is plainly written in John 4 <24 that "God is Spirit" and just as that: "Lord, it is the Spirit and where the Spirit is, there is freedom" cf. 2 Corinthians 3:17, This means that the Spirit is associated with God as part of the Eternal One's overall personality next to the person of God who bears the name the Father and the Son. Similarly, one can say that God is Love, God is Consciousness, God is peace, God's Wisdom and God is Truth. God "Is" ie their qualities and character .. and "have" not just as his creatures. 7) Labor. Acts. 2. After the 33 he is now exalted at the right hand of God and of His Father has given the Holy Spirit of promise, as he shed it like I see and hear. After Jesus had risen, he was put back into the position he had before he became a man, if not even more glorious! 8) In heaven we will never meet the Spirit, but God will be all in all. In what way? By that we are more filled with the Spirit than ever, be you sure, Hallelujah! 1. Cor. 15. 28 but when everything subject to him, then shall the Son even submit himself to him who put everything under him, that God may be all in all. We read that the Spirit came upon Jesus in the form of a dove, and on the day of Pentecost as tongues of fire over the disciples. Ergo said the Trinity teaches that the Spirit is a person. This is not a person to do, but a sign to outsiders that God is at work on a supernatural way and sanction it with a character that was there and then. For example those who feel the Spirit baptism experience no tongues of fire that often, but it was the one time to make it known that it was the Spirit come to all. And when the Spirit came upon Jesus, was the first and last time that the Son of God came down to this earth to live a faultless life in our place when he met the statutory requirements and bids for our sins and died a death in our place. 1. Cor. 14. 22 So then tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers; the prophetic voice is not for unbelievers but for believers. Joh. e. 12 28 Father, glorify your name! Then came a voice from heaven: Both, I have glorified it and will glorify it again. 29 people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered: others said it was an angel spoke to him. 30 Jesus answered and said: Not for me came this voice, but for your sake. We see that God reveals himself sometimes as a character and to do to know that now is something quite extraordinary. 9) Protestants are generally more extreme than Catholics when it comes to learning issues. Their views on the Trinity is romantic and the occult! 10) Catholics who introduced the doctrine of the Trinity has also held onto some of the original vision of the Godhead when they learn that the Holy Spirit is the bond of love between the Father and the Son, but they can not explain this with the Trinity, therefore, they do so to a mystery that they do with most of what they can not explain the Eucharist, etc. 11) We humans are different from animals, plants, etc. when we are spiritual beings and that God has a spirit that God has so we can communicate, share community and fellowship in a completely different plan than what God may be with all of His creatures. 2. Cor. 13. 12. "The Lord Jesus Christ, grace, love of God and the Holy Spirit, be with you all." Psalm 8 6 And you made him a little lower than God, and honor and glory kronte to him. 7 You made him ruler over your hands, everything is put under his feet, 8 sheep and oxen, all together, yes, even the wild animals, 9 birds and marine fishes, all that travel on the ocean paths. 10 O Lord, our Lord, how wonderful your name is above all the earth! Filip. 2. Is it any consolation in Christ, there is some love husvalelse, it is something spiritual community, there are some compassion and mercy, 12) There are many over the centuries who have rejected the Trinity, but with the totalitarianism of which in many ways Christianity is, it's not always easy to stand for truth and are easily seen as abnormal. Isaac Newton was one of them and was aware that God is the source of all truth, and in accordance with the profound awe he had for his creator, it seems that he spent more time searching the true God than to explore scientific truths. A survey of all that Newton wrote, shows that of about 3.6 million words were only 1 million spent on scientific topics, while about 1.4 million was spent on religious topics. In his writings, Newton occupied much of the Trinity doctrine. One of his most important contributions to biblical investigation at the time was his work of AN. Historical Account The smaller part of this thesis was consecrated 1 Tim 3: 16 that reads (according to the King James Version): And indisputably great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached among the Gentiles, believed in the world, interested in glory. Newton showed how it was made a little change in the Greek text. The word God was inserted and the sentence would read: God was manifest in the flesh. He pointed out that they had no knowledge of such a change. Because the text is that Christ revealed in the flesh, who is Christ, the Anointed Messiah. Why public did not Newton this while he was alive. The time may explain this. Those who wrote against the Trinity was still persecuted in England. Those who did so could be punished by losing their work or imprisonment. A publication that attacked the Trinity was seized and burned by order of the house. An 18-year-old student who was accused of denying the Trinity was hanged in Scotland. This happened in the 1600s. When Newton studied a doctrine, he is always the Bible be the touchstone. Newton made this clear when he discussed the church's confessions: It does not require us to accept them because of church meetings authority. Although the councils have failed and may fail in matters of faith and what they have adopted as necessary to achieve salvation is without power or authority if it can be proven that it is taken from the Bible. As another argument to throw Trinity said Newton: the doctrine that the Son is consubstantial with the Father is incomprehensible. It was not understood at the Council of Nicaea, and it has not been understood since. Newton therefore found him on the basis of biblical evidence, logic and the authentic teachings that were preached in the early Christian period, he could not accept the Trinity. He believed firmly in Jehovah God as the supreme overlord and recognized Jesus Christ position of either compromising him as God's son or to elevate him to the position of his father meant. It is clear what conclusion Newton is going to and it is shown always clear from his writings how he looked at the relationship between the Father and the Son. Another place he says, therefore, that prayers should be directed to God in the Lamb's name, but not to the Lamb of God's name. Leo Tolstoy was so frustrated treenighetsdogmets lack of rationality, he rejected it. That should any other thinking people also do, neither the words Trinity, triad, or anything that indicates that God is three or three or three to a stand in the font, but that God is one. Who is the only true God, which they learned and improved knowledge about the dispute. But it's not as difficult as the Word of God provides a unified and very simple answer to this, especially in the New Testament. There is only one God, Father, no one, not even his son is that the Father when Jesus has a beginning which is not God the Father has. Without the Father had been nothing, not even the Son Jesus Christ, therefore Jesus says it again and again that the Father is greater than me, and not the opposite! This is just a short little snippets that show that the whole doctrine of the Trinity and Jesus only doctrine is a worm works and that has its origins not in the word of God but in pagan religions and church meetings and by what it has become a common Christian faith, I think of the Trinity . But the truth is that training doctrine is that Jesus only doctrine, doctrine of demons that come from Satan himself who wanted to be God Father. Discard the Trinity and all the other teachers that do not correspond to the Scriptures, it is my recommendation and wishes to you dear friend. Act now before it's too late and always up for those who stand before the Lord and learn the truth of God's word. Newton believed that I believe God is everywhere - he represents the space and the time we exist in. I think it's a bit silly when some claim that the Holy Spirit is a mystery, and often it is a mystery, but one must still be allowed to debate and examine what Scripture says and former ministers claimed and what the early Christians practiced and preached ang . this mystery. Why tolerate the not to hear others' research and why they can not themselves also examine carefully about this and other mysteries in the Bible but just dismiss that? When they do not know themselves, then they should either close his mouth shut and let others know something more be allowed to communicate God's truth! Otherwise, this whole God really not that hard, we had not had a 1700-year obfuscation and distortion of the truth when it comes to such an important and simple question that goes to God and the Godhead! The early Christians debated hotly and thoroughly regarding Christian issues and teachings of the Bible and why should not we do it today, perhaps it is even more important today when the writing has been so tampered with and many Bible verses have been so mistranslated that one can hardly understand what exactly is the meaning of the word. It's scary and it is very important to be aware of this. I have in my time in the Pentecostal movement, for example. never heard preaching why the early Christians baptized in the name of Jesus and why we should not follow this, and regarding the Trinity is never taken up scriptures that speak against this doctrine, just, etc. etc. 5. Genesis 6 4 Hear, O Israel! Lord our God, the Lord is one. The correct translation is: Hear O Israel, Jehovah is their God and he is a unit. Who is this unit? Father and Son, and they have a common spirit that because the text is not printed with the personal pronoun in front, but the following holy spirit! With great consternation, one must see the hazy mystery people have done to God. Trinity doctrine does not come directly from the Bible. Although Luther had to admit it. How came this doctrine come from? There is certainly no secret. In the book "Who's Who in Church history" we read that the church in Alexandria, Egypt, and through the alexandrinske church fathers were a mix of Hellenistic philosophy and Christianity as they took in both Plato and Aristotle teaching. Both lived in pre-Christian times. The story of this is well documented. Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullian is considered treenighetslærens father and the first, of God, used the Latin word, Trinite. He lived from year 160 to 230 But he also believed that Jesus was the Father and that there was a time when the universe was created alone, and since then created a son. This Trinity's father would today be considered a false teacher of Trinity teachers. None of the apostles knew of the Trinity. It was thus more than a century after they were gone. Trinity was contradicted by four successive bishops of Rome, and the strange is that all these belong to the Catholic Church calls "the papal succession." It is Eleutherus, Victor, Zephyrinus and Calixtus. Tertullian himself said that most believers in his time were shocked by his speech about three in one. Cf. "AntiNicene Church Fathers" 3.bind: "The winds that constantly against us that we preach two or three gods, while they consider themselves to be those who worship one God." This was 150 years after Paul, and still believed the majority of the believers in the Jewish understanding of God, and thus rejected the Trinity and attacks Tertullian. And it is because these teachings are not from God's Word, but from Greek philosophy and mysticism. It is because of his own defenders called a mystery you can not understand. Through four Church Councils, Nicaea in 325, Constantinople in 381, Ephesus in 431 and Chalcedon in 451 men of the church tried to find out who Jesus really is. And from these came the trinitarianske creed that is handed to us. The entire profession is a theological, pagan, philosophical and grammatical stew. But this was associated with a curse, a Anatema clause: "Whosoever will be saved must think thus about the Trinity." Immediately thereafter, the executions of those who did not think so. Something that the Catholic church and other institutional indices of churches and congregations have always done. Today there are no executions, but a strict embargo and censorship line against those who are clear that God is not three but one. And this one God has a son who is a Spirit, referred to in scripture as a Spirit who is holy. Therefore it says about the Holy Spirit following the basic text and holy spirit. Why not stick to the script and let all the fables, Synod doctrines and everything else go away and let go? It is just wonderful and delightful if you ask me! After studying this, I bl. a discovery of many Adventists think straight about this in the beginning of the Advent movement. Here is something from net: One of many quotes from a famous adventistpioner may be one explanation for why many of today's Adventist ministers now accept the Trinity dogma: "Trinity-advocates big mistake when they argue that the theme is: They do not see any of the scales on it to deny the Trinity and denying the divinity of Christ ... and they take every expression that refers to Christ preeksistens as a confirmation of the Trinity. Scripture gives a lot of documentation on preeksistens Christ and his divinity, but is completely silent regarding the Trinity. " JH Waggoner, Review and Herald, November 10, 1863. During prayer to God and enlightened by His Spirit, was the first Adventist led to rediscover a number of important biblical truths of God's people had to accept in order to preserve the end-time violent religious deception and apostasy. These messages may be served on the Reformation back to the Scriptures could be completed. This is the message that is equally relevant to both Christianity for the unchurched. The same depth Bible studies, heartfelt prayers and love to God's revelation, which led the pion viewers to discover the Biblical truths of the Reformation had overlooked, led them to reject the Trinitarian dogma, which they did not find any biblical evidence. None of the present adventistteologer know some of these pioneering did not know, it is rather the opposite. Adventistpioneren e.g. White puts it neatly and easily in one of his many statements about the relationship of Christ to his Father. "The man Christ Jesus was not the Lord God Almighty." (Ms. 150, SDA Bible Commentary Vol 5, p. 1129. (Translation: "Man Christ Jesus was not the Lord God Almighty.") Pioneers accepted problematic scriptural teaching that Jesus, the Son of God, both were and are just as divine as the Father, that he was the Son of God from eternity and that he should be worshiped. They saw him as a savior from sin, that he was equal with the Father, and therefore can carry the title God, as the name of the Father is in him, and that he is exalted and given all authority in heaven and on earth, and that he is this creator of the world, without even being created. They considered not of God and the Spirit of Christ, the Holy Spirit, which is only an impersonal and neutral force. While they were thus sparkling clear that the trinity dogma represented the unbiblical teachings and was an artificial philosophical explanation that contradicted a number of biblical statements. Present verdict from some of the Adventist leader layer in Norway, however, is the pioneer founders were wrong in terms of its rejection of the Trinitarian dogma. This criticism affects adventistpionerer known as James White, Joseph Bates, John N. Andrews, JN Loughborough, Uriah Smith, J.H. Waggoner, S.N. Haskell. Roswell F. Cottrell, John G. Matteson, Alonzo T. Jones, of broken and J. Waggoner, WW Prescott, James E. White, William C. White, MC Wilcox and several other of the Advent movement's early leaders and pastors. The book "The Tidehverv", published in the second edition of the Adventist Church in Norway as late as 1960, written by Adventist TS Valentine, includes a solid review of the Adventist Church's former teaching. The book shows natural NOK a clear faith in Christ preeksistens and deity, but of course, gives no indication that the author believed in or were forced to believe in the trinity dogma. This doctrine was in fact not part of our society's belief system at the time. We do not ignore the fact that Pastor TSValens position also applies to a number of Norwegian Adventist who proclaimed after World War II. Due to the mentioned learning change would probably not one of them was allowed to stand on a adventisttalerstol today. The following well-published statement from adventistprofessor George Knight may be an example of these consequences of this theological turnaround. Pastor Knight teaches at Adventist theology seminar at Andrews University. The quotation is taken from the magazine "Ministry", which is the official journal of the Adventist Adventist. This claim is not only an individual random interpretation of the theology of change effect, but reflects an attitude and action decisions that are now filtered down to all management levels in the Adventist Church. Professor George Knights observation: "Most of the seventh-day Adventism's founders would not have been able to become members of our church today, if they had to accept our church community's fundamental beliefs. In particular, the majority could not agree on religious point No. 2, which deals with the Trinity dogma ". Ministry, October 1993, page. 10. We note that some Norwegian adventistledere is far more authoritarian approach to the topic, in that they forbid people to be baptized, to be members and be able to stand in our pulpits if they do not accept this new belief change, even if people accept and live by all the biblical truths Adventist otherwise stand for. In order to push this new doctrine into the Adventist faith, some managed to find a couple of statements from the pioneer Ellen G. White, who with strong motivation and liberal orientation, can be interpreted to approach one of treenighetsdogmets reflections. These quotes have been with us all the time without being considered to open the door to this doctrine, and do it then either. You have to actually "run downhill" through both the Bible and EG White's writings, to avoid information that makes the Trinity dogma unacceptable to Adventists. Alpha and Omega apostasy. In 1904, writes e.g. White that is revealed from God to her that before Jesus comes again, will take place an eerie apostasy among Adventists. What she calls the "deadly false doctrine" (eng: "deadly heresies"), would be introduced and accepted. She saw that people would stand in our pulpits (read: allowed and approved to stand there, since no release of the Adventist pulpits before their doctrine is approved by management), with Satan's false preaching torch in his hand, and that books would be written among us, as advocated unbiblical teachings. She called this end-time apostasy for "Omega apostasy", and pointed out that in the case and the content was linked to a theological apostasy which took place on her own time, called "Alpha-defection", and that had to do with a false learn about the deity published in the book "The Living Temple" written by Adventists, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg. Get Adventists have obviously studied the problem of Dr. Kellogg's divine teachings, and therefore has not seen his pantheistic ideas are anchored in his published confession that he had begun to believe in the trinity dogma. The deity theology Dr. Kellogg advocated, was naturally NOK violently opposed by EG White, and she got from God to know that a similar mistake would be repeated in the future all of these, "Omega-drop" and that it would do enormous damage to our church community. She writes that she trembled in despair when it was shown her. We're a few hundred Adventists in our country, and probably many tens of thousands worldwide who feel the same way, since we unfortunately have to realize that this is expected and prophesied apostasy no longer belongs to the future. In order to provide historical background to the topic, we choose to include in this article some quotes from Ellen White said. New light can never compromise with the former God-given biblical truths. Trinitarian dogma does just that. Some statements from the pioneer e.g. White. "Satan is working with men in senior positions to eliminate the foundation of our faith. Brothers! If we allow this to happen? "Manuscript 125, 1903, the Review and Herald, vol 4, p 578 "Let the pioneers identify the truth. When the power of God witness what is truth, then this truth forever remain as a truth. No later assumptions, as opposed to the light God has given, must be accepted. Some will come forward with interpretations of Scripture that they consider to be the truth, but that is not, "(Preach the Word, p. 5, written in 1905, also reproduced in two Counsel Writers and Editors, p.31-32 .) "The main points of our faith that we currently hold on, was built on rocky ground. Point after point was clearly identified and all the brothers agreed. Our members were united in the truth. There were some who came with strange doctrines, but we were never afraid to meet and oppose them. Our experience was a wonderful way confirmed by the revelation of God's Spirit. "(EGW Manuscript Releases vol. 3, p. 413 - written in 1903.) "As a nation we must stand firm on the platform of eternal truth which has withstood all tests and examinations. We must hold fast to the sure pillars of our faith. Truth principles that God has revealed to us is our only solid foundation. These truths have made us the people we are and the elapsed time has not reduced the message value. "(EGW Special Testimonies, Series B, no. 2 p. 51, written in 1904, also reproduced in two Counsel Writers and Editors, p. 52) "Not a single line of truth that has made the seventh-day Adventists to what they are, must be weakened. We have received the truth landmarks, experience and responsibilities and we must stand firm in protecting our principles ... "(EG White, Testimonies for the Church, volume 6, p. 17, written in 1911.) "God has given me light about our magazines ... He has said that the dead will speak. How can that be? In their efforts to follow them. We must repeat the pion's words in our work, those who knew what it cost to search for hidden truths and to work to lay the foundation for our faith. They moved forward step by step under the guidance of God's Spirit. One by one, these pioneer founders laid to rest. The message was given to me: Leave these men have written be reproduced ... Let the truths that are our foundation to be kept alive for our people. " Related link: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/09/nr-43-is-holy-spirit-person-or-part-of.html