No. 1647: The case between me and my wife and the Oslo Municipality is clearly a spiritual battle between good against evil and truth against lies!

No. 1647:

The case between me and my wife and the Oslo Municipality is clearly a spiritual battle between good against evil and truth against lies!

Here is the picture of our plot that PBE wrote in 2011 had a level difference of 5 meters.
Ergo, then our wall is not as illegal as PBE claims.
When they fantasize, lie and have built a narrative that our plot is flat.
The entire agency is very sick.

Let's go to the Master himself, Jesus. Look at the treatment he received.
Then you get a look at how the spiritual battle most often takes place.
History will always repeat itself.

It is this property that PBE claims is a toad flat.
Everyone can see that they are lying!
The level difference is 5 meters, and thus they are exposed as the liars, deceivers and crooks that they are!

We read in the scriptures that Jesus meets unjust people

1 Cor. 2. 6 We speak of a wisdom that is mature, and not of the wisdom of this age, or of the rulers of this age, for they are about to perish.
7 We speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom, which was ordained before the world unto our glory.
8 Which none of the rulers of this world understood: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
Acts 1:11-13. 3. 12 When Peter saw this, he responded: “Men of Israel, why is this surprising to you, as if you thought that by our own power and piety we had made him walk?
13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus, whom you delivered up to Pilate and denied in his presence, so that Pilate condemned him to death.
14 For you denied the Holy and Righteous One and asked for a murderer to be granted you.
15 And you killed the Prince of life, whom God raised from the dead, of which we were witnesses.

It was unrighteous men who crucified Jesus!

No other ancient trial is as well-known as this one.
The four Gospels, tell in detail what happened when Jesus Christ was arrested, tried, and executed.
(The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.)

There are several reasons for this: Jesus said to His followers were to commemorate his death, which greatly increases the significance of the trial that led up to it. We should also know whether the charges against Jesus were true.

At the time of Jesus’ trial, the Romans ruled over Israel. They allowed the Jewish religious leaders to judge the Jews according to their own law, but it seems that they did not give them the legal authority to execute criminals.
In keeping with this, Jesus was arrested by his Jewish religious enemies but executed by the Romans. His preaching and countless miracles, healings, and casting out demons.
Yet, he did not deny that he was the coming Messiah and redeemer.
This made the Pharisees and scribes furious, hateful, and jealous.
So outraged were the religious leaders of the day that they decided that Jesus must die.
They wanted it to appear as if he was executed in accordance with the law and justice.
A A law professor who analyzed their efforts to achieve this goal called the whole affair “the darkest crime known in legal history.”

One Offense After Another

The Law that Moses gave to Israel has been called “the greatest and most enlightened legal system ever put forth.”
By Jesus’ day, however, rabbis who placed excessive emphasis on laws and regulations had added a host of unscriptural rules.
Many of these were later recorded in the Talmud.
To what extent were these Biblical and unscriptural laws and regulations followed in the trial of Jesus?
Was Jesus arrested because two witnesses in a court of law had given consistent testimony about a specific crime?
For the arrest to have been legal, that had to have been the case. If a Jew in first-century Israel believed that someone had committed a crime, he presented his accusation to the court during regular court sessions.
The courts could not bring charges, but only investigated the truth of the charges brought before them.
The only accusers were those who had witnessed an alleged crime.
A case was brought to trial when the testimony of at least two witnesses to the same act agreed.
Their testimony constituted the accusation, which then led to an arrest. It was not permissible to convict a person on the testimony of just one witness. (Deuteronomy 19:15)

In the case against Jesus, the Jewish leaders simply sought “to see how they might do away with him.”
He was arrested when “a convenient opportunity” arose​—at night and “when there was no crowd present.”​—Luke 22:2, 5, 6, 53.
When Jesus was arrested, there was no charge against him. The priests and the Sanhedrin, the Jewish high court, tried to get witnesses only after he had had been arrested. (Matthew 26:59)
They were unable to find two witnesses who would come forward with consistent testimony. But it was not the court’s job to get witnesses. And “to bring a man to trial, especially with a demand for the death penalty, without first stating the crime with which he is charged, may rightly be considered scandalous,” he said lawyer and author A. Taylor Innes.
Those who arrested Jesus took him to the house of the former high priest Annas, and Annas began to question him. (Luke 22:54; John 18:12, 13)
This was a violation of the rule that capital cases should be heard during the day, not at night. Furthermore, the facts should have been brought out in open court, not behind closed doors.
Jesus, aware that Annas’ questioning was illegal, replied: “Why do you question me? Ask those who heard me what I said. Look! They know what I said.” (John 18:21)
Jesus did not remain silent, but he answered correctly. Of course, this was completely overlooked, since the hatred against him was so intense. Everything that was according to the Law and for Jesus’ benefit and favor was neglected.
Annas should have questioned the witnesses, not the accused. Jesus’ remark might have moved an honorable judge to consider proper procedure, but Annas was not interested in what was right and proper.
Hatred dominated the entire trial, and no rules or laws were followed.
Jesus’ response resulted in him being struck in the face by one of the officers, and he was subjected to even more violence that night. (Luke 22:63; John 18:22) The law recorded in Numbers chapter 35 regarding the cities of refuge shows that a defendant awaiting trial was to be protected from mistreatment. Jesus should have been given such protection.
Those who had taken Jesus captive now led him to the house of High Priest Caiaphas, where the illegal nighttime trial continued. (Luke 22:54; John 18:24)
There, in complete violation of all legal principles, the priests tried to obtain “false testimony against Jesus in order to put him to death,” but they could not find two witnesses who agreed on anything Jesus said. (Matthew 26:59; Mark 14:56-59)
The high priest then tried to get Jesus himself to say something that would prove him guilty of a crime. “Do you not answer?” he said. “What is it these witnesses are bringing against you?” (Mark 14:60)
This tactic had no place in a court of law.
“To ask such a question of the accused and then to base a conviction on his answer was a violation of the formal rules of the law,” says Innes, quoted earlier.

The assembly finally seized on a statement Jesus made.
In answer to the question: “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” Jesus replied: “I am; and you will see the Son of man sitting at the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven.” The priests interpreted this as blasphemy, and “they all condemned him to death.”​—Mark 14:61-64.

According to the Mosaic Law, trials were to be held in public. (Deuteronomy 16:18; Ruth 4:1) But here everything took place in secret.
No one attempted or was allowed to speak in Jesus’ behalf.
There was no investigation into Jesus’ claim to be the Messiah. Jesus was not given the opportunity to call witnesses to speak in his defense. There was no peaceful and orderly vote among the judges on the question of guilt.

To Pilate

Since the Jews apparently did not have the authority to execute Jesus, they took him to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor. Pilate’s first question was: “What accusation do you bring against this man?” Knowing that their false charge of blasphemy meant nothing to Pilate, the Jews tried to get him to condemn Jesus without further investigation. “If this man were not an evildoer, we would not have handed him over to you,” they said. (John 18:29, 30)
Pilate rejected this argument, so the Jews were forced to make a new charge: “We found this man subverting our nation and forbidding the paying of taxes to Caesar and saying he himself is Christ a king.” (Luke 23:2) So they cunningly replaced the charge of blasphemy with a charge of treason.
The charge that Jesus “forbade the paying of taxes” was false, and the accusers knew it. Jesus had said the exact opposite. (Matthew 22:15-22)
When it came to the charge that Jesus was making himself a king, Pilate quickly realized that the man before him posed no threat to Rome.
“I find no fault in him,” he declared. (John 18:38)
Throughout the trial, Pilate was convinced that Jesus was innocent.
Pilate first tried to release Jesus by allowing him to benefit from the custom of releasing a prisoner at Passover.
But Pilate ended up releasing Barabbas, who was guilty of sedition and murder. —Luke 23:18, 19; John 18:39, 40.
Hatred for Jesus led the Jewish people to be misled and led to participate in the most heinous crime of all time. A robber and murderer was set free. But the Savior of the world was handed over to die for our sins.
Rom. 4. 25 He was delivered up for our offenses, and he was raised for our justification.

Jesus was judged as a lawbreaker—even though he was completely innocent!

 

 The Roman governor then tried to free Jesus by resorting to compromise.
Jesus was scourged, clothed in purple, crowned with thorns, and beaten and mocked.
Once again, Pilate declared Jesus innocent.
It was as if he were saying, Is this not enough for you, priests?
Perhaps he hoped that the sight of a man badly maimed after being subjected to the scourging of the Romans would satisfy their thirst for revenge or appeal to their mercy and conscience. (Luke 23:22) But it did not. Their hatred trumped everything, and here it was literally darkness that prevailed, as Jesus himself said.
John 9:4 I must work the work for which I was sent while it is day, for the night is coming when no one can work.
“Pilate [continued] to seek to release [Jesus].” But the Jews cried out, saying, ‘If you release this man, you are not Caesar’s friend. Everyone who makes himself a king speaks against Caesar.’” (John 19:12)
The emperor at that time was Tiberius, who was known for executing those he considered disloyal​—even high-ranking officials.
Pilate was already in a tense relationship with the Jews, so he could not risk further friction, much less the accusation of disloyalty.
The crowd’s words contained a veiled threat​—blackmail—​and Pilate became afraid. He yielded to the pressure and had Jesus, an innocent man, impaled/crucified. —John 19:16.

Assessment of the Case

Many legal experts have analyzed the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ trial. They have concluded that it was a farce, a pure parody. “That such a trial should be commenced and concluded and the verdict formally pronounced between midnight and the following morning was a violation of the forms and rules of the Hebrew legal system and also of general legal principles,” writes a jurist.
A law professor says: “The entire proceedings were marked by such gross illegalities and such obvious irregularities that the result cannot be considered anything other than a miscarriage of justice.”

The case against me and my wife has striking similarities!

Where the authorities are playing a game of scheming, pretending to follow a law they completely neglect and reinterpret clear instructions as suits them.

We have also been subjected to a conspiracy, miscarriage of justice, discrimination, injustice and abuse as Jesus was. Of course, Jesus was subjected to far greater and worse abuse than we were. But the principles and the same Satan and unjust people are of the same type and bad character.

What we did was right in one and all.
While the Oslo Municipality and the authorities have made all the mistakes and abuses that are possible.
Where they shift the responsibility and mistakes onto me, but it is the Oslo Municipality and the authorities who lie, distort the facts.
Keeping hidden what is to my advantage and favor.
What is to my disadvantage and hindrance, is blown up beyond recognition!

1.) When we were guided how to build. My then case manager does not remember the phone calls. That is of course a lie.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2023/02/nr-3175-hva-skjedde-i-de.html

2.) We have a wall that fits perfectly into the terrain and keeps mold and dirt away from the roadway. The environmental benefit is great, but this and everything that is to our advantage and benefit. Is completely, completely overlooked and not commented on.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2022/04/nr-3008-vart-skriv-til-plan-og.html

3.) Our shed is to be demolished as it is a minimal excess of 3 sq m. The shed is 11 sq m. So not meeting us is a major discrimination in relation to everyone else who gets exemption and approval compared to us up to 60 times.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2024/03/nr-3355-at-det-er-nesten-ingen-som.html
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2023/11/nr-3301-oslo-kommune-som-er-ansvarlig.html

4.) Our staircase is 100% on our property. Even then we will not get it approved.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2023/09/nr-3273-det-er-direkte-lgn-at-var-tomt.html

5.) PBE has kept it a secret and will not address the fact that we do not have a flat plot as they have claimed. But the level difference is a full 5 meters, which means that we are allowed according to PBE's own regulations. To have a wall approximately the one we have of 1.8 meters. We almost have a legal wall. And have sent a compromise proposal that we do not get a response to.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2024/12/nr-3433-etter-plan-og-bygningsetatens.html

Final comment:

To believe that the authorities are not in some cases like bandits and thugs to be considered.
Then you have not learned much?
As for Jesus, he was subjected to the greatest and worst miscarriage of justice in the history of the world.
As for our case, this is of course a trivial matter compared to what Jesus had to go through.
But still, still.
It is at least an abuse of power that we have experienced!
Our case is ongoing, so in this sense one cannot yet predict what the whole thing will end up with?
Personally, I believe that we will ultimately win our case.
And get the redress we are entitled to.
Time will tell, it will be exciting in every way.

 

We live in Norway, and PBE operates as an agency in a closed country that will not answer legitimate questions.
The case here is very different from when we started.
In the beginning, there was only one argument I had and understood.
It was that Kaja Aubert Lange guided me how to build.
She countered this by lying that she did not remember.
Then I had to read up.
I quickly realized that we were being treated differently.
Afterwards, I found out that we were allowed to have a wall of 1.5 meters, ours is 1.8 meters.
They are making what I see as illegal decisions to the Debt Collection Agency and the Bailiff to extort money from me, which is downright disgusting to act in such a way.