All that I have been in contact with give a coherent testimony that I will be acquitted. Whether now in court, but guaranteed in the Court of Appeal!
Lawyer Brynjar Meling says it bluntly, that either I become 100% exonerated now. But surely the Court of Appeal when the things which may create problems for a 100% acquittal, they know we possibly weed out. And that the things that the police prosecutor had to come by all this we will document does not match at all!
This says Media law Attorney Jon Wessel-Aas when he asked in Our Country as essentially absolves me 100%. Which also will certainly happen now on Friday the 29th of January when I get the verdict. Everything else will be and be a big surprise acquittal than 100%.
But it should not be there, then it becomes an appeal to the Court of Appeal. And if we lose there, then it becomes Supreme Court. And on to Strasbourg, which I do not think we will ever need. But give me? Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The criminal here is Jan Aage Torp, we receive come back to.
This says Media law Attorney Jon Wessel-Aas in Our Country:
Media law Attorney Jon Wessel-Aas reacts to violation of Penal Code Section 390A 'for the troublesome behavior or other reckless behavior to be violating another's peace "underlie the case against Pastor Jan Kåre Christensen.
- I can not comment on details of the case, but I think in principle that it is specifically that this clause is used, because we are talking about the remarks in a blog. Christensen seeks therefore not Torp by phone, text message or otherwise directly, but writes what he thinks of him as a pastor in the blog. It lies outside the core area that provision, says Wessel-Aas, stressing that he only knows the case through circulation in Our Country and by reading the indictment.
Wessel-Aas points out that the aforementioned provision of the Criminal Code since ancient times has been called "telephone harassment law."
- It is clear that bullying and harassment in social media over time can do that people can not bear to be there more. But I still think it is important that the Court did not expand penal provision to include too much. There is a point to be as specific as possible when to restrict freedom of expression through legislation, says Wessel-Aas.
Statements such as "living in adultery" makes it more natural to use defamation law, says the lawyer. Defamation is decriminalized in the new Penal Code and can therefore only be the basis for civil action. It seems more relevant in this case, according to him.
- I think there is danger if clause of the Penal Code will be expanded by adding something that is no longer a crime, says Wessel-Aas.
Public person. - What impact can an eventual judgment make?
- If there is a punishment in line with the indictment, I believe much more can be judged the same way. It will make the limits of free speech little obvious, which in turn can lead to people avoiding expressing themselves, responding Wessel-Aas and points out that whatever is provision for protection against false accusations, violations of privacy, threats and incitement to violence .
Wessel-Aas points out that Torp is a familiar figure in Christian-Norway and largely in the same position as many politicians.
- The room must be greater when it comes to statements about public persons.
Christensen disagrees with how Torp practice the relationship between life and doctrine, that his interpretation of biblical texts, highlighting Wessel-Aas.
- Also there will be great headroom.
(end of quote).
Final Comment:
Brynjar Meling said at least five things for me to be acquitted. It was this:
1) Incorrect application of the law, this section has nothing to do with harassment and this as the police claim.
2.) Jan Aage Torp has even gone much, much further than Christensen in their statements with, inter alia, calling him too many ugly and terrible things, and his blog, he has condemned in the most crudest and violated Christensen.
3.) Torp has encouraged nettrolene to continue with flaming of Christensen, when he himself has been silent.
4.) Torp has sought out MY BLOG THAT HE COULD dissociate themselves from SINGLE NEVER clicked on IT! What I have done him no a violation of § 390 a. One can not use a § as a self-will, then we are North Korea or Saudi Arabia.
5.) Christensen has used only the Bible and Canaan language, it is not punishable, but legal.
6.) The sixth and final point that I would mention, there came the lawyer to Torp, police prosecutor who changed almost 180 degrees during the trial. From being challenge negative to me, and be fighting posetiv. He, Dag Paulsen said Christensen has not written anything illegal. I've really only hurt feelings Torps something very when he himself has chosen to click onto my blog!
Bring to end an article I have written before the trial which is a home run:
No. 932:
I do not really up through preñar ran after I became a believer and started following God's word carefully. Always experienced resistance. But simultaneously, I think I can say that by and large it all I have turned the other cheek and overlooked things were!
Photo by psychologist Jan Atle Andersen who has a teaching that goes on is not what is said, but how we deal with it is being said!
I am opposed to report people as God's word discourages this, God will "run" our cause and are the judge. Simultaneously we believers have a internal justice where we rectify such things. Then there are usually always more a spiritual conflict than what one sees with the naked eye. But as if unwillingly can review and if there are of course some very criminal acts etc.
I've heard so much about me, not least in the recent past by Jan Aage Torp and website Searchlight. Including I'm a demon, false prophet, needs treatment is retarded, has asparagus syndrome, heresies, vile blogs, like lies, soon convicted and imprisoned, stalker, looks retarded, have the treatment, dangerous, suffering from a mental disorder, lacking empathy and so much else it will take too long time to mention more.
How do I respond? I try the individual statements, and ask me, it is no substance in it. All this is mentioned here is not it, therefore I am not characterize this at all!
I've heard a psychologist Jan Atle Andersen, who is very much instructive to tell us.
What his teaching including going out is not what is said, but how we deal with it is being said!
I've heard him on P2 radio program Echoes where he has said a lot well, and have read a bit about him in retrospect. Here is some of what he has responded during an interview:
- When I get such messages, I'm glad I've learned to not let me violate words, says Andersen bt.no today.
The major points to Andersen that victims can be violating the bully.
To reduce bullying, one early teach children to take responsibility for themselves and their own reactions. Children must also learn that words can not hurt, stab or kill. To believe otherwise is pure voodoo, says Andersen.
"Missing Link"
- I had expected a lot more pepper than I got for these bogs. Surprisingly, many have given me support, says Andersen.
- What feedback did you get?
- Some believe my way of thinking is a kind of "missing link" in bullying. Some believe this is the way to think about the future, says Andersen.
But Andersen has also received harsh criticism. A teacher asked Andersen be quiet.
"Bullying leads to anxiety, depression and suicide. There is a reason that voodoo works. Use your words to encourage, assist, rose, guiding - or be silent »
- Some of the messages have been full of invective, often from people who say they have been victims of bullying. They react in affect and it is like it is the problem. They let themselves violate without've been meaning from my side to violate them. They have not learned to take responsibility for their own feelings. It is not I who irritates them, but those who irritates herself, says Andersen.
- What feedback have you gotten from the professionals?
- There is very little support. I have been accused of saying this to get around PR person. I rather think that they are talking about themselves, says Andersen.
- You've got some requests from victims who have told their story. What impression do you?
- I think that there have been so terrible many unnecessary tragedies. I answer most of those who have approached, if not too many epithets involved. My view is: If I show compassion victim, so I pickle them into victimhood. If I say they must find the way out of victimhood, so they experience it as offensive, says Andersen.
- What about those who are not able to travel out of a possible role of victim?
- The best we can do is to teach them to take responsibility in their own lives, but it's easier said than done, says Andersen.
- They let themselves violate without've been meaning from my side to violate them. They have not learned to take responsibility for their own feelings, psychologist Jan Atle Andersen
Discussion with Bekkemellem
Saturday was the psychologist in radio debate with Karita Bekkemellem in connection with its initiative. The former Labour minister has previously emerged in the media and told how she was bullied by established AP women when she came as a young 24-year-old to Parliament.
- But Bekkemellem have a pretty strong story about how she should have been frozen out of a pretty snappy woman group in labor. What should she have done in such a situation?
- Short and sweet not care about what they said. People are responsible for their own emotions. I do not think it is necessarily true that the ladies of Labor was necessarily so grisly that Karita want it to. From my experience as a conflict advisor in working life, I have never experienced a situation with many villains that goes against an innocent victim, says Andersen.
- As a rule, a person who is in conflict obtained both one and two and three yellow cards before the red coming, says the psychologist.
General believes Andersen that most people being thrown out of a party or a workplace, has contributed itself to the situation they have landed in.
- I do not think jobs are full of psychopaths. When one gets collective reactions, so one has very often contributed yourself, either by act or disloyal challenged norms. Very often due to the whole lack of social intelligence, says the psychologist.
Chauvinistic hersketeknikk
Even says Bekkemellem to BT that she reacted strongly psychologist Andersen appearance in the radio program.
- I want me frabedt that I provoked. He must endure counterarguments to his vision. Claiming that I obviously provoked is nothing else than chauvinistic hersketeknikk says Bekkemellem.
- It's okay that he said anything about my background, but I reacted strongly to the signal power in that one from his profession go out and portray it as if victims can be blamed for what they are exposed to, says Bekkemellem.
She says she has been faced with many declarations of support for their radio meeting with the psychologist.
- Facebook wall mine is full of greetings, she says.
- Makes himself a victim in life
Andersen also come with several comments about Christian Democrat former deputy Inger Lise Hansen.
- Generally, I think that whoever takes responsibility, strengthens itself. Whoever blames others, weakens himself and making himself a victim of life. After 26 years as conflict treat, I've yet to hear a man say "I've got myself into a conflict with someone at work. I wonder if I might have listed me stupid. Maybe I should go and ask someone excuse "
- It is always "the others" who are to blame, says Andersen.
(End of quote).
Final Comment:
2 Cor. 6. 3 We do not give people any reason to be banished so the service be not blasphemed. 4 No, we show ourselves as servants of God in every way: with great patience in adversity, distress and anxiety, 5 under reproaches, in prison and in riots, in hard work, in watchings and hunger. 6 We go forward with integrity and wisdom, with patience and kindness, in the Holy Spirit, with sincere love, 7 with the word of truth and power of God, with righteousness weapon in right and left hand, 8 in honor and dishonor, maligned and honored . They say we are leading people astray, but we speak the truth, 9 we are unappreciated, yet recognized, we are dying, and behold we live! We are beaten, but not killed, 10 we mourn, but is always happy, we are poor, but making many rich; we have nothing but possessing everything.
11 We have now spoken outspokenly, Corinthians. You have large room in our hearts. 12 Ye have not cramped with us, it is in their own heart is tight. 13 But I speak as to children: Do return! Open yourselves to us.
What is it really apostle Paul says here? Key phrase is in the middle here:
"In honor and dishonor, maligned and honored. They say we are leading people astray, but we speak the truth, we are unappreciated, yet recognized, we are dying, and behold we live! ".
As Christians, not least as a public preachers, we must assume that this is "normal". Experiencing honor and dishonor, not everyone will like us. Maligned and honored, Jesus heard both hosanna and the crucifixion, so it probably will be for us too!
They say we are leading people astray, but we speak the truth. It will never be "in" to be a true preacher of the Word, the resistance will many times be greatest from the so-called believers.
We are unappreciated, yet recognized God recognition and pleasure is more precious and important than human praise and recognition.
We are dying, and behold we live! We die away from our own, and this world. More and more we become liberated, happy and alive. There is pain and through the pain we will experience our greatest triumphs and what lives within us is revealed and it arrives!
So never let what other people think and control you, or me. But what God's word says, and what lives in our hearts, follow you and careful to have a clear and clean conscience! Then we will have victory, even more than victory is the Lord's words and promises of the Lord to us!
Acts 23. 1. Paul looked straight at the Council and said, "Brethren, with quite good conscience I have lived my life for God until today."
Rom. 8. 31 What shall we then say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us? 32 He that spared not his own Son, but gave him up for us all, he can do anything other than to give us everything with him?
33 Who can accuse them God has chosen? God who acquits. 34 Who then can condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died, yes, more than that, he stood up and seated at God's right hand, and he prays for us. 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Distress, anxiety, persecution, famine, nakedness, danger or sword? 36 As it is written:
For your sake we are killed all day long,
We considered slaughtering sheep.
37 But in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither that which is in the high or in the deep, nor any other creature, shall able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar