Picture of my excellent lawyer Brynjar Meling.
There has basically been a dirty "campaign" against me from Torp, the police and the courts. The justism of times is no doubt what I am convicted of not participating in the trial or discussed in court.Besides that, the code of law used against me is an abuse.Section 390a of the Criminal Code "for the occasional occurrence or other reckless conduct of having violated another's peace." I have never been close to breaking when I have never bothered Torp. He has been looking for me, he has searched my blog and else what I have written and spoken.In other words, this is an abuse of Norwegian law, only to get me.Therefore, we must make it clear that the "campaign" against me from the narrator Jan Aage Torp, the Manglerud police chamber and the courts here in Norway is nothing more than Christian prosecution. Without this element, this case had never been relevant. That's the only reason to get me is that I keep the word of God, and I'm also hated, disgusted and lied.Disputing!What has been written in this case, when the amount comes from a long word shift. Der Torp, the Searchlight, the False Smyrna blog and other actors have been writing to me for years. As I have largely responded to the heavenly blog. This is so far from section 390a of the Criminal Code "for the purpose of acts of unlawful conduct or other reckless conduct to have violated another's peace." It is possible to come, this law I am convicted of.Listen to Brynjar Meling's speech in Borgarting Law of Appeal, where he clearly indicates that this statute has never been violated.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnLmUHtMdB8&t=5108s
The Justism of Time!1.) What I am convicted of never stood in the trial.2.) What I'm convicted of has never been discussed in any court in Norway.3.) The Act of Penal Code, Section 390a of the Criminal Code, "for the purpose of acts of unlawful conduct or other reckless conduct to have violated another's peace." Speaking of completely different things than I have done. I have never sent an SMS to Torp, have never sought him at meetings or private. The man I do not even know where and is not interested in either. The man I do not know about and never threatened or cursed him. Only written on the heavenly blog largely. Never ever written on Torp's many websites, not sometimes as far as I can recall. But he searches me, not least online where he can not get "enough" of me. Repeating me repeatedly, it is he who seeks me, I never him.
Final Comment:Ends with an article written a few years ago, which is as current today.
- Brynjar Meling is a conscientious man, therefore I am convinced that his fronting that it is wrong lovanv ending that is used against me.
- He has f to tt full st ø support of many, including media law judge Jon Wessel-Aas.
- A dvokat Brynjar Meling who in my opinion have been used by the Oslo District Court and Court of Court of Appeal to make it look nice, although they have kept us for fun.
- After the session the Court of Appeal, cutting ø nth Brynjar Meling that we were f carr ied behind "the light" and wrote a too crass appeal letter to Norwegian H ø Supreme.
As stated at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his oppositions had to be subjected to punishment or to be judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given that the special theological con text is both convicted and insulted?
- Øystein Hermansen, Malin Str ø mberg Amble and all other judges holding really Brynjar Meling and me for a fool. Then I can not say that it was Meling's mistake that we lost. They left Meling mess for several hours, totally dribbling in what he says. What I say is blaming all the judicial authorities in.
- It is lawyer Brynjar Meling to take care of the appeal and, if necessary, continue negotiations with the Strasbourg Human Rights Court.
As said, one can not blame a man for whom the court has held "breath."