Climate change is a cycle that follows the earth and that God allows evil because man is great!
The researchers sent a large satellites into space. They measured different temperatures, but scanning time was not set and thus the earth was warmer then it some measurements were day, other days night. When it was colder. For several years this was enacted and read. To a doubt began to look at the data and found out quickly that the change was human invented. This is the closest we get that climate change is man-made and that scientists make mistakes, then everything is wrong. When this was discovered, he found out that the removed (as usual). But those who believe in this nonsense, got a raise of the United Nations, talk that the world will be deceived. In this building sits people who live by the people behind the light, and unfortunately, the world will be deceived. There's only one way out of this, as the prophet Amos says:
Amos 4:12 Therefore will I do unto thee, O Israel, so as I have said. And because I will do this unto thee, to do thee, prepare to meet thy God, O Israel!
United Nations building in New York
When it comes to this, so it has not been allowed to disagree with the "elite". Is it is both ignorant and worse. But who is ignorant? There are those who can not tolerate and will hear other opinions and views by heart even become angry.
There have always been changes in weather, climate and temperature. For about. 1000 years ago it was just hot in Rogaland where I come from, that today in Northern France. And in Greenland they once also grew potatoes, talk about climate change.
Do not debating this for ages. But much of what we see happening is also something God does when we turn away from him and to his enemy Satan. I do not know everything, but what I do know. That God has promised his blessing upon us as we seek Him and live according to His word and will. The Word of God speaks of this earth is under the curse after the fall. One thing I will mention in this article, regarding the major and devastating tornadoes that plague the United States. I ask why? Now I have heard that there are Indians who live in this area and they are doing large-scale avgudspåkallelser there for a long time at this time of year tornadoes insert. Does this have any connection can be questioned. I think so. We do not play with principalities and powers. Only by invoking the living God who created heaven and earth and pray to him in the name of Jesus, we can know that we are on safe ground. It is also the only safe because we can stand on in the universe. Everything else is dangerous ground and we will sink.
Rooms. 8 19 For the creature longing and a desire God's manifestation of the sons 20 creature was made subject to vanity - not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same - 21 in hope that the creation itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the children of God glorious liberty. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and travail in pain together until now.
Here is something I have scissors neat. It does not have anything to argue against these climate scientists even if they do not have a single incontrovertible evidence for his claims.
I have to save the environment as possible, but it is primarily because we humans can have very good when we take care of each other, ourselves and nature.
Time after time, as the word of God warns us that the majority could be wrong, but the minority has the right, so also here. It does not help that 97% of scientists say that this is manmade. And the remaining people doubt. Who is right? Let's take an example from the word of God: 2 Chron. 18th 1 Jehoshaphat had riches and honor. Joined affinity with Ahab; 2 and some years later he went down to Ahab in Samaria, and Ahab hath killed sheep and oxen for him and the people that were with him, and he urged him to go up against Ramoth Gilead . 3 And Ahab king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, Wilt thou go with me to Ramoth-Gilead? He replied: That you, as I, and as thy people, my people - we will be with thee in the war. 4 And Jehoshaphat said unto the king of Israel: Search dog first to know what the Lord says! 5 Then the king of Israel gathered the prophets together, four hundred men, and said unto them, Shall we go to war against Ramoth Gilead, or shall I forbear? And they said, Go up; God will deliver it into the king's hand. 6 But Jehoshaphat said, Is there not here any other prophet of the Lord, that we may inquire of the LORD Council of him? 7 king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat, There is yet one man by whom we may inquire of the LORD council: but I hate him because he does not prophesy good concerning me, but evil all his days, that's Mika, Imlah son. Jehoshaphat said, Let not the king say so! 8 Then the king of Israel called one of the courtiers, saying: Make haste and Micaiah, son of Imlah! 9 Meanwhile, the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah, in royal robes, each on his throne, in a void place in the entrance of the gate of Samaria: and all the prophets before them and uttered their predictions. 10 And Zedekiah the son of Chenaanah made him horns of iron and said, Thus saith the LORD, With these shalt thou push the Syrians, until thou have consumed them. 11 And all the prophets prophesied so, saying, Go up to Ramoth Gilead? Thou shalt prosper thee, and the LORD shall deliver it into the king's hand. 12 And the messenger that was gone to call Micaiah said to him, prophets with one mouth good for the king, therefore let your words also match their predictions and well! 13 Micaiah said, As the LORD lives, what my God saith, that will I speak. 14 When he came to the king, the king said unto him, Micaiah Shall we go to Ramoth Gilead, or shall I forbear? And he said, Go up; So shall ye prosper you, and they shall be given into your hand. 15 And the king said unto him, How many times shall I adjure thee that thou shalt speak to me other than the truth in the name? 16 And he said, I saw all Israel scattered upon the mountains, as sheep that have no shepherd: and the LORD said, These have no master: let them return in peace, every man to his house 17 Then the king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, Did not I tell thee: He predicts no good concerning me, but evil? 18 And he said, Therefore hear the word of the Lord! I saw the Lord sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing on his right and left. 19 And the Lord said, Who shall entice Ahab king of Israel to go up to Ramoth Gilead to his death? and one said so, and the other saw. 20 Then a spirit came forward and stood before the LORD, and said, I will persuade him. And the Lord said unto him, Wherewith? / 21 He answered, I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. Then the Lord said, Thou shalt entice him, and thou shalt also prevail: go out and do so! 22 Behold now, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee. 23 Then came Zedekiah son of Chenaanah forward and struck Micaiah on the cheek, and said, Which way went the Spirit of the LORD from me to speak unto thee? 24 Micaiah said, thou shalt see on that day when thou shalt go into an inner chamber to hide thyself. 25 And the king of Israel said, Take Micaiah, and carry him back to Amon the city centurion and to Joash the king's son, 26 And say, Thus saith the king, Put this fellow in the prison, and feed him with bread of affliction, until I catch come in peace again! 27 Micaiah said, If thou return in peace again, the Lord has not spoken by me. And he said, Hearken, all ye people! 28 Then went the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah up to Ramoth Gilead. 29 And the king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat, I will apron me and then go into battle, but you take your normal clothes on! So the king of Israel disguised himself, and went into battle. 30 And the king of Syria had commanded the captains of the chariots shall not be contrary to them, neither small nor great, save only with the king of Israel. 31 And when the captains of the chariots saw Jehoshaphat, they said, This is the King of Israel. And they surrounded him to fight. When put Jehoshaphat cried with a great cry, and the LORD helped him; God turned them away from him. 32 For when the captains of the chariots saw that it was not the king of Israel, that they turned back from pursuing him. 33 And a certain man drew a bow at haphazard and hit the king of Israel between brynjeskjørtet and armor. And he said to his chariot man, Turn and carry me out of the army! I'm hurt. 34 And the battle was becoming harder that day, and the king of Israel joined himself upright in the cart against the Syrians until the even: and at that time the sun went down, he died. What we learn here? That was a lying spirit that made them so unanimous, so I think it is also the focus of this climate it is man made, I think that something is man made. But that in the whole earth is his own cycle being followed and what is out there. Is much p.g.a. human sin and anything that makes a lot going on with nature that does not always completely normal. Or is it normal? Nature awaits the children of God redemption and the coming glorious 1000 year kingdom with Jesus Christ as the future regent out of Jerusalem and Israel!
Here is something from net:
The school tier on natural climate change
Natural climate factors are virtually silent in death in school climate education, writes Erik Bye and Eystein Husebye sr in this feature article.
Here we see this CLIMATE booklet in a wider perspective, to elucidate the consequences of lack of knowledge dissemination in school textbooks. Climate Paperback - insufficient CO2 descriptions We are told that we are now experiencing dramatic'' anthropogenic climate change'', implied, caused by the greenhouse gas CO2. Students are not told that CO2 - content in the atmosphere is as low as 0.04 percent, that this gas is not a contaminant and that it is necessary for all life. At this the only 3 percent man-made, that is 0.001 per cent of the content in the atmosphere and that the rest of it comes from the nature itself. This is information that inquisitive learners will appreciate. Influence of this gas on the greenhouse effect? No proof of this exists even for those periods of Earth's history when detectable CO2 levels were higher than today.
In a letter to the editor of Bj. Nofseth Aftenposten 3 December 1938, we read about the dramatic climate changes, with green fields in December, plowing in February Hallingdal (sleeps with.), winter temperatures on Svalbard 7 degrees C (annualized over 3 degrees C) and large seas without drift. We think that this is the dramatic climate changes, but they are not mentioned in the principal Hælbeks climate issue. The reason for this may be that these climate changes were scarcely human. In 1930 the world population was about 2.5 billion at today's 7 billion.
Temperatures
In our feature article states that during the warm period of 800 - 1350's and the Little Ice Age from about 1400 til1800 temperatures were about 2-3 degrees higher, respectively lower than today. The formulation was probably a bit unlucky because the parameter temperature often varies rapidly with time and place.
A journey in January 2011 from Bergen Flesland to showed variations from - 8 to - 22 oC. Other times shows NRK / Yrs maps almost equal temperatures along the coast, from Hammerfest in the north to Stavanger in the south. The best thing here is enough to introduce climate zones horticultural use for planting flowers and shrubs. Settlement in Greenland was only possible under the hot climatic conditions of the Middle Ages, while the little ice age caused the closure of farms upper Gudbrandsdal and Eastern Valleys. In Northern Norway was farming changed in favor of livestock because grain harvest occasionally failed.
Extreme values and statistics
A postulate is that there always comes a day we get new heat, cold, rain or flood records - where time is of course dependent on the reference temperature, precipitation record etc. This creates obvious problems for many climate scientists and also for Hælbek. Often omitted references to the heat Ages and the Little Ice Age - periods with obviously more drastic temperature variations than those we have experienced in the past 100 years. In those times there was no significant anthropogenic CO2 emissions as climate must obviously have been influenced by other factors. But such is excluded in climate models researcher created.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
The UN panel established under the auspices of WMO (World Meterological Organization, Geneva) and representatives appointed by the respective national governments. Here emphasis is not necessarily academic knowledge, reflecting that the UN is a political organization and does not have supranational authority. The latter requires that the IPCC reports and recommendations must be based on consensus. This is not easy, as large meetings in Copenhagen and Cancun to the fullest demonstrated. IPCC's latest report has received much criticism, obvious errors, omission of key scientific works and conclusions on declining terms. Not particularly surprising, because the UN is a political and not a scientific organization, and thus not based on academic excellence and integrity. (For your information, one of the authors (EH) has 15 years experience as a participant in a United Nations expert group).
Climate research - dance around the golden calves state
Climate research is still popular among many politicians, which in turn has resulted in major funding for such activities. The result is a significant expansion of organizations and activities in this area. We can mention: Cicero, Bjerknes Centre, Nansen, Bellona, Zero and several nature conservation associations. The latter is now medically climate anxiety, with the diagnosis of "patients" in Finnmark. Since these organizations are primarily funded through state grants, competition from other researchers undesirable, cf. statements by President Paul Presterud Cicero NRK P2, Culture News 10.12.10. In other countries such as the United States, much of climate science based on state contributions. But in Norway is relatively strong political guidelines for such funds. The objectivity that sought in the research is not good enough prevalent among funding agencies. These factors explain part of the comprehensive climate disinformation going on.
Most of the natural disasters should therefore caused dramatic, human-induced climate change and said instruction booklet is a good example of this. Environment Minister Erik Solheim still takes the "cake" in this context. On Dagsnytt 18, 16.3 in year he stated'' we will see more tsunamis in the future as a result of climate change.'' It is almost inconceivable that such nonsense can be conveyed by a minister of the environment. Anthropogenic climate change - Fiction or Fact?
Climate scientists have long operated a persistent campaign based on the assumption that the current global warming destroys the world we know. Today, the strategy changed. Now it says anthropogenic climate change likely in view of the cold winters we have had in Europe, North America and Siberia. Although changes in lemming populations on Hardangervidda, see NC Stenseth in Today's Market, 03.12.11, and in oceanic minke whales attributed to changes in climate - a sort of scientific "open sesame". Serious researchers are concerned with the source, which is the number of people on earth because after all causes CO2 emissions. IPCC and climate scientists in general are concerned with the number of CO2 molecules, because the population explosion is taboo as a topic in many countries.
Pupils in primary schools understand that the amount of water needed in an area of 100 million people is different from that needed for the 200 million living in the area. Similarly, in case of natural disasters, the economic damage from an earthquake fifty years ago was considerably less than an earthquake today, with greater population density, many costly installations like nuclear power and assets - as demonstrated by the disaster earthquake off the coast of Japan 11 March.
Indoctrination to state control
Rector Hælbeks climate issue fits well into the pattern we have in this country and elsewhere in the world when it comes to global warming. There is a deep indoctrination of climate in schools. One of us (EB) knows the Tellus 10 used in secondary school course "Climate Wise" led by dr.gradsstudent Siri calves, as well as textbook Nexus 1Vg, used in high school. Along with the booklet mentioned in this chronicle, Tellus 10 that we've written about in Education No. 13.09 and the course material discussed in Dagsavisen 01/20/10, this shows that climate education in Norwegian schools is far from any knowledge. It is more characterized by indoctrination based on a one-sided view of climate and climate change. Now the closest to the natural climate factors silent in death. Critical thinking In this perspective: How be it the students' training in critical thinking? Where are the rivers opportunities to develop the ability to consider multiple sides of an issue? The considerable uncertainty associated with the models IPCC bases its predictions is also sometimes very strongly communicated. Where are the students' challenges through knowledge, to be able to manage complex risks in the future? We'll probably even accentuate that with the development of society as we see today, there is a growing need for good and objective of education minded people in schools. The new generations must be able to remain independent and critical of the many initiatives in newspapers and other media, as we are confronted with daily. We need active participants and not passive spectators indoctrinated!
The school tier on natural climate change
Natural climate factors are virtually silent in death in school climate education, writes Erik Bye and Eystein Husebye sr in this feature article.
The article our 7 March referred principal Hælbeks issue: CLIMATE. Everything is connected to everything, and is intended for use in secondary school. Response to the Science readers has been overwhelming. Here we see this CLIMATE booklet in a wider perspective, to elucidate the consequences of lack of knowledge dissemination in school textbooks.
Climate Paperback - insufficient CO2 descriptions
We are told that we are now experiencing dramatic'' anthropogenic climate change'', implied, caused by the greenhouse gas CO2. Students are not told that CO2 - content in the atmosphere is as low as 0.04 percent, that this gas is not a contaminant and that it is necessary for all life. At this the only 3 percent man-made, that is 0.001 per cent of the content in the atmosphere and that the rest of it comes from the nature itself. This is information that inquisitive learners will appreciate.
Influence of this gas on the greenhouse effect? No proof of this exists even for those periods of Earth's history when detectable CO2 levels were higher than today.
In a letter to the editor of Bj. Nofseth Aftenposten 3 December 1938, we read about the dramatic climate changes, with green fields in December, plowing in February Hallingdal (sleeps with.), winter temperatures on Svalbard 7 degrees C (annualized over 3 degrees C) and large seas without drift. We think that this is the dramatic climate changes, but they are not mentioned in the principal Hælbeks climate issue.
The reason for this may be that these climate changes were scarcely human. In 1930 the world population was about 2.5 billion at today's 7 billion.
Temperatures
In our feature article states that during the warm period of 800 - 1350's and the Little Ice Age from about 1400 til1800 temperatures were about 2-3 degrees higher, respectively lower than today. The formulation was probably a bit unlucky because the parameter temperature often varies rapidly with time and place.
A journey in January 2011 from Bergen Flesland to showed variations from - 8 to - 22 oC. Other times shows NRK / Yrs maps almost equal temperatures along the coast, from Hammerfest in the north to Stavanger in the south.
The best thing here is enough to introduce climate zones horticultural use for planting flowers and shrubs. Settlement in Greenland was only possible under the hot climatic conditions of the Middle Ages, while the little ice age caused the closure of farms upper Gudbrandsdal and Eastern Valleys. In Northern Norway was farming changed in favor of livestock because grain harvest occasionally failed.
Extreme values and statistics
A postulate is that there always comes a day we get new heat, cold, rain or flood records - where time is of course dependent on the reference temperature, precipitation record etc. This creates obvious problems for many climate scientists and also for Hælbek.
Often omitted references to the heat Ages and the Little Ice Age - periods with obviously more drastic temperature variations than those we have experienced in the past 100 years. In those times there was no significant anthropogenic CO2 emissions as climate must obviously have been influenced by other factors. But such is excluded in climate models researcher created.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
The UN panel established under the auspices of WMO (World Meterological Organization, Geneva) and representatives appointed by the respective national governments. Here emphasis is not necessarily academic knowledge, reflecting that the UN is a political organization and does not have supranational authority. The latter requires that the IPCC reports and recommendations must be based on consensus. This is not easy, as large meetings in Copenhagen and Cancun to the fullest demonstrated. IPCC's latest report has received much criticism, obvious errors, omission of key scientific works and conclusions on declining terms.
Not particularly surprising, because the UN is a political and not a scientific organization, and thus not based on academic excellence and integrity. (For your information, one of the authors (EH) has 15 years experience as a participant in a United Nations expert group).
Climate research - dance around the golden calves state
Climate research is still popular among many politicians, which in turn has resulted in major funding for such activities. The result is a significant expansion of organizations and activities in this area. We can mention: Cicero, Bjerknes Centre, Nansen, Bellona, Zero and several nature conservation associations.
The latter is now medically climate anxiety, with the diagnosis of "patients" in Finnmark. Since these organizations are primarily funded through state grants, competition from other researchers undesirable, cf. statements by President Paul Presterud Cicero NRK P2, Culture News 10.12.10.
In other countries such as the United States, much of climate science based on state contributions. But in Norway is relatively strong political guidelines for such funds. The objectivity that sought in the research is not good enough prevalent among funding agencies. These factors explain part of the comprehensive climate disinformation going on.
Most of the natural disasters should therefore caused dramatic, human-induced climate change and said instruction booklet is a good example of this. Environment Minister Erik Solheim still takes the "cake" in this context. On Dagsnytt 18, 16.3 in year he stated'' we will see more tsunamis in the future as a result of climate change.'' It is almost inconceivable that such nonsense can be conveyed by a minister of the environment.
Anthropogenic climate change - Fiction or Fact?
Climate scientists have long operated a persistent campaign based on the assumption that the current global warming destroys the world we know. Today, the strategy changed.
Now it says anthropogenic climate change likely in view of the cold winters we have had in Europe, North America and Siberia. Although changes in lemming populations on Hardangervidda, see NC Stenseth in Today's Market, 03.12.11, and in oceanic minke whales attributed to changes in climate - a sort of scientific "open sesame". Serious researchers are concerned with the source, which is the number of people on earth because after all causes CO2 emissions. IPCC and climate scientists in general are concerned with the number of CO2 molecules, because the population explosion is taboo as a topic in many countries.
Pupils in primary schools understand that the amount of water needed in an area of 100 million people is different from that needed for the 200 million living in the area. Similarly, in case of natural disasters, the economic damage from an earthquake fifty years ago was considerably less than an earthquake today, with greater population density, many costly installations like nuclear power and assets - as demonstrated by the disaster earthquake off the coast of Japan 11 March.
Indoctrination to state control
Rector Hælbeks climate issue fits well into the pattern we have in this country and elsewhere in the world when it comes to global warming. There is a deep indoctrination of climate in schools. One of us (EB) knows the Tellus 10 used in secondary school course "Climate Wise" led by dr.gradsstudent Siri calves, as well as textbook Nexus 1Vg, used in high school.
Along with the booklet mentioned in this chronicle, Tellus 10 that we've written about in Education No. 13.09 and the course material discussed in Dagsavisen 01/20/10, this shows that climate education in Norwegian schools is far from any knowledge. It is more characterized by indoctrination based on a one-sided view of climate and climate change. Now the closest to the natural climate factors silent in death.
Critical thinking
In this perspective: How be it the students' training in critical thinking? Where are the rivers opportunities to develop the ability to consider multiple sides of an issue? The considerable uncertainty associated with the models IPCC bases its predictions is also sometimes very strongly communicated. Where are the students' challenges through knowledge, to be able to manage complex risks in the future?
We'll probably even accentuate that with the development of society as we see today, there is a growing need for good and objective of education minded people in schools. The new generations must be able to remain independent and critical of the many initiatives in newspapers and other media, as we are confronted with daily. We need active participants and not passive spectators indoctrinated!
Related links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/02/nr-255-audun-lysbakken-socialist-shows.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/07/nr-18-prime-minister-jens-stoltenberg.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/10/nr-72-norway-stands-in-front-of.html
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar