torsdag 19. oktober 2017

No. 1613: In hindsight, I would not have paid lawyer from the state, as they have used him as an excuse for that trial should seriously look out, the outcome was really clear in advance then what I'm judged for is not discussed by the court!

No. 1613:
In hindsight, I would not have paid lawyer from the state, as they have used him as an excuse for that trial should seriously look out, the outcome was really clear in advance then what I'm judged for is not discussed by the court!
Malin Strømberg Amble, in my opinion, did a miserable job when she did not bring the line to me or Brynjar Meling what she was going to build the judgment on.The verdict from Oslo district court that really matters the whole case.
Photo of Judge Malin Strømberg Amble who writes simply lie when figures are not disputed. I did, and when she led the trial, she did not ask me or Meling once about this.
In other words, she was not fit for the job and therefore the whole case against me and the heavenly blog is a legal scandal as it includes have been judges both in the district court and the court of law who were not fit for the job. When the Norwegian Supreme Court rejects the appeal from Brynjar Meling, the whole thing is really a big, big tragedy for Norway that is good and democratic justice.

That was the amount, but here there are two conditions that make the whole sentence incorrect!

1. 98% of what is written against Jan Aage Torp written by his fictional review.

2. What Torps "poodles" and "lackeys", not least Norway's two largest networks roll has written in quantity and verbal words and u pressure surpasses me a thousand times.

3. Of course, this is nothing but a regular right of justice if this judgment is standing. But God knows, it keeps a lot!

Should not also Jan Aage Torp manage to lure such a low standing straight and jury as we have here in Norway with the same method? Of course, what we see now is nothing new in the story of the innocent goes free and the innocent is taken.

Now my case between me and Jan Aage Torp gone through the whole judicial system here in Norway and last and decisive instance is now Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg in France.

When it was legal, I received Brynjar Meling as defender as we applied for. I regret this today when Meling was really used for everything to look serious. The case was settled in advance as they would nevertheless have judged me!

It has been a father!

I am aiming for a thing called Torp for the Hour and a Horkarl. During the trials in both the Oslo District Court and Court of lagman n srett has application of the law have been the subject no. 1.

This with the amount of printer has not been the subject of discussion in the sense that things have emerged. This printer also Brynjar Meling the appeal leaflet toNorwegian Supreme Court following:

The fact of the case

The Court of Appeal has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections in the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.

Case handling error, provocation and retribution

As stated at the bottom of page 4 and the top of page 5 in the Appeal Court, cited convicted in his defense that his remarks had charges punishable or judged mildly out of principle a about provocation and retorting.

In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and contradictory opposition by the accused party's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to withstand in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.

As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to provocation and rhetoric in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward from both sides, it is stated that the decision of the Court of Appeal is insufficient.

The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is insufficient in order to eliminate the meaning of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.

The above-mentioned inadequacy of the premises of the Court of Appeal is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
(quote ending).

Since I also talked about the amount of it, it was clear that there are only undocumented claims that the court could not trust. Something it has done, which shows that the case against me is a justice word.

I told her in the Court of the Court of Appeal that they could not rely on the judgment of the Oslo Tin wept when the numbers Torp op justs with is not documented.
Look here:

The verdict of Oslo Tingrett states that:
"The numbers are not the best ridt, and the court finds them because as proven."

I came across a report from the newspaper The day where it becomes clear that I also contest this in Oslo District Court.
Have a link to the recording from the Court of Appeal where I again contesting the number and that what Torp and his berm has written against me surpasses me many times.

This was stated in the newspaper The day after they attended the trial in Oslo district court:

Jan-Aage Torp's assistant attorney has registered that the pastor in Restoration Oslo's church is called "old pig", "horebukk and horkarl" "narcissist", "psychopath" and "false pastor / prophet / apostle". Defender Brynjar Meling believes Jan Kåre Christensen's blog-writings are well within the law.

Christensen did not say guilty after the accusation when the case against him went to Oslo district court on Wednesday.

The blogger was notified on September 29, 2014 by pastor Jan-Aage Torp.

In the first phase of the trial, Torp was not present because he was witnessed by actor Dag Paulsen, who has his daily work at the Oslo Police Department's hate crime department.

Shoots back

Christensen went to an early defense when he was questioned by a prosecutor who confirmed that Christensen acknowledges the facts, namely a lot of outcome against Pastor Torp - as well as a large number of other Christian leaders.

The common denominator among them seems to be divorced and married again, but others have also received their passport thoroughly and extensively.

Torp's assistant attorney has registered that the pastor in Restoration Oslokirken is called "old pig", "horebukk and horkarl" "narcissist", "psychopath" and "false pastor / prophet / apostle".

There are registered 920 such cases on the Norwegian blog, twice as many as the English language edition is considered.

Torp thinks it's mentioned 3218 times on Christensen's blog, or 2-7 times a week over five years, as he said when he relaxed with his version.

Public person

This must be within freedom of belief and expression, especially since Torp must be regarded as a public person, believes Christensen himself has been pastor of the Smyrna Oslo church, but presented himself as a bus driver in court.

Christensen made clear that he believes that Torp has come with least equally strong expressions about him, as Christensen has done to Torp and his wife, Aina Anine Lanton Torp.

Christensen was partly wondering why he had spent so much energy talking to Torp on his Heavenly Blog. It was easier when his defender Brynjar Meling asked him out.

Then he explained the posts, among other things, that Torp had gone to counter attacks on various web channels, including the website

Christensen also showed mail correspondence he had sent to the police when he was asked to document what Torp had said about him during the investigation.

Among other things, he believed that various people who had been active online battengers were in charge of Torp, something Torp fired.

Particularly bad Christensen thought that the son was referred to as gay on the website - consistently referred to as "the fake Smyrna blog".

- rough language

"Your language usage is quite rough," said Paulsen to the defendant.

- Torp is even coarser, black Christensen.

- Yes, but now we are talking about your language use. You call him psychopath.

- It's wrong for you to pick it up. I have said it has been removed from the blog, said Christensen who did not mean he had crossed any line.

Used the Bible

Christensen silenced the Bible by hand, and used it diligently when he responded. His main point is that Christians, and especially Christian leaders, can not marry after divorce if the first husband is still alive.

"A Christian leader should be one woman's man," he said, referring to Paul's first letter to Timothy.

- Torp and Jan Hanvold (editor of TV Vision Norway, red.anm.) Are door openers for demons. The demons have their handstanders and there are people who live contrary to the word of God and the will of God, Christensen said.

Torp said it is quite possible to have Christianity's theological point of view when it comes to remorse.

"You can have different perceptions about it.

- And there are Bible texts that support this? asked lawyer Meling.

- Yes, certainly, take Torp.

Has deleted

"I stand for everything I have written, but I have changed some words at the request of Torp in the Conciliation Board. I have changed some words and expressions to meet him. What I wrote about marrying the nanny was unnecessary, and I have deleted it, said Christensen, but failed to emphasize that "the word of God is very clear about this", implying that reverberation should not take place.

Christensen emphasized that he refers only to people who have one or another leadership position, in his opinion, contrary to Torp.

Tough for Torp

Jan-Aage Torp clearly stated that Christensen's many blog posts had been a major burden for him and not least his wife.

"It's tough to be called Hore 167 times in less than five years," said Torp.

If the court considers that Torp has been subjected to punishment, it is for consideration. Prosecutor Paulsen asks the court to impose a fine of NOK 12,000 or 24 days in prison on Christensen.

Christensen's defender, Brynjar Meling, asked for full exemption, referring to freedom of expression.
The case will be Friday 29 January.
(quote ending).

Final Comment:

What is incredibly important, which makes this case a scandal. A righteous scandal is that nobody has asked me about this with the number when this was what I'm convicted of.
Yet, I think it is true that Brynjar Meling has spent hours lecturing that there is no Norwegian law that goes against me. It's only manufactured that I've done something criminal and punishable.
Again, the police, the prosecution force and everyone else in this case are criminals and kidders!

Why has the number been so big? This is because we have discussed the different online forums life and learn to preachers like Jan Hanvold, Jan Aage Torp and others actually over the years. The court has not emphasized this and purely verbally and in number, Torp has overdue me several times. Yes, the judges and the entire judicial system with police who has refused all this with just tells me that those who are real criminals here they are, not I and Brynjar Meling who have gone honest and straight forward in this case and the proceedings. Meling they have allowed dos ere the application of the law, but ignoring it completely when they never really cared.
What they have sentenced me to, I am not being charged or confronted with in court.
The whole judicial process against me and the Heavenly blog is a big, big scandal for Norway as a legal society and a democracy!
That I chose to take a lawyer just made it easier for them to get me judged. I do not bother Meling, he's just done his job. Only the police and the courts blame I, who have condemned me for something that has not been debated really in a proper way in court. I can not find any Norwegian law that says that one can not write a lot of things involved than that. The amount will not make it a punishable offense, but what they say, it can do anything to a criminal offense.
Those who are criminals here in my eyes is Torp, police and the courts in their own way. Torp I do not expect anything from when he has always been as he appears.But had expected more of police and judges, sad that they were going to end like this!

Related links:

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar