No. 1437: For reasons that I do not understand, PBE here in Oslo wants Kjell Henning Thon to know that when our neighbor Roar Telje has run his hat campaign against us will also be on other issues that do not affect these matters at all!

No. 1437:
For reasons that I do not understand, PBE here in Oslo wants Kjell Henning Thon to know that when our neighbor Roar Telje has run his hat campaign against us will also be on other issues that do not affect these matters at all!

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2019/03/nr-2431-vanskelige-naboer-har-gjort-at.html

Our neighbor Roar Telje, who has run a regular hate campaign, all that he has written has certainly been a lie and fabricated falsehood.

It is obvious that what we consider right and normally do not always consider the PBE here in Oslo the same.
Must say it is very frustrating and one knows a sense of excitement when they want things that have nothing to do with them to be in case numbers that have zero to do with it.
They should have been on our case, something they do not always do when they are misplaced.

Roar Telje, our closest neighbor and run a hat campaign against everything we have done. Bringing other neighbors with him as he has signed up for his hate campaigns against us. All the arguments he has used have never been taken. Even when we built a wall, it would not be possible for the seagull car to arrive and lay snow in and around our property.
This has seemed to be so wrong and fabricated lies that are possible.

But afterwards he went to several other neighbors and made a petition against us. As he forwarded to Oslo municipality as a complaint about what we had built.
Those who joined his hat campaign against us were Randi Lavik in Stormyrveien 4, and Ragnhild Skramstad in Stormyrveien 6, where her husband did not join this hat campaign between neighbors. Which is totally useless and ugly.

Here they sit in houses that are worth at least 10 million, good pension and otherwise have it very well.

What do they do right away they can? Have fun and be happy that they have good health and otherwise mostly on "care" in life? No, they go to frontal attacks on us, and report us to PBE here in Oslo.

Ragnhild Skramstad in no. Stormy road's "most" illegal wall located 20 cm from the road with an illegal sign on its property which also Randi Lavik in Stormyrveien 4 has. They have made their garage so that they have to back out in the Stormyrveien which also Roar Telje must.
This is so illegal and insane that they will subdue us witnesses, nothing but the one here sees the beam in their own eye, only the tile in our eye.
They shoot sparrows with a cannon, and unfortunately PBE here in Oslo has been involved in this and is part of this.

Here is our mail correspondence, which shows that they do not want to remove from our cases the things that we really want to completely get away from the net as all that is written against us is really nothing but a hatred and bullying campaign.

I am writing this, and we have also talked on the phone, so there is actually more information here to download which I cannot document.

I write:

Hi Kjell Henning Thon! Oslo 7 / 6-2019


Thanks for the phone call. I believe that all these emails should be handed over to us, there may be more. But I mention a few here.

https://innsyn.pbe.oslo.kommune.no/saksinnsyn/casedet.asp?mode=&caseno=201011373

Ranked. 56
Ranked. 57
Ranked. 63
Ranked. 64
Ranked. 65
Ranked. 67
Ranked. 98 accuse us of interfering in this matter, preferably remove this as well.

It is located on the house Krokstien 2 d.
But it should have been at our house.

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crocodile 2 c
0672 Oslo

Hi!

Here is another one who is going over to us. Item # 10.

https://innsyn.pbe.oslo.kommune.no/saksinnsyn/casedet.asp?mode=&caseno=201410925

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crocodile 2 c
0672 Oslo

Got this answer:

Hi!

I have taken a round about the documents in cases in Krokstien 2 A-D with our document center, which are the ones that manage the filing of documents.

We have come to the conclusion that we keep the documents where they are, and thus do not completely agree with you.

We believe that we come to different conclusions because we look differently on the issues. You look at the issues as related to different people, while we see the documents as related to different building issues.

For us, it is therefore relevant to keep the documents in the 201011373 case because they are comments related to the legality of cases relating to the listing of the four homes in the 2010 cases on the property. These could perhaps have been linked to the case number before (201011372), as this is what is housing C, but since these cases contain references to each other and are closely linked, and that several of these documents contain comments and answers to various elements in The same thing, then we choose to keep them as they are.

With best regards

Kjell Henning Thon
senior architect, Resource Center, Planning and Building, Oslo Municipality

I answer this and have since not heard any of the world's things.

To Kjell Henning Thon Oslo 17 / 6-2019

You write this:

I have taken a round about the documents in cases in Krokstien 2 A-D with our document center, which are the ones that manages the filing of documents.

We have come to the conclusion that we keep the documents where they are, and thus do not completely agree with you.

We believe that we come to different conclusions because we look differently on the issues. You look at the issues as related to different people, while we see the documents as related to different building issues.

For us, it is therefore relevant to keep the documents in the 201011373 case because they are comments related to the legality of cases relating to the listing of the four homes in the 2010 cases on the property. These could perhaps have been linked to the case number before (201011372), as this is what is housing C, but since these cases contain references to each other and are closely linked, and that several of these documents contain comments and answers to various elements in The same thing, then we choose to keep them as they are.

Answer:

What you come up with here we totally disagree with when we believe that the emails have no relevance to the case with neighbor Peter Faarlund.
The emails we have pointed out are solely a neighbor, Roar Telje who is harsh and hateful to us with really everything we do.
Be it rental, construction of storage room, staircase and wall.
He mentions that it will also offer problems with plowing, parking etc. Everything has been known to be calling "wolf, wolf!"
None of his arguments have stuck. That this should be important for this matter seems very sought after!

Hope you remove everything we have pointed out and are put over where it belongs, on our cases.

This is not a complaint, just pointing out through this email that we hope that you realize that the cases discussed do not belong to Peter's case.
But they belong to us, no one else. Then they should also be in our directory, nowhere else.

One final question, when does this matter come to a decision? You set dates for feedback, but they are not followed.
For example, we have followed everything that PBE has come up with dates, and it has worked out that they have opposed us so much they have been able to. It looks like it doesn't pay to be dutiful to PBE?

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Krokstien 2 c
0672 Oslo
Found even more, sent this also, has not received any answer, yet.

From: Jan Kåre Christensen
Posted: Thursday, June 20, 2019 at. 6:43 p.m.
To: Kjell Henning Thon
Topic: also remove this, it has nothing to do here.

Ranked. 86, remove it, https://innsyn.pbe.oslo.kommune.no/saksinnsyn/casedet.asp?mode=&caseno=201011373

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Krokstien 2 c
0672 Oslo