torsdag 11. april 2019

No. 1507: We have been enticed by the PBE (the planning and building agency here in Oslo), they have really laid a trap for us!

No. 1507:
We have been enticed by the PBE (the planning and building agency here in Oslo), they have really laid a trap for us!

This is what PBE here in Oslo has ordered us to demolish. This is nothing more than "mad-Mathias" and evil that causes people to hold on to this.

Here is our beautiful wall, no bigger or higher than what the neighbor's on the other side.

Our booth is exquisite, tearing is just evil in people who can seem like this.

Stairs that are necessary and safe to have, tear such are only dark people who want such things to be done.

When I see what I've gone through, that's completely horrible. Then I think of Brother Hans Nielsen Hauge what he had to suffer for his faith. Hans Nielsen Hauge was brought 14 times to have disturbed the peace and quiet by holding meetings and put together 11 years in prison. Then they attacked him for breaking the convention poster. I suffer for having been law-abiding and called the City of Oslo and followed their guidance. One must be punished anyway, whether it is today or 200 years ago by the authorities, they are unfortunately many times not the servants of good, as they should be and are set to. But they are the servants of the wicked and the servants of darkness, contrary to what they are set to be.

Room. 13. 1. Every soul is obedient to the guardian authorities! for there is no authority except of God, but those who are, they are ordained of God, 2 so that whoever opposes the government opposes God's order; But those who oppose will get their judgment. 3 For the rulers are not afraid of the good work, but of the evil one. But will you not have to fear the government? Do what is good, and praise it; 4 For it is the servant of God, good for you. But do what evil is, then fear! for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is the servant of God, a vengeance of punishment upon him that doeth evil. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to be obedient to it, not just for the sake of punishment, but also for the conscience. 6 Therefore you also pay taxes; for they are God's servants, who just take care of this. 7 Give to all that you are guilty of them: the treasure of tribute, the toll of the tribute, the fear of fear, the glory of honor.

In fact, when the authority is not the servants of the good, the scripture says that we should obey God more than humans. Here, in our case, and unfortunately also other times, we must rather do good than follow and do evil.
We must follow the word of God, the good and our conscience, not least when the authority is so comfortable and lying!

We have built an exquisite and neat wall, as well as a storage room and staircase after consulting with PBE here in Oslo. Now these "lunatics" with the laws and paragraphs in hand will have to tear this. See for yourself, isn't this both neat and ordained, then I don't know.
What we have built is "ordained", neat, not unsightly and on "equal" level like any other. There is a brutal vandalism that the City of Oslo welcomes us.
It says in the scriptures that Satan has come to murder, destroy and steal. Do not need to comment further on this, as the words of the scripture speak for themselves!

Joh. e. 10. 10 The thief comes only to steal and murder and destroy; I have come to have life and abundance.

We called down and got a clear message. It all started with the fact that we got "law" to build our wall on top of the old wall that stood there from before. That they have now returned to this shows only that we have to do with people who change opinions and positions.

How to deal with a public agency that changes opinion?
And it is we who must take the "punishment" and the noise of it all, this is bad!

This writes our lawyer to the Borgarting Court of Appeal regarding this:

Support Wall - Advance guidance

Christensen applied for advance guidance in the Oslo municipality on two occasions before the support wall was erected. Christensen has argued that in both inquiries he described the wall and that he was accepted for the entry of the wall without having to seek prior permission.
In the two telephone calls in 2013 that Christensen had with case officer Kaja Lange Aubert, who knew the area years back through the development period at Krokstien 2, he asked whether it was okay to record a new and higher wall on the former old wall along the Stormyrveien in order to get a bigger and much better outdoor area southwest of their home on Krokstien 2 c.
On both occasions, Christensen thinks that by the municipal case officer he got clear answer that the wall was not subject to application as he described it. He himself perceived it as a binding acceptance and agreement. It appears to be clearly unreasonable if it is Christensen who in a case like this should have the risk of a possible misunderstanding.
It is stated that there are service faults in relation to guidance / counseling. If there had been any basis for any form of doubt on the part of the officer regarding what the request was, she should have requested to receive a sketch and / or written presentation of the construction measure to ensure that her guidance / advice was correct.
Thus, the municipality's duty to proper guidance and / or counseling has failed and in any case not been properly clarified vs. an initiative owner who addresses the municipality's planning and building agency with a very specific question about prior permission in a concrete building case.

The case officer was dropped off as a witness to the district court. But it turned out later during the main hearing that the prosecutor for the state had no knowledge that the case officer in question who Christensen approached had also been case officer in connection with the planning and development of Krokstien 2 a b c and d.

The person was thus locally known in the area, familiar with the terrain heights and formations, as she had followed the development of Krokstien from A to Å as far as Christensen has knowledge. The person in question will therefore, as a witness, supply the necessary information so that it becomes far better and more properly informed.

In the guidance given by Christensen, nothing was mentioned about the consideration of housing development, only that Christensen's wall would be like the other walls in the immediate area. Aubert Lange guided out from other people's house in Stormyrveien.

Against this background, it is wrong of the district court to not assume that the owner of the measure has been in good faith with regard to the obligation to apply. Only thing that has taken place of negligence is the case handler handling Christensen's inquiries. It is wrong of the district court not to see this as a significant breach of the duty of supervision after fvl. § 11.
(Quote end.)

My lawyer has now spoken to Kaja Aubert Lange afterwards, and in my opinion she lies to "let go" saying she doesn't remember. She remembered that well before. Then she remembered and knew that if we built a wall of 1.5 - 2 meters with fence on top then we did not come higher than the neighbor's. Which has a wall of just over 2 meters with fence on top there. The whole thing is just the mess and delusion of PBE and the entire public Norway against us. We live in this country, where one tries to be as angry as possible against each other, I'm angry and ashamed!

Final Comment:

"It's not the criminals who are the real danger, but the national madness, created through a deliberate methodical breakdown of what's right and wrong."

Parliament President Carl J. Hambro, stated this in 1940.

Yes, when the public is allowed to hold on as they do here, this is a madness that surpasses most. Don't have words to say what they really do against us, it's barbarism and vandalism, nothing else. They are worse than criminals and criminals who, after all, receive punishment for what they have done for misdemeanors when taken.
While these public vandals with laws and paragraphs in hand are "rewarded" with both. They protect each other and let the evil continue, but sooner or later it says stop! Be sure!

Here's my description of this:

We moved in here in 2012. In 2013 we called down to our then case officer Kaja Lange Aubert. It was called down 2-3 times, to make sure we did the right thing.
It is not easy to reproduce this five years later, and when there were several phone calls it feels like one when it is five years later.
And, that the city of Oslo has not been interested in hearing our version at all, they had decided 3 - 4 years ago that we should get everything down.

What happened to the phone calls we had with our then supervisor Kaja Lange Aubert?

Do you remember remembering that we called down mid-May and August 2013? It is five years back in time, it is a long time ago and difficult to remember in detail every word as it was said, but in my memory she replied like this.
Then I asked about the following, we set up stairs and wanted to set up a wall. Trapp I think we set up 2013, when before this we had had a rope that we threw ourselves down on in the Stormyrveien, and believe it or not, it is until this level that the Oslo municipality has given us the order to return to that should use a rope to throw us down on the road with. You do not believe it, but we had it before we built a staircase that the city of Oslo has ordered us to demolish, to grasp the one who can.

I asked what was needed to build a wall, to which I got the answer that if a wall had been built there before, it was not mandatory to build one on top of it. This replied Kaja Lange Aubert.
I said yes, and then Kaja Lange answered Aubert that then it was NOT APPLICABLE WHEN IT WAS BUILT A WALL FROM BEFORE!

I further said that we see a wall of 1.5 meters and 1 meter fence.
This was no problem, she said, as others from before have higher walls than you.

In 2013, I even called an extra time, for the sake of safety and asked the same, and the same answers were given.
As long as there was a wall there before, we didn't have to search even though the wall was different. In other words, we got permission in advance of our construction of masonry, the Oslo municipality breaks Norwegian law by contesting this.

However, PBE says something else now, namely:

b.) "However, it may have been said that repairing / returning the original wall along the road would not be subject to application. The existing wall to which was shown was a low brick wall and cannot be compared to the listed wall. "

The Oslo municipality has not missed this conversation.
Only I and Kaja Lange have Aubert, no one else.

When the City of Oslo sets out to explain what has been said in a telephone conversation that they have not overheard. Then they make two big mistakes here.
First, they lie, and afterwards they fantasize about something they think has been said. This in itself means that neither the City of Oslo, the County Governor nor the Civil Ombudsman have any credibility when they can allow themselves to commit such roars. This is also against Norwegian law and regular decency to make things into a document.

Had the fictitious and lying presentation that PBE gives here been true, then of course we had never set up wall.

Of course, it is obvious lies that PBE is doing.
Unfortunately, both the County Governor and the Civil Ombudsman have let this pass, it just says that their credibility in this case is equal to zero.

What has really been done here by the City of Oslo, the County Governor and the Civil Ombudsman? When it can be determined with certainty that all government agencies do not speak true and are not willing to accept that we have received oral approval, it means that their overall credibility is absolutely critical!
Yes, they do not respond to our inquiries regarding this, and when they do, they have either fabricated either a "truth" or speak false and dictate what could and may have been said in several phone calls they have never missed or referred back. to Kaja Lange Aubert who gave us oral permission to build.

§ 171. Service errors

With imprisonment or imprisonment for up to 2 years, the person exercising or assisting in the exercise of public authority is punished and grossly violates his duty of service.

c.) "The administration's duty to provide guidance must be seen in light of the fact that supervision is mainly conducted orally over the telephone, and that information is provided on a general basis on the basis of the information provided by the promoter."

This also becomes false and wrong to write. We have not received general guidance, but specific guidance on several occasions. Therefore, to write such, then they neglect their duty of service again. The lies will if no end take for various bodies we have been in contact with. They lack impulse control completely. One day this is law, the next day it is illegal.

d.) «No breach of the duty of guidance under fvl. § 11 »

This claims the municipality of Oslo, but it is not just a breach of the supervisory duty. There are also violations of Norwegian law. This says Norwegian law.

King Kristian the law of the fifth.

By Decree 14 Apr 1688, the law came into force from Mikkelsdag (Sep. 29, 1688). Here, only the provisions that are believed to remain in force are included. If repeal of various provisions and if any provisions that are supposedly lapsed, please refer to older editions of Norway's Law.

Fifth Book. About Access, Gods and Gield.

In Cap. About Contracts and Obligations.
1 Art. Anyone is obliged to comply if the hand with mouth, hand and seal promised and entered gardens.

2 Art. All contracts made by the volunteer by the volunteer, and come to the age of them, be they jealousy, hall, gift, alternation, pledge, loan, rent, obligation, forerunner, and other things by what name the name of the name of the man who is not against The Law, or Honor, should be kept in all its words and punctures, such as those entered.

See here for more information:

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar