What Jesus is talking about in Matthew about the innocent party does not marriage, but concluded that betrothal is broken!
This with
the so-called innocent party is an abuse of God's word as this does not apply
to the church, but Israel and betrothal being broken. With the so-called
innocent party came during the Reformation with Rasmus. But who was behind this
again? This of course was the enemy who sowed his seed, no wonder we see such
deterioration that today. It is strange that there are so few who confront
others with what God's word says about these things. But scripture says:
2 Pet. 3. 16
In this he speaks in all the letters which he enters these questions. There is
something there that is hard to understand, and they are unlearned and weak
distorts this, as they do also the other scriptures, and it leads to
destruction for themselves.
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/05/no-710-protestantism-has-come.htmlhttp://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/01/nr-648-humanist-erasmus-of-rotterdam.html
Being called
asserting that the innocent may enter into a new marriage is nothing other than
this: "There is something there that is hard to understand, and they are
unlearned and weak distorts this, as they do also the other scriptures, and it
leads to destruction for themselves. "
Yes. It
leads and directs people away from God, not to God opening up for remarriage
among the believers.
Picture of
me and my wife who are approaching 28 prs marriage.
What Jesus
is talking about in Matthew about the innocent party does not marriage, but concluded
that betrothal is broken!
Matt. 5. 31
It is said, 'Whoever divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.'
32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife for any reason other than
adultery, he is guilty of the commission of adultery with her. And whoever
marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
19. 9 I tell
you that anyone who divorces his wife for any reason other than fornication,
and marries another woman commits adultery. "
10 The
disciples said to him: "Is it so between man and woman, it is better not
to marry." 11 But he said: "This is something not everyone can take
to it, but only those to whom it is given. 12 For some are eunuchs because they
have come so from the womb, others because people have made them eunuchs, but
there are also some who have made themselves similar to a eunuch for the
kingdom of heaven's sake. Let him who can, take this to heart. "
1 Cor. 7. 10
To the married I have this injunction, not from myself but from the Lord: A
wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she still stands, let her
remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not
divorce his wife.
- Quote from
the book "The great pitfall" of Øyvind Olav Sydow Kleiveland ",
page 34-38 (excerpts of the book), ISBN 978-82-999584-0-0. Reprinted with
permission.
"In
today's society it for many certainly seem contradictory to present a profound
teaching about Jewish marriage practices, since the Bible after all be viewed
as a" Christian "book. It is a powerful misconception because even
though the Bible is often regarded as a Christian, is large parts of it written
by Jewish authors.
It is
therefore essential to understand the Jewish traditions in order to understand
what the Bible talks about in different contexts. Lack of insight into Jewish
traditions for generations meant that teaching about marriage unbreakable has
been leached. Biblical writers is quite agree, while there appears that many
Christians would prefer to see that it was not the case.
The most
common explanation and they always recurrent biblical sites have revolved
around Jesus' words in Matthew 5 and 19. It says that if a man were to divorce
his wife for any reason other than adultery, and this man then was to marry
another woman, he would commit adultery against his first wife.
With these
verses that basis claim Christians that they can file for divorce if the wife
or husband is cheating. For a person who reads the Bible for the first time,
this post seem very appropriate.
About this
scripture had said that his wife had committed adultery, or used the word
infidelity that often translates to today, so it could perhaps have been a
reason for the man to get a divorce. One must first have the attitude to God's
word that it is the supreme authority in all matters having to do with our
lives.
With this in
mind it is wise to go a little deeper into the material. Sticking to only two
scriptures and do not include the rest of God's word, it would be like building
a house and only examine parts of the area where the house will stand.
On the
surface it sounds very "holy" out believing that one can get a
divorce if one's wife or husband has been unfaithful or has committed adultery,
as it says in many Norwegian translations.
But this is
only mentioned twice in the entire New Testament (Matt. 5:32 and Matt. 19: 9),
and only in Matthew's Gospel. Moreover, it says not infidelity in these verses,
for the Greek word used is porneia. The word for adultery is however moicheia.
I ask: If it
was God's perfect will and a Christian duty to file for divorce, had it not
been logical if this was clearly stated a number of places, distributed
throughout the Bible?
Whether this
was a permit that applied to everyone, not just Jews trolovelsesperioden -
something I'll elaborate thoroughly later - God would not then have repeated
"permit" considerably more times? I think so.
Here Paul
says that they are his words and not the Lord.
Previously
he has made it obvious to anyone who would doubt, that the Lord's will is that
none should stand, either men or women.
But notice
that Paul did not mention a single opportunity to
could
remarry!
It describes
the action itself to remarry as a sin. It does not say that the divorce has not
taken place (for one must necessarily stand to remarry), but it says that
whoever marries again, after a divorce, commits adultery against his first (and
only) spouse.
The word
used for this is the Greek moicheia, signifying adultery. The Bible also uses
the expression "living in adultery" about living with someone other
than their spouse.
Two choices.
For proper
cementing what is God's will regarding marriage unbreakable, we must study 1
Corinthians, Chapter 7 then some.
Tucked away
in verse 10 God gives a clear command on how a Christian will live if
a divorce is a fact. Here it is important to point out that a divorce
has occurred, it is important that there is at the initiative of the
Christian majority. This is because the Christians are commanded to not stand.
"
Final
Comment:
I think
Øyvind Olav Sydow Kleiveland get it out clearly that these verses of Matthew
does not deal with marriage, but betrothal being broken. Are you the book? Buy
it here: https://nb-no.facebook.com/DenStoreFallgruven
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/10/no-1054-why-i-have-not-written-about.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/10/no-1055-jan-eriksen-tangent-record-for.html
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar