lørdag 29. november 2014

No. 825: Bibelfelleskapets Bible teacher Olav Fjærli divorced and re-married as believers when he claims he is the innocent party!

No. 825:
Bibelfelleskapets Bible teacher Olav Fjærli divorced and re-married as believers when he claims he is the innocent party!

Here on bibelfellesskapet.net: It will be published Bible studies, devotionals and sermons of different words, texts and themes from the Bible. These will be from several authors, but the majority will be authored by Bible Community founders; Olav Fjærli and Kjetil Holen - both members of the Pentecostal Church Filadelfia in Grimstad.

Studying God's Word, by going deeper into the words and texts' meaning, gives us more insight into what the Bible says to us. It is also very encouraging and rewarding to embark on studying a word or theme.
(end of quote).

Here it is really possible to interpret the word of God as it fits when there is always something wrong with everyone else except themselves. This so-called innocently clause is really nothing else than what the Apostle Paul says to his good friend and coworker Timothy:

1 Tim. 4. 1. The Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith. They should stick to seducing spirits, and demons learn.

Photo by Olav Fjærli

Olav Fjærli is a so-called innocence man, which can persist as he pleases, he has "word of God" that he is innocent. But what does the word of God? On the contrary, we are bound by our spouse for life. It is only and solely a physical death, which lifted a marriage and giving Biblical right to remarry.

Rom. 7. 2 A married woman is bound by the law to her husband so long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 Therefore applies she adulterer if she marries another man while alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from the law no adulteress if she marries another.

Luke 16 18 Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery. And whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

1 Cor. 7. 10 To the married I have this rule, not from myself but from the Lord: A wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.

Where did this doctrine from? I have written about before, here is an article about this:

Humanist Erasmus of Rotterdam Holland who managed to seduce a whole Christianity with his teaching permission remarriage and belief in a Triad God!

Erasmus or his full name Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus was probably never born again, but he managed to seduce a whole Christianity, not least the Protestant to translated the bible wrong and put things into God's word that is not there. Neither the Trinity or remarriage among Christians are biblically based on the New Testament. He was also a humanist (a very known), where one puts the human in front of God. As a Christian, we are first and foremost Christians, we are possibly humanists where we accept the human also belong. But to turn this upside down, it is to put God aside.

How he affected the Trinity

Theologians have pointed out several places in the NT to support in their view that God is three, three persons. Father, Son and Holy Spirit-who are in a god. This dogma is not particularly emphasized in the Bible except in some later texts other than in John's first letter to chapter 5 verses 7-8

Through the Latin Middle Ages believed that the text said: There are three that bear witness in heaven. Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit. Ah here it is, the dogma of the Trinity. But this is found only in the Latin manuscripts. Absolutely not in the Greek manuscripts of the NT.

When the New Testament of the Greek manuscripts were published in 1516, a scribe named Erasmus did not include these verses to the great hubbub of his theological opponents who maintained that he had a mischievous way removed Trinity from the Bible, Erasmus replied that he could not find this part in some of the Greek manuscripts he knew. And here goes the story. He challenged his opponents to produce a Greek manuscript of the Trinity. If they did it, he would include it in the next edition of the NT. In response produced his opponents a manuscript or at least they got a produced. Some copied John's first letter from the Greek and added these verses, and presented them to Erasmus. As the honorable man he was, he included these verses in the next edition.

It was this version that became the basis for the King James version, which was important in the historical Bible in English. These verses are still in the King James version but not the newer and more reliable translations.

This is why an older generation of readers of the English Bible was assumed that the Bible taught the dogma of the Trinity, even though this is not found in any Greek manuscript for more than a thousand years.

So what is the most reliable? The Greek manuscripts or the much later Latin?

Now let this be very clear, I stick to the original Greek manuscript. Then one must reject both the Trinity and Jesus alone doctrine and belief in only one God, the Father and that he only has one only begotten Son, Jesus Christ!

How he affected their view of remarriage among Christians

The theory of the "innocent party" his right to remarry is less than 500 years old.

The idea that Matthew chapter 5 and 19 passages or "clauses" which gives the "innocent party" right to remarry, did not appear until year 1519, when Erasmus, a great humanist, presented his interpretation of First Corinthians 7. Erasmus' interpretation of Scripture introduced human reason in the interpretation, instead of letting text interpret text. His interpretation of Scripture was characterized by humanistic overtones, where he emphasized human happiness ahead obedience to God's word. Erasmus was neither traditionalist or reformer, but wanted the utmost to be perceived as a godly man. He managed, however, to take settlement against sin and found rather simpler solutions thatched people. He did as Gnostics relied on excessive intellectual experience.

Spirit lifted according Erasmus those moral ethical laws that had been the mainstay of the Jewish idea.

The last 50 years have left these heresies gained a foothold in the churches. There is one paradox that the church has increasingly focused on spiritual gifts, healings and services that take our breath away, yet increasing number of divorces in the same churches. Frenzied manifestations of the spirit is a intoxication leading to more liberal Christian understanding, rather than being more faithful to the word.

Biblical infallibility was undermined and Erasmus attacks scriptural correctness. He linked the Christian ministry with God's holiness of life. Erasmus taught that love should come before any marriage and emphasized that it was not "loving" made by the church to insist that unhappy people should continue to live together. He believed that the church should set them free, who lived in the so-called bad marriages.

Reformers adopted Erasmus' views on divorce and remarriage, but this idea was not taught in nearly 1,500 years before Erasmus, from Christ's time and the first Christians. Although this theory is less than 500 years old, many Christians sought a "loophole" or an excuse, that makes it okay for them to remarry. Therefore Erasmus interpretation of first Corinthians gladly accepted by Christians who are looking for opportunities to follow their carnal desire to love a new person after one marriage has been "broken" or one says that one is living in an unhappy marriage.

In 1532 King Henry VIII did exactly this. He wanted to divorce his wife Catherine, to marry Ann Boleyn. He did Erasmus' interpretation of 1. Kor.7 popular and eventually broke with the Catholic Church, because he would remarry

He views on women: Women - can not live with them and you can not live without them.

This is it seems that the porn industry has on women, no wonder that remarriage and this belongs in conjunction with belief in one God Triad.

Erasmus was a very religious person. For a time he was Augustinian (Luther), but soon found that it was not right for him. Through mystique he nevertheless sense of religious fervor and inner piety. Church maturity could be combated through personal ethical improvement and conduct. Something he practiced the exact opposite by allowable remarriage. But pious and good will it sound like, where one contradicts himself with fair and virtuous words.

Erasmus believed outer forms of religiosity, as indulgences, saint worship and relics was completely erroneous, and he spent a lot of time to ridicule the kind. He criticized contemporary theology discussions for being concerned trivialities and abstract relationships. Erasmus was a spokesman for an undogmatic piety. It was Jesus' practical life that interested him. Tradition had covered over the core of Christianity.

Therefore should the Bible be made available to the common people. Although he made a notable effort to get to it. He translated the New Testament from Greek into Latin, and the idea was that it should form the basis for further translation into people languages. In addition to the translation, he released the comments, which made him a pioneer in critical biblical science.

Notice that it was the life of Jesus as "meant" something. He was also socialite and enjoyed the social layers. Learning was nothing but change and adapt the most part, he could. This man is the Protestant Christianity characterized more by than any other, no wonder that it is becoming a Babylon that is different than the Catholic church. Yet a Babylon where everything is allowed. The word of God refers to as Nicolaitans and Balaam teaching and preaching.

Erasmus reminds me of the modern man who will put their own lusts always higher than God as Scripture also warns (2 Tim. 3 5.).

Final Comment:

It is of course our selfishness behind this teaching, and when both remarries as most do today. And they claim is the so called innocent party ought have called for the vast majority? But here only one walks forward, without reflecting and asking about what this is. God's Word gives at least not opening for some believers to remarry after a divorce. Make a so live one in sin after God's word. That preachers and those who are called leaders or pastors do this in profusion in Pentecostal Charismatic contexts especially makes this particularly bad and dangerous. And Fjærli a background religious movement and is today Pentecostal, he has been joined by all the negative balances stone it is possible to see. As it is right in the within its circuits the worst offenders here!

Related Links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/01/nr-180-it-is-to-remarry-or-marry.html


Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar