tirsdag 19. februar 2013

Nr. 457: The newspaper Dagen and other defense and allows extreme people to get the word speaks only the warm and good about Israel, this is very unfortunate for anyone who will stand up for Israel!

Nr. 457:

The newspaper Dagen and other defense and allows extreme people to get the word speaks only the warm and good about Israel, this is very unfortunate for anyone who will stand up for Israel!

God needs no defending him or his people, basically, but that does not mean that we should sit with head in her lap. But anyway, it's a balance that day newspaper and others have left when they repeatedly allow extreme, sarcastic and somewhat coarse opinions stand on the pressure time after time. Chief Editor Vebjørn Selbekk not its editor responsible enough and who is responsible for what he makes repeatedly stand on either press the paper the day or on the Today website. This picture of two super-extreme manor men Mads Gilbert and Erik Fosse

If one speaks warmly of Israel are mostly law or otherwise to some, who call themselves believers!

Israel has its place, its central position. We take the example. Israel channel on Vision Norway, what does it do? It also spreads propaganda for Satan perhaps foremost representative here in Norway called Pastor Jan Hanvold is a false prophet, what good is it when speaking warmly of Israel. And they are also on his channel, Vision Norway. It's ridiculous, stupidity and lascivious that Israel canal are doing when they speak warmly and Israel but also goes in tandem with Jan Hanvold.

The newspaper The day will never deal with this, why?

We must learn to always distinguish between snow and bare, between good and evil, between white and black, between true and false and what's what in whatever landscape they move, even if a friend or Israel's Zionist. I am for Israel, but I hate the false Christianity as such. January Hanvold and charismatic represents. We must and will tell apart what is what.

The scores most of the newspaper's Day Israel fabric, thus making a non issue with this? It looks like this. Viewing of those who also writes as a debate ears on their website are very many friends that Israel goes too far in his statements time and again. But they are deleted or asked to take a break? It does not look like this, why is the Day and the editors there unnfallende to such and it is cowardly and immature and mature.

I love and defend Israel, but I will also speak well of others as far as possible.

Scripture speaks of in Hebrews 12 14 Pursue after peace with all men and after holiness, for without holiness no one will see the Lord.

It fails newspaper Day and many others.

We shall win the sanctification something they do when they for instance. might permit Hanvold and peers. And we should as far as possible, seek peace and not be unnecessarily provocative against others, even those we deeply disagree

There are several reasons why we should not provoke unnecessary.

1) They we should now that is radical example. against Israel is perhaps letting the truth, but has applied the wrong place. So many times their Israel-hatred a cry for help. Thinking of Mads Gilbert and Erik Fosse example. that must have really hurt to himself with such a condescending view of Israel, which after all is a free, functioning and democratic country unlike unfortunately most Arab nations and states where Islam is the top priority.

2) God's word says we should pursue peace with others, no one should have anything to put on us unnecessarily. Thinking of some of Today's blog Helen34 (synonym name) and others who have a hatred against anyone who is not radical enough for Israel and against all others. To me, she and her peers in the same ditch as Mads Gilbert and Erik Fosse, just in the opposite ditch. It is the massive hostility against anyone who speaks Israel's case, and Fosse and Gilbert and peers are at the opposite end, they can not stand a hot and good words about Israel and those who stand up for Israel. There are extreme people on both sides, the Middle East, Israel is the Arabs who are responsible for violence spiral with its terrorist attacks and bombings against Israel, which I take in the great and the entire Israeli political party.

3) The truth will always prevail in the end, so we can relax and have faith in God that He sees our case, also regarding Israel.

4) As believers are our "defense" of Israel forever "below" the touching reconciliation. Israel's case is important, but salvation in Christ is important and it is important that we see everything in the light of the Gospel. Therefore, it is double standards to defend Israel while working with false prophets January Hanvold.

5) We know who will prevail in the end, it is God's church and Israel. We know the end from the beginning, when we have revelation in the knowledge that through the Bible.

It is something that is important, which is on my heart. It is that we, as believers and as a nation must learn to use the words and expressions that I really like. It is our Judeo-Christian heritage.

What is this? I've written about this before, revisit it again here, and will end this article with this. Totally secure something for the newspaper and other day to write about: Jewish-Christian heritage: From Wikipedia: Jewish-Christian (in British English, Judeo-Christian) is used in the U.S. since the 1940s to refer to standards of ethics are common with Judaism and Christianity. The term is also used in a historical sense to refer to the relationships between the precursor of Christianity and Judaism (end of quote).

Learn this phrase: Judeo-Christian.

This is such an important and little understood here in Norway that we build in Jewish-Christian understanding of dypes seen it. So I put out the English translation translated with Google's help, read it even if there are some translation errors:

History of the term:

The earliest use of the term "Judeo-Christian" in the historical sense dates to 1829 in the journal missionary Joseph Wolff, and before that as a "Jewish Christian" in a letter from Alexander M'Caul dated October 17, 1821. Former appears in discussions theories of the rise of Christianity, and both are used with a different feel than the usual today. "Jewish-Christian" here referred to Jewish converts to Christianity. The term "Judeo-Christian" had been used in this sense as early as 1785 in Richard Watson essay "The Teaching and testimony from the Holy Ghost," and "Judeo-Christian" (as an adjective) as early as 1644 in William Rathband is one Briefe Narration of a church course. "Judeo-Christian" is used in 1841 to mean a combination of Jewish and Christian faith, and in 1877 to mean a common Judeo-Christian culture, as used in the phrase "Judeo-Christian traditions of character." Early German use of the term judenchristlich ("Judeo-Christian"), in a decidedly negative sense, can be found at the end fonts Friedrich Nietzsche, who stressed what he saw as neglected aspects of continuity between the Jewish world view and that Christianity. The phrase appears in the Antichrist, published in 1895 and written several years earlier, a fuller development of Nietzsche's argument can be found in a previous work, the Genealogy of Morality. The term "Judeo-Christian" does not win popularity until after the Holocaust in Europe. Reacting against the anti-Semitism of Nazi Germany, sought European and American commentators to redefine Judaism as an integral part of the history of The West. The term has since been used as part of the American civil religion since the 1940s to refer to standards of religious ethics is said to be held in common by Judaism and Christianity, for example, the Ten Commandments or the Great Commandment.

Related links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/09/nr-66-are-israel-and-jews-chosen-people.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/09/nr-372-israel-of-gods-eye.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/09/nr-371-why-is-dan-tribe-omitted-in.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/09/nr-370-where-is-then-ten-lost-tribes.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/10/nr-80-yasser-arafat-worlds-biggest-liar.html

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar