No. 1551: New information sent to the Discrimination Tribunal regarding Unibuss!

No. 1551:
New information sent to the Discrimination Tribunal regarding Unibuss!

Inibus instructor Abdullah Kayabasi writes:
"He listens to the radio, sometimes there is singing and sometimes some talking but I who was sitting right behind the bar could hardly understand what was being said on the radio."
Nothing about loud noise at all.



Discrimination Tribunal case 20/420 and 20/42

Oslo 31 / 12.2020

Unibuss and Per Christian Bing have led you behind the light and the verdict against me is thus false.
Unibuss are obviously corrupt.

I repeatedly asked to get an instructor on the bus to verify these fake customer complaints.
This was overlooked and they would not do I was told.

Then it shows in retrospect that they have had an instructor on the bus who writes clearly that I do not play loud on the radio.
He's not even able to listen to what I'm playing.

The lies of Unibuss have been revealed.
This is to keep away essential and crucial information.

Date: 31.08.2020
Instructor: Abdullah Kayabasi Salary No: 29383
Name: Christensen Jan Kåre
Bus no .: 3062
Wagon race: 3712
Type of follow-up: Random
Garage:
Driving style: 4 - Satisfactory
Comment driving style:
Uniform: Good
Comment uniform:
Service: Good
Comment service:
Cleaning in the bus: Good
Comment cleaning:
Precise departure: Yes

Notes from instructor:
He listens to the radio, sometimes there is singing and sometimes some talking but I who was sitting right behind the bar could hardly understand what was being said on the radio.
Feedback leads:

Here it is clear, he can not even perceive what I play.
You are corrupt if you do nothing about the judgment, as it is false!

This follow-up was 31 August, just before the board meeting which was 17 September 2020.

That this has been withheld, or omitted and taken out even though I have requested it. And this was a fact that they had had an instructor, can be equated with false and incorrect explanation!

The verdict against me is then invalid, and Unibuss is corrupt and everyone who agrees and defends them!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Krokstien 2 c
0672 Oslo

No. 1550: Satan is our real enemy and adversary - not those who perform evil deeds, they are only an instrument in the Evil One's fight against good, us and God!

No. 1550:
Satan is our real enemy and adversary - not those who perform evil deeds, they are only an instrument in the Evil One's fight against good, us and God!

Norway's national coat of arms, and the shield in Norway's royal coat of arms, is on a red background an upright, crowned lion of gold, which in the front paws carries a gold-jawed ax of silver. former.
Having met the authorities in various contexts, it is with a certain mixed feeling. If I look at the national coat of arms with the lion, I think that I also see a predator that is inside the system.
Why not a lamb, cat or a pet?
Yes, there is probably also a certain part of the predator nature behind it all.
In any case, we see a duality, as discussed i.a. and the prophet Daniel.
As I write about a little further down in the article.

 

 

Room. 16. 17 But I beseech you, brethren, to watch over them which cause disobedience and offenses against the doctrine which ye have learned, and depart from them; 18 For these do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but his own belly, and by his sweet speech and his beautiful words the hearts of the simple fool. 19 For the word of your obedience has come to all; therefore I rejoice over you, but I want you to be wise to the good and pure to the evil. 20 But the God of peace will hasten to crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you!

As a believer, struggle is not uncommon, at least it should not be.
Job says:

Job 7. 1. Is not a man's life on earth a service of war, and his days as the days of a laborer?

Is not a person's life on earth a service of war?
This is the truth and reality of the one who walks with the Lord.

We as Christians experience a whole different and much more violent struggle on all levels in our lives than the children of the world who are, by and large, on the verge of perdition.
Jesus himself says the following.

Matt. 7. 13 Enter through the narrow gate! for the gate is wide, and the way that leads to perdition is wide, and many enter through it; 14 For the gate is narrow, and the way is narrow leading to life, and few find it.

Here we see what Jesus himself said, that there are two paths that we humans follow.
The "easy" path we all follow from birth. It is the way that does not lead, which Jesus calls the broad way.
Then we have the other way, the one that leads. As Jesus refers to as the narrow way. Jesus also uses the word gate to cross or narrow the narrow road. When it comes to the wide road, there is a road that one does not really need to do anything to be on.
Why? For that path we are all on from birth, but we must then leave this path to enter the path that leads to Jesus, heaven, the 1000 year kingdom and the new Jerusalem.

When we read in the basic text, it becomes much clearer that the narrow road is not really the narrow road, but the road.
While the wide road is the road that leads to destruction and annihilation!

We encounter this with the road, something as the first were called if they belonged to the road.

Ap.gj. 9. 1. But Saul was yet making a tumult and of murders against the disciples of the Lord: and he went to the high priest 2 and asked him for letters to Damascus, to the synagogues there, that he might find men who belonged to God, both men and women, he could then lead them bound to Jerusalem.

Notice what is written: "For if he found anyone who belonged to God, both men and women, he could bring them bound to Jerusalem."

Those who belonged to the road, which is like a parallel to what Jesus says about us Christians, that we walk on the road or the road that leads forward. The only way that leads, as the "other" way leads only to destruction and annihilation!

In the basic text it is clearer that those who were on the road.
In other words, one had to make an effort to both get on that road and be on that road.
"Fell" one down or did not come up the road, which was one not on the right path that led and leads forward.

In other words, there are two ways. A path that does not lead, but that leads to destruction and annihilation!
While the other is the very good and right path, which will ultimately make you reach the goal of our journey as humans on this earth.

It is clear and obvious that those who are on this path will be under attack.
Not least from the spirit army which aims that no one should and must travel on this road.

It is obvious that the enemy - Satan - and his spirit army will do everything he can for us who are on the road. Neither should we influence those who are on the "wrong" path, and we ourselves should get away from the "right" path.
The path that leads to life as Jesus himself said.

The Kingdom of God - The kingdom of Satan is two greatest opposites!

From My Bible Commentaries Colossians 1:13 For he has delivered us out of the power of darkness, and brought us into the kingdom of his beloved Son.

Once upon a time, we too were children of darkness and lived like them. We did not know better, at least dmost of us. But now we have been set free, and there has been a colossal upheaval, we are now placed in the beloved kingdom of the Son of God. What characterizes that kingdom is the opposite of the kingdom we were in before. Before darkness, now light. Before hate, now love. Before looseness, now the responsibility to follow Jesus and the word of God. Before anything is allowed, now we live under God's will and bound to Christ and God's word. Everything has become new, therefore we must live accordingly or it will be worse off with us than those who have never experienced this.
(end of quote.)

There are two kingdoms fighting against each other, where the kingdom of God is the strongest and the perfect.
But in this world it is not always so, as not all things are yet subject to the kingdom and dominion of God and Christ.

From my Bible commentaries Hebrews 2. 8 everything you have put under his feet. When it says: "put everything under him", then nothing is except; everything was to be subject to him. We still do not see that everything is under him.

But with Jesus, God the Father "bet" everything on him. Should there be salvation, redemption and we humans could have to do with God. Was everything related to whether Jesus passed the test and the Father would acknowledge it!

9 But we see that Jesus, who for a short time was lower than the angels, is crowned with glory and honor, because he suffered death. Thus, by the grace of God, he should taste death for all.

Jesus persevered as a human being and completed his work. But it was in the most bitter way. He was not spared anything, even death embraced him.

10 For God, who is the cause and origin of all things, would bring many children to glory. Then he had to let the leader who leads them to salvation reach perfection through suffering for the Son of God.

This is such a great paradox that we must take eternity for help to understand and get to the bottom of this. That God himself could allow and acknowledge that salvation had to and should go through humiliation, suffering and death.
(end of quote.)

Scripture also says the following that I want to include.

2 Cor. 4. 3 If then our gospel is hid, then it is hidden among those who perish; them.

Scripture says that the God of this world is none other than Satan!

We also read in Hebrews the following:
"Put everything under him," then nothing is excepted; everything was to be subject to him. We still do not see that everything is under him.

Jesus has all the power and authority of the scriptures, we read this, among other things. here.

Matt, 28. 18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

We all live in this zone of conflict, but first and foremost we believers are the object of this struggle as we are on the "wrong" side in relation to him who has temporary power on this earth; Satan, the Evil Serpent who seduced Adam and Eve and the entire human race!

Now there is a lot to say about this. But deep down, there are two opposites fighting. It is God and Satan, it is the dominion of Jesus Christ or the God of the world, Satan's dominion!

When e.g. people go against the word of God and believing people, then it is more or less affected by the negative forces!
When we as believers and we humans do things according to God's word and God's will, the scripture says that we partake of God's Spirit and really God himself!

Ap.gj. 5. 32 And we are his witnesses of these things, likewise the Holy Ghost, whom God gave unto them that obey him.

When we obey God, we partake of the Spirit of God and the Divine nature.
When we obey Satan, we share in the Spirit of this world and that which breaks down!

Scripture says of those who have not turned to the Lord and been saved the following:

Eph. 2. 2 in whom ye walked after the course of this world, after the prince of the powers of the air, the spirit which now worketh in the children of unbelief; 3 among whom also we all in the past walked in the lusts of our flesh, and we were by nature children of wrath like the others.

Closing comment:

In Daniel we see the kingdoms of the world in two ways. A way that people perceive, and a way that lies behind them of spiritual dimensions.
We read in Daniel 2 and in Daniel 7 where in Daniel 2 we get to see the outside world.
Then as a picture support, which has various alloys and metals that are and look like something very nice, beautiful and large.
But in Daniel 7 we meet the same world kingdoms as predators, and then it is the predator nature that is prominent, where there is also a form of complex predator nature that is described to illustrate these world kingdoms.
Now we will not go into this here, because it will be too extensive, but we see the difference.
What is clear in the word of God is that the one who is behind it all is none other than the old Serpent, Satan himself!

I have been and am also in battle. Who is behind these fights?

It is very easy for a believer to know, it is not God but Satan.
It may seem so "innocent", but when all the cases against me are built on lies and fabfalse lies and false accusations. Then we know with a good "safety margin" that it is Satan.

Joh.e. 8. 44 You have the devil as your father, and you will do the will of your father; he was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth; for truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of lies.

We as believers know where evil and lies come from, Satan.
We as believers know where the good and the truth come and go, God!
Therefore, it is important to be informed and ready for this battle, it is part of our spiritual armor that Ephesians 6 speaks of.
See my Bible commentaries on Ephesians.
http://janchristensen.net/bibelkommentar-hoved.php?side=bibelkommentarer-Paulus-brev-til-efeserne

No. 1549: In all probability, there will be a labor lawsuit between me and Unibuss!

No. 1549:
In all probability, there will be a labor lawsuit between me and Unibuss!

This is logical thinking and most realistic, right?

At first I was a little unsure what to go for after I was fired or fired on November 20th.
What I was thinking about were several things, but after talking to several and considering what is right and best.
Then I came to the conclusion that as I see it, the whole resignation is a prank from beginning to end.
We will have a negotiation meeting on January 11 with me and my Lawyer Josefine Wærstad from YTF.
Where Unibuss has allied itself with the arrogant and foolish lawyer Johannes Straume and boss bully Per Christian Bing from Unibuss.

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/10/nr-2777-skal-mte-sjefsmobber.html

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/09/nr-2755-unibuss-driver-med-en-ren-og.html

The whole case is such that the dismissal is unfounded and foolish

I consider Unibuss to be bullies, harassment and persecution and discrimination!

Then we'll see where we end up and what the court says!

Unibuss has his views, and I mine. But what they are referring to is in their stomach the reason for the dismissal went on service charges they are referring to.

These my lawyer Josefine Wærstad has met very clearly, consistently and well.

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

There is a reference to service charges, it shows that Unibuss has engaged in bullying, harassment and persecution.

These service charges state, among other things: car washing as a problem. When I stand and wash the car with others, and this is embedded in the service indictment.
Then this is personal persecution!
It just shows that Unibuss is the worst thing in working life.
When it says that the following: "shows that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life."

Then this is a perfect description of the inferior management in Unibuss that creates a dysfunctional and destructive work environment!

I am looking forward, and I just hope that various agencies wake up to the in many ways criminal and degrading bus company Unibuss that one gets shaken up and removed many in the management and make other positive and good changes!

We finally show that Unibuss, with various instructors, has been on the bus with me and only given me positive and good feedback.
This only shows that it is only to look forward to a possible lawsuit against Unibuss!
My Lawyer Josefine Wærstad surpasses Unibuss' prank on Lawyer a thousand times.
Only Johannes Straume is interested in, and he is also bad at it.
It is to blacken others.
https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/09/nr-2757-det-er-bare-trist-at-unibuss.html

Given that we receive fair treatment, we will not be subjected to a murder as we were in the Discrimination Tribunal.

See here for feedback where I only get praise, and no one has anything to comment on when it comes to my radio play.
The fact that I play so-called loud radio is nothing but a lie!

The truth of the matter is that I drive a bus and do my job masterfully.
While the management with Abdullah Hatay, Andrej Peric, Per Christian Bing all act as one who bullies and engages in harassment.

If they had been interested and done their job!

Then they would have done everything differently. Not least verified these lies from some who claim that I play high Christian radio and have either confirmed or denied this.
If I had then played loud something I have never done.
Then they had asked me to mute the sound and see if I did this.
The whole case against me is nothing but fabricated lies!

 

 

No. 1548: Finally - after 1 month. came Unibuss by Advokat Johannes Straume with the reasons for the dismissal, this was really just nonsense, nonsense and slander!

No. 1548:
Finally - after 1 month. came Unibuss by Advokat Johannes Straume with the reasons for the dismissal, this was really just nonsense, nonsense and slander!

Here's what's the real reason I've listened to Christian radio programs on the radio.

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/nr-2788-sa-langt-jeg-forstar-er.html

The whole thing is a form of blurring and lying that Lawyer Johannes Straume comes up with as an "answer!"



Here is the justification and answer from Lawyer Johannes Straume:

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

We are facing an aggravation in working life that will not come up with answers why they fired me. This is really just nonsense, nonsense!

I wrote this letter to Attorney in response to this alleged response.

Hi again Josefine!

Think you have to answer this, because I did not break any internal rules or anything else.
This answer makes no sense, has no substance, it is blurring!

At the meeting we had, it only went on radio use. And allegations of high radio play.

They write:

"The reason for the dismissal is that Christensen, despite several service charges, has not complied. Kristensen's response to complaints, and attempts at corrective action, show that he does not want to change behavior or also adapt to ordinary rules of the game in working life. "

What have I not adapted to?

What response have I given that is not right?

I have acknowledged that discussion / conversation is usually worse.
Therefore, I will either turn off or switch to another channel if any passengers complain that I listen to Christian radio programs.

As I see it, I should have been defended. But okay, it's not hard for me here to join.
Not interested in standing up for my rights, but being solution oriented.

What corrections do I not align myself with?

What rules of the game do I not conform to?

++++
This was no reason!

Svada! No sense in telling you now - I don't wanna ruin the suprise.

I can then not change when no instructors and others get on the bus and guide me more than the one time Andreja Peric was with me.
It is Unibuss who does not do their job, when they do not come out and guide me when I ask for guidance.
I ask about getting corrective and everything else they accuse me of not doing!

I mean they come up with false accusations and fabricate something that is not true.

I have ridden the bus exemplary, that they go to the step of kicking me is of baseless allegations.

I have always complied, when I have received complaints. For example. that I washed the car in the car wash, then I stopped with this. Although others washed the car and received no complaints.
Can not see anything that I have complained about, that I have not adjusted and changed.

The only thing that is difficult is radio play.
Since I have never listened to radio programs with loud sound. That some passengers have complained about loud noise, I can not do anything about it.
I have repeatedly asked to get an instructor to get on the bus, unannounced or unannounced, to possibly adjust me.
When I believe and am sure I do not play radio louder than others.
Should I, against all odds, do so, someone must come and guide me.
The truth is, I have had people on the bus from Unibuss, none of them have once pointed out that I play loud on the radio.
All the accusations that Straume makes, I can not find have any basis and hold in.
They are also, as I said, not concrete and relevant, how to understand Straume's accusations is very difficult.

Hear from you!

Regards
Jan Kåre

https://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/nr-2789-oppsagt-fra-unibuss-for-ha.html

Here is the termination:

No. 1547: Unibuss meets itself in the "door" with dismissal, I look forward to the continuation!

No. 1547:
Unibuss meets itself in the "door" with dismissal, I look forward to the continuation!

When they come with e.g. that I have washed the car as something negative.
Then there is actually personal persecution when others are allowed to wash the car, but when I do, there is a basis for service prosecution!
I stood with others, for me this is once again proof that Unibuss engages in discrimination, personal persecution and discrimination!
 
When they come with me playing on the radio, as something reprehensible.
Then it is really personal persecution when others are allowed to do the same.
That some customers complain is not an objective truth, something my lawyer pointed out already in 2017.

Everything that Unibuss brings with it from accusations is also of a trivial nature.
Tell me then, is also illegal as it is only trivial matters that are behind it!
This in turn gives me a good opportunity to claim compensation, and it shows that Unibuss is a worst thing in working life.

I only want to do one thing, fight for redress and keep the job.
Here is the last email / letter from my lawyer to the furious Lawyer Johannes Straume who has only one agenda.
It's blackening me and finding fault with me, talk about a lawyer who is in the style of Unibuss. Straume is anything but fit to be a lawyer in my opinion.
That Unibuss and he have found each other, does that tell its story? Yes!!!!!!!

 

No 1546: As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 No 1546:
As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/no-1544-dismissed-from-unibuss-for.html
 

I do not mind Muslims or others, but it is sad that the Christian and the Christian message are so repressed in today's Norway that I have been fired for playing Christian radio programs with muted sound where someone has come up with false accusations. That I play with a loud sound.
I lost the case against Jan Aage Torp when he also made false accusations.
That is if the new slogan has become, false accusations and one arrives with it.
Norway has become a country where you go a long way in accusing others that you want to hit, this is bad.
Picture of Jesus, who also "lost" to false accusations against him.



But that Unibuss is trying to hang other things on me, it will probably fall back on themselves. For it will reveal that pursuing personal persecution!

Here are the minutes from when we meet Lawyer Johannes Straume and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing for § 15-1. discussions.

PROTOCOL

On Friday 6 November 2020, a discussion meeting was held in accordance with the Working Environment Act § 15-1 between Unibuss AS and Jan Kåre Christensen

Present:
Jan Kåre Christensen
lawyer Josefine Wærstad
Per Chr Bing, HR Manager
lawyer Johannes Straume


The background for the meeting was, as it appeared in the notice of 27.10.20, that there had been a new customer complaint of 14.09.20. The meeting was held via Teams and minutes are exchanged via email at the end of the meeting and are therefore signed electronically.

The complaint has come despite previous history such as contains a warning of 10.06.20 for the same condition. Unibuss has been of the opinion that Christensen's behavior shows that he neither can nor will change his behavior.

In response to this, Christensen has in an email to Bing of 29.10.20, among other things. expressed the following:

- "I do not like loud radio, do not play loud radio, it is solely your claims"
- "What a lie, there you are who can not change your behavior as you just keep bullying and lying both to and about me."
- "The accusations you have against me are also trivial, and you inflate it as something very"
- "You lie constantly, distort the truth and only make really trivial matters into something very.
You can not change, not me.
What should I change? Mention it specifically.
I can say what you need to change, but you do not want to. "


The employer asked if Christensen stood by these statements.

Christensen regrets that the e-mail was somewhat sharply worded, but points out that it must be seen in a larger context where a lot of frustration has built up. Christensen has not played higher than he did when he had Peric with him while driving in June. Christensen wants to get on a more constructive track.

Christensen says that lately he has thought a lot about why he gets complaints. He finds the meeting with the customers challenging, and feels that he loses no matter what he does. He has drawn the conclusion that he must try to handle the situation in another way, and will in the future turn off the radio if someone reacts negatively. He will continue to listen to the same volume that he and Peric agreed on in June.

The employer emphasizes that no one has asked him to turn off the radio, but that he is expected to behave decently.

Christensen asks for a clarification of what the employer means by decent, and asks for more specific instructions on what he should do differently. This with volume on the radio, he says that he has complied with since he received specific instructions in June.

The employer reads out statements from the blog to substantiate that they do not trust that Christensen, with the "attitudes" he expresses, has a will to improve. When asked, the employer denies that Christensen's attitudes or the content of the blog are the basis for convening a discussion meeting.

Christensen suggests that Unibuss should feel free to do unannounced spot checks to verify that he is telling the truth when he says that he does not listen to higher volumes than they agreed on in June. Alternatively, Unibuss "seals" the radio so that it is not possible to listen at higher volumes. He has been in contact with a workshop that says it is possible to do.

The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment. Christensen, apart from age, had no special social circumstances to state

For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.


Addition, it says here:
The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment.

Yes, I am on sick leave as my experience is that Unibuss bullies, harass and discriminate r meg.
My experience of how Unibuss handles the case is anything but good and professional.
What you think should be mentioned, I will leave up to you.
But I have an ambivalent and strained relationship with Unibuss and the management.
They probably have the same thing and clearly state that I am a bad bus driver who is unable to treat customers. That I have now realized and are trying to change this, they do directly the opposite of what a good management should do. It is to praise and encourage, but they are constantly trying to just put me in the worst possible light.

Furthermore, it says:
For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.

I answer this in an email to you. As I write the following:

But Johannes Straume is a little right that I have had a "Damascus" experience if he also had some fun at it at my expense.
But it's okay that he laughs a little at me if it can please him.
Have talked a lot with a lot of bus drivers and you.
It has made me realize that I must and need to change.
It has meant for me to be positive to discuss with some passengers if this has happened only a handful of times.
I do not intend to do this anymore, but either turn off the radio or switch to another channel.
Then I mean that I have changed as much as I can with the things that I can.
(end of quote.)

I have realized that it can be "wrong" to be in the way I have behaved in being able to believe that it will lead to good discussions.
It obviously has not been !!!!!!!!!!!

Will also include some of what a colleague wrote, which you can possibly include in the minutes:
Christensen has a very jovial demeanor, with both charismatic and outgoing features. This combined with his contemporary Karl-Marx beard makes him easily get in touch with people. We can not exclusively that contact-seeking people, and there are many of them on the bus lines that operate Oslo Inner City, have started a basically cheerful passenger who has gotten out of control due to. disagreement about, yes religion or politics. I have a whole register of such cases hidden behind the forehead.
 
This is a practice I do not recommend. 25 years of experience with Unibuss is that you maintain a dialogue with the public, or customers as they are correctly called tramway routes to an absolute minimum. Absolute minimum.

It's almost like feeding a hungry dog ​​who has an illness. It's a game of chance. Suddenly it bites as you want to help.
Then it is much better that I have decided to do in the future if customers complain.
Switch to another channel or switch off completely.

Another moment, which is important to me. It is that as long as the verdict from the Discrimination Tribunal stands, I unfortunately only have to accept that Unibuss can make a difference between me and e.g. Muslims.

I have to adjust to this.

Closing comment:

The agenda of Unibuss is to find something they can take me for.
This is how I see it, such a bad way to proceed as an employer it is possible!
Unfortunately, they are in part a worst thing in working life in creating such a poorly psychosomatic work environment !!!!!

No. 1545: We have been guided by PBE to build a wall, and the shed is built in good faith, while PBE makes mistakes and mistakes, they still have an agenda, it is to hit us as hard as possible!

No. 1545:
We have been guided by PBE to build a wall, and the shed is built in good faith, while PBE makes mistakes and mistakes, they still have an agenda, it is to hit us as hard as possible!

I seriously believe that PBE is behaving towards us completely uncontrollably, irrationally and directly hatefully
One who has looked at what PBE is doing, writes the following:

"PBE is ridiculously unprofessional in its handling of cases.
At least it's safe!
Do not seem to know exactly what they are doing?
Wondering what they actually smoke in that agency?
Hashish or something more sedative? »

It is nothing but abuse of power and authority.
Should we align ourselves with them and remove our wall that is for the benefit of all and it is they who have guided us in building it?

As human beings, the scriptures say that we should not be too righteous.

Ecclesiastes 7. 16 Do not be overly righteous and do not become overly wise! why do you want to destroy yourself? / 17 Do not be overly unjust, and do not be a fool! Why do you want to die prematurely? / 18 It is good for you to hold on to one, but you must not let go of the other; for he that feareth God findeth a way out of all this.

It's obvious that we humans - all make so many mistakes.
Acting as besserwissere and superhumans as the Planning and Building Agency here in Oslo does, actually looks completely sick!
PBE makes mistakes on mistakes and we who only need a small dispensation at the far end of Oslo city, where Østmarka is the nearest neighbor.
We are treated in the hardest possible way with fines, orders and threats.
It's really bad, rigid and totally pointless.

What is also sad is that when they make a mistake, they ask for forgiveness and receive it.
While when we do the same, even if it is indirectly their fault for guiding us wrong. Then we are met with harshness, threats and what is worse.
Is it possible? Yes, PBE has that standard.
We also asked a lawyer we asked to be able to help us if we got his fee covered through the insurance, which we did not get. Then both he and we asked, he does not get involved anymore as he is not working on the case.
What does PBE, promise to do as we said, but still send dozens of emails.

Here is some of the correspondence, and what is also super rude here, they register on our property what they think is an illegality even though this is something they have guided us to.

From: Lawyer… …….
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2020 1:53 pm Post subject:
To: 'Jan Kaare Christensen' <jk.chris@online.no>
Subject: VS: PBE-201510929-87 Registration of orders on property - Krokstien 2 C
Hi, forward this received from pbe Oslo municipality today.
With best regards
Lawyer MNA
Attachments:
   1_Registration of order on property - Krokstien 2 C.pdf (Main document)

Next mail:

Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 2:30 PM
Two: Agnes Nygaard Andenæs
Subject: VS: PBE-201510929-87 Registration of orders on property - Krokstien 2 C

Hi Agnes.

In all modesty, I must again remind you that you must not forward emails or contact Advokat …… .. as he was taken out of the case months ago.

Is it so that his email can not be deleted from the case? If so, can you tell me what I can do to delete this email?

All correspondence with the lawyer entails unnecessarily large costs, as well as additional work for both Advokat …… .. and me.

With best regards

Next email she lies and fantasizes that this she did not show.

From: Agnes Nygaard Andenæs <agnes.andenas@pbe.oslo.kommune.no>
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:59 pm Post subject:
To:
Subject: RE: PBE-201510929-87 Registration of orders on property - Krokstien 2 C

Hi!

His email has been deleted. The last two letters were actually both sent on November 12, before I received the e-mail from you to remove Advokat… ...
Due to a delay in the actual sending of the last letter, it did not arrive with you until today. I really just have to apologize.

 With best regards
Agnes Nygaard Andenæs
adviser
+47 477 84 648
Next mail:
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 1:43 PM
Two: Agnes Nygaard Andenæs
Subject: SV: PBE-201510929-87 Registration of orders on property - Krokstien 2 C
Yes it is very boring. Now I'm very unsure what to do, mtp. invoices he collects due to this.

Can you contact him and possibly arrange mtp. invoicing and further correspondence, so that this is resolved?

Take a very long time to get him out of the case, and this especially because of the cost of having a lawyer. I have also given notice of this, and the municipality has received a letter about this from Advokat in a letter dated Tor. 15.10.2020.
With best regards

Last mail from PBE.

From: Agnes Nygaard Andenæs <agnes.andenas@pbe.oslo.kommune.no>
Posted: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 2:07 PM
To:
Copy: PBE Postmottak <postmottak@pbe.oslo.kommune.no>; Astrid Marie Myhra <astrid.myhra@pbe.oslo.kommune.no>
Subject: Case 201510929 - Krokstien 2 C

Hi,

 

I now spoke to lawyer ……, who assured me that he did not invoice you for the two letters in which he had been mistakenly put on a copy. He had only forwarded these to you, without accruing some cost for this.
Recommend contacting him to inquire about the background of the invoices.

With best regards
Agnes Nygaard Andenæs
adviser
+47 477 84 648

Planning and Building Services
technical department
oslo.kommune.no
Switchboard: 21 80 21 80

Our last email to which we have not received a reply:

You mean, like, saltines and their ilk, eh?
First I call down and ask about how to build a wall.
Then we have to tear it down.

What now?
You're sending lots of emails wrong to a Lawyer who has nothing to do with this case.
Do not understand what you are doing?

Regards
Berit and Jan Kåre Christensen


Got someone to read through this, and here was the answer:

PBE is ridiculously unprofessional in its handling of cases.
At least that's for sure.
Doesn't seem like they know exactly what they're doing.
In that case, you should ask him to delete all emails from PBE.
Wondering what they actually smoke in that agency?
Hashish or something more sedative?

It is very possible that they smoke hashish or something else at PBE in Oslo?
For what they are doing above us is completely outside of everything that is "normal!"

No. 1544: Dismissed from Unibuss for having played Christian radio programs on "normal" radio strength as some Christian miscreants come with false accusations that I play loud!

No. 1544:
Dismissed from Unibuss for having played Christian radio programs on "normal" radio strength as some Christian miscreants come with false accusations that I play loud!

https://www.sokelys.com/blogger-jan-kare-christensen-mister-jobben-fikk-oppsigelsesbrev-i-dag/

What I am experiencing here is nothing new, it is really the same as I have experienced before with the Police, Nav, the Child Welfare Service, the Discrimination Tribunal, the Civil Ombudsman, the Planning and Building Agency, etc.

False and baseless accusations that are distorted against me and us as a family for false, false and that are false accusations!

Here is the termination

No, 1543: Singer and songwriter Sveinung Hølmebakk divorced and remarried as a believer, is this straight from God's word?

No, 1543:
Singer and songwriter Sveinung Hølmebakk divorced and remarried as a believer, is this straight from God's word?

To write and speak against remarriage, especially among preachers, Christian singers, and those who are shepherds and leaders of the church of God.
So this has really been a battlefield of dimensions.
Picture of Anita Therese Hølmebakk and Sveinung Hølmebakk, who according to God's word are disqualified to be a singer / shepherd in God's church.
Sad, but that's how it is!



But let's try to bring out what God's word says.
Without attacking or lifting anyone forward. Just let the scripture decide!

James 3. 1. My brothers! not many of you become teachers, because you know that we will receive its heavier judgment!

We know that those who are to stand forth in a visible service to God and man, have a special responsibility and God really demands almost perfection.
In many ways one can say that preachers / singers / shepherds / elders are God's «nobility».

The nobility have privileges that others do not have, but also all the more responsibility.
Nobility commits it is called !!!!!

Make all the people of the land noble, by freeing the minds and refining the will.
Quote by Henrik Ibsen

This is also what God wants, then they must begin with the shepherds / singers / preachers and those in the leadership of the church of God.

Therefore, the scripture says the following:

1 Tim. 3. It is a credible word: If anyone desires a supervisory position, then he desires a good deed. 2 Therefore a watchman shall be blameless, the husband of one woman, sober, temperate, dignified, hospitable, able to teach others, 6 not a new convert, lest he be inflated and fall into the judgment of the devil. 7 But he shall also have good testimony of them that are without, lest he be mocked and fall into the snare of the devil. 8 Likewise, the ministers of the church should be worthy, not heavy-tongued, not inclined to much wine, not covetous, 9 those who have the secret of faith in a clear conscience. 10 These also must first be tried; then they must serve in the congregation, whether they are immaculate.

God demands almost perfection from his shepherds and overseers, therefore it says, among other things. that he should be one woman's husband.

In other words, only been married once as a believer.

1 Tim. 3. It is a credible word: If anyone desires a supervisory position, then he desires a good deed. 2 Therefore shall one overseer be blameless, the husband of one wife, sober, temperate, dignified, hospitable, able to teach others;

This has been the norm throughout the GT, NT and in the coming 1000 year empire.

We read that the scriptures give a clear testimony of the priest in the old covenant how he should live, who was in the same relationship of responsibility before God and his fellow human beings as the preacher and overseer are in the new covenant. Leviticus 21:14: “A widow, or a divorced woman, or a dishonored woman, or a harlot, does not marry. Only a virgin of his people shall he take to wife ».

We read that God gives the same testimony and demands the same from the Priest during the coming 1000-year kingdom that will serve the people of Jerusalem in Israel, where law and justice will be based. Ezekiel 44:22: “They shall not take a widow or a woman from whom her husband has divorced, but only virgins of the house of Israel. But they can take a widow who is the widow of a priest.
When the Scriptures are so clear when it comes to the priest in the old covenant and during the 1000 year kingdom, then it is no less clear when it comes to the church's time management, we who live under the most glorious and greatest privilege of all; «One woman's man».

I'm fully aware that we are not all enough.
Will in no way hover and look down on others.
Yet, we must uphold the word of God and the teachings of the Bible as the norm for all of us, even today!
God has not changed, not His word, not the teachings of the Bible, nothing is different today than it was before or will be.

2 Tim. 2. 20 But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also vessels of wood and clay, and some for honor, others for dishonor.
21 If any man abide in these things, he shall be a vessel unto glory, sanctified, useful unto his master, ready for all good works.

This refers to the preacher (s). We as Christians become one and the same part of the preaching and preachers we lend our ears to.
Scripture speaks of merging with the word, the word of God.
We blend in with the heresy as well, therefore we become part and one with the preachers / singers / communicators we listen to.
This also applies to singers / praise singers / communicators we enclose and take part in.

The saying goes.
"Tell me who you associate with, and I'll tell you who you are," is an ancient saying. It is said to have originated from a Greek sage who lived more than 400 years before Christ. It comes in different varieties. But for the most part, it probably means the same thing all the time.

What I focus on is the preaching and the preachers / singers / shepherds / elders we take part in, they will influence us in one direction or another. Our leaders who have a "platform" service.

Sthe cancer says in short the following. A preacher who teaches and lives right.
Who is a vessel to glory, for God.
Affects others, especially other believers positively.

2 Cor. 2. 15 For we are the fragrance of Christ in God, among those who are being saved, and among those who perish, 16 for these a fragrance of death to death, for them a fragrance of life to life. And who is capable of this? 17 For we are not, as many are, so that we falsify the word of God for our own gain; but as in purity, even as of God, we speak before God in Christ.

While a preacher / singer / leader who lives against the will of God, who is not a vessel of honor. He influences the sheep in a negative direction.
The result is that some believers become a vessel of honor, while others do not.
I believe that all preachers and singers who are remarried as believers are on the verge of perdition, we must believe the words of the Bible. But the sheep that stand with these preachers and shepherds, if they perish. I dare not say that, but their life's work is about to "burn up", and they will not receive full pay.
By opening up to sin in the church, there are only negative consequences and it leads wrong.

Let me mention again that the shepherds / teachers / singers, those who have a ministry that is about influencing / guiding / communicating should be judged all the more severely.
Scripture says that the righteous one is hard to be saved, that preachers / singers who are to be judged all the more severely choose to go against the word of God, speak of a severe judgment!

1 Pet. 4. 18 And if the righteous man be saved, where is the ungodly and the sinner?

Closing comment:

There are some things that I think many Christians will not understand.
That the world means a lot of nice things, I live well with that.
But that Christians do not see this, that we who stand in the pulpit or in public before Jesus and God.
Then we are "subject" to God and Jesus with our lives, our words, yes absolutely everything.
We do not stand up on our behalf, but as his representatives.

Scripture says.
2 Cor. 5. 20 Then we are messengers in Christ's place, as if God himself were exhorting us; we pray in the place of Christ: Be reconciled to God!

The basic text states that we are ambassadors for Christ.
What then is an ambassador?
It is an envoy for a state or Government / King.
He does not represent himself, but another.
As I see it, and understand the word of God.
Then it is absolutely necessary for a preacher, singer or pastor in the church of God. It is that he / she has the right and necessary qualifications in all areas of his / her life.

There are always those who say to me, are you so flawless, are you so much better etc.
No, I'm sure in many ways worse than these.
I'm just trying to point out what God's word says. That this should not be done without hearing such piss, I live with that. But we must all take into account that it is only the word of God that is the guide for life and doctrine, nothing else.

Psalm 119. 105. Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path.

No. 1542: Meeting Johannes Straume and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing for § 15-1. discussion before deciding to resign or to be "taken" to grace!

No. 1542:
Meeting lawyer Johannes Straume and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing for § 15-1. discussion before deciding to resign or to be "taken" to grace!

Jesus himself was whipped and tormented, for a crime?
No, because he said he was the Son of God and the Messiah.
This was true, then I must be able to turn off the radio for a few minutes even if Muslims and others are allowed to play their broadcasts?
That one is discriminated against here in Norway - in 2020 - it goes perfectly well!
When one thinks about what Jesus went through, then we as believers must manage everything!



§ 15-1.Discussion before decision on termination

Before the employer makes a decision on dismissal, the issue shall, as far as is practically possible, be discussed with the employee and with the employee's shop stewards, unless the employee himself does not wish to do so. Both the basis for the dismissal and any selection between several employees of who is to be dismissed will be discussed.

We had a link transfer where Lawyer Johannes Straume and HR Manager Per Christian Bing sat in a room here in Oslo. Unibuss' premises in Schweigaards gate. But me and my Lawyer Josefine Wærstad were in YTF's premises in Lakkegata 19-23.

It was a very amp and speech needed Lawyer Johannes Straume who asked and teased the same thing over and over again!
He probably talked 80% of the time and repeated that I would not change countless times, something else he did not believe.

I myself have come to the conclusion that I want to change.
Will not discuss with anyone, who does not like Christian radio programs.
If anyone points this out. Then I turn on a profane channel or turn off completely.

This does not cost me a calorie. Have opened my eyes to being jovial and accommodating, as I have been. This is probably not the best way to meet people who do not like Christian radio broadcasts.
Then it's better to do as I want now, it's turn off or switch to a profane and worldly radio channel!

HR Manager Per Christian Bing hardly opened his mouth, but Lawyer Johannes Straume chatted, got annoyed, asked the same questions 10 times and did everything he could to put me in the worst possible light, not good at all!
While Advokat Josefine Wærstad stood out as gentle, solution-oriented and stuck to the case, Advokat Straume responded time and time again to his great annoyance, frustration, anger, and disappointment!
It creaked loudly from him while Bing was abnormally quiet!

Now I expect to get an answer within 14 days, whether the answer is uncertain!
Should they want to dismiss me, I hope and believe that we will avoid trial as it is quite obvious that it is not good for any parties to be in conflict for as long as we have done!
The final package and that I can find a new job must be the best for all parties, right?

Closing comment:

Now we have to wait and see what lawyer Johannes Straume and HR manager Per Christian Bing bring!

But Johannes Straume is a little right that I have had a "Damascus" experience if he also had some fun at it at my expense.
But it's okay that he laughs a little at me if it can please him !!!

Have talked a good deal with a number of bus drivers and others. It has made me realize that I must and need to change.

I spoke with Strømmen Bilstereo and they thought it was entirely possible to arrange the setting on the radio so that they do not play louder than e.g. to 20.
Think they go up to approx. 40 - 50? Then in volume.
In other words, it is not physically possible to play radio loudly.
We have the same thing about driving out of a stop.
We are not allowed to start the bus until we have flashed, then release the brake and we can drive.
Therefore, no buses will be blamed here in Oslo for driving out of a stop as you have to blink to be able to drive.

It has meant for me to be positive to discuss with some passengers if this has happened only a handful of times.
I do not intend to do this anymore, but either turn off the radio or switch to another channel.

Then I mean that I have changed as much as I can with the things that I can.
If Unibus has several suggestions, I am willing to listen to them.

I would also like to emphasize in the end that over the years I have had a good number of instructors and others from Unibuss with drivers and others on the bus.
Not a single one of them has ever commented on my radio play.
I most recently asked instructor Elin Anmarkrud Uthushagen who is also a believer, if she has ever heard me play loud on the radio as she has been on the bus with me several times.
No, never, I do not even think about it. It goes without saying that Unibus' own employees, whom I trust and are much more credible to me than customers / passengers.
They have nothing to complain about me except that some passengers can not stand Christian radio programs.
Since I lost in the Discrimination Tribunal, I then have to change myself even though I thought that this is discrimination against me as a Christian and believer!
Scripture says the following:

1 Pet. 4. 12 Beloved! do not marvel at that fire who comes upon you for trial, as if something strange had happened to you; 13 But inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings, ye shall rejoice, that ye also may rejoice in the revelation of his glory. 14 If you are mocked in the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. 15 For none of you shall suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as a doer, or as a meddler in other people's affairs; 16 but if he suffers as a Christian, then he should not be ashamed, but praise God for this name.

That Muslims and others can play on the radio they want, and I may have to turn it off. It is just something one must reckon with as a Christian, to be treated badly and unfairly.
Then one must be positive, and praise God for it all!
After all, Muslims and others never hear anything like that. No Muslim has been prosecuted for playing Muslim radio programs. It's just me as a Christian, who is "free game!"

No. 1541: The only thing that can deprive President Donald Trump of not being re-elected for 4 new years as President of the United States, are probably the postal votes where his votes can be rejected or omitted!

No. 1541:
The only thing that can deprive President Donald Trump of not being re-elected for 4 new years as President of the United States, are probably the postal votes where his votes can be rejected or omitted!

What are postal votes?
It is that one votes, and does not put the ballot papers in the ballot box.
But sends it per. mail.
This is very easy to really cheat with. It is then only a matter of either removing the ballot papers or rejecting them.
This can present a major problem in the United States, now!
This is probably the only thing that can deprive Donald Trump of the victory in the Presidential election this November.
Pray for Trump that he wins and that no votes are rejected or removed!
That it must be and be a fair choice!

Picture of Melania and Donald Trump.



This is what the newspaper Dagen writes:
https://www.dagen.no/meninger/leder/2020-08-04/Det-Trump-har- done-rett-919804.html

What Trump has done right


When you read the Norwegian media, you can almost get the impression that everything Trump does is wrong.

No other American president has been the subject of so much criticism in the media as Donald Trump. And there will certainly be more for this presidency, which is so special that it is actually difficult to find historical parallels to it.

But when you read the Norwegian media, you can almost get the impression that everything Trump does is wrong and that none of what he does is good. But this is of course and fortunately not the case.

Therefore, this editorial - regardless of the overall impression we have of his presidency - is about three important things that Trump in our eyes has done right during his presidency. It's about the economy, China and Israel.

When businessman Donald Trump was elected president on November 8, 2016, the world's most important stock index, the Dow Jones, stood at 18,000. At the time of writing, it stands at almost 26,500, a growth of just under 50 percent.

We should note that this sharp increase has come despite the worst pandemic in the world in over a hundred years. The Trump administration has pursued a business-friendly policy that has obviously had a positive effect on American business and thus also on the global economy.

At a time when many governments, including our own, are demonstrating an embarrassing indifference to the increasingly powerful China, it has been refreshing to see how Donald Trump has the courage to stand up to the communist regime. For China's aggressive ambitions on the global stage are perhaps the greatest long-term threat to a peaceful and democratic development in the world.

Then it is crucial that there are leaders in the free world who dare to challenge the authoritarian rulers in Beijing. Donald Trump is obviously such a leader.

The American presidents' confession of friendship with Israel is almost like a regular ritual. But Donald Trump proved to be a true friend of Israel not only in terms of beautiful words and promises, but also in deed and political realities.

The most important and symbolic step he took in December 2017 when the United States recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and carried out the relocation of the American embassy there. Congress approved such a move as early as 1995, but all more or less pro-Israel presidents have since vetoed the decision.

Trump has also recognized the Golan Heights as Israeli territory. Thus, the world's most important nation has finally abandoned the meaningless belief that this strategically crucial area will ever be handed over to the terrorist regime in Syria.

Under Trump, the United States has also moved away from the use of the word "occupied" in other areas under Israeli control. For example, it is no longer called "Israel and the Occupied Territories" in the US Department of State's annual human rights report. It now says "Israel, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and Gaza".

Opponent of the upcoming presidential election, Joe Biden, has said that even if he disagrees with Trump's Jerusalem decision, he will not reverse it. Israel's friendship will thus remain a lasting legacy after Donald Trump, regardless of how things go in November.

No. 1540: Had I been a Sikh, Hindu, Muslim or something else and been bullied and discriminated against as I have been by the Discrimination Tribunal / Unibuss, I would have been front page material guaranteed in VG, Dagbladet, Aftenposten and other media!

 No. 1540:

Had I been a Sikh, Hindu, Muslim or something else and been bullied and discriminated against as I have been by the Discrimination Tribunal / Unibuss, I would have been front page material guaranteed in VG, Dagbladet, Aftenposten and other media!

2 Tim. 3. 1. But know this, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall then be selfish, money-loving, eloquent, arrogant, mocking, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, unreliable, slanderous, immoderate, unloving, without love of good, 4 deceitful, impulsive, inflated, love their lusts higher than God, 5 who have the skin of godliness, but deny its power - and these you shall turn away from.

This is from 2011, 9 years ago. The truth is that it is us Christians who are provoked and are more vulnerable than anyone else.

I argue that we Christians will never threaten or retaliate against anyone physically, only verbally.

This from VG in 2011.

Erna Solberg believes that Muslims are incited like the Jews in the 1930s

Conservative leader Erna Solberg believes that Muslims are incited in the same way as the Jews were in the 1930s. She asks Norwegians to deal with everyday racism.

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/GpyxJ/erna-solberg-mener-muslimer-hetses-som-joedene-paa-30-tallet

Picture of a Muslim ready to defend himself, while we Christians would never do such a thing. Illustration image.

These should be overprotected, but we Christians are not even allowed to listen to the radio until we are threatened with dismissal from our job, this is what I am experiencing these days.

I do not see myself as a victim, so far from it.

But it is still strange to experience that one is approached freely wild and has almost no legal protection!

I have experienced false accusations against me on several occasions, and still not won in Norwegian law and before the authorities!

Think, it could be Satanists, people from pagan society or what they now are and belong to ????????????

This fact that I listen to the radio, is not documented by any invalidity party that I hear out loud.

And if that had been the case, I would have turned it down.

Christian persecution and discrimination, no doubt what I have been subjected to!

Here is an email sent to the Civil Ombudsman in my case:

Sak 83559 Oslo 6.10.2020

The Civil Ombudsman

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against Disktriksnemda's decision in case 20/42

It is only mentioned that it is sick leave that is a night of revenge.

The whole case against me is a retaliation for not being a person they have managed to crack as they have tried for decades!

The night of revenge, retaliation and reprisals against me are far more than sick leave!

These are really repeated service charges and try to find all possible errors to use them against me in all possible ways.

This actually started in 2007-8 when Unibuss had to withdraw a service charge.

When they had to do the same in 2017, it got even worse.

I went to the Discrimination Tribunal in January 2020 and then it got so bad that I was prosecuted for matters that were insignificant and that I had played again on Christian radio.

But other words that they have disputed sick leave they have also done before. Blue. in 2017 as a night of revenge and reprisals that I did not participate in their prank.

The actual sick leave that is disputed is only a small and ugly part of the whole picture. There are several reports of illness they have disputed, such as revenge, reprisals and retaliation against me!

The retaliation, reprisals and revenge have actually been going on since 2006 when I was summoned to a meeting with my then leader Tveit, which you can read about in the drawn-up service indictment.

See here for screenshot.

Since then, the management of Unibuss has behaved badly and armored towards me by convening meetings in the east and west.

Get service charges for everything between heaven and earth.

Pull them and give new ones.

It's completely wild as they go, and it certainly does not end. Now they are incited after the cruel verdict from the Discrimination Tribunal!

This is murder de lux as I have never played loud on the radio and the so called customer complaints are false accusations that may have been given by Satanists and or others who hate Christianity and Jesus !!!!!! ??????? !!!!!! ?????

Those people can be anyone and they are not invalid and credible.

There is no objective party, and blindly trust those who also complain about me anyway. Some of the customer complaints are loud, all of them otherwise have both sound and the Christian message they dislike.

No customer complaints go only on loud sound, therefore this is no credible and invalidity complaint. But obviously that goes on my faith and that I also play Christian radio programs with a license and am legal by the authorities here in Norway.

Such programs as P7, Ptro, Visjon Sverige, Joh.3.16 and other programs on the radio that have a license and are approved by the authority.

I get provoked by some passengers, Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal!

It is obvious that I have been subjected to discrimination and gangs

celebration of Unibuss!

They have put undue pressure on me for almost 15 years with false accusations, fabricated things and oversizing small trifles to the most "dangerous" incidents.

Everything is put out of proportion and I make the same mistake as others.

Others hardly hear it, I get more service charges for the same conditions.

This is not good

It's so bad that words do not suffice.

Something is documented, mostly not!

Unibuss has threatened service charges, given them, withdrawn them and given new ones.

In recent years since 2016, they have mostly given service allegations that I have played Christian radio programs if there have been complaints about too loud sound, no sound or just to threaten with dismissal that I play Christian radio programs muted and with the same volume as everyone other bus drivers.

I must be taken, it is so primitive and evil behavior that words do not suffice.

Look here:

I have then obviously been subjected to retaliation and revenge by the management of Unibuss for decades.

Here is an example from 2016 which is also included in the ruling from the Discrimination Tribunal:

04.02.2016 Meeting with the driver regarding customer complaint from 12.1.16. The customer reports devotion / missionary work and criticism of other religions played on the bus radio. The customer complained to the driver, but was told that "here it is I who decides"

Furthermore, I have had instructors on the bus many times, they have never complained about the radio volume.

But complained about other matters as a retaliation and if possible to find fault with me.

Now they make new service accusations every time they find out that I have played on Christian radio programs.

This is both a night of revenge and reprisals against me on all levels.

How mean and hateful must the Unibuss management be before the Discrimination Tribunal sees it?

This is what I anchor, and that they do not see what is obvious even for a 4 year old!

That I will be subjected to revenge, retaliation and retaliation all the way and for decades!

No one stands up and speaks my case, I am a Christian and must endure so fervently all the injustice that befalls me.

If, on the other hand, I had been a Muslim or belonged to another religion, "everyone" would have stood up for me.

Everyone knows that it is a lie and hesitation that I hear loud on the radio.

But a murder against a Christian, who will never use force or violence.

It is so harmless and "safe" that this is what everyone does today!

Isaiah 5. 20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own thoughts!

No. 1539: Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

No. 1539:
Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

Erna Solberg believes that it is Muslims who are persecuted in Norway, and need special protection.

From what I experience, it is the Christian who needs extra protection and who is persecuted.

Has now sent some additional explanations to the cases that have been sent to the Civil Ombudsman for processing. Pray for the cause.

Erna Solberg, our Prime Minister, also needs intercession as she obviously understands so little about what is really going on in the spiritual struggle in Norway. Yes, not only in Norway, but all over the world!

Here are the emails I have sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/314 with suspension!

The fact that this case is dismissed is based on both procedural errors, misconduct and an incorrect judgment in case 20/42 at the Discrimination Tribunal, which has been appealed to you as a lie as that judgment is based on circumstances that have not been documented.

Then it will be a consequential mistake with this closure.

It is clear from our side that when there have been instructors, managers and others from Unibuss' management on the bus with me.

Has it never once been pointed out that I play loud on the radio.

On the contrary, there are other things that they have tried to trap me in such as that I do not drive "well" enough ". Other claims that are largely fabricated.

The haughty Ivar Danielsen writes in his answer to me about closure the following:

The condition of "reason to believe" states that the complainant must refer to specifics

evidence or indications that discrimination has taken place, beyond a mere allegation of this. In this case, the allegations of discrimination are not

substantiated with documentation. "

There is a lot of documentation here.

But when one does not want to "see" and have to lie that I listen to the radio aloud, something that has never happened.

Then you can also think of writing as much visvas as Danielsen does here.

Documentation abounds, but when you always "turn" away from what we bring from documentation such as. On June 8, 2020, a manager was with me on the bus and quickly found out that I was listening to the radio with the same sound level as all other drivers. There is a wealth of other documentation that Danielsen is lying about saying that it is not!

It is solely because I have received complaints on the bus that I have played on Christian radio. This is also stated in the customer complaints that it is propaganda and that I am looking to missionize on the bus when I choose "wrong" channels in these Christian haters and who have an agenda.

Bullying, harassing, lying and discriminating against me for my Christian faith as no one can ever document once that I have heard on the radio louder than others.

In the Discrimination Tribunal, Unibuss had explanatory problems, and had to admit that it was probably not because I played pop music, but that I played Christian song / praise that some were more vulnerable and hairy according to Unibuss' lawyer Johannes Straume!

Furthermore, the strongly haughty Danielsen writes the following:

"The way the case is presented, it is the tribunal's assessment that it clearly does not give reason

to believe that you are exposed to discrimination / harassment / retaliation from Unibuss

because of your religion. ”

As I understand it all, the issue is that I then play too loud on the radio even though I do not like loud radio sound.

Then I will try at the end of this complaint to say something about this and attach attachments that go on this.

I take into account that there are other factors inside that are also important, as I mean and see it quite obviously that it is solely my channel choice that has made me really harassed by everything and everyone here!

This with false stories on so-called loud sound is something that those who want to hit me for playing on Christian radio hang on to the complaint for the simple reason that they should get a response for their false ankles. It is only and exclusively that I have played on Christian radio that is the "problem" for these.

When others from the management of Unibuss have been on the bus, reported or unannounced, this with radio use has never even been mentioned. Why? I have never in 15 years as a bus driver played a single loud sound so that some passengers have been disturbed.

My sound level has never been higher than others and what is normal for us bus drivers to have in terms of volume and volume.

I do not consider myself to be vulnerable in any way, but I just try to relate to the facts.

As well as in a normal and as objective way as possible relate to the false accusations that have been received against me.

It is without a doubt my relationship with Jesus and the gospel that is the basis here, as I love playing Christian programs that are broadcast over the air.

Channels like PTro, P7, Visjon Sverige, Joh.3.16 and others that I listen to during the working day on the bus.

It is highly discriminatory that I am not allowed to choose the channels that I want from Unibuss as all other bus drivers do.

I receive service charges and am summoned to meetings with the management to hear on Christian radio. Now they are also threatening to resign and fire me!

In other words, the case is basically about my working relationship and it is clearly proven that Unibuss does not have the next documentation from an objective party that I play loud on the radio.

All things against me I consider solely as discrimination and bullying.

That this is happening in Norway in 2020 is only deeply, deeply, deeply tragic and shows that Norway is in some respects on a par with the old communist states where all religion, especially Christianity, is not "stubborn".

Where it is allright to persecute those who believe under the pretext of other conditions that they belong in high light. This is shameful and on a par with what other countries are doing that we in Norway will not compare ourselves with, tacky and false of the entire public agency and Unibuss, really bad!

1.) I'm 56 years old, I'm over with adolescence a long time ago. That I would sit and listen to loud radio for an entire working day? It's so adventurous that it's ridiculous. I have never, ever heard of loud radio.

2.) No one in the Unibuss system has ever been able to complain about my radio use. Should they be like that, something it never has been. Then I had turned down the volume.

3.) Unibuss has no standard and training. Then giving me a service charge for playing loud on the radio is also contradictory. Now I have never heard a loud sound either.

4.) Oslo is a city with 700,000 inhabitants. Of them, there are probably many who have many and special opinions and views. That some of them do not like Christian radio and write lies, there is nothing special about this of such a large crowd! That some of them claim that I play loud on the radio is more for the reason that I stand out. There are probably not many others who do that? It is then not tolerated by some who dislike Jesus and Christian radio broadcasts. This is not abnormal for me who has been a Christian for so long and knows that many are provoked as soon as they only hear something from the Bible. But that I play loud on the radio? Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5.) It was a night of revenge that Unibuss continued to pursue my sick leave also until now the social security court. Unibuss has a completely sick behavior!

6.) Unibuss gave me a new service charge to listen to Christian radio. This is also completely sick and undocumented as no one can prove that I have ever heard loud on the radio.

7.) When someone has been with me on the bus, reported or unannounced from Unibuss, no one has ever during the 15 years I have ridden a bus pointed out loud sound on the radio.

8.) All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

All complaints that have pointed out that there have been Christian programs, it has been as an appendix in some of the complaints that there has been loud noise. This is of course with the intention of getting a response that I play Christian radio programs with people who themselves obviously have problems with me being allowed to listen to Christian radio.

9.) Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

10.) In an ordinary court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

11.) That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!

There is so much to go through in terms of documentation, that it's just a matter of getting started. Come up with questions, the entire Discrimination Tribunal, led by Ivar Danielsen, is nothing else in this case 

than a gang of liars and which allows Christian persecution and discrimination of pretexts of service prosecutions and retaliation and revenge that are both directly and indirectly protected and protected by the Discrimination Tribunal when they base all service prosecutions given are of a loud voice that no one can document or prove that I have listened to.

The Discrimination Tribunal with Danielsen is nothing more than a bunch of liars that I resent that such a thing is possible to do in Norway. Something that is on a par with North Korea and Congo, where you also make up stories to get the answers you want.

I, Jan Kåre Christensen have never driven loudly over the radio with passengers in the bus, it has never happened!

Regards

Jan Kåre Christensen

Krokstien 2 c

0672 Oslo

Tel: 99598070

2nd email sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/42!

I am both upset and sorry that now the lies of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal are posted as a "truth" on the Discrimination Tribunal's website.

https://diskrimineringsnemnda.no/artikkel/2814

Click one further and go to the link https://www.diskrimineringsnemnda.no/showcase/2020000042

Then it says, among other things. following:

"The case concerned the question of discrimination on the grounds of religion in that the complainant, who is a bus driver, was prosecuted for listening to Christian radio programs while driving. The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice. The tribunal also concluded that the complainant was not subject to retaliation from the employer after he complained to the tribunal. "

The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice.

This is stated as a "truth". The real truth is that this is a blatant lie as no one can ever document or prove that I have heard on the radio sometimes at high volume.

And should something like this have happened, I would of course have adjusted the sound level accordingly.

But here it is a lie, a lie, a lie and another lie on the part of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal.

The whole case is just sad, but I complain the case inside the Civil Ombudsman so that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal clear lies that I play loud on the radio is strongly proven back as untrue!

If a judgment is to be credible, it must in one way or another be substantiated and the judgment in this case has zero documentation of this.

Only some false accusations from some customers on the bus who have disliked that I have played on Christian radio programs.

That they claim that I play loud some of these, is nothing but a lie and only false and untrue accusations against me!

It is very sad to know that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal can lie like this without any consequences!

All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond, have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

All complaints that have pointed out that there have been Christian programs, it has been as an appendix in some of the complaints that there has been loud noise. This is of course with the intention of getting a response that I play Christian radio programs with people who themselves obviously have problems with me being allowed to listen to Christian radio.

Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

In a normal court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction

. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!

Regards

Jan Kåre Christensen

Krokstien 2 c

0672 Oslo

Tel: 99598070

N. 1538: Board meeting above, where both I / we and Unibuss were allowed to present our arguments to the Discrimination Board, which will probably hand down a verdict within 1 month!

 N. 1538:

Board meeting above, where both I / we and Unibuss were allowed to present our arguments to the Discrimination Board, which will probably hand down a verdict within 1 month!

Picture of Ivar Danielsen who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal.

From YTF I then received help and who spoke on my behalf, Lawyer Josefine Wærstad.

From Unibuss, they had a broiler and rude Lawyer Johannes Straume.

Who was only concerned with one thing, to blacken me and had no arguments at all except to blacken me.

The head of the court was Judge Ivar Danielsen (Agder Court of Appeal).

He led the whole affair excellently.

Judgment I think will come after the Discrimination Tribunal's guidelines of approx. 1 month.

Unibuss I did not take into account other people.

Unibuss itself completely shit in my rights as a bus driver and human being that I, on an equal footing with everyone else, should be allowed to choose the radio channels I want and have available on an equal footing with everyone else.

In other words, when Unibuss spoke, it was like hearing the description of themselves when they tried to blacken me as much as possible.

This is where they themselves are stuck, they do not take into account.

On the other hand, we tried to bring out the factual and legal points. Where my Lawyer Josefine Wærstad thought that there were 6 points that were important.

1.) Unibuss is the person responsible here in relation to the complaint. Not Routes or others.

2.) Listening to Christian radio channels is protected by the provision of the law or the legislation.

3.) Whether I have been discriminated against and discriminated against, in other words.

Should it be allowed to listen to Christian radio channels on an equal footing with other radio channels.

4.) Whether the Discrimination is direct or indirect. The volume and content are intertwined, so this is both direct and indirect discrimination as I can not really listen to Christian radio anyway.

5.) Whether the Discrimination against me has objective grounds, something we believe it does not have at all.

6.) Retaliation with new service charges and contestation of sick leave etc.

Closing comment:

But what makes us guaranteed to win this case is the question that leader Ivar Danielsen asked me.

If I feel that I am allowed and can rant on the radio with Christian content high or low, will put my job at risk in terms of dismissal?

I answered yes to that, which of course is true and which makes Unibuss guilty of answering itself.

The case is then also about my working relationship as Unibuss constantly disputes sick leave and other things due to this case.

I personally believe that we both win the case and get redress.

Not least these retaliation in terms of reviewing my sick leave and other things. Has made my case strong in terms of compensation!