No 1546: As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 No 1546:
As far as I understand, the reason for the dismissal is that I have played Christian radio programs, but of course, Unibuss is also trying to hang other things on me to hit me!

 

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/11/no-1544-dismissed-from-unibuss-for.html
 

I do not mind Muslims or others, but it is sad that the Christian and the Christian message are so repressed in today's Norway that I have been fired for playing Christian radio programs with muted sound where someone has come up with false accusations. That I play with a loud sound.
I lost the case against Jan Aage Torp when he also made false accusations.
That is if the new slogan has become, false accusations and one arrives with it.
Norway has become a country where you go a long way in accusing others that you want to hit, this is bad.
Picture of Jesus, who also "lost" to false accusations against him.



But that Unibuss is trying to hang other things on me, it will probably fall back on themselves. For it will reveal that pursuing personal persecution!

Here are the minutes from when we meet Lawyer Johannes Straume and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing for § 15-1. discussions.

PROTOCOL

On Friday 6 November 2020, a discussion meeting was held in accordance with the Working Environment Act § 15-1 between Unibuss AS and Jan Kåre Christensen

Present:
Jan Kåre Christensen
lawyer Josefine Wærstad
Per Chr Bing, HR Manager
lawyer Johannes Straume


The background for the meeting was, as it appeared in the notice of 27.10.20, that there had been a new customer complaint of 14.09.20. The meeting was held via Teams and minutes are exchanged via email at the end of the meeting and are therefore signed electronically.

The complaint has come despite previous history such as contains a warning of 10.06.20 for the same condition. Unibuss has been of the opinion that Christensen's behavior shows that he neither can nor will change his behavior.

In response to this, Christensen has in an email to Bing of 29.10.20, among other things. expressed the following:

- "I do not like loud radio, do not play loud radio, it is solely your claims"
- "What a lie, there you are who can not change your behavior as you just keep bullying and lying both to and about me."
- "The accusations you have against me are also trivial, and you inflate it as something very"
- "You lie constantly, distort the truth and only make really trivial matters into something very.
You can not change, not me.
What should I change? Mention it specifically.
I can say what you need to change, but you do not want to. "


The employer asked if Christensen stood by these statements.

Christensen regrets that the e-mail was somewhat sharply worded, but points out that it must be seen in a larger context where a lot of frustration has built up. Christensen has not played higher than he did when he had Peric with him while driving in June. Christensen wants to get on a more constructive track.

Christensen says that lately he has thought a lot about why he gets complaints. He finds the meeting with the customers challenging, and feels that he loses no matter what he does. He has drawn the conclusion that he must try to handle the situation in another way, and will in the future turn off the radio if someone reacts negatively. He will continue to listen to the same volume that he and Peric agreed on in June.

The employer emphasizes that no one has asked him to turn off the radio, but that he is expected to behave decently.

Christensen asks for a clarification of what the employer means by decent, and asks for more specific instructions on what he should do differently. This with volume on the radio, he says that he has complied with since he received specific instructions in June.

The employer reads out statements from the blog to substantiate that they do not trust that Christensen, with the "attitudes" he expresses, has a will to improve. When asked, the employer denies that Christensen's attitudes or the content of the blog are the basis for convening a discussion meeting.

Christensen suggests that Unibuss should feel free to do unannounced spot checks to verify that he is telling the truth when he says that he does not listen to higher volumes than they agreed on in June. Alternatively, Unibuss "seals" the radio so that it is not possible to listen at higher volumes. He has been in contact with a workshop that says it is possible to do.

The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment. Christensen, apart from age, had no special social circumstances to state

For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.


Addition, it says here:
The employer then asked if there were special social factors Christensen thought should be important for the employer's assessment.

Yes, I am on sick leave as my experience is that Unibuss bullies, harass and discriminate r meg.
My experience of how Unibuss handles the case is anything but good and professional.
What you think should be mentioned, I will leave up to you.
But I have an ambivalent and strained relationship with Unibuss and the management.
They probably have the same thing and clearly state that I am a bad bus driver who is unable to treat customers. That I have now realized and are trying to change this, they do directly the opposite of what a good management should do. It is to praise and encourage, but they are constantly trying to just put me in the worst possible light.

Furthermore, it says:
For the employer's part, it appears as if Christensen with a "constructive clue" believes that the employer should meet him, and accept his perception of reality. It appears to be noticeable that Christensen expresses that he has changed attitudes between 29.10.20 and today's meeting, without being able to say anything concrete about when and how this has happened.

I answer this in an email to you. As I write the following:

But Johannes Straume is a little right that I have had a "Damascus" experience if he also had some fun at it at my expense.
But it's okay that he laughs a little at me if it can please him.
Have talked a lot with a lot of bus drivers and you.
It has made me realize that I must and need to change.
It has meant for me to be positive to discuss with some passengers if this has happened only a handful of times.
I do not intend to do this anymore, but either turn off the radio or switch to another channel.
Then I mean that I have changed as much as I can with the things that I can.
(end of quote.)

I have realized that it can be "wrong" to be in the way I have behaved in being able to believe that it will lead to good discussions.
It obviously has not been !!!!!!!!!!!

Will also include some of what a colleague wrote, which you can possibly include in the minutes:
Christensen has a very jovial demeanor, with both charismatic and outgoing features. This combined with his contemporary Karl-Marx beard makes him easily get in touch with people. We can not exclusively that contact-seeking people, and there are many of them on the bus lines that operate Oslo Inner City, have started a basically cheerful passenger who has gotten out of control due to. disagreement about, yes religion or politics. I have a whole register of such cases hidden behind the forehead.
 
This is a practice I do not recommend. 25 years of experience with Unibuss is that you maintain a dialogue with the public, or customers as they are correctly called tramway routes to an absolute minimum. Absolute minimum.

It's almost like feeding a hungry dog ​​who has an illness. It's a game of chance. Suddenly it bites as you want to help.
Then it is much better that I have decided to do in the future if customers complain.
Switch to another channel or switch off completely.

Another moment, which is important to me. It is that as long as the verdict from the Discrimination Tribunal stands, I unfortunately only have to accept that Unibuss can make a difference between me and e.g. Muslims.

I have to adjust to this.

Closing comment:

The agenda of Unibuss is to find something they can take me for.
This is how I see it, such a bad way to proceed as an employer it is possible!
Unfortunately, they are in part a worst thing in working life in creating such a poorly psychosomatic work environment !!!!!