Heavenly blog!: No. 1539: Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

torsdag 1. oktober 2020

No. 1539: Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

No. 1539:
Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

Erna Solberg believes that it is Muslims who are persecuted in Norway, and need special protection.

From what I experience, it is the Christian who needs extra protection and who is persecuted.

Has now sent some additional explanations to the cases that have been sent to the Civil Ombudsman for processing. Pray for the cause.

Erna Solberg, our Prime Minister, also needs intercession as she obviously understands so little about what is really going on in the spiritual struggle in Norway. Yes, not only in Norway, but all over the world!

Here are the emails I have sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/314 with suspension!

The fact that this case is dismissed is based on both procedural errors, misconduct and an incorrect judgment in case 20/42 at the Discrimination Tribunal, which has been appealed to you as a lie as that judgment is based on circumstances that have not been documented.

Then it will be a consequential mistake with this closure.

It is clear from our side that when there have been instructors, managers and others from Unibuss' management on the bus with me.

Has it never once been pointed out that I play loud on the radio.

On the contrary, there are other things that they have tried to trap me in such as that I do not drive "well" enough ". Other claims that are largely fabricated.

The haughty Ivar Danielsen writes in his answer to me about closure the following:

The condition of "reason to believe" states that the complainant must refer to specifics

evidence or indications that discrimination has taken place, beyond a mere allegation of this. In this case, the allegations of discrimination are not

substantiated with documentation. "

There is a lot of documentation here.

But when one does not want to "see" and have to lie that I listen to the radio aloud, something that has never happened.

Then you can also think of writing as much visvas as Danielsen does here.

Documentation abounds, but when you always "turn" away from what we bring from documentation such as. On June 8, 2020, a manager was with me on the bus and quickly found out that I was listening to the radio with the same sound level as all other drivers. There is a wealth of other documentation that Danielsen is lying about saying that it is not!

It is solely because I have received complaints on the bus that I have played on Christian radio. This is also stated in the customer complaints that it is propaganda and that I am looking to missionize on the bus when I choose "wrong" channels in these Christian haters and who have an agenda.

Bullying, harassing, lying and discriminating against me for my Christian faith as no one can ever document once that I have heard on the radio louder than others.

In the Discrimination Tribunal, Unibuss had explanatory problems, and had to admit that it was probably not because I played pop music, but that I played Christian song / praise that some were more vulnerable and hairy according to Unibuss' lawyer Johannes Straume!

Furthermore, the strongly haughty Danielsen writes the following:

"The way the case is presented, it is the tribunal's assessment that it clearly does not give reason

to believe that you are exposed to discrimination / harassment / retaliation from Unibuss

because of your religion. ”

As I understand it all, the issue is that I then play too loud on the radio even though I do not like loud radio sound.

Then I will try at the end of this complaint to say something about this and attach attachments that go on this.

I take into account that there are other factors inside that are also important, as I mean and see it quite obviously that it is solely my channel choice that has made me really harassed by everything and everyone here!

This with false stories on so-called loud sound is something that those who want to hit me for playing on Christian radio hang on to the complaint for the simple reason that they should get a response for their false ankles. It is only and exclusively that I have played on Christian radio that is the "problem" for these.

When others from the management of Unibuss have been on the bus, reported or unannounced, this with radio use has never even been mentioned. Why? I have never in 15 years as a bus driver played a single loud sound so that some passengers have been disturbed.

My sound level has never been higher than others and what is normal for us bus drivers to have in terms of volume and volume.

I do not consider myself to be vulnerable in any way, but I just try to relate to the facts.

As well as in a normal and as objective way as possible relate to the false accusations that have been received against me.

It is without a doubt my relationship with Jesus and the gospel that is the basis here, as I love playing Christian programs that are broadcast over the air.

Channels like PTro, P7, Visjon Sverige, Joh.3.16 and others that I listen to during the working day on the bus.

It is highly discriminatory that I am not allowed to choose the channels that I want from Unibuss as all other bus drivers do.

I receive service charges and am summoned to meetings with the management to hear on Christian radio. Now they are also threatening to resign and fire me!

In other words, the case is basically about my working relationship and it is clearly proven that Unibuss does not have the next documentation from an objective party that I play loud on the radio.

All things against me I consider solely as discrimination and bullying.

That this is happening in Norway in 2020 is only deeply, deeply, deeply tragic and shows that Norway is in some respects on a par with the old communist states where all religion, especially Christianity, is not "stubborn".

Where it is allright to persecute those who believe under the pretext of other conditions that they belong in high light. This is shameful and on a par with what other countries are doing that we in Norway will not compare ourselves with, tacky and false of the entire public agency and Unibuss, really bad!

1.) I'm 56 years old, I'm over with adolescence a long time ago. That I would sit and listen to loud radio for an entire working day? It's so adventurous that it's ridiculous. I have never, ever heard of loud radio.

2.) No one in the Unibuss system has ever been able to complain about my radio use. Should they be like that, something it never has been. Then I had turned down the volume.

3.) Unibuss has no standard and training. Then giving me a service charge for playing loud on the radio is also contradictory. Now I have never heard a loud sound either.

4.) Oslo is a city with 700,000 inhabitants. Of them, there are probably many who have many and special opinions and views. That some of them do not like Christian radio and write lies, there is nothing special about this of such a large crowd! That some of them claim that I play loud on the radio is more for the reason that I stand out. There are probably not many others who do that? It is then not tolerated by some who dislike Jesus and Christian radio broadcasts. This is not abnormal for me who has been a Christian for so long and knows that many are provoked as soon as they only hear something from the Bible. But that I play loud on the radio? Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5.) It was a night of revenge that Unibuss continued to pursue my sick leave also until now the social security court. Unibuss has a completely sick behavior!

6.) Unibuss gave me a new service charge to listen to Christian radio. This is also completely sick and undocumented as no one can prove that I have ever heard loud on the radio.

7.) When someone has been with me on the bus, reported or unannounced from Unibuss, no one has ever during the 15 years I have ridden a bus pointed out loud sound on the radio.

8.) All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

All complaints that have pointed out that there have been Christian programs, it has been as an appendix in some of the complaints that there has been loud noise. This is of course with the intention of getting a response that I play Christian radio programs with people who themselves obviously have problems with me being allowed to listen to Christian radio.

9.) Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

10.) In an ordinary court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

11.) That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!

There is so much to go through in terms of documentation, that it's just a matter of getting started. Come up with questions, the entire Discrimination Tribunal, led by Ivar Danielsen, is nothing else in this case

than a gang of liars and which allows Christian persecution and discrimination of pretexts of service prosecutions and retaliation and revenge that are both directly and indirectly protected and protected by the Discrimination Tribunal when they base all service prosecutions given are of a loud voice that no one can document or prove that I have listened to.

The Discrimination Tribunal with Danielsen is nothing more than a bunch of liars that I resent that such a thing is possible to do in Norway. Something that is on a par with North Korea and Congo, where you also make up stories to get the answers you want.

I, Jan Kåre Christensen have never driven loudly over the radio with passengers in the bus, it has never happened!

Regards

Jan Kåre Christensen

Krokstien 2 c

0672 Oslo

Tel: 99598070

2nd email sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/42!

I am both upset and sorry that now the lies of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal are posted as a "truth" on the Discrimination Tribunal's website.

https://diskrimineringsnemnda.no/artikkel/2814

Click one further and go to the link https://www.diskrimineringsnemnda.no/showcase/2020000042

Then it says, among other things. following:

"The case concerned the question of discrimination on the grounds of religion in that the complainant, who is a bus driver, was prosecuted for listening to Christian radio programs while driving. The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice. The tribunal also concluded that the complainant was not subject to retaliation from the employer after he complained to the tribunal. "

The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice.

This is stated as a "truth". The real truth is that this is a blatant lie as no one can ever document or prove that I have heard on the radio sometimes at high volume.

And should something like this have happened, I would of course have adjusted the sound level accordingly.

But here it is a lie, a lie, a lie and another lie on the part of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal.

The whole case is just sad, but I complain the case inside the Civil Ombudsman so that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal clear lies that I play loud on the radio is strongly proven back as untrue!

If a judgment is to be credible, it must in one way or another be substantiated and the judgment in this case has zero documentation of this.

Only some false accusations from some customers on the bus who have disliked that I have played on Christian radio programs.

That they claim that I play loud some of these, is nothing but a lie and only false and untrue accusations against me!

It is very sad to know that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal can lie like this without any consequences!

All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond, have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

In a normal court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction

. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!