792: Jan Hanvold live in blatant contravention of Jesus and Paul's teaching, "Christian people" pray for him when God allows him to have a heart attack!

792:

Jan Hanvold live in blatant contravention of Jesus and Paul's teaching, "Christian people" pray for him when God allows him to have a heart attack!

May God heal Hanvold? Or is it Satan through his demons who rule here? What is it? For me it is obvious that it is Satan through their unclean spirits behind all this. How can I be so sure of this? Because Hanvold living in sin and he is Satan's property. We humans belong to either God or Satan. Do we live in sin, we are Satan's property. Do we live right and have therefore received Christ Jesus, so we are God's property.
It is something that can take us humans when we let Satan and sin unto, it is not only our flesh which acquires, but also demons scripture says that could cause disease, and other unnatural abnormalities.
 


There is nothing in between, but not everyone who does not believe in Jesus is demon possessed.

Let me make it very clear, all non believers are influenced by Satan. This Scripture teaches:

Efes. 2. 2 You lived in them at the current world view and let you lead the ruler of the skies, the spirit that now worketh in the disobedient.

We read that the Spirit is at work in the sons of disobedience, but from this point a of the Spiritual Obsession far.

All believers have the Spirit of God are sealed until the day of redemption.

2 Cor. 1. 22 who put his seal on us and given the Spirit in our hearts.

But people of faith can also be animated by the spirit of Satan at times, especially if one does not take the time my Lord. But where is Hanvold here in "landscape"?

Is he God or Satan property? He is obviously not God's property, then he is living in open sin to be re-married to a believer (except he's heresies with his charismatic glory theology). But he is as Satan's possession, then spiritually? Yes he is so.

First, Satan took his Nyra, now he goes to heart. What lies behind here? It is that Hanvold living in sin, in darkness. Then he gives no God but the Evil determination. And the consequences will be that Satan eats little and slightly inward in his body. To operate Satan. If we give him a little, so he takes over more and more. It's like the saying goes: "If we give Satan the little finger, then he takes my hand."

From kidney - heart - so dead!

Hanvold says he will be 120 years. By all means, it may well be that Satan keeps him alive so long. But Hanvold liver exposed to!

Being an adulterer and be a friend of Israel is a very bad combination!

Hanvold stands up seemingly for Israel, yet even live in sin. Where will this end?

Now he had a heart attack, what is next? The way I see it, the outlook for Hanvold that he should repent and live righteously very small. He's probably been in a position where he is hardened and will live as he always has. Here there is no going back enough ?!

The unclean spirits thrive in a life full of sin, Satan through his demons love that we do not take things so carefully, specialty teas if we will "serve" God. When he knows that he gets his way and will for us Nevertheless it. That's how the evil is.
First, a kidney he took off Hanvold, so he was a little "better" and it was heart. Demons get their footing, and they first got it. So they give themselves never without a fight! But in Hanvold there is no struggle, he thrives in sin and also get backing for his sin of many deceived and deluded believers.

Final comment:
Can we belong to God and Satan? Or we belong to either God or Satan? What does the word of God?

This can of course be misunderstood, but all people are created in God's image. But we humans are not just flesh and blood, we have a mental life and spiritual life as the Bible describes as the heart. In this heart live either the Spirit or Satan's spirit. This is of course very radical, but it is what God's Word teaches.

From this point of view, we are not children of God by giving a few coins to Moldova, or by having a TV channel. Are we children of God, then it may well be a fruit of being a child, but being a child of God is far more than that.

Becoming a child of God is about to have Christ and his teachings at the center of their lives and live by it. Make January Hanvold this by neglecting, rationalize and live contrary to the teachings of Jesus? Of course not, so we can say with certainty that he is not a true child of God.

A true child of God live by the teachings of Jesus, love it and would not for the world go away from it. This is what makes us true disciples. And true child of God, God be eternally promised because of the Lamb and the blood he gave for us and redeemed us from the world and to God!

This has nothing to do with Hanvold that person, he is equally loved by God of all men. God either sees or makes a difference in someone, but through the life that Hanvold have lived and are living. So he gives dark full access to their lives, unfortunately there are so many others who do the same as him.

We must take responsibility for our lives, or so goes us bad. But we take responsibility, live in accordance with God's word, God takes care of us.

1 Joh.b. 3. 24 And he that keepeth his commandments abideth in him, and he in him; and by this we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he gave us.

What must then Hanvold do?

He has short, repent, and what is it? First and foremost, living single, he lives in a relationship that God's word is cohabitation. The word of God is above everything and everyone.

What is going on with Hanvold when he asks and commands? These spiritual powers in him, they just move around him. A day in Nyra, the next day in hand. So when they approach the heart, it comes closer and closer to death.

Hanvold says he will be 120 years!

What does it really mean. If we are to live to 100, 70 or 120, it is to live with the Lord is essential. Here comes Hanvold short, he is not good enough. Therefore, he is an easy byte for Satan, he is his property legally. Liver and walking than in darkness, that belongs over Satan. Liver and we walk in the light, as we belong to the Lord. It is no golden mean. But an either or!

The way I see it, it goes well Hanvold from bad to worse? He came in a vicious spiral of his life. Then one must repent and improve their own ways with the Lord. But what does he do? He believes it is the solution to help and do something. The solution is never to do but to repent. Then we can also do. The important thing is to get in right relationship to God, then comes everything else. we are not in a right relationship with God. Since we live and walk in the dark!

But we repent and improve our roads, walking in the light. Then we are also light and sons of God and Satan can not touch us and fa has on us!

Examples in Scripture where demonic possession is behind the disease. But it is far from there to say that all disease is demonic possession. However, in some cases, as with Hanvold that is breath obsession behind and trigger and make a person sick.

Matt. 17. 14 And when they came to the people, a man came to him and knelt before him, saying, 15 O Lord! have mercy on my son! He has seizures and is suffering greatly; He often falls into the fire and often into the water. 16 And I brought him to your disciples; but they could not heal him. 17 And Jesus answering said, O faithless and perverse generation! how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? Before him to me! 18 And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him: and the child was cured from that hour. 19 Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out? 20 Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief; for verily I say unto you, have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder! and it shall remove, and nothing shall be impossible unto you. 21 Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

Here was someone who was both sick and demon-possessed. When the spirits left him because he was too fresh.
What ar the cause of his illness? Obsession. In other words, in some cases obsession that is causing the disease, but other times it is not. Then it's old age, poor lifestyle, genetic load etc. behind. Everything that came in among humans after the fall!

Do not ask for Hanvold, he lives in sin to death with being an adulterer or adulteress. Scripture urges not to ask for such as they must first repent before they can work with healing. Then there are spiritual powers that go around the body and attack one day the foot, so there is a period of time, then it may be kidney. And they come to you, so we know that death occurs. Hanvold has given Satan full sovereignty in his life by allowed sin to come into his life. Therefore pray and command Hanvold on both the one and the other, it hurts worse. He must repent when he lives in sin and spiritual death.

1 Tim. 5. 6 But whoever lives by their desires, is living death.

Scripture says Hanvold is living death when he lives according to his desires, and we will either pray or eat with such an adulterer and fornicator!

Related Links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/02/nr-760-benny-hinn-enchanter.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2013/05/nr-499-todd-bentley-remarried-with-his.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2013/04/nr-490-pentecostals-and-charismatics.html

Nr. 790: Being separated for living single word of God says is a "luxury problem"!

Nr. 790:
Being separated for living single word of God says is a "luxury problem"!

God's word says that we as believers are bound to our spouse so long as the other students. If we sign any reason. So speaketh the words unambiguous and clear to remain single or be reconciled.
1 Cor. 7. 10 The married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, that a wife should not separate herself from her husband; 11 but divorced him, then abide, she being unmarried or be reconciled to her husband - and a husband should not divorce his wife.
Rom. 7. 2 The married woman is bound by law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 Therefore, she is called an adulteress if she, while her husband lives, marries another man; but if her husband dies, she is free from that law, so that she is not an adulteress if she marries another man.
Photo of Frank Mang and his family who was divorced, but remained alone the rest of your life even if it happened in the early years and many had countless lovers who want to capture him.

 
Scripture is not that we should follow a doctrine that is impossible to follow.

1 Cor. 10 13 You have not met any of the human temptation. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond your strength. No, when you are tempted, he will show a way out so that you can endure.

God gave us marriage as something good and God willed.

1 Genesis 2 18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for man to be alone. I will make a helper of the same kind. "19 And the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky of earth. He brought them to the man to see what it would call them. The man called each living creature, that was the name. 20 The man gave names to all cattle and to the birds of heaven and all the wild beasts of the field. But to himself found the man no helper of the same kind.
     21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man. While he slept, he took a rib and closed up the flesh. 22 Of the rib the Lord God had taken from man, he built a woman, and He brought her to the man.
     23 Then the man said:
           "Now there is bone of my bones
           and flesh of my flesh.
           She shall be called woman,
           for the man she was taken. "
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and they two shall be one body.

But when this goes sour, what then? Yes what then !?

I think the basis of my own experience and what God's word says, it is to live single to reach the sky a very, very small sacrifice. Not least when viewed in the light what others have had to go through. I'm not saying it costs, but that single is also so many other possibilities, depending on which one stands in life.

We hear this, so I must go alone the rest of your life? Yes, indeed, if one does not get along with his spouse. So this is the way to go for a believer.

I'm in no way whatsoever that it is not a sacrifice, but I think it really is as difficult to live alone as when one is older. It has with one's own attitude and that takes a decision about what you will. When God's word is so clear on this point, it is because it is possible to live it. Otherwise, God had never spoken to us.

Suffering, deprivation, denial and discipleship, that is what makes us disciples. Do we want to Heaven, we must go on the road that leads there.

We read about several places in the word of God that one also had to stand, even if the marriage was entered into. If it was not valid and just. This is of course completely against the mother person, but to speak the word of God, and God has not changed.

Nehemiah 13 23 In those days also I saw that someone Judah had taken the women from Ashdod, Ammon and Moab. 24 Half of their children spoke the language of Ashdod or the language of the other nations. They could not speak Judean. 25 I rebuked the men and cursed them. Some of them struck me, and I tore out their hair. So I let them swear by God. I said, "You shall not give your daughters to the others' sons, or take some of the other's daughters as wives for your sons or for yourselves. 26 Was it not because of such that Solomon king of Israel sinned? Among the many nations there was no king like him. He was loved by his God, and God made him king over all Israel. Still got the strange women him to sin. 27 If one now hearing about you that you do so much evil and unfaithful to our God in marrying foreign women to you? "

Marriage no. 2 for a Christian while the other is "invalid" and those who are married with no. 2, the sexually immoral by the font. Do I have to repeat this? Unfortunately, as few others do, so I will have.

Final Comment:

It is clear that we humans have very strong urges, but we will be strong and stand Satan and the evil desire in our lives and hearts against.

But to deny himself? Fits this modern and carnal man? No, but it is demanding and require the Lord of us.

We humans go through so much, and something we must deny ourselves if we come up in those situations and end up in things. However, a sign that believers, do not open the word of God into something new marriage under any circumstances, as far as I can see from the word of God. The so-called innocent party exists neither in God's word or in the real world! This came Humanist Erasmus of Rotterdam Holland who managed to seduce a whole Christianity with its teachings for permission to re-marry. When the doctrine of the so-called innocent party.

The theory of the "innocent party" its right to remarry is less than 500 years old.

The idea that Matthew chapter 5 and 19 passages or "clauses" that give the "innocent party" right to remarry, did not show up until this year 1519, when Erasmus, a great humanist, presented his interpretation of First Corinthians 7. Erasmus' interpretation of Scripture introduced human reason in the interpretation, rather than let the text interpret text. His interpretation of Scripture was marked by humanistic overtones, in which he emphasized the people's happiness ahead of obedience to God's word. Erasmus was neither traditionalist or reformer, but wanted the utmost to be perceived as a godly man. He managed, however, to take payment for sin and also found simpler solutions thatched people. He served as the Gnostics focused on excessive intellectual experience.

Spirit lifted according to Erasmus the moral code of laws which had been the cornerstone of Jewish thought.

The last 50 years have left these heresies gained a foothold in the churches. There is one paradox that the church has increasingly focused on spiritual gifts, healings and services that take our breath away, yet increasing number of divorces in the same churches. Frenzied manifestations of the spirit is intoxication leading to more liberal Christian understanding, rather than being more true to the word.

Biblical infallibility was undermined and Erasmus attacks scriptural accuracy. He tied the Christian ministry with God's holiness of life. Erasmus taught that love should precede any marriage and emphasized that it was not "loving" made ​​by the Church to insist that unhappy people would continue to live together. He believed that the church should set them free, who lived in the so-called bad marriage.

Reformers adopted Erasmus' views on divorce and remarriage, but this idea was not taught in nearly 1,500 years before Erasmus, from Christ's time and the early Christians. Although this theory is less than 500 years old, many Christians looking for a "loophole" or an excuse, that makes it okay for them to remarry. Therefore Erasmus interpretation of first Corinthians gladly accepted by Christians who are looking for opportunities to follow their carnal desire to love a new person after one's marriage has been "destroyed" or they state that you live in an unhappy marriage.

In 1532 King Henry VIII did exactly this. He wanted to divorce his wife Catherine, to marry Ann Boleyn. He did Erasmus' interpretation of 1 Kor.7 popular and eventually broke with the Catholic Church because he wanted to marry again

He views of women: Women - can not live with them, can not live without them.

This is it seems that the porn industry has on women, no wonder that remarriage and this belongs in conjunction with belief in one God Triad.

Final Comment:

Erasmus was a very religious person. For a time he was Augustinian (as Luther), but soon found that it was not right for him. Through the mystique he nevertheless sense of religious fervor and inner piety. Church maturity could be combated through personal improvement and ethical conduct. Something he practiced the opposite by permitted remarriage. But pious and well it should sound like, where one contradicts itself with fair and virtuous words.

Erasmus believed outward forms of religion, such as indulgences, saint worship and relics were completely erroneous, and he spent a lot of time ridiculing the sort. He criticized contemporary theological discussions to be concerned with the unimportant and abstract relationships. Erasmus was a spokesman for a undogmatic piety. It was Jesus' practical life that interested him. The tradition had covered the core of Christianity.

Why should the Bible be made available to the common people. Although he made a notable effort to get to it. He translated the New Testament from Greek into Latin, and the idea was that it should form the basis for further translation into the languages ​​people. In addition to the translation he published comments, which made ​​him a pioneer in critical biblical science.

Note that it was the life of Jesus as "meant" something. At the same time he was socialite and enjoyed the social strata. Learning was nothing but change and adapt the most part, he could. This man is the Protestant Christianity characterized more by than any other, no wonder that it is becoming a Babylon that is different than the Catholic church. Yet a Babylon where everything is allowed. The word of God refers to as Nicolaitans and Balaam's teaching and preaching.

Erasmus reminds me of the modern man who will put their own desires always higher than God, Scripture also warns against (2 Tim. 3 5).

Related Links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-779-gods-tv-founder-rory-alec-makes.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2013/09/nr-583-nordic-countries-largest.html

Nr. 788: How it goes with the case against Pastor Jan Aage Torp?

Nr. 788:

How it goes with the case against Pastor Jan Aage Torp?

Are called, and asked otherwise people will know how it goes with the case where Torp has reviewed me first. And I had to reviewing him again. For me it goes incredibly smoothly, although I am somewhat late to understand what I have come up.

Picture of a pig that refers to what people call a person who marries a woman who could be his daughter. This is just an Illustrative image in a relationship where one call someone for being a dirty old man, but this is only an Illustrative image.
 

 
It dawned on me that it was not a "normal" man who had reported me, but a psychopath and human power. Therefore, this is "self-defense" to rain. Therefore, it can go to "helter-skelter and" in writing. You do not track everything at once! But it has dawned and passed up to me what I thought and thought this was about. That remarriage is a sin based on God's word, it is the psychopath manipulated away to apply something else, if it affects him. But here I have been able to both view based on the word of God that remarriage is a sin for a believer. And "caught" psychopath!

After what I think and experience, then Torp not "normal" man. But a psychopath, false apostle and man power.

This I wrote in my last reply to Torp in Searchlight, and my last post where ever:
Seek Torp, I never harassed, harass or done anything against you. Only pointed out that you are not "legally" married in God's word!
And the police, I'd never been "positive" to you, and tried to get in the face as an adult, healthy and good man!
Should just rejected you as the psychopath and power of person you are!
You have always approached me, I never you!
(end of quote).

Having reviewed Torp, but also sent an addition to the police. But I think Torp is hopeless "lost".

Was also at Politi Manglerud chamber to report Ansgar Braut, but there was no one with that name in Norway. So here it is obviously one that has a synonymous name. But okay, the big bad "wolf" is not he, but Jan Aage Torp has staged all this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But as the psychopath and power of person he is (this is my opinion and many others) so I know how to deal with such people now!

Stay as far away from them as possible after having warned them! To warn them is futile, only thing is to warn ABOUT THEM!

You learn as long as you live, or live as long as you learn!

Here is an excerpt of what I wrote to the police as additional for review:

Cause. no: 13123258

Seeing that my review Torp there are things that are both omitted and want to be included.

1) That it is false review as Jan Aage Torp comes against me.
(False accusation, crimes regulated in the Penal Code §§ 168-170. Whoever the fake review or explanation seeks to get another charged with a criminal offense, punishable by imprisonment for up to 8 years. Has the person accused also had to endure the punishment, the offender is punishable by up to 21 years in prison. Also the one who without reasonable cause to suspect the reviewer someone of a criminal offense where it is not removed charge is punishable, but in a milder penal provision, up to 1 year in prison).

2) Torp is threatening and therefore bring with paragraph 5.8 of threats. Here are a threat:

  Hi Jan Kåre!

I filed a police report today by you and made simultaneously an agreement with Oslo Police that I would like to first try to meet you in Mediation under the supervision of skilled brokers. This is a meglingsråd where we meet face to face, and everything happens in confidentiality, and the purpose is that we should be able to sign a mutually binding agreement, so I have to go ahead with the police, with all that it can cause. Theme is naturally limited to politianmeldelsens content, and not all topics and concerns we had to agree or disagree.
(end of quote).

It threatens Torp extended the police if I did not obey him.

3) Torp argues in his review of me the following: I have argued Penal Code § 135a ("discrimination or proportionality based on religion and belief"), § 247 ("Defamation"), and § 390 ("Personal Harassment") in my police.
This suit does not at me, but those who have gone out of the sect to Torp says it fits perfectly on him.

4) I do not know what one should call for Torp. But to me he appears as a psychopath who is responsible for all this that after my concepts are no police case. But all covered by Religious and freedom of speech that I have written.

5) It's in the police management that this is the network's performance, it's there for barely. But that has not happened in Krosktiveien 2 c, but in Torp confused head all together this madness here I would say. Have the feeling that it is the psychopath January Aage Torp is behind all this.


6) Do not want to imprisonment for Torp, only a single penalty as a warning not to do such a thing again! Looks to me a fine of 5.000, - kr.

7) Since everything revolves around what is published on the celestial blog, I have written an article on this subject: http://blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/nr-903-pastor-jan-aage- torpedo-har.html

This is what I am reviewing Torp for which the Prosecutor:
False accusation, crimes regulated in the Penal Code §§ 168-170. Whoever the fake review or explanation seeks to get another charged with a criminal offense, punishable by imprisonment for up to 8 years. Have the person accused also had to endure the penalty, the offender shall be punished by up to 21 years in prison. Also the one who without reasonable cause to suspect reviewer someone for a crime which is not taken out charge, punishable, but in a milder penal provision, for up to one year in prison.

But I hope not for imprisonment for Torp, either treatment when there is certainly a traumatic childhood or other things that are the basis for his actions?

This I wrote the Spotlight:
Roberto we have Freedom of Speech and Freedom of religion in Norway.
Everything I have made is covered here with very good margin.

All we are left with then is bogus police review Torp.

It survives enough Torp as it only then becomes a fine to Torp in 5000!

The rest are dropped on evidence position as it is called.
This is what I think.
I also believe that Torp is a false apostle, psychopath and living in sin.
The latter is the crux.
Police and prosecutors are human.
But God and the word of God is above all!

Final Comment:
Wants to write two papers to which the focus will include be that it is basically not in accordance with scripture reviewing each other as believers.
And an article in which I will highlight Torp's theology, which is not something classical Pentecostal theology, is an American understanding of scripture far right!
But I look at what I've done as a "self-defense" against a person who is a sick man power and acts as a ruthless psychopath! But being reckless is also running a game in which he sometimes acts as the most innocent people one who Torp both live in sin, preaching unbiblical teachings and fit perfectly in the power of man's ward LinkedIn Løvås describes in his book!

Related Links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-787-pastor-jan-aage-torp-has-staged.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-786-have-jan-aage-torp-their.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-784-jan-aage-torp-hope-i-finish.html
 
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/nr-781-pastor-torp-disclose-personal.html

http://storage.cloversites.com/norsklutherskmisjonssamband/documents/Vanskelige%20medarbeidere.pdf
 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-777-pastor-torp-has-now-become-front.html
 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-776-jan-aage-torp-hate-speech.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/10/no-775-what-conflict-with-torp-really.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/02/nr-239-jan-aage-torp-jan-hanvold-harald.html