No. 1503: Woman convicted of far milder statements than what Pastor Jan Aage Torp has come up with above me!

No. 1503:
Woman convicted of far milder statements than what Pastor Jan Aage Torp has come up with above me!

http://justismord.janchristensen.net/2020/01/nr479-jeg-er-blitt-utsatt-for-tidenes.html

Call someone what Pastor Jan Aage Torp labels me, as "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer, twin soul and follower". (many, many times).
It is 1 Million times worse than anything that others have ever been hated and harassed for. Others are convicted, Pastor Jan Aage Torp is protected even though he is obviously a criminal and deals with harassment and anger.
It is impossible to call anyone for worse things than what Torp has labeled. It's not possible.
At the same time, Pastor Torp should receive ten times punishment as this is only to spread false rumors and create a charged mood against me. So that everyone would take me!
The man is super-criminal obviously.



We live in an absurd and corrupt world.
This by the Norwegian Supreme Court.
We read about this here from the Document website.

Look here:
The 71-year-old doesn't have to zone out for writing "corrupt cockroaches" about Sumaya Jirde Ali
https://www.document.no/2020/01/30/71-aring-slipper-a-sone-for-a-ha-skrevet-korrupte-kakerlakk-om-sumaya-jirde-ali/

A 71-year-old woman from Bergen is sentenced in the Supreme Court to 24 days suspended jail for calling debater Sumaya Jirde Ali "your corrupt cockroach".

In Gulating Court of Appeal, the woman was sentenced to 14 days unconditional jail.

- There was no basis for unconditional imprisonment, as the Court of Appeal had come to, and for which the prosecution had argued, the Supreme Court writes in a summary of the verdict.

It was in the comments section of the Facebook group "We who support Sylvi Listhaug" that in the autumn of 2017, the Bergen woman wrote the comment about the Somali community debater. It read: "Damn the black offspring go back to Somalia and stay there your corrupt cockroach."

Look here for what Pastor Jan Aage Torp has called me for and not punished for this, call me "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer, twin soul and follower". (many, many times).

Here are some of what Jan Aage Torp has called me, not a little:
http://justismord.janchristensen.net/2017/12/nr-47-striden-mellem-meg-og-den-falske.html

"Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer, twin soul and follower". (many, many times).

"If you want a" wish opponent ", Jan Kåre Christensen is" perfect ".

Furthermore, Torp writes that I am filthy, stalker, totally unintelligent, a bullshit, the "hat-blogger", idiot, demon, lusts, mean-spirited blogger, protagonist who lacks the mind of Christ, ordinary judgment and social intelligence. Rumor JKC and, to say the least, his insight into English and Norwegian is pretty limited too!

I am struck by what low level JKC is acting on…. "

About the Heavenly Blog: "who is confused, naughty, evil and stupid - throughout. It should be closed, short and good. He also writes this on the Heavenly Blog: "Jan Kåre Christensen's Un-Heavenly Blog!"

"I want the police to bring charges and bring him to justice. I have no qualms about having to atone. "

You should probably call it a variant of social pornography »+ Much, much more!

Final Comment:

Think, Pastor Jan Aage Torp has admitted everything too, but is not charged or punished for anything.

Torp himself also admitted in his testimony that he also called Christensen on his website both "lies", "idiotic", "rumor spread", "bad", "evil and stupid" and communicates "social pornography" +++ a lot , much more!

No. 1502: The union clearly states that one is allowed to play radio - and the channels that one wishes for it!

No. 1502:
The union clearly states that one is allowed to play radio - and the channels that one wishes for it!

How is the case between me and Unibuss who thinks it qualifies for service claims that they maintain if one listens to Christian radio or song that possibly some passengers respond too!
Illustrative image of a bus that should not be allowed to listen to Christian radio broadcasts even though it was broadcast legally.

Here is mail correspondence between my Attorney Josefine Westad and Personnel Manager Per Christian Bing who has not answered our inquiry yet.

Reply from Unibuss:

Answer from Unibuss regarding service allegation for playing Christian radio:

Subject: VS: regarding their case number 02132
-----Original Message-----
From: Bing, Per Christian
Posted: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 12:23 PM
To: josefine@ytf.no
Copy: Myhre, Leif-Arne <leifarne.myhre@unibuss.no>
Subject: regarding their case number 02132

Hi

Sorry for late reply, but you had sent the letter of 20.11.2019 to the wrong postal address.

Unibuss will not meet your demand that the warning be withdrawn, but the letter of 20.11.2019 will be filed in the personnel folder of Jan Kåre Christensen.

With best regards

Per Christian Bing
Human Resources
-------------------------------------------------- ---

-------------------------------------------------- ---
Schweigaardsgate 16
0191 Oslo
www.unibuss.no
-------------------------------------------------- ---
Best on Bus - best together

Answer from my lawyer:


Christensen still wants clarification of which rules apply in the future. Especially what applies if there are passengers who want him to switch off the radio or change channels.

Feedback can be given directly to Christensen, but he wants written feedback, so it is clear what he should relate to.

Thank you in advance.

With best regards
Josefine Wærstad
Lawyer
_____________________________________________________
www.ytf.no
facebook.com/Yrkestrafikkforbundet
twitter.com/YTF_Norge
Occupational Traffic Association (YTF)
Lakkegata 19-23, pb. 9175 Greenland, 0134 Oslo

Final Comment:

Pray for the matter, not least that freedom of belief and expression is put under even greater pressure.
Finally, in Norway, as it is in today's China, it becomes almost impossible to be a Christian.

Here is correspondence between me and my lawyer that I post as that correspondence does not contain any kind of sensitive information.

Hi Josefine.

Read through the answer from Per Kristian.
There was no answer. He didn't answer.

It is important to know if it is permissible to listen to the radio stations you want yourself or if Unibuss has any guidelines.

The service charge against me is really the way I see it as a form of harassment and at least discrimination.

Believes that we should go to equality and the discrimination officer with this case regardless if they do not pull the service charge!

This matter means a lot to me, as it really attacks me as a person and who I am.

Hear from you!

Attaches to this which I received from Equality and the Discrimination Ombud:

What I wrote:
Hi Ragnar Lie

Thanks for the phone call. Send the answers here, jk.chris@online.no

I've only played on regular channels, such as P1 and P4, and some others.
Otherwise, I listen to the usual sound level on these Christian channels as well.

107.7 which is now local radio and the UN network. A legal Norwegian channel. As well as Ptro, P7, Joh. 3. 16 and Vision Norway where I hear if there is anything about Israel in particular. All of these are legal with a license, and I never listen to a CD or anything else on my job.
That I turned up a song or something that I wanted to bring with me, it may have happened.
But on the whole, I hear excellent and don't need special loud music!
This is obviously harassment and bullying because my Christian faith, nothing else!

Know it sounds fierce, but so be it!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo
Tel: 995980

This answer I get:

Hi!
As I said, what you describe may be discrimination on grounds of religion under the Equality and Discrimination Act § 6. If there are no guidelines for playing music / radio at the employer, you may have been treated less well than others because you choose channels with Christian content. However, this is an issue that you must address with your union. The union must call here for guidance on the discrimination regulations.

Sincerely,

Ragnar Lie
senior advisor

Gender Equality and Discrimination Ombud | Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud

Mariboesgt. 13, 4th floor N-0183 Oslo (visit), PO Box 8048 Dep, N-0031 Oslo, Norway
www.ldo.no

Regards
Jan Kåre

No. 1501: When the planning and building authorities want to remove a wall, staircase and storage space that fits into the terrain, but what obviously does not fit in and is illegal, should be left standing!

No. 1501:
When the planning and building authorities want to remove a wall, staircase and storage space that fits into the terrain, but what obviously does not fit in and is illegal, should be left standing!

What is so bad about PBE and the public, that one must say that they are pill rot. Everyone is pretty much allowed to romp as they please, we will be taken for absolutely everything they can find on us.
Now they have overworked themselves with sending to the County Governor over 40 attachments ++++
In other words, they are putting in unlimited resources to get us now.
It is so rotten and smelly by PBE that it opens up from Vahls gate on Tøyen to us here at Hellerudtoppen.
All this could and should have been avoided in treating us like everyone else, and showing understanding and compassion. Worse than it is!

Isaiah 5. 20 Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil, that turn darkness to light, and light unto darkness, that turn bitter to sweet, and sweet to bitter! 21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and wise in their own thoughts! 22 Woe unto them that are mighty for drinking wine, and able to mix strong drink; 23 Those who give as gifts to those who are iniquity, and take the right from the righteous!

Think here in our case, then we have built something that fits in perfectly with our house and everything else. It is a straight line, so possibly high has nothing to say.
While there are 3 neighbors who have sent repeated emails to PBE in Oslo and warned against our building stock. With conspiracy theories about one and the other. Blue. that the brewing car could not do its job. There is no place in Oslo city that the brewing car drives so easily past.

Our responsible applicants Ferdigattest AS writes about this here:

Mht. use, it is pointed out that the road in the area in question is almost exactly right. Establishment of storage space many meters from the road in no way affects visibility etc. then the wall is added until approx. 1 m from (at the nearest 95 cm) from the established asphalt edge / road. The wall slopes the slope from the roadway towards the property of the beneficiary. The road has been in use - and worked well - for several seasons since the wall was erected.

Mht. operation and maintenance it appears that the road has been in use for several seasons. The policyholder states that paving and other maintenance of the roadway seems to work well. We have also on this occasion asked the City Environment Agency for a statement on the occasion. We understand that they have not received inquiries related to problems in the sc. wall.

The contractor considered it very appropriate to have an external storage room which ensured good and dry storage, regardless of garage and basement. The booth was established on an area of ​​little use (north facing slope / fence). The settlement solution was accepted by the nearest neighbor, the measure is well below 15 square meters, and the measure holder was therefore of the clear opinion that the establishment of the estate would not trigger an obligation to apply. He has also never received any negative feedback at the booth, which is both designed with a subdued expression, with good aesthetic design and further expertly executed. The booth is located at a height below the neighboring fence, and is noticeably visible to the surroundings.

The establishment of a wall has given the gardener a much more usable outdoor area. When establishing a retaining wall, the holder of the project has achieved significantly better quality of living space with better usability in the outdoor areas, including an approximately flat west-facing area where different types of outdoor living are ensured. On this occasion, it seems necessary to point out that PBE itself has introduced an area requirement of 8x8 m for outdoor areas to be usable at all in the municipality's discretion. When establishing the support wall, the initiative holder has just achieved this. In today's situation, there is a west facing total area of ​​just over 8x8 m. It is 8.1 m from the house wall to the fence on the top wall. This was not possible until the wall was established.

The wall is approx. 1 m from paved road and that the situation works well today.

The intervener contacted PBE and inquired whether it was ok to erect a new wall where the previous wall had stood. According to the promoter, this was seen as unproblematic and exempt from the obligation to apply. The defendant regrets that he has misunderstood, but it is nevertheless pointed out that it was difficult to contact PBE if you did not act in good faith and that you erected the wall as you thought was in accordance with the regulations. This view is reinforced by the fact that there are apparently no support causes in the immediate area, despite the fact that several walls are established there. It has further been taken care of that the work was carried out professionally.

Former wall was in old plot of land. A new wall has been erected where the old wall was. Unfortunately, there was something wrong with the old borders, which meant that the wall was a few cm. out in a regulated way. This was first discovered by surveying. The wall is almost exactly at the previously stated site boundary, which is therefore somewhat incorrect.

It is requested that PBE, in its assessment, take into account that the consequences a possible refusal for the proprietor in no way is proportionate to the consequences the measure has regarding circumstances. Both the consequences for quality of the home and not least the economy no consequences will be significant for the policyholder.

Establishment of storage and masonry is, in our opinion, not a significant or unreasonable disadvantage for neighbors, neither in terms of. the measures themselves or traffic conditions. There is also the consent of the nearest neighbor.

In our overall assessment, the benefits of granting an exemption are greater than the disadvantages. The considerations behind the provision and the purpose of the plan are not significantly neglected. Exemption can be granted.

Regarding the wall has a negative impact on road traffic and maintenance: In this regard, it seems necessary to point out that it is somewhat striking that a neighbor in Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 has signed these quotations. It is important to emphasize on this occasion that the promoter in this project does not in any way want to indicate his neighbors as he feels that some have done in this case, because he has misunderstood the regulations and erected the building / building. But when all three neighbors Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 themselves have walls that are all within or within a regulated road boundary, then it becomes difficult not to mention this. In addition, when there are several other walls in the area with a similar location, it must be said to be an established practice in the area with walls up to - and indeed also in - regulated road boundaries. I fm. Both Stormyrveien 4 and 6 are also the walls all the way to the paved road. In Stormyrveien 5 is a garage and brick wall with approximately the same location in ft. the roadway as the measure now being applied for. We can hardly see that the wall in Krokstien 2c significantly affects the roadway significantly more than these measures. The fact that 2 neighbor (s) have a continuous exit of more than 20 m, and that none of the 3 neighbors has snooze on their own land, is otherwise considered to contribute significantly more negatively in terms of. traffic conditions than the right wall along the road that is being sought here. But as mentioned - it is not the task of the proprietor to hang up in neighboring circumstances. You just want to get your own situation settled. Mht. In addition, it is obvious that this wall, which is completely out of the roadway, has some influence on road engineering considerations. However, after an overall assessment, the wall is not considered to negatively affect road engineering considerations. Mht. road traffic is affected to a limited extent as the visibility etc. of the right stretch is changed to a small extent. In this connection, it is shown in the previous report. Mht. maintenance then it is pointed out that the asphalt edge is still at a sufficient distance to the wall, and that there is a road shoulder in the area in question, so that you can store some snow here. By the way, there is a considerable area where the wall goes into terrain where snow has been stored in recent years. Initiatives have never experienced this as difficult. As far as we understand, the City Environment Agency has not registered a single complaint or incident in recent years, neither with regard to. that the areas in question are dangerous to traffic or maintenance problems. We note that the wall has been standing for a long time without the road authority in the municipality - which manages and maintains the road - has not registered any problems, neither in terms of. use or operation.
(quote at the end.)

None of the three neighbors who have attacked us for so-called illegalities, which we have proven, did not hold the team. They even have a property where none of them can turn on their own property.
They have cones from the municipality set up. Illegal signs with private parking out in a public road.
It works and is nice with us, this should be torn down. That is the order and we have so far received fines and invoices so far of approx. 60,000, - kr.

At the neighbors, they really put their lives and others at risk every day.
PBE also puts others' well-being at risk of not doing something that doesn't work.
What should you say then?
It is deeply, deeply tragic that the whole of PBE and the public are only concerned with tearing down booths, walls and stairs with us as everything is perfect.
But the neighbors do not work. Even the wall of our neighbor just across the road does not work. It is right in the road, it prevents traffic.
Illegal signs and pillars stolen by the municipality of Oslo, where it does not work at all.

Paal Løvaas For Completed Test Byggesak A / S writes this as already seated.

Regarding the wall has a negative impact on road traffic and maintenance: In this regard, it seems necessary to point out that it is somewhat striking that a neighbor in Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 has signed these quotations. It is important to emphasize on this occasion that the promoter in this project does not in any way want to indicate his neighbors as he feels that some have done in this case, because he has misunderstood the regulations and erected the building / building. But when all three neighbors Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 themselves have walls that are all within or within a regulated road boundary, then it becomes difficult not to mention this. In addition, when there are several other walls in the area with similar location, it must be said to be an established practice in the relevant area with walls until - and indeed also out in - regulated road boundary. I fm. Both Stormyrveien 4 and 6 are also the walls all the way to the paved road. In Stormyrveien 5 is a garage and brick wall with approximately the same location in ft. the roadway as the measure now being applied for. We can hardly see that the wall in Krokstien 2c significantly affects the roadway significantly more than these measures. The fact that 2 neighbor (s) have a continuous exit of more than 20 m, and that none of the 3 neighbors has snooze on their own land, is otherwise considered to contribute significantly more negatively in terms of. traffic conditions than the right wall along the road that is being sought here. But as mentioned - it is not the task of the proprietor to hang up in neighboring circumstances. You just want to get your own situation settled.

Final Comment:

We are really bullied, discriminated against and discriminated against by PBE and the public. Of course, this is not the way it should be.
It is really pointless that we should tear up. And it is completely, completely incomprehensible that others have problem properties that PBE completely ignores. It's like they're fucking full of it!

What to say about this?
It is so unfair, plain work and simply it stinks of PBE, the County Governor, the Civil Ombudsman and the courts long, long way!
That they think this is acceptable and we should accept something like that, is on wild roads.
Here we really see the whole of the public Norway trying to protect each other, but for more they do.
More and more their folly and incompetence are emerging!
2 Thess. 3. 9 But they shall not prosper; for their disbelief shall be revealed to all, as also they were.

No. 1500: Already on November 6 last year 2019 I presumably showed through a parliamentary politician that this ISIL woman with her 2 children was on her way to Norway again!

No. 1500:
Already on November 6 last year 2019 I presumably showed through a parliamentary politician that this ISIL woman with her 2 children was on her way to Norway again!

Let us pray for those who will now be sent from Norway to Iraq and will face major challenges regarding the Middle East conflict!



I believe that it was an encouragement from the Lord that I should contact a parliamentary politician and even pray for those who have been involved in the war in Syria and Iraq after the war is partly over.
That they should have the opportunity to return to Norway.

I have sent some messages back and forth, with it being the message I received on November 6 that made me pretty sure it had become a solution for the woman with the sick boy.
But it would take some time for these to come to Norway and everything had to be arranged.

Here is the message I received November 6:

I can understand that since nothing is happening, but I can promise you that KrF is pushing for a solution. What makes the situation difficult to get Norwegian citizens out now is the war actions in the area. However, we are working on and believe in a solution.
Hans Fr

What I wrote:
Hi Hans Fredrik Grøvan.

You probably don't know who I am, but I drive a bus here in Oslo, and you've driven with me. Otherwise, I "know" you through your work in KRF.

I would go so far as to say that I know the memory and the man to write a few words to you about a really important matter.

It is that although these IS women and others have participated in something that is completely, completely beyond evil and wrongdoing.

Then the war is over, even though the aftermath is not over.

But then it sits down in Syria, and elsewhere maybe also Norwegian citizens with children, maybe without children too?

What is the point, I mean, we should as a Christian country.
A country that believes in propriety and goodness, let these go "stingy?"

Then we are almost like IS.

I believe FRP logic does not hold. These are Norwegian citizens, none of whom have been convicted yet. Tell them not to go home until sentenced. It is against all law and form of decency. These are not convicted, therefore they are entitled to protection. If we don't give it to them, then who else?

Of course, the suffering that they go through has chosen for themselves. But should we who have the resources, opportunities and can accept them simply sit down to do nothing?

For your aftermath, and all of Norway's aftermath when you look back on this in 20 - 30 years. Then I am convinced that if we do nothing and get these homes with the children etc. then this will testify against us.

Of course, they do not deserve this. But as a civilized and Christian country. Then it is our duty and appetizer to be able to help.

Hope, believe and pray. Really know me more memory and man to say this.
That you, Kjell Inge Ropstad and the entire management of KRF should do everything you can and as soon as possible. For example, FRP will get some money for tolls, can you say that then you will do everything possible to make these homes to Norway?
Every day that goes by is really a day too much for those who do not know will live tomorrow.
That is why it is so important to get these homes to Norway.

Is convinced that this is actually one of the most important things you will do throughout your political career to get these homes,

Hope you do not share this message with anyone in public.
But do everything you can to get these homes to Norway, and share this message with other politicians.
If we don't do something, it's our fault.

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Oslo / Karmøy

Deuteronomy 15. 9 Take heed that no evil thought enter into your heart, saying, Now is the seventh year, the year of remission, and you look upon your poor brother with evil eyes, and give him nothing. ! For then he will come to you to complain to the Lord, and you will sin.

Galatians 2:10 only that we should remember the poor, and I have just won to do that.

I also got this in response November 6, 2019, which shows that it was then about to settle.

I totally agree and work for that.

I wrote this:
Thank you, I believe that those who are Norwegian citizens are entitled to return home, even if the mothers should receive a prison sentence. We should be better than them, showing love and decency, even if they do not deserve it.

When the woman and the children were out of the camp and on their way to Norway I wrote this:

Congratulations, very good that now this woman has been brought to Norway.
But I do not understand why it is immediately said that the children should not be taken away from her?
Imagine, here, Norway is repeatedly convicted in the human rights court, and even then some do not get the children back. It is a great injustice.
But enough about that. What is right is to bring everyone home, and imprison the woman with a subsequent trial as soon as possible. Let them zone and then they are free.
When it comes to the children, I think the best thing is if they are placed in their families either with siblings, parents or other relatives while the mothers are zoning.
But glad that the first ones have come to Norway.
They've been doing one great wrong, but let's learn from e.g. Rwanda. There they forgave each other, and society is moving forward. This is how we must deal with this as well, let's learn here that there is forgiveness that has to come after they have been charged, convicted and given their punishment which I believe should be mild as they have obviously realized that what they have done is not good.
Also want to remind you that this IS woman has apologized and acknowledged that what she did was not right. After all, it speaks in her favor!

When said parliamentary politician was on TV, I wrote this:
Sat. 11:25
Very good what you said on Tv2.
Now you just have to get home to Norway the rest of the mothers / children.
The posterity will show that you did the right thing.
The alternative that those who remain is that you did not complete what you started 🙏

Got this answer;
Thanks for the nice feedback!

I answered this:
FRP is nothing to worry about in this matter.
It's just a game for the gallery.
After the FRP joined the government, net immigration and everything have gone their way.
That they will then leave the government is just something they lose themselves.
The peace of God!

Sent a recent message here:
Sees that the Foreign Ministry will demand this woman for money.
This can KRF and you get something done?
What one should keep in mind is that most people who come to Norway want to be law-abiding and good citizens.
The signals we are giving out here are not good.
We help with one hand and bring others.
Once you have gone in to help, your help should be unreserved!
The signals that the Foreign Ministry and the Norwegian state show above this woman, the children, and the others left in Syria.
It will again especially above all immigrants, they will feel that the way we treat them. This is how we look at foreigners coming to the country.
We will do so many times to bring back those who are in Syria.
Not least with the media coverage that we show that we are not like Isil and others.
It is our misfortune that we do not repay an oath of not being able to show care.
But it helps and does the best above even those who have been involved in a terrorist movement mentioned here.
Good night!

Final Comment:

Of course, I did not go out with this. But my wife and I prayed for this and have several things that we have on our prayer list.
I encourage everyone to have that!

No. 1499: I will try to explain why it is not the NAV, the politicians or others who are guilty of the NAV scandal, but that it is Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch and the "judges' pool!

No. 1499:I will try to explain why it is not the NAV, the politicians or others who are guilty of the NAV scandal, but that it is Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch and the "judges' pool!"

It is Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch and his office that have failed, not anyone else to that degree.
Therefore, it is he and the judges who should be punished here over someone else. It is not a NAV, but a legal scandal, where the country's judges must take the greatest responsibility.



It is not a NAV, but a legal scandal, where the country's judges must take the greatest responsibility.

I have been through several lawsuits and therefore know what is what.

You can be indicted for anything or sue others for justice.
We humans can be very opposed to each other and mean very much.
Here, the NAV believes that there is a frenzy of people who have received unjustified social security.
Here people must wake up, it is NAV's job to take care of this.
Therefore, when they believe and believe that there are some who do not follow the rules and the law, then they did it right.
They were notified and then the police and prosecution took over. Here, some were claimed to be criminals. Or, to put it legally, there are some who have been indicted and brought to court as drug abusers.

Then here we come to the heart of the matter.

All the problems and disagreements we humans have with each other, to make a decision on this.
Then in Norway, as in most western countries, there is a three-part.
The three state powers are:

the rule-making - legislative
the rule-implementing - executive
the rule-controlling - judgmental

In Norway, it is therefore fair to say that it is judicial power that has failed as no one has complained about the legislation as far as I know to a particular extent. Yes, there are those who believe that we should not be an EEA country, but we are now and the laws that apply here, they apply from 1 January 1994.
In other words, it is the District Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court that have failed to any degree!

IT'S HOW OUR SOCIETY IS BUILT.
WHEN THERE ARE DISPUTES BETWEEN US PEOPLE.
AS HERE, BETWEEN NAV AND RECEIVERS.
THEN IT IS THE COURTS THAT MUST HAVE THE FINAL AND LAST WORD.
THAT COURT LAW DETECTED THAT THE LAW WAS NOT APPLIED TO OTHERS.
IT DOES NOT DISCLAIM THAT THIS IS A LEGAL SCANDAL

Also includes some links.

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/01/no-1497-attorney-general-tor-aksel.htmlhttp://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/01/no-1497-attorney-general-tor-aksel.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2020/01/no-1498-attorney-general-tor-aksel.html

No. 1498: Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch and Attorney General Fredrik Sejersted should surely have been brought before the national court !?

No. 1498:
Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch and Attorney General Fredrik Sejersted should surely have been brought before the national court !?

Do not realize that one does not realize that this is a legal security scandal where, of course, the judicial power, is thus responsible. Yes, others have partial responsibilities such as NAV, politicians, media etc.
It is the EU that Norway is aiming for, this happened from 1 January 1994 when the EEA regulations were implanted in Norwegian law and in Norway.
The European Economic Area (EEA) is a collaboration between the European Union (EU) and three of four Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). The overall aim of the agreement is to link countries outside the EU to the EU internal market. The EEA regulations entered into force on 1 January 1994.



Sent this to a journalist in VG the following, this article applies.

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/meninger/i/LABVrR/de-skulle-vaert-paa-nav-hele-gjengen

I write:
Hi!

Reads what you write, but neither you nor many understand how Norway works obviously.

The whole of "Norway" can sue each other. Private individuals and government agencies, absolutely everyone.
That's good, and NAV has just done its job.
They have tried to limit payments, that is their job.
I'll put this on the lead of course.
But it is the courts that are the judging, tried and governing body that have really shit on the drag here and this is tragic that you do not understand.

Look here:
http://blog.janchristensen.net/2020/01/nr-2642-riksadvokat-tor-aksel-busch.html

Marius Reikerås writes the following:

It is misleading to call this a NAV scandal.

Rather, it is a legal security scandal, in which all power institutions fail.

But, even the word "scandal" is not strong enough, for this is about system abuse. In other words, judicial murders are carried out with intent.

And it is a pervasive phenomenon, affecting a great many jurisdictions.

Have a nice weekend!
(Quote end.)

I am surprised that one does not understand that the courts are the highest body, they should control us others. They set the standard and thus have the responsibility.

Anyone can sue a counterpart. Then the case goes to the district court, and possibly further into the court system. The Attorney General has the overall leadership of the prosecuting authority. But it is the judges in the District Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court who do the job and who are responsible for the entire NAV scandal.

Don't make this article that long. But read here, that the judge's stand in Norway has not brought with them this is ridiculous, primitive and the alarms.

See here: https://resett.no/2020/01/10/advokat-om-nav-skandalen-norsk-lov-er-underordnet-eu/?fbclid=IwAR2h7MSkEggHTVue-XGVwJD9398CM54O4zRqfSkc8KJOHSRWrml2QoS

Some excerpts:

Advocate on the NAV scandal: - Norwegian law is subordinate to the EU

Norway voted no to the EU twice, but was still bound to the Union via the EEA Agreement. It gave us access to the EU internal market, but with the EEA also followed EU laws and regulations.

- The social security scandal is deeply about the denial that Norway underwent a legal revolution in 1994, writes Eirik Vinje in a reader post in VG.

- The so-called NAV scandal is probably the biggest crisis in the legal system after the war. The injustice has been going on for a long time, perhaps from 1994.

- In reality, we introduced a new legal system in Norway by joining the single market. In fact, the parliamentary majority in civilized and formally democratic forms adopted a judicial revolution. For practical justice, the upheaval was probably greater than the introduction of the Constitution in 1814.

No. 1497: Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch "fools" the entire Norwegian people!

No. 1497:
Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch "fools" the entire Norwegian people!

Picture by Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch


 

Who is to blame for this hub scandal?

Many, but one cannot expect so much neither from the NAV nor the politicians, they come up with allegations.
Who should control them?
Of course that's when you have to look at the law. It takes place in the District Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
Who is sitting and judging there? It's the judge's stand that Busch was responsible for, he was their boss.
Who, then, is responsible for the hub scandal?
Judge Stand 80%
Politicians 10%
NAV 10%
Why? The governing body itself is not the NAV or the politicians, but the judge who should be able to do this.

According to Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch, there were 75 cases and 33 cases that he could have prevented if NAV and the politicians had done their job.
This is both ridiculous and a disclaimer.

If you lose a match 10 - 12 - 14 zero then the relegation stands for luck anyway!
It is a man who should have taken all the blame, and not blamed on others as Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch did today!

Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch succeeded in deceiving all of Norway with his cunning trick, by issuing "Black-Per" to NAV and others.

Attorney-General Tor-Aksel Busch and the judge's stand are guilty of 80% of this scandal.
There are those who are professionals and want to know far more than anyone else what is what.
Don't be fooled, it is Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch who is the "most" guilty here and the judge's stand !!!!!!!!!!!!

I have been in Social Security, District Court and Court of Appeal. Social security is really just a "like" court, not the district court and the court of appeals, it is a proper court with a judge and the possibility of an appeal etc. the courts here in Norway are ridiculous. All cases should really be tried again, as it is the same judges who have sentenced all cases in this country!

Actually, there is only one professional player here, that is the judge's position,
When the NAV and others come to court, this must be tried.
But what happens as a rule in Norway whatever the case?
It's planking, prosecuting gets what they want!

In a well-functioning democracy, the judge had looked at what was presented if it was in accordance with the law.
In Norway it does not work that way!
Not seeing this and blaming NAV and the politicians is not good!
If the judiciary had worked, they would have discovered this from January 1994 when we got the EEA agreement!

What is strange is that when one hears the hearing, the roles are partly turned upside down.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg actually responds to much of what Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch should have answered, but managed to get out of the "trap" by focusing on not knowing about the case in 2017.
For a disclaimer, the judge's position as Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch was and represents the supreme leader should have known about this in both 1994 and 2012.
Talk about being able to fool all of Norway as Attorney General Tor-Aksel Busch was able to do yesterday!

Strange that no one - or few - realize that it is the judge's position that has the main responsibility here.
It is the District Court / Court of Appeal / Supreme Court that is to control and decide on other such as the NAV, the prosecution power etc. anyone who promotes a case in Norway.
Everyone can sue others.
But then this will be up first in the district court, and then one can appeal this further.
But it is the judge's stand that always has the final and decisive word. Not the NAV, not the politicians, not Kari, Pål or Per, but the judge's stand!

Must clap my arm, I've been through a number of trials for various reasons.
Must be quick here.

Everyone can sue or bring others to "squares".

I've done that, and others have done it with me.

But it is when one comes to court that "everything" happens.

Then it's the "Cup Final!"

Then everything is settled.

NAV, and everyone else is not "guilty" of this. It's the judges.
Or did the judges not understand what they were doing?
They just let what NAV and the prosecution said, meant and did "Norwegian Law!"

No, and again, no, that one does not see that the judge's position has the main responsibility here is quite strange of so many people?
The Attorney General managed the art piece by talking about the 33 cases he was not told in time by the National Insurance Court so that he would not judge these.
It's like a nursery, but even worse.
The prosecutor and the judge are the "culprits" here, not the NAV, not the politicians, not anyone else!