No. 1463: Will PBE and the public send my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!

No. 1463:
Will PBE and the public send my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!

The huge and unnecessary opposition from the public will result in them sending my wife to Bredtveit Women's Prison, and me to Ila Prison and Detention Center? Then we refuse to pay their rigid submissions!



I do not think that all people experience PBE here in Oslo, or the public as difficult, rigid and unjust.
The reason for that is many, largely because, after all, PBE shows up from a far better side than we do.
We are one of the sure part? Many or few? I do not know, as we who have experienced similar things. Maybe we should gather?
I think that is not so easy, as most will just finish the case (s) and get on with life!

Our case is the classic where the phrase "the feather that turned into five chickens"

In the fairy tale "It's Admitted" by HC Andersen from 1852, a feather of a hen falls on the other side of town after she has peeled herself in the feathers.

"The more I take pills, the better I will be". But the hen next to the neighbor did not sleep and said to the next “there is a hen that will pick, to look good! If I were a rooster, I would despise her! ”

Then both owls and pigeons hear it all, fly over to the other side of town and say that "there is a hen, yes there are some who say that there are two who have picked all the feathers off, not to look like the others, thus attracting the male's attention, "

So, after the story had gone through cocks and bats, there had been “five chickens picking feathers off to show which of them had become the magician's best friend for the rooster, and then they chopped each other to blood and fell died down, to shame and disgrace to their family and to great loss to the owner! ”.

The hen who had lost the little feather she peeled off at the start of the story did not, of course, recognize her own story. And so a feather became five chickens.
(quote at the end.)

The truth of our case is that the public agency is lying, fabricating problems that do not excite and are downright evil against us as they were against Trude Strand Lobben.

Of course, it is much worse to be deprived of your child than to tear down a dead wall.
But the procedure is the same, here is a "criminal" state that can do most! The truth of our case is that the public agency is lying, fabricating problems that do not excite and are downright evil against us as they were against Trude Strand Lobben.
Of course, it is much worse to be deprived of your child than to tear down a dead wall.
But the procedure is the same, here is a "criminal" state that can do most!

We of course refuse to pay fines / fines of now 20,000 kroner and next to maturity on 15 October of 35,000 kroner, as they now also want to include stairs as an "illegality case" even though the municipality of Oslo is the "criminal" "And that is the cause of this conflict. Not least that it has become so "big". This could and should have been solved much earlier, but they would not even meet us for meetings. Far less come to fears that we have asked them repeatedly to meet them for a dialogue and have resolved this matter.

There are several mailers, but I see that in 2015 we asked for surveys and meetings several times. Without response and response. Here is an email in from 25.08.2015

Appeal against rejection of order for rectification / reversal -decision on forced fine -Krokstien 2 C

Hi!

Want to complain about rejection. It is okay that we have built as I understand it 18 cm outside the boundary. But EVERYTHING IS MADE IN GOOD FAITH WHEN WE WERE IN CONTACT WITH THAT PRESENT AND WE HAVE BUILT UP ON OLD WALL.

Secondly, the wall of other neighbors is almost out of the way. Our wall is set 1-2 meters from the road. The principle of equality for the law is enshrined in the Constitution. When others build only 20 cm from the road and we build over 1 m within the roadway, how is it that the municipality can believe that this wall is illegal?
We have built so that both the bus and the seagull in winter glide easily by. From a visual point of view, is it not possible for the municipality to meet us and help us to get an exemption for what is illegal?
This feels discriminatory against us by using so many paragraphs against us that we feel overrun instead of using some common sense and looking at the real situation that nothing prevents either traffic or visibility.

Getting to an inspection will also make everything much easier for all parties!
(quote at the end.)

Final Comment:

The only mistake we have made here is to build a slightly too large storage room, but it is to the benefit of everyone and for miles inside where PBE is required to grant us a waiver.

The wall is built in consultation with PBE, however orally.

A staircase was required when, before building a staircase, we went down and up with a rope,

Everyone complains from neighbors Roar Telje, Randi Kristine Lavik and Ragnhild Skramstad that the wall is gray and should not stand there. And what Roar Telje claims as his court argument that the brewing car would not come forward. And that it will solve problems with parking. It is true that there are problems with parking on Stormyrveien. But that's because Randi Kristine Lavik and Ragnhild Skramstad have really miserable conditions on their own property as they have to back out from their property as Roar Telje must too. And that the wall of Ragnhild Skramstad is obviously completely illegal as it is completely outside the road. Something that also our responsible applicants Ferdigattest AS wrote in our application to keep masonry, stairs and storage.

We read here what they wrote:

Regarding the wall has a negative impact on road traffic and maintenance: Reg. This point also seems to indicate that it is somewhat striking that a neighbor in Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 has signed these quotations. It is important to emphasize on this occasion that the project owner in this project does not in any way want to indicate his neighbors as he feels that some have done in this case, because he has misunderstood the regulations and erected the wall / building. But when all three neighbors Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 themselves have walls that are all adjacent to or within regulated road boundaries, it becomes difficult not to mention this. In addition, when there are several other walls in the area with a similar location, it must be said to be an established practice in the relevant area with walls up to - and indeed also in - regulated road boundaries. I fm. Both Stormyrveien 4 and 6 are also the walls all the way to the paved road. In Stormyrveien 5 is a garage and brick wall with approximately the same location in ft. the roadway as the measure now being applied for. We can hardly see that the wall in Krokstien 2c significantly affects the roadway significantly more than these measures. The fact that 2 neighbor (s) have a continuous exit of more than 20 m, and that none of the 3 neighbors has snooze on their own land, is otherwise considered to contribute significantly more negatively in terms of. traffic conditions than the right wall along the road that is being sought here. But as mentioned - it is not the task of the proprietor to hang up in neighboring circumstances. You just want to get your own situation settled. Mht. In addition, it is obvious that this wall, which is completely out of the roadway, has some influence on road engineering considerations. However, after an overall assessment, the wall is not considered to affect road engineering considerations to a significant extent. Mht. road traffic is affected to a limited extent as the visibility etc. of the right stretch is changed to a small extent. It is shown in this connection for past disclosure. Mht. maintenance then it is pointed out that the asphalt edge is still at a sufficient distance to the wall, and that there is a road shoulder in the area in question, so that you can store some snow here. By the way, there is a considerable area where the wall goes into terrain where snow has been stored in recent years. Initiatives have never experienced this as difficult. As far as we understand, the City Environment Agency has not registered a single complaint or incident in recent years, neither with regard to. that the areas in question are dangerous to traffic or maintenance problems. We note that the wall has been standing for a long time without the road authority in the municipality - which manages and maintains the road - has not registered any problems, neither in terms of. use or operation.
(quote at the end.)

In other words, in reality the problems in Stormyrveien are not with us. But it is with others and with the neighbors. Here, PBE does nothing even if we have pointed this out. This only shows their evil and rats against us. And that others have utilized the site 57 times more than us!

Here is an agency that is obviously criminal and that we are subjected to abuse and abuse of the law against us!

No. 1462: The truth is that the public administration is in deep crisis here in Norway. our case and that the human rights court in Strasbourg is running a number of cases against Norway, which testifies that this is not a one-off case!

No. 1462:
The truth is that the public administration is in deep crisis here in Norway. our case and that the human rights court in Strasbourg is running a number of cases against Norway, which testifies that this is not a one-off case!

Picture of our wall as PBE we want to demolish. They believe it is too far off the road and the property should be traced back to the way it was before. Before that, our sloped plot lay farther out than what our wall does. Here we meet people who are full of lies and then act to the degree unrealistic and pathetic.

Now we have a wall that allows the fill mass to stay on our property, and we were fortunate enough to build on an old wall without searching.
We have done as PBE said, and everything is just fine and good, now.
Much better than we had it, the roadway is also "bigger" now than before.
We are going to tear down, here are people who are so lying and acting outright quarrelsome and difficult, even if they call themselves case managers, unit leaders, group leaders and others.
Unfortunately, even if the whole case is based on lies, fabricated problems and other things that contradict their decision and the way in which they apply laws and regulations, they run into each other.

We have infinitely greater honesty and truthfulness than the public, so we have also revealed them time and time again that they "know everything", but their folly is only becoming more and more apparent to everyone!

2 Tim. 3. 9 But they shall not prosper; for their disbelief shall be revealed to all, as also they were.

For anyone and everyone who intervenes in this matter, only their misunderstanding and folly will be revealed more and more. They want us to demolish a wall that works very well, and before we built the wall it was more muddy and the slope lay more in the roadway than it is with our wall.
Neighbor Roar Telje complained that the brewing car would not arrive because our wall, but there are no places in Oslo city that the brewing car arrives as easily as with us. The whole chorus against us has been revealed as a bunch of liars and who are just looking to make nausea and anxiety!



What we experience with PBE and in fact the entire public administration acting in such a way, that one must say that they do not proceed in a fair and reasonable way is unfortunately not a one-off case!

I also have my question marks with writing as I do!

One of them is that after all, having lived 50 years of my 55 years in Norway, all of Norway is a country with wonderful people and a fantastic nature and freedom!

But why and how can it be as wrong as it sometimes does. We saw, for example. now in the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg where Norway was convicted. This was a child welfare case, but the similarities to our case are strikingly similar.
One puts oneself on a pedestal, high above others. Attacking than this, it is something that no one else has anything to do with. The truth is what the state and the public have determined.

We read here about the verdict
In the Strand Lobben case, the judgment of the EMD particularly attacks the decision-making process up to the final adoption decision. The child welfare service is criticized for its lack of efforts in order to bring about a possible return and for how togetherness was carried out. The get-togethers had not been designed to promote close contact between mother and child, in light of possible reversion, but only as a goal was for the child to gain "knowledge" of their biological origin.

The verdict also raises sharp criticism that her mother's care skills were not re-examined after she had a new child without demonstrated concerns about mother's ability to care. The Child Welfare Service had not made any real attempts to improve the poor connection between the mother and the child.
(quote at the end.)

Here we see that it was the very process that Norway "stroked" on. What is this really?

Lack of maturity, that's what it says. In many ways, it is the same in the case between us and the City of Oslo / Norwegian State that they appear extremely clumsy, unprofessional, rational, immature and then one can say that one is not worth the task.

I played football until I was 40 years old.

It reminds me that Norway acts as if they are engaged in a sport other than football. It's like playing handball, or playing athletics, but not soccer.
Such is indeed the whole of public Norway.

I am Danish, as I said, and I think this could not have happened so easily in Denmark as in Norway. The reason for this is probably that there is a lack of maturity here in Norway that is noticeable!

Let me take an example of really what low plane PBE is moving on here in Oslo.

Similar issues where wall placement is an issue Unlawfulness case 201717539 in Tamburveien 10 also a wall has been erected on a regulated road surface. This cannot be approved either, and will also have to be removed through follow-up in the illegality case.

I answer them and have never answered this:

Eg. then I got a reply from Nils-Henrik Henningstad that there were several others who had to demolish walls etc. I went into the cases he brought with, and then the fire and rescue agencies and other agencies were in to impose demolition. I pointed this out and told us it was also an advantage for fire and ambulance, as well as other agencies as we have built. Did I get an answer then? Never, such is PBE, just full of cheating and lack of good folk to answer things.
(quote at the end.)

Comparing this case with ours only shows that you have not understood any of the world's things.
Here is the fire and rescue agency inside, and with us it is the opposite!
Blue. when our daughter became acutely ill they had to use our stairs which we have been ordered to tear down, which testifies that their decision is completely rigid and meaningless!

Final Comment:
I just find that there is something very little mature and one moves on a plane that testifies that they are not suited to the task they are assigned to. In other words, they lack competence and act proud and arrogant!
Unfortunately, this is something that, in part, permeates the entire public Norway.

No. 1461: Sent this as a tip to some newspapers now - as our case is so unreasonable, wrong and completely extraordinary as others build at the same time as us and receive exemption for far less conditions than what we get rejected for!

No. 1461:
Sent this as a tip to some newspapers now - as our case is so unreasonable, wrong and completely extraordinary as others build at the same time as us and receive exemption for far less conditions than what we get rejected for!
Yes, but our case is probably more ala North Korea and Congo than is usual.
Remember, our differential treatment happens at the same time that others are allowed.
Therefore ours and many things are not completely comparable, although there are similarities, but more inequalities than similarities in my opinion!
After all, this is a very extra ordinal issue as we have been given verbal commitment by the City of Oslo to build. At the same time, others like us are building and in our living area. They get yes while we get no. This is as unreasonable as possible.

Picture of our estate as PBE has given us orders and fines for not tearing. As well as the wall and stairs. Can't understand that this is so bad when others in our tree area can use the land up to 57 times more than us!

Here is the tip sent to some newspapers, asking that they write about this horrible and very ugly and horrible case that we have come across completely innocent!

When the third state power fails, then the fourth state power is needed !?

Oslo 22 / 9-2019

Of course, our case is not the most important in Norway, but when the authorities fail so to the degrees they have done in our case. What?
Then the press needs to mention these ugly and incorrect conditions.
It is the "bad" conditions we need the press most, not the good and the good. They are happy and need no help? Which we really do when we have been exposed to abuse of authority and dimensions !!!!!!!!!!!!

Will also remind you that Norway is obviously so to the degrees outside to drive.

Only in the human rights courts does Norway suffer defeat time and time again and there are many cases in line. It is really impossible to relate to public Norway when they choose to sit on the "back legs." Then we need the press, which has time and time again given the authority to change its position. Unfortunately, I think this is relevant in our case. Since our neighbors have built at the same time as us and been given approval for far more violations and other things. In other words, here is such a big difference. At the same time, they always use the law against us, not for us! In many ways, our case is nothing more than a state and municipal abuse of power and government.

In our case, PBE has done as bad a job as it is possible to do. Yet they are supported by the Civil Ombudsman, the County Governor and the courts. Here it is a camaraderie that is so permeated poorly, rigid and dangerous.

When the case against us is built this way, I do not see that it is right to comply with these requirements that are not based on Norwegian law, nor what I think most people consider to be right and proper.

Look here for links that discuss our case:

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2019/09/nr-2552-svar-i-fra-huseiernes.html

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2019/09/nr-2563-var-protest-og-skriv-til-pbe.html

https://www.sokelys.com/?p=26229

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2019/06/nr-2487-marius-vamnes-godkjente-frst.html

https://innsyn.pbe.oslo.kommune.no/saksinnsyn/main.asp?text=krokstien+2+c

https://www.sokelys.com/?p=25125

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2019/05/nr-2462-pbe-her-i-oslo-fremstar-som-de.html

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo
Tel: 99598070

No. 1460: How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 2

No. 1460:
How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 2

In many ways, it can be said that God treats us according to the light we have. For more light, more responsibility. Therefore, God is "tougher" toward us believers than the children of the world. But in the end, all sin will lead us away from God, it creates a divide. Therefore, we must not let God's goodness fail us to take him seriously. God is not only love, but also our judge and eventual rewards.

The scriptures say:
Joh.e. 1 17 For the law was given by Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. Picture of Moses who came with the law, showing all people have fallen short of God's standard.



Deuteronomy 32. 35. I hear vengeance and retribution at the time when their feet tremble; for their day of adversity is at hand;

More recently, I or we have since this also includes my family. Really got to experience wrongdoing and lying people in "free dressage!"

Both believers and non-believers. In this article I will not go into these events too much. Rather focus on how to deal with these people and relate. What does the scripture say? What are the Bible's teachings and practices?

First, there are times when God also judges people "before" time. Still, I would also point out that even in the NT and the new covenant, God does the same as in the GT and the old covenant. He keeps judgment, reveals, and people are ashamed of God and His servants!

After all, God is the same in the NT as in GT, God or Jesus has not changed.

But as a rule, God allows people to "hold on" to what they want and want. Since he has to judge all people. But, nevertheless, we find more places in the NT and the new covenant that God holds judgment. As if we live in GT and the old pact. But then one can say that this is my exception to a rule. In the GT and the old pact it was not so.

In other words, God does not want us to wish the death, doom, or anything of any sinner! But still, all people will lead or later answer for their bread, sin, injustice and everything else they have done. Let's have this clear. But it is not us as believers anymore as in GT and the old covenant in the same way to pronounce judgment. But salvation, life, hope and restoration!

Here are some examples, that even in the NT and the new covenant that God keeps judgment, reveals and people have to pay for their bread before they have to stand before God with their lives.

Room. 1. 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel; for it is the power of God for salvation to every one that believeth, both to Jew first, and then to Greeks;

There is no doubt that God first both blesses and judges those closest to him. We read that it is first for a Jew, and then for Greeks or Gentiles. To that I would say that it is also a pattern, that God first judges us Christians, those who profess Jesus' name, then the world.

We read about the judgment given to the Jews in the year 70. Which Jesus had prophesied about when he went down here.

Matt. 24. 1. And Jesus went out of the temple, and departed, and his disciples came unto him to show him the buildings of the temple. 2 And he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, Here shall not be left stone upon stone that shall not be broken down.

The temple and the temple buildings were the pride of the Jews. But Jesus said that every stone should be removed literally. This happened in the year 70. from Wikipedia.

The destruction of the temple

The Roman triumph that carries the spoils of war from the Temple in Jerusalem, an image on the Arch of Titus in Rome.

In the year 66 AD the Jewish people revolted against the Roman Empire. Four years later, in the year 70, Roman legions under Titus had recaptured and then destroyed most of Jerusalem and the Second Temple. See the siege and destruction of Jerusalem

The Triumphal Arch in Rome, the Arch of Titus, built to celebrate the victory over the Jews and the destruction of Jerusalem, shows Roman soldiers guarding Menorá, the seven-armed candlestick used in the temple. Jerusalem itself was leveled to the ground by Emperor Hadrian at the end of the Bar Kokhba rebellion in 135 as he sought to establish a pagan city named Aelia Capitolina.
(quote at the end.)

Here we see that judgment first struck the Jews. And so powerful that they were spread all over the world for almost 2,000 years. Before they returned to their own land, they proclaimed Israel as an independent state on May 14, 1948.

In short, one can say that when a reader eg. John Revelation, then the judgment will hit the church first. As we find in John. Obvious. 2 - 3. Say the judgment will hit the world chapters 4 - 16. Furthermore, the names Christian and religious in John. Obvious. 17 - 18. In other words, God will judge everyone in his "order!"

Then it will take place also other judgments, where God will judge the nations, which we find among others. in Matthew 25. The judgment in front of the white throne, which we find in John. Obvious. 19. Then we also have the judgment or judgment of all believers before Christ's court in 2 Cor. 5. 10.

But in the meantime, especially in GT, but also sometimes in the NT and among us Gentiles, God holds judgment. This is discussed throughout the Bible, including in GT. Just take the time to read the prophets, not least the prophet Isaiah and the other prophets.

By and large, God lets judgment wait, but it will come. In the meantime, it happens from time to time that even in the present time God holds "judgment", and settles with sin, disobedience and unbelief.

The "knit" is longer in the new covenant than it was in the old covenant!

But the wages of sin is always death! This is an unmistakable act throughout the entire Word of God. We must never believe that God is different from what He was in the old covenant. It's just that Jesus has now atoned for sin, the debt is paid. God has decided that we humans need mercy. But we must not miss this grace as we read in God's Word that God will not tire or work with us humans in the infinite. One day, we have lost God's grace.

Genesis 6 3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not judge among men for ever; for its delusion is flesh, and its days shall be a hundred and twenty years.

I wrote in the headline the following:
“How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? ”

Of course, we should punish and point out injustice, sin, and keep the word of God. But above all in the new covenant we must pray for the people. in the Sermons on the Mount.

Matt. 5. 43 You have heard it said: You must love your neighbor and hate your enemy. 44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do well to them that hate you, and pray unto them that persecute you;

Furthermore, Scripture says that revenge is not ours, but Him.

Room. 12. 19. Do not avenge yourselves, my beloved, but give up wrath! for it is written, "The vengeance belongs to me; I will repay," says the Lord.

I myself have experienced sometimes that God has both judged, and given warnings to people who oppose him and his servants. This happens from time to time, but rarely would I say, because if this had happened as often as in the GT and the old pact, Norway and the world would not have looked the way it looks today. Unfortunately, humans have largely turned their backs on God and the Christian message to an extent that is truly disheartening and alarming.

Example 1:

I have experienced 2 times concrete that there are people who have died by opposing the Lord, and the Lord's words. This I do not want to write more than what I have done in this article. This is extremely extraordinary. But it happened in the days of the apostles, and it also happens in our days.
See here: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/06/nr-325-man-who-died-as-ananias-and.html

Example 2:

When we built a house in Karmøy, we came across a fraudulent contractor who had not done his job for which he was paid. I met him in the conciliation council and there he promised repentance and improvement. He did not keep this. Suddenly even though he had both money and resources to make up for himself. Something he didn't want, not least because that I was a believer was pretty obviously burning his house down completely.

The same happened in the same moment that I got the fine of 10,000, - kr as it was that the house of Pastor Jan Aage Torp's parents-in-law burned down.
This was the same, all this I consider as the warning finger of God that one cannot do as one would to believing people who serve the living God.
Sooner or later, God puts his "finger" down and says that enough is enough!

No. 1459: Free to download and pass it on Norway's best and most accurate translation of the New Testament is available on our website: http://janchristensen.net/

No. 1459:
Free to download and pass it on Norway's best and most accurate translation of the New Testament is available on our website: http://janchristensen.net/

You visit our website: http://janchristensen.net/

Go to Books & Links and click on that link. Here it is:
http://janchristensen.net/index2.php?side=linker

Then you go down to the Greatest Man and press it.
http://janchristensen.net/Det-storste-mennesket.pdf

Facsimile of our website, Norway's most content-rich website.
Do you want to help support?

Look here:

Need intercession and support for further work and service, will you join?
Thanks!

Here is the account number in DNB: 0535 06 05845

Be blessed in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ!
The opportunities are many, but then we must stand together and help each other forward in the service!

No. 1458: How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 1

No. 1458:
How and in what ways should we as Christians deal with and deal with unjust people, whether believers or non-believers? What does the scripture say? Part 1

If we have resistance, then because we stand for something, be clear!




Deuteronomy 32. 35. I hear vengeance and retribution at the time when their feet tremble; for their day of adversity is at hand;

Room. 12. 19. Do not avenge yourselves, my beloved, but give up wrath! for it is written, "The vengeance belongs to me; I will repay," says the Lord.

More recently, I or we have since this also includes my family. Really got to experience wrongdoing and lying people in "free dressage!"

Both believers and non-believers. In this article I will not go into these events too much. Rather focus on how to deal with these people and relate. What does the scripture say? What are the Bible's teachings and practices?

The Apostle Paul says something to the believers in Asia Minor here.

Efes. 5. 8 For ye were formerly dark, but now ye are light in the Lord; walk like the children of light - 9 for the fruit of the light shows itself in all goodness and justice and truth - 10 as you try what is pleasing to the Lord, 11 and have nothing to do with the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but refute them too!

It is perfectly legitimate from the word of God - also go wrong. This includes unjust people, of course. Sitting down, accepting everything, it is not spiritual or "Christian". On the contrary, Scripture says the following:
"Have nothing to do with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather refute them!"

When the scriptures say this, I have also practiced this to people who have ventured in this way. Whether it is apostles, municipal servants, government employees and who it is now. But there are times when we also have to make a difference to people and act differently. We can be allowed to warn against false brethren, and believe that in a special way God will intervene to judge and reward. As with the copper smith Alexander and Jan Aage Torp who were obviously people who would not conform to the word of God. But went against the word of God and the servants of the Lord.

With the non-believer, we should pray that God “melts” their hearts, as scripture says that revenge belongs to the Lord. At the same time, it is the goodness and love of God that "melts" the hearts and ice that lie there frozen in their hearts and minds.

Room. 2. 4 Or do you despise the riches of his goodness and patience and longsuffering, and do not know that the goodness of God drives you to repentance?

We, both myself and our family, have experienced great injustice towards us from, among other things. The municipality of Oslo, and in fact the entire public Norway.
Almost like Hans Nielsen Hauge, they would take for a relationship that we view today as ridiculous and completely beyond. That one should not have a public meeting where people should come together.

But it is important to understand and act completely differently than what was done in GT and the old covenant towards people who do us wrong. In the Old Covenant, we read about many actually frightening and, in part, horrible things happened to those who went against the people of God and the servants of the Lord. This is basically not the case in the NT and the new covenant!

But there are examples of how God truly judges and punishes people. Here, too, in the past, before we should all be responsible for him, here comes one of many examples from GT and the old pact.

2 Kong. 1. 3 And the angel of the LORD said unto Elijah the tishbite, Get ready, and meet the messengers of the king of Samaria, and say unto them, Is it because there is no God in Israel, that ye go and ask Baal-Sebub, Ekron God? 4 Therefore thus saith the Lord, Thou shalt not come down from the bed into which thou art gone up; you shall die. Thus Elijah went. 5 When the messengers returned to him, he asked them, "Why have you returned? 6 And they said, A man met us, and said unto us, Return unto the king that sent you, and say unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Is it not because there is no God in Israel, that thou sendest to inquire? Ba'al-Sebub, the god of Ekron? Therefore, do not descend from the bed in which you have risen; you shall die. 7 And he said unto them, What was the man that came to meet you, and thus spake unto you? 8 And they answered, There was a man in a shabby robe, with a leather girdle bound about his loins. Then he said, It was Elijah the tithe. 9 And he sent unto him a captain of fifty with his men; And he went up to him, and sat on the top of the mountain, and said unto him, Thou man of God. The king says, Come down! 10 But Elijah answered the captain of fifty, "If I am a man of God, let fire come down from heaven and devour you and your fifty men." Then fire came down from heaven and devoured him and his fifty men. 11 And he sent unto him another captain of fifty with his men; And he answered and said unto him, Thou man of God. Then the king says: Come down immediately! 12 And Elijah said unto them, If I am a man of God, let fire come down from heaven, and devour thee and thy fifty men. Then the fire of God came down from heaven and devoured him and his fifty men. 13 Then he sent again a third captain over fifty with his men; And this third captain went up to Elijah, and kneeled before him, and prayed him, and said unto him, Thou man of God. Let my life and those of your fifty servants be precious in your sight! 14 Fire went down from heaven and devoured both the first captains over fifty with their men; but now let my life be precious in your sight! 15 And the angel of the LORD said unto Elijah, Go down with him, and be not afraid of him. Then he got up and went down with him to the king.

This is GT and the old pact. We read here that the judgment hit them hard, but in the NT and the new covenant, two of Jesus' disciples say something about this incident. They pray and Jesus will do the same. We read about this in the New Testament.

Luke 9. 51 And it came to pass, when it came to pass, that he should be taken up, he turned his face toward Jerusalem to go up, 52 and sent messengers before him. So they departed, and came into a Samaritan city to prepare him; 53 And they received him not, because his face was toward Jerusalem. 54 When his disciples Jacob and John saw it, they said, Lord! Do you want us to offer fire going down from heaven and devour them, just as Elijah did? 55 But he turned and spoke to them sternly, saying, "You do not know what spirit you are." 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy human life, but to save. And they went to another city.

Notice that Jesus would not hear that comparison, that was not why he had come. Jesus had come to save and make us whole, into spirit, soul and body.

In other words, God does not want us to wish the death, doom, or anything of any sinner! But still, all people will lead or later answer for their bread, sin, injustice and everything else they have done. Let's have this clear. But it is not us as believers anymore as in GT and the old covenant in the same way to pronounce judgment. But salvation, life, hope and restoration!

Final Comment:

But should still come up with another article, where I would also point out that even in the NT and the new covenant, God does the same as in the GT and the old covenant. He keeps judgment, reveals, and people are ashamed of God and His servants! After all, God is the same in the NT as in GT, God or Jesus has not changed.

Heb. 13. 8 Yesterday and today Jesus Christ is the same, yes forever.

Saddle. 90. 2 Before the mountains were created, and you created the earth and the earth, yes, from eternity to eternity you are, God.

No. 1457: Why it was a fictitious review that Jan Aage Torp went with the Oslo police.

No. 1457:
Why it was a fictitious review that Jan Aage Torp went with the Oslo police.

Unfortunately, the police are largely not on alert in such cases when going to the police with false charges, and that they again prosecute anyone who has made false charges that Pastor Jan Aage Torp came against me and the Heavenly blog.

Explain this I shall try. I had been proclaiming remarriage for several years. Then focus on publishers, who were married. In fact, this had almost spread like a pageant on the Heavenly blog, and our English-language blog Heavenly blog.

This, Pastor Jan Aage Torp fell heavily on his chest when he was mentioned here. Even after, he invited me out for a talk with promise from Torps that I could write what I wanted on my own blog without him doing anything about it.

I did, and he went almost behind my back and notified me with a fictitious review. False accusations as it is called in law.

It was solely my proclamation against remarriage that caused Torp indignation. The "problem" for Torp was that I had such high scores on my articles at Google.

Torp is "smart", he knew he couldn't trap me with my proclamation of remarriage. Torp is, as I said, no dumb, he is cynical, calculating, manipulative, calculated and cunning!

He then goes and reports me for harassing him, something I've never done. I've never visited him or had anything to do with him, except when he asked me out to the cafe.

What happened next is the story. The police bet, there was a horrible lawsuit where I was charged with calling Torp leprosy, manipulative and a whore.
This was "reversed" to the fact that since I repeated this "too much" I was sentenced. Judicial murder of the time, it was only to get caught and convicted me!

Final Comment:

In other words, since one cannot judge anyone in Norway for preaching against remarriage. Then Torp carefully looked for something I had written about him, and the police and the courts were deceived. Poor me, hey! Of course, this is nothing more than seducing and manipulating.

Just hope and pray that the Oslo police and the courts will uncover Pastor Jan Aage Torp using false accusations to achieve his goal here in the case against me and the Heavenly Blog!

Criminal and unethical it is obvious!
That the police would not prosecute this is sad. Therefore, I also appealed the case further to the State Attorney, hoping that he will reverse the plea for further investigation, and hopefully charges against Pastor Torp and a conviction for false charges!
He distorted the entire review to apply something completely different to what the case was about. The case was about only one thing, that Torp hated me for preaching against his new relationship which the Bible describes as sin.

No. 1456: Talked to someone who has been a case manager himself, who thinks this is a very ugly case as the planning and construction agency in Oslo has systematically violated the Public Laws Act by failing to answer our questions, treated us unfairly compared to others!

No. 1456:
Talked to someone who has been a case manager himself, who thinks this is a very ugly case as the planning and construction agency in Oslo has systematically violated the Public Laws Act by failing to answer our questions, treated us unfairly compared to others!



Like Danish, one has his thoughts, even if one lives in Norway as a foreigner and a foreigner. As PBE and the public Norway hold, are they really Molboers? I have turned that down, as they do not want to answer our questions time and time again, if they do not fit. That they are really more monkeys than they are molesters. Therefore, include this mole story so readers can understand PBE better, and how and why they behave as they do.

The monkey

A gentleman at Mols had a monkey, for whom they had for fun sewn nice clothes, so that on the move it looked like a little boy.
A man in the neighborhood one day sent a farmer to the manor with an important letter, telling him that he had to have an answer back.
When the farmer came to the farm, the army had just gone out into the garden, but the monkey stood by an open window. When the farmer saw this well-dressed person, he went over to him and asked if the gentleman was at home; he had a letter to him, to which he should reply.
The monkey nodded and reached for the letter the farmer gave him. The monkey took it, looked at the seal, turned it over, looked at its contents, and finally tore the letter into bits, which he threw out of the window. The farmer, who was watching this, then asked if he should have any answer back. The monkey looked at him, smiled faintly, and shook his head. Then the farmer went his way.
When he got home, his master asked if he had a letter back.
"No," he said, "there was no one else home but junior, and I gave him the letter. He opened it and read, but it was easy to see that he was furious at the letter and would not answer it."
Image of a monkey, as an illustration image.


 


Coincidentally met someone who himself has been on the other side of the "table" than us, had a good time with him when we also ate in together. There I got to go through our case pretty well. this as I write in the headline here.

Talked to someone who has been a case manager himself, who thinks this is a very ugly case as the planning and construction agency in Oslo has systematically violated the Public Laws Act by failing to answer our questions, treated us unfairly compared to others!

The Public Law says discrimination is not allowed.

We have been discredited time after time, while others have been exempted even near our living area up to 57 times more than us. In other words, the discrimination in our case is systematic and has been going on for several years.

§ 6 Prohibition of discrimination

When dealing with cases under the law here or in other cases where access to information is granted, it is not appropriate for any kind of discrimination between comparable cases or to agree that someone should have exclusive rights to access information. The fact that an inquiry is presented by a public or a public enterprise does not give rise to any discrimination when the purpose of the inquiry is not related to the public action of the agency.

The prohibition in the first paragraph does not preclude the possibility of an exclusive rights agreement if it is necessary to provide a service of general interest. A new assessment of the grant will be required to make such agreements in the third quarter. Agreements on exclusive rights made in pursuance of this paragraph shall be public. It is not possible to agree on exclusive rights to access information that the public has a legal requirement to gain access to in accordance with the legal precedents in law or regulations.

Unless otherwise specified by the King in regulations, the provisions of this section shall apply to activities falling within the scope of the EEA Agreement, Annex XI (5k) (Directive 2003/98 / EC as amended by Directive 2013/37 / EU) concerning the use of public sector information.

Furthermore, we have repeatedly asked about things, even the same things and never got an answer. They fail to systematically and for several years subcommunicate and not communicate at all.

31. Rejection and granting

Refusal of access requirements must be in writing. The body must always refer to the driver's license that provides the basis for the rejection, and to the link, letter or number in the driver's license used. If section 13 is the basis for the rejection, the body shall also refer to the driver's license as an obligation to impose an obligation. If the refusal is based on regulations, the body must inform about this, and what point in the regulations the refusal is based on. The refusal must also inform the court to appeal and the time limit for appeal.

Anyone who has been rejected may, within three weeks of the rejection, receive our request for a more detailed justification for the rejection, where the main reason that has been the deciding factor for the rejection shall be almost. The body shall give written reasoning as soon as possible and no later than ten working days after the claim was received.

We have asked many things that we have never had tt answer to. In other words, they have repeatedly broken the law here and not get an answer to a question when one also repeats the questions, that's bad.

This is stated in the Public Law: If the refusal is based on regulations, the body must inform about this, and what point in the regulations the refusal is based on.

When we do not get answers about things we have asked. Here are some examples of questions.

1.) We have asked why they cannot when they are so careful to follow the regulations why they completely ignore the exemption law.

2.) The neighbor on the other side, has a wall that is 20 cm from the road. They are allowed to have it, but we are not ours.

3.) We have asked why they approved and want us to build a more "illegal" slant than the wall we have today. We have never answered this.

4.) Why do others get roughly in the same situation as us, and in a far "worse" situation than us exemption?

5.) When we e.g. put PBE answers guilty, then they never answer back. This is not good!

This I also pointed out in our complaint to the County Council, so this is nothing new. Here's what I wrote:

10.) When we ask for answers, they usually never answer. If they answer, then it is to blur. It is very difficult to have a good dialogue, since PBE really leads than monologue above us and largely against us!

No. 1455: Complementary comment to the County Council regarding our complaint case!

No. 1455:
Complementary comment to the County Council regarding our complaint case!

Known I had to send a supplemental mail to the County Governor with something that did not come out well enough with forge mail as oral agreements are as binding as written in accordance with Norwegian law.

Photo: Jan Kåre Christensen share the photo for free.

Here is the email we sent:

Case number 201510929 Oslo 31 / 8-2019
To the County Governor of Oslo and Viken.

Wishes came up with a short supplement to fill the forge mail of 24.08.2019

We live in a trust-based society, which includes our Prime Minister Erna Solberg said:
"Trust - it's typically Norwegian, that.
A raw society, where we see each other and stand up for each other.
This is the kind of Norway I want. "
 
From this stands the planning and building, as well as the County Governor, the Civil Ombudsman and the Norwegian courts in some cases as far from this as possible. Not least in our case. Where one completely ignores this fact that like us, we are used to relying on other people, as much orally as in writing. Something like also stands in King Kristian the fifth law where oral agreements are as binding as written:
King Kristian the Law of the Fifth.
https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1687-04-15/KAPITTEL_3-1#a1

By regulation 14 Apr 1688 the law was put into effect from Mikkelsdag (29 Sep 1688). Only the provisions that are believed to still apply are included here. For the repeal of various provisions and for certain provisions which are believed to have lapsed, please refer to older editions of the Norwegian Laws.

Fifth Book. About Access, Goods and Gield.
In Cap. About Contracter and Commitment.
1 Art.Everyone is obliged to comply with whose hand with mouth, hand and seal promised and entered into gardens.
2 Art. All Contracts that are voluntarily provided by those who are legal, and come to their Ages, be it Purchase, Sal, Gift, Gut, Mortgage, Loan, Rent, Commitment, Promoter and other know what Name the mentioned child who is not against The law, or veneration, should be kept in all their words and points, as they are.
(quote at the end.)

There is talk of minimal overrun conditions, where one has also been guided by PBE, however orally.
How everything should be built etc., as well as a small storage room is built in good faith.

Erna Solberg who, after all, is sore The Prime Minister wants a society that she describes as follows:

"Trust - it's typically Norwegian, that.
A raw society, where we see each other and stand up for each other.
This is the kind of Norway I want. "
 
Yes, you should really think about this, because unfortunately, the way the public administration is dealing with us is the exact opposite.

Agree that rules, laws and paragraphs must be followed, but also that rule of exemption should be followed. Not only all other paragraphs, after all, we are human beings and in some cases it happens that one does not fully manage, ability or overlook to follow the applicable rules, paragraphs and other.
Then one should and should look with benevolence, and grant exemption.
Not least in our case where there is talk of such minimal violations that do not affect anyone in a negative way. On the contrary, it benefits everyone!

Best Regards
Jan Kåre and Berit Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo

No. 1454: Reply in from the Homeowners' Association, which clearly states that the City of Oslo is responsible even for demolishing and erecting a new wall as they have given us guidance to build on the old wall without having to search as I understand them!

No. 1454:
Reply in from the Homeowners' Association, which clearly states that the City of Oslo is responsible even for demolishing and erecting a new wall as they have given us guidance to build on the old wall without having to search as I understand them!

Here is the old wall, bad picture but it clearly shows that there was an old wall on which we built our "new" wall. Without applying, but in consultation with PBE.



Here I ask:

Thanks for the call, it was very clear to me.

I'm just a simple bus driver, so I need help with the law.

Try to write down everything you said to me with reference to paragraphs.

Have a nice day still!

Regards
Jan Kåre

This answer I got:

I'm referring to our phone call today. As I emphasized earlier and repeated over the phone, the case complex is of such scope and complexity that I have no opportunity within the free time to familiarize myself with this in a way that I can advise you on what to do.

When you stated that you wanted to claim the costs of demolishing the wall covered by the City of Oslo, I stated that Section 2-1 of the Compensation Damage Act regulates the employer's liability for employees' damaging actions in the performance of the service. Whether there is access to, and any grounds for claiming compensation from the municipality in this matter, I cannot decide.

If you are considering legal action against the municipality, the case should be thoroughly reviewed by a lawyer. As you are aware, you may have legal aid coverage included in your insurance policies, but this must be clarified with the insurance company.

The Compensation Act can be found at lovdata.no. Section 2-1 states:

§ 2-1. (Employer's responsibility for employee.)

1. Employer (67) is responsible (68) for injury (69) inflicted intentionally (70) or negligently (71) during employee (72) performance of work (73) or job (74) for employer, with (75) considerations be taken into consideration if the claims that the injured party can reasonably make to the business or service are breached. (76) Liability does not include damage that results from the employee going beyond what is reasonable to expect by the nature of the business or area of ​​business and the nature of the work or the job. (77)

2. By employer (78) is meant here the public (79) and any other (80) who has in his or her employment business (81). (82)

3. Employee (83) means anyone who does work or performs employment (84) in the employer's service, except for employment as an employee representative in another enterprise. (85) Equal to employee (86), agents in public service (87) are considered, those who serve in the Armed Forces and others under mandatory (88) public service, as well as inmates, patients, etc. who participates in work in the prison care facilities, in health care institutions, etc. (89)

4. If the patient injury compensation applies, the Patient Damage Act applies. (90)

As an HL member, you get one hour of free legal advice from a lawyer per. years, and this time is now used up. If you need further legal assistance in this matter, we have cooperation lawyers who can assist you. You can find an overview of these here:

https://www.huseierne.no/om-oss/radgivning/samarbeidsadvokater/

As a HL member, you get half an hour of free consultation, as well as a 20% discount on the attorney's usual fee.

Sincerely

Per Christian Nordal

Lawyer MNA
member Advisory

Final Comment:

According to what the Homeowners' Association says, we can cover everything regarding demolition and put up a new wall. Then if we win a new lawsuit against the City of Oslo.

Chapter 2. Responsibility of public and other employers, etc.
§ 2-1 (Employer's responsibility for employee.)

1. The employer is liable for damage that is intentionally or negligently caused during the employee's performance of work or duties for the employer, taking into account whether the claims that the injured party can reasonably impose on the business or service have been breached. The liability does not include damage that results from the employee going beyond what is reasonable to count on the nature of the business or area of ​​business and the nature of the work or the job.

2. By employer here is meant the public and anyone else who, in or out of business, has someone in their service.

3. Employee means any person who does work or performs duties in the employer's service, except for duties as a representative of another company. Equally with employees are agents in public activities, those who serve in the Armed Forces and others under mandatory public service, as well as inmates, patients, etc. who participates in work in the prison care facilities, in health care institutions, etc.

4. If the patient injury compensation applies, the Patient Damage Act applies.
0 Amended by Laws 13 June 1997 No. 44 (IKR 1 Jan 1999 pursuant to Res. 17 July 1998 No. 615), 15 June 2001 No. 53 (IKR 1 Jan 2003 for the Public Health Service pursuant to Res. 20 Dec 2002 No. 1623), June 20, 2003 No. 45 (Ikr. July 1, 2003, according to Res. June 20, 2003, No. 712), Aug. 12, 2016, No. 77 (Ikr. July 1, 2017, according to Res. June 16, 2017, no. 778).
§ 2-2 (Relief of the employer's responsibility
r.)

1. The employer's responsibility may be eased pursuant to § 5-2.

2. The liability may also be alleviated if the damage is due to a decision by the public authority and the injured party has for no reasonable reason failed to attempt to amend the decision.
0 Amended by Laws Feb 13, 1976 No. 1, June 21, 1985 No. 81.
§ 2-3 (easing the employee's responsibility.)

1. Anyone who has become liable for an employee under section 2-1 may claim him as far as is reasonable in view of the behavior, financial ability, the employee's position and other conditions.

2. The employee's liability to the injured party may be alleviated when circumstances as mentioned in paragraph 1 make it reasonable, and it is justified even with regard to the injured party. Employees who themselves are liable for damages may claim back what the employer should bear after paragraph 1.

3. The rule in paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis if the employer makes a claim against an employee who in his service has caused him injury.