fredag 17. august 2012

Nr. 345: I will be accused of recommending and disseminating Jesus only teachings and preachers!

Nr. 345:

I will be accused of recommending and disseminating Jesus only teachings and preachers!

We have a link with Ove Ludvigsen January which unfortunately do wrong in some things that so many others today. But anyway, I would say that he is "a fearless servant of the Lord" as I write on our website. Go even on his website and see, it is recommended to take a look. Here it is, and with a picture of brotherly Ludviksen



From my commentaries Philip Wiper letter 3 16 Let us only so far we have come, keep up the same track! But it is important to accept others but even go back on what God has shown. It's strange when someone has seen believers baptism but rejects this and join the state church. State of the Church is ripe to be closed, it has surpassed itself many times. Luther was a wonder-man of God, but he lived 500 years ago and reformed a lot. But it is totally unbiblical that fair and ugjenfødte shall belong to the same community. 17 Put me as a role model, you, too, and look at those who follow the example we have given you. Paul was the great exemplar Christ. But there is something to be a role model, but something else to live up to it. Paul managed it with his decision and by the Spirit. Paul had continued to follow the regulations and arrangements had led into hatred, intolerance and party spirit. But the love of Jesus had melted his heart after he met her Savior on the road to Damascus (Ap.gj.9.). The love of Jesus had done Paul for a successor and could also have him to model. 18 I've said it often and have to say it again with tears that there are many live as enemies of the cross of Christ. It's a pain to see that other believers fall short, like time after time. We are a body, when a member suffers and feels pain spread it over all others. Psalm 119 158 I look with loathing at the faithless, do not keep your word. Unfortunately there are still "Judas" who walks among the believers, who do not have the wedding garment on. But we must distinguish between misleading and being misled. And between cheaters and those which fail to. 19 They end up in hell, they have the stomach to the god and takes pride in what is a shame for them, and they are only concerned with earthly things. It shows, unfortunately, time and again that there are too many people take so lightly on everything. God is rich enough for all but one have to open up and let him in.. When pleasure and deeds of the flesh can take root even in the believer's heart and mind. This can and will perish if you do not repent again (Ezekiel 33).

It has emerged accusations against me that I'm not boycotting Jesus only people that most other believers do when they do not believe in the unbiblical doctrine of the Trinity which, unfortunately, the vast majority of believers are misled to believe in

It has emerged accusations against me that I'm not boycotting Jesus only people that most other believers do when they do not believe in the unbiblical doctrine of the Trinity which, unfortunately, the vast majority of believers are misled to believe. Among other things, that I have some links to some Jesus alone preachers and some articles on the website of someone who believes in Jesus alone Jesus only doctrine. For me this is not so hard, I take away from the so-called traditional doctrine of the Trinity and Jesus only doctrine 100% on both of them. And I look at them as unbiblical and illogical. But I think that it is believers who are on their way to heaven. As a member of the body of Christ like me, who does not think properly and learn directly about God. For example, some links out there among books and links where preachers who believe in Jesus alone doctrine. It is especially a preacher there that I get attacked for having, it is Ove Ludvigsen January.

Ove Jan Ludvigsen

I know not very far Ove Jan Ludvigsen January. I myself have been shut out on the Safety of Our Country The debate and the next day and KS's discussion forum. But I have followed a little in between. There, Ove Jan Ludvigsen also attended. And he is one of the few who have managed to stand up for God's word and truth. Then it must be justified and proper that others can read what he writes, although he teaches wrong about God? It also makes sure 99.9% of Christianity because they believe in an equal and unbiblical teachings for the most part, the Trinity. That there are three gods in one god, who is both unbiblical and a mathematical impossibility.

Why I like Ludviksen

When the weird and old Emanuel Minos that reminds me of the prophet Eli could not answer such a simple question on the Vision of Norway concerning remarriage, and particularly among preachers. Then the adventurous Ludviksen about it on his blog that we have reproduced here on our blog here:

There is a difference between a heresy and apostasy!

I disagree with Ove Jan Ludvigsen when it comes to the sight of God, but otherwise I share his view the lot. He impressed me a lot when he wrote on verdidebatt.no where as one of the few who have written which hold the truth. And t.o.m. warned against remarriage which unfortunately almost no one else is doing today! Ludviksen are no heresies he takes severe errors concerning God and Jesus.

All who believe in the Trinity believe in heresy, but to say they are heresies is to draw the word of God very much!

I must with sorrow of heart say that they are all most believers believe in the Catholic and unbiblical doctrine of the Trinity. It is strange that most Christians acknowledge the different creeds that are made from time to Katolikere. For example. the creed of "our" reads a holy universal Church. But it's not when it was written, as was the same as it is in all Catholic churches and writings, "a Catholic Church." Talk to fool themselves and others.

An editorial responsibility

That someone criticizes me for the publicans to others, it's not every day. Mostly I get criticized for criticizing others. It is that which is never satisfied no matter what!

He who has ears, hear! But what shall I compare this generation? They are like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to each other: 17 'We played the flute for you, but you would not dance. We sang a song, but you would not grieve. 'For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say:' He has an evil spirit in him. 'Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say,' Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of publicans and sinners! Matthew 11:15-19 You are a child, Jesus says in this short parable. Children playing on the square. Someone shouts, "Come let us play weddings. We can play the flute, so you can dance. "But those who called got no response," You did not dance, you would not play weddings. "The children did not engage. "But let us play funeral, then," cried the first group, "we can sing songs provide." But even when the children got no response. They would not complain. They would not play funeral. They were not in mournful mood, either. Jesus stated. You would not let you get involved, no matter what we propose. You are the only negative. I do not know what to do to satisfy everyone, but I will never compromise my beliefs. There are also preachers that we should promote and keep up, even if we do not agree with them in all parts!

What I have the books and links are not part of my preaching, but that is a "public Christian" collection of good links

There are sure some of them that I should remove? Have had 2 links where I want to remove. It is of Hal Lindsay that I have 25 years ago read a lot of good, now married for 3 time I heard. And by Derek Prince who was married to a divorcee. And thus lived in adultery after what scripture teaches. But it is also sure others could have been removed and others included. But time is not enough to have the full track of everything, but by and large all are very many good preachers there if unfortunately the vast majority of errors in learning a few things. As remarriage, the Trinity and God will torture people in an eternal hell.

We are not home yet, so it is also a lot of mistakes to learn from the faithful, for now!

Matt. 13. 24 Another parable set he before them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. 26 But when the blade shot up and bore grain, then then the weeds appeared. 27 When his master's servants went to him and said, Lord! you do not sow good seed in your field? whence comes it then weed in it? 28 And he said unto them, An enemy has done. Said the servants to him, Wilt thou we go and gather it together? 29 But he said: No, that ye be not also uproot the wheat when ye gather the tares together. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and when harvest time comes, I will say to the reapers, Gather first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them up, but gather the wheat into my charge!

From the book the great prophecies of John F. Walvoord located on our website here: The first parable was about to hear the Word. The second parable takes deals with the mixed sperm, represented by wheat and weeds. Here the be the kingdom of heaven as a field, where it has been sown good seed, and wheat begin to appear. But as it turns out that an enemy sow tares, and it grows up with the wheat. Then the servants asked if they would gather it together (Matt. 13.28), they were told that they had to do it. In Instead, Jesus said, "Let both grow together until the harvest. When it is time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather together first the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them, but you will gather the wheat in the barn min "(verse 30). Both truth and falsehood will be preached in the period to the fulfillment of Empire. Again we see that there is no support for the post-milli anise fantastic views that the wheat should be gradually overcome the weeds. There is no Here a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies about the Millennium, so amillianistene claim. Another doctrinal problem arises from the post-milli anise great argument meant that this parable indicates that the wheat is taken up first, which contradicts the view that the church should be pulled up before the great tribulation. The argument is based on the erroneous view that the judgment of Christ Second Coming is a simple event. The Bible says that there will be a series of judgments, in which God, in some cases will actually take care of the righteous, while in other cases takes care of the bad first. This is illustrated in the last parable, where the net with good fish being taken up first (Matt. 13.48). The real problem is that this section does not speak of the Rapture, as post milli anise seats claims. It speaks of Christ Second Coming, and then there will be no rapture. According to those who believe that Christ will bring her before the tribulation, the rapture will take place Some years before Christ's second coming, and this is not described in Matthew. The argument that this parable speaks of the rapture, is irrelevant; because the rapture is not mentioned here. As in the case of the parable of the sower, Jesus explained the parable of the tares of the field for his disciples. He said: "He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world. The good seed is the sons of the kingdom. The weeds are the children of evil. Enemy who sowed them is the devil. The harvest is the end of this age. Reapers are angels. As the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so it will be at the end of this age. Son of Man will send out His angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all who cause offense, and the living in lawlessness, and they shall cast them into the furnace. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in their Father's kingdom. He who has ears, let him hear "(Matt. 13.37 to 43). Here, too, seeks post milli anise seats in vain for an affirmation that gospel will triumph over evil in the end times and that the church will stand triumphant before Christ at His Second Coming. The whole laughs talking about a development of both good and evil, where evil grows and the good is losing ground. There is also no support for the amillianistiske up fitting that this parable meets kingdom promises of the Old Testament. It is instead a description of the time between Christ's first and second coming. This describes what happens in the two thousand years since Christ came the first time. Some have embraced the true message, while others have followed false teacher. Scripture speaks of an increase of false teaching on the end times. It prophesies Paul in Second Timothy 3.1 to 9. The relationship of Matthew 13 shows that this is a revelation of the kingdom in its mystical form. It is not revealed in the Old Testament, but in the New.

We must live with the fact that there are different perceptions among the faithful, but we must always even look after our own lives and preach what God has shown us

I am always pretty much accused of being too negative, but here I am accused of being too positive. But I try as best to have a fair "judgment." When I treat those who believe in the false doctrine of the Trinity and the false doctrine Jeus only right. Both camps have much good and much bad, as the scripture says. Therefore, I recommend above all else what I preach and teach. But fortunately, there are still 7000 who have not bowed the knee to Baal, and who will go and the way of the Lord, I believe that Ove Ludvigsen January are among those fearless and powerful preacher, among other things clearly against the remarriage of believers who are one of the main issues for us here in Smyrna Oslo and for me in my ministry as a preacher the Word! I intend to do as Paul admonished his young co-worker Timothy. Preach the word, for it to come, Paul says. And the time has come when one will have that itch in your ear, you can not see that Ove Ludvigsen January makes it so clear that preaches against remarriage even though he is sadly mistaken in some other things. Especially on an eternal burning hell and about God. I dare to recommend those that I do not completely agree with, only they live that scripture teaches and holds up so far they have come. But by all means, I hope that Ove Ludvigsen January and everyone else to change things as they are wrong and teaches incorrectly about! It is one of the goals of running blogs and a website. The fact that more people will be enlightened and be set free. For the Son gets released, will be free indeed. And Jesus is the word, therefore, our liberation as believers nodes up to the law and jurisprudence!

Related links: http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/02/nr-242-emanuel-minos-co-are-they-with.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/09/nr-40-jan-hanvold-is-false-prophet.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2011/09/nr-61-you-like-if-jimmy-swaggart-very.html

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar