No. 1483: We have experienced the terrible and dangerous Norwegian child welfare!

No. 1483:
We have experienced the terrible and dangerous Norwegian child welfare!

The BV case is a hundred times worse than all the NAV scandals combined.
Of course, it is bad to lose a few bucks. Or, last of all, don't get the money you are entitled to.
But it is far worse and more serious to lose his or her children by a pierced BV.

Actually here - in this case there is a minister in from KRF, Kjell Inge Ropstad.
The man doesn't understand a thing. And show off every time that there is a lot of good with BV.
It is not much good with Norske BV, it is dangerous, evil and incompetent!

The child welfare we were involved in was BV in Karmøy Municipality, and I think people other than these do not exist in Norway, not even at Ullersmo!
Don't have words to say how bad BV in Norway is.
Norwegian child welfare is in crisis, and the Lobben case shows that Norway does not even listen to the human rights court.
Quite incredible and arrogant of the Drammen district court and sovereignly overestimate the Norwegian defeat in Strasbourgh.
The first and next must be that other countries must start boycotting Norway.

It was Helga Urrang who came up with the famous suggestion that we could make a "deal" with them. Just before the trial to keep the two largest, but give us the least child as the temporary foster home wants the smallest child.
This is Norwegian Child Welfare Service which reminds us of what we have read about what happened during i.a. communist rule further east. It's so bad that words don't stretch. For good measure, we did not agree with this and we fortunately won the trial in the county board.



We have faced conflict and everything else with BV.
Know exactly how they work and think.
In other countries, adoptions from parents occur with major personal problems.
In Norway, this happens to a lesser extent, but parents with children who are well-educated, kind and compassionate "take over" the Norske BV, and go for adoption.
In our case, they wanted to take all of our 3 children, but they always ran home to us. When the 2 biggest, when the smallest man did not quite understand what was going on.
Two days before the matter was going to the County Council, we got a proposal.
They wanted to compromise with us.
In the beginning our kids were deprived of us because Our oldest child had come up with a lie story. That was reinforced by the school and BV to the degrees. The truth was the opposite!
That's why they took all the kids from us when we were at work.
Then they would make a compromise. It was that now they would only "have" our smallest child, the two largest we could get back. This was BV "horse trading!"

Fortunately we won in the County Council. But this taught us many things with BV.
They wanted our kids when all the families that our kids were placed in "fight" to have them when they were so well-behaved, responsive, helpful and were just plain pattern-children.

This is how Norske BV works, stealing "well-behaved" children.
Therefore when it says in Aftenposten that:
«Norwegian Child Welfare is criticized for being at the top when it comes to taking care of children. But several countries are about the same as us. "

Then that's probably the case, as other countries take only those children who need help. These are neglected to a large extent in Norway.
But well-functioning children are the "struggle" to adopt to others than their biological father and mother! No wonder Norway is equal to other countries!

I wrote this a few years ago:

The first trial I / we were in as "prosecuted" we won complete victory, not least because that we had a very good lawyer, Gullbrand Kjos.

The reason for this trial was the following.
One late winter day in 2004, I was called to work by my wife.
She was completely out of touch, our kids were taken care of by child welfare while we were at work.

Why?
Of course, it was just false rumors that the Child Welfare Department were spending, these servants of darkness.

If there had been any team in this, then only everything would have been resolved with a simple conversation.
That was all that was needed.

But here they made an emergency decision, put it to life to try to break the Christensen family. They didn't succeed at all, I knew who was behind it. It was not of the good, or of God. Of course, it was Satan who was behind these ladies who went against us. It was probably a five piece with a priestess in the lead, Marta Elisabeth Åtland Førsvoll. She was rotten right through!

Eventually, they tried to negotiate with lying, threatening and all that is possible. Child welfare is so, if you admit something. which you never have to do, they use it against you. If you admit nothing, they will fantasize freely about both. If you speak against them, they say, "I hear what you say!" and do just as they please and have decided. The child welfare service in Norway is over-ripe for winding down as it works today!

To avoid trial, but we knew this was Satan's behind.
When we had been the world's best and most loving parents!

Fortunately, we had a very good lawyer, the now deceased Gullbrann Kjos from Haugesund.
And that the judge and fellow judge were a man who quickly realized that this was madness!

These include if they got the minimum, then we should have the two biggest ones. And other lies and Satan's formulations. The trial came in early summer 2004 and we won on all counts. It has not been in Norway's history a trial well where the child welfare until the degrees have been revealed and not gained at any point ?!

Final Comment:

Has much more to say about BV. But when the slogan is in many respects they do not want or have the ability to take care of the children and families who really need it. Who struggles with intoxication and other things.

But well-functioning families with kind and well-behaved kids are throwing themselves over. This is how BV is here in Norway. Now they have so many cases against them in Strasbourg, France that it resembles war states and Norway is the verses, which stand out. This came as no surprise to anyone like us.
We know that Norske BV is really ravenous when they do not yet realize that they have been abusing - not helping - against well-functioning families!

No. 1482: Even my wife Berit Nyland Christensen objected to the evil, speculative, controlling, unfair and unwelcoming treatment of the planning and building authorities!

No. 1482:
Even my wife Berit Nyland Christensen objected to the evil, speculative, controlling, unfair and unwelcoming treatment of the planning and building authorities!

How we have been met by the municipal and county administration in this matter. Then it's like reading about the old GDR with Stasi. There, if an opponent is punished, the more severe the punishment. This is how PBE has been against us.



The way we meet the public is under par. They have, as we see it, acted as incorrect and unfair as possible.
It is actually a form of speculation where one lives in a form of fantasy. Where everyone else is "scoundrels" but that they themselves are the biggest they were not themselves. Jesus said it so aptly in the Sermon on the Mount.

Matt. 7. 1. Do not judge, lest you be judged! for with the same judgment with which ye judge, ye shall be judged; 2 and with the same measure that ye judge, ye shall be measured again. 3 Why do you see the splinter in your brother's eye, but the beam in your own eye you do not become? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, Let me pull the splinter out of your eye? and behold, there is a beam in thine own eye! 5 You are hypocritical! first pull the beam out of your own eye, then you can see the splinter out of your brother's eye!



Even my wife has now sent letters to PBE for their evil, speculative, controlling, unfair and inaccessible treatment of us.

Am glad to have such a wife, here are her two mail to PBE.

Case numbers 201610333, 201609223, 201510929 and 201908605
Construction case PBE here in Oslo 19 / 11-2019

Hi!

Just want to make a few remarks.

1.) See that for several documents, my husband's name and mine stand as signatures. But then only my husband's name is responsible for their websites. Like everything else you have been dealing with in this case, this is fabricated and the forgery you get with it.

2.) All documents and cases I have the same responsibility as my husband, whether it is me or he who writes the emails and documents. One has to write, and of course it is a collaboration.

3.) You have, in this and several other matters, separated us in a way that is really against all custom, decency, and which is a false explanation for those who read their pages online and lie.


4.) Want to state as strongly as I can, that of all the decisions and orders you have made, they are so deficient that it is very difficult to relate to them seriously as you almost never answer our questions and objections. If you do, it is because you believe you are servants to it. But when we answer and put you back in place. Then, as always, we will receive an order that is even more difficult than ever. This is a form of punishment that is so bad that words do not stretch.


5.) We now see that the entire judicial system and the public administration are shredded by so many cases. Isn't it time you take something inside you and act humbly in the future? Far wiser and shows a treatment of us has been until now?


6.) What you impose on us, it is disproportionate out of all proportions. It's okay that we look at certain things differently, but to be as square and difficult as you have been before us in this matter. That way no one should be allowed to hold on! Order us to demolish and return everything to the way our property was before we built. It is completely beyond thinking something like this. We have documented more than enough other places, so I will not repeat this now.


7.) If we send or log in from my husband's or my account or mail, then the signature is what is valid.


8.) It is completely incomprehensible to me that you can allow yourself such a low goal and we who are the unprofessional must point out such a matter of course.


9.) I send this document with only my signature, so that you will go into each document to correct your name and my husband's name. It should stand together, not just my or his name when we both have signed.


10.) What is sad about you is when we have pointed out time after time that you have acted incorrectly against us. Then we are punished with even harder orders. We saw this, not least when we had to search again. This was a great spectacle on their part. We would then submit a far more comprehensive application for the first time that was actually so comprehensive that you will find no one who has applied for a bid has applied with so many factors. Then we should apply again. Then the factors were impossible to comply with. You, in our eyes, actually like rats to count!


11.) Now is the time to put a roast on this whole thing. You give us the minimal exemption we need, and everything is approved without anything.


12.) That you have chosen this way of being is just sad, but hope that it is possible after all, that the matter can and will have a friendly and good arrangement that everything is now approved? We are not looking for any revenge, but justice. That others almost write at 1 p.m. add and get dispensed time after time. While we should not be taken into account in any way. There is nothing but profoundly unfair and discriminatory treatment that should not occur!


13.) Finally, we will say that our attitude will always be to do the right thing, even if you have chosen to be the opposite. But now should be the time to realize that it is still possible to come to an arrangement that is right.
After all, masonry stairs and storage rooms still stand and are just for the benefit and benefit of everyone! There is no hint of what we have built, only operational benefits. Then there should be an exemption.
The advantages are far more disadvantageous, there are no disadvantages!

§ 19–2 The dispensation decision
• whether the benefits of granting an exemption will be clearly greater than the disadvantages of a comprehensive assessment
With us there are actually 100% and 0% disadvantages, beat it !!!!!!!!!!!

Regards
Berit Nyland Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo

Hook path 2 C - Construction of storage room, stairs and masonry
Case number 201908605 - Construction Case

Got a letter from you 1.10. 2019

You want us to reduce the wall and the shed.
But we will return to the way it was before then.
But then our property will be ½ meter further out than our wall is today.
It is then more "legal" to have the wall as today. It will be nicer and cleaner then, think it is not right to listen to you who do not want to comment on this.
This is a disclaimer of dimensions that makes PBE credibility equal to zero.

Answer this why you will not answer why we now have a more legal wall than we had before and we will demolish this wall. There is so beyond all reason and justice it is possible to achieve what you are doing and of course we will never align ourselves with your rigid and false instructions.

We have a house on an "old" plot where there are today 4 houses in an old housing estate.
You must also take this into account. It is completely wrong that others are allowed to receive an exemption up to 57 times more than us. In the same residential area and builds contemporary as us. They also apply on multiple occasions and receive exemptions each time.

We should now have professional applicants etc. who will not even take on the assignment.

Others sit at home on the "kitchen counter" and write an application and receive an exemption.
We are tasked with an impossible task.
What you are doing is nothing more than an evil and totally unnecessary to do so!

Only remedy is that we get the exemption we need which is minimal. Everything else is profoundly unfair and unnecessary!

Regards
Berit Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo

No. 1481: Was the Apostle Paul's thorn in the flesh demonic Spirit powers who "set his foot" on him, and caused trouble for him?

No. 1481:
Was the Apostle Paul's thorn in the flesh demonic Spirit powers who "set his foot" on him, and caused trouble for him?

What is "thorn in the flesh". This is probably what we would say a chip in our fingers today. There is something there that bothers us, that can and can be taken away.
I come here with some considerations and views on this in this article here.
Lots of threats and noise against the Apostle Paul, but it all failed. It only made the apostle more dependent on God, which in turn allowed him to carry his testimony and preaching. Was this Paul's "thorn in the flesh"?
This very and unjust witch-hunt for him and his service to God and people? It's not entirely unlikely now I mean!

2 Cor. 12. 1. I must commend myself though it is not useful; but now I come to visions and revelations of the Lord. 2 I know a man in Christ - whether he was in the body, I do not know, or outside the body, I do not know; God knows - one who was moved straight into the third heaven fourteen years ago. 3 And I know this man - whether he was in the body or out of the body, I know not; God knows - 4 He was moved into Paradise and heard unspeakable words that no human being is allowed to speak. 5 Of this I will boast; but of myself I will not boast, but of my frailty. 6 For if I will boast, I will not be a fool; for there is truth I will speak; but I will, lest any man think of me more than he sees me, or heareth of me. 7 And that I should not exalt myself from the high revelations, there was given me a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan, that he might smite me, that I should not exalt myself. 8 Of this I asked the Lord three times that he should depart from me; 9 And he said unto me, My grace is enough for thee; for my power is perfected in frailty. Therefore, I would rather boast of my frailty, that the power of Christ may abide in me. 10 Therefore I am well pleased in frailty, in misery, in distress, in persecution, in affliction, for Christ's sake; because when I am frail, then I am strong.

Henric Staxäng writes something interesting here:

Paul mentions his high revelation that 14 years ago he was moved straight into the third heaven, into paradise. This happened at the beginning of Paul's apostle time. After talking about this incident, Paul tells of something difficult in his life: "And so that I may not be exalted by the exceedingly great revelations, I have a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan shall strike me, that I do not exalt me. ”(verse 7).

Paul prayed to the Lord three times for deliverance, but was not heard as he intended. He was not healed or freed from this troublesome affliction and humiliation of him. Paul is not talking about what kind of burden this suffering was in his life. But it was clearly a suffering that Paul experienced as particularly heavy. It disturbed, tormented, inhibited and humiliated him. Perhaps it was some kind of physical disorder - a disability or other life burden that he experienced almost unbearably. In Galatians 4:14 Paul writes to the congregation in Galatia: "And though my flesh might tempt it, you despised and did not reproach me."

God's meaning with suffering is to teach you the great and difficult secret of godly life: "My grace is enough for you". But this blissful secret is so difficult for us to acquire and to be content with. To stand in the same line as the robber and the salvation of robbery, no it is disgusting to our old nature. When crosses, trials, sickness, weakness, adversity, defeat, false or true rumors strike you, or when a particularly long-lasting suffering, a thorn hits you, stings, hurts or bothers you, you become weary of all your own. In the end, only grace remains.
(Quote end.)

We do not know what this was, but when we see the great opposition that the Apostle Paul experienced.
Then it is not unlikely that this was for the Apostle "a thorn in the flesh!"

But who and what created this? Supposedly, were it evil Spirit powers that exerted and influenced other people in a negative direction?
Or in other ways attacked the Apostle. Because he went through some severe disorders. We read this about here:

2 Cor. 11. 23 Are they servants of Christ? I speak in madness: I am more; I've worked more, got more punches, been in jail several times, often in death. 24 Of the Jews five times I have received forty blows at one; 25 three times I was struck by the skin, once stoned, three times I suffered shipwreck, one day I was in the deep. 26 Often I have been in journeys, in dangers in rivers, in dangers among robbers, in dangers of my people, in dangers of heathen, in dangers in the city, in dangers in the sea, in dangers among false brethren, 27 in strife and labor, often in vigil, in hunger and thirst, often in fasting, in cold and nudity. 28 Besides everything else, I still have the daily flow, the care of all the churches.

Jesus said something about himself, which also applies to his servants in the greater or greater

No. 1480: Then the answer is sent to Unibuss where my Lawyer writes clearly that I violated some guidelines of listening to Christian Radio programs, therefore the service claim is waived and shredded!

No. 1480:
Then the answer is sent to Unibuss where my Lawyer writes clearly that I violated some guidelines of listening to Christian Radio programs, therefore the service claim is waived and shredded!

Image of the letter:




Unibuss AS
PO Box 210 Alnabru
0614 Oslo

Oslo, 20.11.19


Your ref .: Our ref .: Case no .:
JW: 02132 02132


REGARDING. SERVICE prosecution
The undersigned represents Jan Kåre Christensen through his membership in the Professional Traffic Association.

Christensen received a written service complaint on 11.11.19. This is contested and it is requested that it be waived and shredded.

The service charge is contested on the grounds that Christensen has not broken any guidelines. Furthermore, it is unclear what the service charge orders Christensen to do differently.

Christensen and union representative Leif Arne Myhre state that it is allowed and accepted that employees get to listen to music or radio while driving a bus. Headphones are not allowed. There are no guidelines for how loud you can listen to radio / music, or whether you are required to switch off if a passenger requests it. There are also no guidelines for what one is allowed or not allowed to hear.

Christensen states that he has not listened to any volume higher than usual. The complaints may be due to the content of the radio program. If it is not allowed to listen to Christian content programs, please clarify this.

The warning is required to be withdrawn and replaced with some guidelines that apply to everyone.

We would also like to point out that it is very unfortunate that it takes so long from the first complaint until Christensen is informed that such a complaint has come. He did not hear anything about these complaints until he was given a service charge for the circumstances.

Their prompt feedback is met.

With best regards

Josefine Wærstad
Lawyer
(Quote end.)

In short, this case is only about one thing.

Should Christian radio programs be allowed to listen when everyone else is allowed to listen to their programs of their choice?

May I, and possibly others turn off and not listen to Christian radio or not!

When it comes to these customer complaints, they are so on the road trip that I can't bear to comment on this.

However, here is just one of two things that will be the result of this case.

Should it be allowed to listen to Christian radio or not?

When all other bus drivers and others get to choose the channels they freely want, and many also play far higher than me.
If I do not, and others get to choose the channels we want, there is discrimination and bullying from the employer. Then it becomes clear that Unibuss obviously sits above Norwegian law. We have no internal rules for this either, it is obvious that here Unibuss has taken care!

Final Comment:

Seems here it was right on the case, and it gets exciting and see if it is allowed and allowed to still listen to Christian radio shows or not!
Do we have free religious freedom or not? It will be exciting to see what happens next.
I bet this goes to full victory in Jesus name!

No. 1479: The case between me and Unibuss is important both for me and for it to be made pressing for all believers and others who do not "fit" into a desired pattern!

No. 1479:
The case between me and Unibuss is important both for me and for it to be made pressing for all believers and others who do not "fit" into a desired pattern!

What Unibuss does as completely without filters and barriers is listening to customer complaints without reservations.
Where I am really required and refused to listen to the radio the programs I want is bidding discriminatory. At the same time, I would say that there is difference treatment.
Illustration of sound waves, which this case is about.

Here, Unibuss has settled. There are no internal rules or other rules that say that playing on one channel over another should be "paid" with a service charge and strict refs after playing radio that some do not like!

Here we see that the case is being tried on the head of the management that I have made some serious mistakes.
But there are those who have made some serious mistakes here!

If I and others do not respond now, what next?

The case between me and Unibuss is of great importance as it sets a standard for other similar cases.

This Unibuss keeps reminders of how believers are treated, including in China.

In China it is promised to be a believer, but you should rather be it for yourself. Human rights, religious freedom and everything else are totally overlooked.

Like me, I enjoy listening to Christian programs.
Other programs on radio have my interest when I ride a bus and have access to radio.
Be it news, debate program, music, sports and more.
Not only do I listen to Christian programs, my interests are also other things. But that freedom has everyone riding a bus, that one can listen to the radio programs that are legally approved here in Norway. As in other words have concession. I never play loud for others to hear, only for myself. But that's what they need and want to hear. Sitting behind me, listening intently. I cannot prevent such persons from hearing and listening!

Has now received legal assistance and assistance.

Everyone is very clear here, that only Unibuss can impose. It's the same thing they have to do with all drivers and employees. A common set of rules.

They cannot discriminate against me by ordering me not to listen to any radio channels that are legal here in Norway.

A bit about the legislation here:

https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2017-06-16-51/KAPITTEL_1#%C2%A72

I have been on various buses many times and the music and the radio have exceeded my volume many times. This is discrimination and discrimination right? Yes, it is, yes!

The discrimination law states:

Chapter 2 Prohibition of Discrimination

§ 6. Prohibition against discrimination

Discrimination on the grounds of gender, pregnancy, leave on birth or adoption, caregiving, ethnicity, religion, beliefs, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age or combinations of these grounds are prohibited. By ethnicity is meant, among other things, national origin, lineage, skin color and language.

The prohibition includes discrimination on grounds of existing, assumed, past or future conditions as mentioned in the first paragraph.

The prohibition also applies if a person is discriminated against because of his association with another person, and the discrimination occurs because of circumstances as mentioned in the first paragraph.

By discrimination is meant direct or indirect discrimination according to Sections 7 and 8 which is not legal under Sections 9, 10 or 11.

§ 7.Direct discrimination

Direct discrimination means that a person is treated worse than others are, have been or would have been treated in a similar situation, due to circumstances as mentioned in section 6, first paragraph.

§ 8. Indirect discrimination

By indirect discrimination is meant any seemingly neutral provision, condition, practice, action or omission that will disadvantage persons worse than others, due to circumstances as mentioned in section 6, first paragraph.

Final Comment:

Let me be clear, there are many conditions in my workplace that are also very positive.
That is also what is clandestine. This I try to avoid commenting on.
My focus is only on what goes on in the spiritual, Christian and having freedom of belief and expression.
Simply live as a free human being. Or as a believer in this world
I do not mean this if I, or others, do not get the opportunity to hear the radio channels installed in the bus.
Of course, it is also profoundly unfair and discriminatory not to be given the opportunity to play the radio programs that I myself wish.
Jokes that I mean and that I think will be the outcome of this case.
It is the volume that should be used for all bus drivers.
But the content itself, it is free for the individual to choose!

No. 1478: Who is TV Vision founder and "Pastor" Jan Hanvold?

No. 1478:
Who is TV Vision founder and "Pastor" Jan Hanvold?

Picture of Jan Kaare Hanvold from when he was in "rut" and really could not contain his flesh and lusts. Today he has become so old and worn out that the drive he did with then he has grown too old?
Even Playboy King Hugh Marston Hefner did not manage the run he had when he was young and strong.

The fact that Hanvold has "calmed down" in his old days and lived a wild life before should have been an awakening. Jesus said that on the fruits the tree should be felt.
After all, the "real" Jan Kaare Hanvold is a different man than an aging old man like Hanvold is today!

He was saved when he was approx. 25 years and then had many relationships with him, a life of intoxication and other things.

Then he was saved, later married to Berit, then he got bored when he did not have good sex he has said.
Then there was a new girlfriend from Poland, whom he wanted to divorce after what he himself said p.g.a. that she only wanted his money, etc.
Then he began to grow old, tired and tired.
New lady with new kids that he couldn't get in the natural way.
Is this a Christian minister, pastor, and shepherd?
He is as far away from this as it is possible to get!
It's time for the Christian people to bring up the gulls!

From Wikipedia:
https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Hanvold#Bakgrunn_og_tidligere_virksomhet

Final Comment:

Include from what they write about Jan Hanvold, it speaks for itself.

Background and past business

Jan Hanvold went on the Evidence Bible and Mission Institute in Saron's Valley under Hans Bratterud's leadership in the late 1970s.

Inspired by American neo-charismatic theology, Hanvold in the 1980s invested heavily in evangelism and healing meetings with hired preachers, including at Jordal Amfi. The business was brought together under the concept New Vision and was run from the old Jobuf factory in Drøbak. In 1985, Hanvold established New Vision Bible School in this building in collaboration with Sigfred Rafoss and Hans Bratterud, both with central roles in the Oslo Church of the Fullevangelisk Church (OFK). There were also plans for a new Christian newspaper.

Together with Bratterud, Hanvold also ran the European Broadcasting Network and the TV channel New World Channel inspired by American Christian TV channels.

The canal reached approx. 100,000 households in Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands and France before it was closed down in 1986. [9] Parallel to this, Hanvold ran his own company, "Jan Hanvold Ministries", which distributed recordings of speeches by international ministers and himself. In 1989, Hanvold also established the Vision Bible Center (VBC) foundation, which was to carry out missionary activities and distribution of Bibles in Eastern Europe under the concept name Bible For All.

The business eventually got out of control, culminating in a series of bankruptcies in 1989. Hanvold was personally bankrupted, got the bankruptcy quarantine and was sentenced to 120 days in prison, of which 45 days unconditional.

Since Vision Bible Center was a foundation with no links to Hanvold's other corporate structure, it was cleared of bankruptcy. In 1990, Frank Kaleb Jansen was incorporated into the foundation's board. At the same time, he became the foundation's face in raising money for missionary work. At this time, Hanvold also sat on the board of OFK Radio, which was run by Hans Bratterud.

Related links:
http://janchristensen.net/artiklerhoved.php?side=visjon-norge-er-en-aandelig-svinesti

http://janchristensen.net/artiklerhoved.php?side=Bileam-beors-sonn

http://janchristensen.net/artiklerhoved.php?side=jan-hanvold-en-falsk-profet

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2013/06/nr-619-selve-kardinal-synden-for-pastor.html

http://jan-hanvolds-blogg-usminket.janchristensen.net/

No. 1477: Unibuss is sure to lose this fight against me as they deal with discrimination and persecution of Christianity!

No. 1477:
Unibuss is sure to lose this fight against me as they deal with discrimination and persecution of Christianity!

The only thing that Unibuss can impose on us according to what my lawyer Josefine Wærstad says is the sound level.
Which program we choose to hear, as it is allowed for everyone to play the radio installed in Unibuss buses. In other words, they do not have their own rules for this, thus you are harassing and discriminating against me.
Give me a service claim for this is also the "happy frenzy" as they then settle on Norwegian laws and internal rules of the company that they do not have according to what others have said to me such as the Equality and Discrimination Ombud and the Labor Inspectorate etc. They take care "Freedoms" to really pursue Christian persecution!
Then it will be in Norway as in China, You may be a believer but not out in the public space. Then nothing that has to do with the gospel, Jesus or the Bible will communicate or be heard! That is why this case is so very important here!
Illustrative image, where one cannot command me not to listen to Christian broadcasts, it is discriminatory and persecuting Christianity!


The only thing they can command me and everyone else is not to have loud noises.

Which programs we play have no employer or other right to impose on us.
This is the law! I've never played loud music or anything!

Talked to my Lawyer Josefine Wærstad who is writing an email where she will say clearly that the only thing that Unibuss can impose on its drivers is not what radio programs they want to listen to.
There they come no way.

The only thing they can impose on their drivers and employees is the volume - and it should be the same for everyone!

In other words, this is where Unibuss actually lost before they "got" started the fight.

Am glad for the Lawyer's help I got, it looks like it pays off.

Here on discrimination:

Direct and indirect discrimination

Discrimination can be direct and indirect. People who, despite their qualifications, do not get a job because of age, sexual orientation, complexion or gender, face direct discrimination. This type of discrimination will usually be illegal, although there is room for narrow exceptions. In practice, it is often difficult to prove that there has been direct discrimination.

An apparently neutral act that puts, for example, the elderly, the disabled or women in a worse situation than other workers, is considered indirect discrimination. An example is when part-time employees receive lower hourly pay than full-time employees for the same job at the same employer. Since the majority of part-time employees are women, this affects far more women than men, and must therefore be regarded as indirect discrimination against women. It is usually easier to prove that there is indirect than direct discrimination.

Final Comment:

Will finish with what's right here. There are no internal rules or the working environment law, no places that require not to play the channels that I have done.
I've only played on regular channels, such as P1 and P4, and some others.

Otherwise, I listen to the usual sound level on these Christian channels as well.

107.7 which is now near radio and FM network. A legal Norwegian channel with a concession.
As well as Ptro, P7, Joh. 3. 16 and Vision Norway where I hear if there is anything about Israel in particular.
All of these are legal with a license, and I never listen to a CD or anything else on my job.

That I turned up a song or something that I would especially bring with me, it may have happened?
But on the whole, I hear excellent and do not need special high light!
This is obviously harassment, discrimination and bullying because my Christian faith, nothing else!

No. 1476: Now I have got Advocate that is paid for by my union, that is Advocate Josefine Wærstad!

No. 1476:
Now I have got Advocate that is paid for by my union, that is Advocate Josefine Wærstad!

After my case is pretty much fixed as Unibuss claims so much, I am glad that my trade union YTF is advocating for me against the company.

This is exciting and I think in this case we have very good "cards" at hand as the service claim I have received is incorrect, fabricated and discriminating against me as a Christian. That I should not listen to the radio channels that I want.

The only thing to discuss in this case is the volume of the radio, how high it should be.

Picture of my Lawyer in this case, Josefine Wærstad

In this context, I think we can include the Stavanger ensemble - Radio.
Shouldn't you be listening to the radio you want? Yes, of course!

No. 1475: The Gender Equality and Discrimination Ombud gives me full support that I am the one to be protected and that those who believe something else like Ruter / Unibuss and others have misunderstood and misinterpreted Norwegian law!

No. 1475:
The Gender Equality and Discrimination Ombud gives me full support that I am the one to be protected and that those who believe something else like Ruter / Unibuss and others have misunderstood and misinterpreted Norwegian law!

Screenshot of the website of the Gender Equality and Discrimination Ombud.


What I wrote:
Hi Ragnar Lie

Thanks for the phone call. Send the answers here, jk.chris@online.no

I've only played on regular channels, such as P1 and P4, and some others.
Otherwise, I listen to the usual sound level on these Christian channels as well.

107.7 which is now local radio and the UN network. A legal Norwegian channel. As well as Ptro, P7, Joh. 3. 16 and Vision Norway where I hear if there is anything about Israel in particular. All of these are legal with a license, and I never listen to a CD or anything else on my job.
That I turned up a song or something that I wanted to bring with me, it may have happened.
But on the whole, I hear excellent and don't need special loud music!
This is obviously harassment and bullying because my Christian faith, nothing else!

Know it sounds fierce, but so be it!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen
Crockstone 2 c
0672 Oslo
Tel: 995980

This answer I get:

Hi!
As I said, what you describe may be discrimination on grounds of religion under the Equality and Discrimination Act § 6. If there are no guidelines for playing music / radio at the employer, you may have been treated less well than others because you choose channels with Christian content. However, this is an issue that you must address with your union. The union must call here for guidance on the discrimination regulations.

Sincerely,

Ragnar Lie
senior advisor

Gender Equality and Discrimination Ombud | Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud

Mariboesgt. 13, 4th floor N-0183 Oslo (visit), PO Box 8048 Dep, N-0031 Oslo, Norway
www.ldo.no

Final Comment:

In reality, everyone now accepts me.
This I am very glad, thank you and praise for it.

I did not violate any internal rules or the Work Environment Act.
Therefore, this is also a matter for the Equality and Discrimination Ombud.

They write so clearly and correctly:
As I said, what you describe may be discrimination on grounds of religion under section 6 of the Equality and Discrimination Act.
If there are no guidelines for playing music / radio at the employer, you may have been treated less well than others because you choose channels with Christian content.

No. 1474: The Labor Inspectorate agrees with me that this I have received is a so-called illegal service claim as Unibuss or Ruter can point out that the Work Environment Act or some internal instructions are broken!

No. 1474:
The Labor Inspectorate agrees with me that this I have received is a so-called illegal service claim as Unibuss or Ruter can point out that the Work Environment Act or some internal instructions are broken!

Picture of a speaker, but I hear excellent and do not need loud sound.

Had a chat with the Labor Inspectorate today November 11, 2019 where I got to present this case to them.

Here is some of the chat log:

Hi, and welcome to the Black Service.
You're talking to Kristin now. What can I do for you?
K4346581:
Today 11:11

I have been prosecuted by the company for playing Christian song, is this law in Norway? I am a bus driver and this has happened through Ruter's so-called customer complaint
K4346581:
Today 11:12

I haven't played loud, but some customers call it propaganda, but this is only normal Norwegian radio that is legal over the ether
Kristin:
Today 11:12

This is not regulated by the Working Environment Act. You should check if you have any internal guidelines governing this.
K4346581:
Today 11:13

There are no internal guidelines on this
Kristin:
Today 11:13

But is this law in Norway? Be refused to play regular radio? This is experienced as harassment and bullying
K4346581:
Today 11:17

Had I been a Muslim or something else, everyone would have defended me, but not as a Christian, sad
K4346581:
Today 11:18

I mean I'm the one to be protected here, no one else. Do you agree with that?
Kristin:
Today 11:19
(Quote end.)

Final Comment:

Isaiah 5. 20 Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil, that turn darkness to light, and light unto darkness, that turn bitter to sweet, and sweet to bitter!

From the large Norwegian lexicon:
Christianity has a special position in Norway, but religious life has become increasingly complex and diverse. It is characterized by secularization, new forms of religiosity, and increased influx of persons with a religious affiliation other than the Christian, or of other forms of Christianity than the Evangelical-Lutheran direction.
(Quote end.)

I've only played on regular channels, such as P1 and P4, and some others.
Otherwise, I listen to the usual sound level on these Christian channels as well.

107.7 which is now local radio and the UN network. A legal Norwegian channel. As well as Ptro, P7, Joh. 3. 16 and Vision Norway where I hear if there is anything about Israel in particular. All of these are legal with a license, and I never listen to a CD or anything else on my job.
That I turned up a song or something that I wanted to bring with me, it may have happened. But on the whole, I hear excellent and do not need special high light!
This is obviously harassment and bullying because my Christian faith, nothing else!

No. 1473: Despite all our Oil billionaires being in full crisis in public Norway, have we lost anything on the road to becoming so rich?

No. 1473:
Despite all our Oil billionaires being in full crisis in public Norway, have we lost anything on the road to becoming so rich?

Photo of Nav Director Sigrun Vågeng. It is not about any kind of ethics and responsibility or the lack of ethics and responsibility. It's all about just her personal gain and her retirement.
She is 69 years old and would like to wait until she retires with a planned pension at her 70th birthday! She has 2 Million in salary + pension that everyone gets when they turn 67.
Zacchaeus met Jesus, and here is his testimony.
Luke 19 8 And Zacchaeus stood and said unto the Lord, Behold, O Lord; I give half of my goods to the poor, and if I squeeze money out of someone, I give it four times more.
When you meet Jesus and become a "normal" person, honesty means much more than anything else. Think here Sigrun Vågeng has a long way to go, but there is hope for her and all other people.



Ecclesiastes 7. 18 It is good that you hold on to one, but you must not let go of the other; for the one who fears God will find a way out of all this.

There is a clear connection between the NAV scandals, the murder of justice against me x 2 times and the record number of cases in the European Court of Human Rights:
It is about that executive and judicial power has given way to our basic human rights, and got away with it.

That is why when such things happen, to discuss the wages of waste of calories and space. The focus is the miserable job they have done. Not one, but here the Government has failed at the Prime Ministers and the Prime Minister.

Everyone who works for them, everyone has gone into the same "fog world"

Hub the boss, and everyone who works for her. The courts, and everyone who works there. This is probably just the tip of an iceberg, the whole of public Norway does not work. No judge against anyone we can really be sure is correct, truthful and to be trusted.

The whole public is an overly large system. An unparalleled monster. A bureaucratized and largely dysfunctional mastodont, more concerned with cynical and ruthless A4 paragraph wrestling than helping people and fulfilling their real social function. This is evident in countless ways, through people sharing their horror stories with the public. There are probably many talented people in this organization who are doing their best within the framework provided by the system, but the whole organization seems to be characterized by a lot of unhealthy mentality in relation to the people to help, whether it be unemployed, people on admission, during work clearance or in relation to disability benefit or social security benefits. This is supposed to be a "service company" in the public domain, driven to help people, not to make life a nightmare for people they are supposed to help!

How much criticism really needs, how many horror stories from individuals must be made public, and how wrong must it really be before politicians take action?

Now politicians need to clean up this chess-driven mastodont and the uncultured and unfortunate mentality that characterizes this whole organization at the systemic level.

But the problem is that they are really part of the whole thing, what then?

I will briefly comment on how I have experienced the entire municipal and state system.
Then in from the municipality, to the County Governor, the Civil Ombudsman, the Police and the courts from the District Court, the Court of Appeal and the Norwegian Supreme Court. As well as the media with TV, Radio, newspapers and what's happening online!

According to statistics in the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg, France, Norway is the country if you include its citizens and share it with the population. Who has the most cases against them, where BV cases overweight.
But I think it is just as bad in Norway at every level, the fact is that Norway has become the most rotten and smelly country in Europe in terms of corruption and legal security.
Have faith in the public in Norway and that the judgments, the treatments and what the public has established since Norway became the EU's country in 1994 is like believing Santa Claus.
It is simply a tragedy, and the damage is so great and irreparable that I think most people will just close their eyes and think it is just a bad dream.
But that is not it, it is a reality that Norway is at the bottom of Europe not only in football, but also when it comes to public administration!
Tragic!
I think I am probably Norway's kindest and most law-abiding man, twice in court with 2 losses. Or to put it another way, 2 Justices murder against me!

Am not frustrated or stated on my behalf first and foremost

But when I read about how the Tolga Municipality was dealing with these three brothers who were unmasked by a money-grisly municipality. Now the NAV scandal, and an even worse scandal and bad is how Norwegian child welfare is. There are horrible and dangerous things there, and they are even allowed to keep on doing what they have always done.

Final Comment:

Room. 3. 10 As it is written, There is not one righteous, nor one; 11 There is not one that is wise; there is not one that sGod increases; 12 all have departed; they all become hopeless in hope; there is no one who does good, there is not one. 13 Their throat is an open grave; with their tongues they did deceit, worm poison is under their lips. 14 Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. 15 Their feet are quick to shed blood; 16 destruction and desolation are in their ways, 17 and they know not the way of peace. 18 It is not godliness in their eyes.

This is the testimony of us humans as we are in ourselves. This is my testimony as well. In other words, being dishonest and lying is man's "usual" standard. That is why we need to repent, it is the only cure. Everything else is hopeless!