No. 1541: The only thing that can deprive President Donald Trump of not being re-elected for 4 new years as President of the United States, are probably the postal votes where his votes can be rejected or omitted!

No. 1541:
The only thing that can deprive President Donald Trump of not being re-elected for 4 new years as President of the United States, are probably the postal votes where his votes can be rejected or omitted!

What are postal votes?
It is that one votes, and does not put the ballot papers in the ballot box.
But sends it per. mail.
This is very easy to really cheat with. It is then only a matter of either removing the ballot papers or rejecting them.
This can present a major problem in the United States, now!
This is probably the only thing that can deprive Donald Trump of the victory in the Presidential election this November.
Pray for Trump that he wins and that no votes are rejected or removed!
That it must be and be a fair choice!

Picture of Melania and Donald Trump.



This is what the newspaper Dagen writes:
https://www.dagen.no/meninger/leder/2020-08-04/Det-Trump-har- done-rett-919804.html

What Trump has done right


When you read the Norwegian media, you can almost get the impression that everything Trump does is wrong.

No other American president has been the subject of so much criticism in the media as Donald Trump. And there will certainly be more for this presidency, which is so special that it is actually difficult to find historical parallels to it.

But when you read the Norwegian media, you can almost get the impression that everything Trump does is wrong and that none of what he does is good. But this is of course and fortunately not the case.

Therefore, this editorial - regardless of the overall impression we have of his presidency - is about three important things that Trump in our eyes has done right during his presidency. It's about the economy, China and Israel.

When businessman Donald Trump was elected president on November 8, 2016, the world's most important stock index, the Dow Jones, stood at 18,000. At the time of writing, it stands at almost 26,500, a growth of just under 50 percent.

We should note that this sharp increase has come despite the worst pandemic in the world in over a hundred years. The Trump administration has pursued a business-friendly policy that has obviously had a positive effect on American business and thus also on the global economy.

At a time when many governments, including our own, are demonstrating an embarrassing indifference to the increasingly powerful China, it has been refreshing to see how Donald Trump has the courage to stand up to the communist regime. For China's aggressive ambitions on the global stage are perhaps the greatest long-term threat to a peaceful and democratic development in the world.

Then it is crucial that there are leaders in the free world who dare to challenge the authoritarian rulers in Beijing. Donald Trump is obviously such a leader.

The American presidents' confession of friendship with Israel is almost like a regular ritual. But Donald Trump proved to be a true friend of Israel not only in terms of beautiful words and promises, but also in deed and political realities.

The most important and symbolic step he took in December 2017 when the United States recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and carried out the relocation of the American embassy there. Congress approved such a move as early as 1995, but all more or less pro-Israel presidents have since vetoed the decision.

Trump has also recognized the Golan Heights as Israeli territory. Thus, the world's most important nation has finally abandoned the meaningless belief that this strategically crucial area will ever be handed over to the terrorist regime in Syria.

Under Trump, the United States has also moved away from the use of the word "occupied" in other areas under Israeli control. For example, it is no longer called "Israel and the Occupied Territories" in the US Department of State's annual human rights report. It now says "Israel, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and Gaza".

Opponent of the upcoming presidential election, Joe Biden, has said that even if he disagrees with Trump's Jerusalem decision, he will not reverse it. Israel's friendship will thus remain a lasting legacy after Donald Trump, regardless of how things go in November.

No. 1540: Had I been a Sikh, Hindu, Muslim or something else and been bullied and discriminated against as I have been by the Discrimination Tribunal / Unibuss, I would have been front page material guaranteed in VG, Dagbladet, Aftenposten and other media!

 No. 1540:

Had I been a Sikh, Hindu, Muslim or something else and been bullied and discriminated against as I have been by the Discrimination Tribunal / Unibuss, I would have been front page material guaranteed in VG, Dagbladet, Aftenposten and other media!

2 Tim. 3. 1. But know this, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall then be selfish, money-loving, eloquent, arrogant, mocking, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, unreliable, slanderous, immoderate, unloving, without love of good, 4 deceitful, impulsive, inflated, love their lusts higher than God, 5 who have the skin of godliness, but deny its power - and these you shall turn away from.

This is from 2011, 9 years ago. The truth is that it is us Christians who are provoked and are more vulnerable than anyone else.

I argue that we Christians will never threaten or retaliate against anyone physically, only verbally.

This from VG in 2011.

Erna Solberg believes that Muslims are incited like the Jews in the 1930s

Conservative leader Erna Solberg believes that Muslims are incited in the same way as the Jews were in the 1930s. She asks Norwegians to deal with everyday racism.

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/GpyxJ/erna-solberg-mener-muslimer-hetses-som-joedene-paa-30-tallet

Picture of a Muslim ready to defend himself, while we Christians would never do such a thing. Illustration image.

These should be overprotected, but we Christians are not even allowed to listen to the radio until we are threatened with dismissal from our job, this is what I am experiencing these days.

I do not see myself as a victim, so far from it.

But it is still strange to experience that one is approached freely wild and has almost no legal protection!

I have experienced false accusations against me on several occasions, and still not won in Norwegian law and before the authorities!

Think, it could be Satanists, people from pagan society or what they now are and belong to ????????????

This fact that I listen to the radio, is not documented by any invalidity party that I hear out loud.

And if that had been the case, I would have turned it down.

Christian persecution and discrimination, no doubt what I have been subjected to!

Here is an email sent to the Civil Ombudsman in my case:

Sak 83559 Oslo 6.10.2020

The Civil Ombudsman

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against Disktriksnemda's decision in case 20/42

It is only mentioned that it is sick leave that is a night of revenge.

The whole case against me is a retaliation for not being a person they have managed to crack as they have tried for decades!

The night of revenge, retaliation and reprisals against me are far more than sick leave!

These are really repeated service charges and try to find all possible errors to use them against me in all possible ways.

This actually started in 2007-8 when Unibuss had to withdraw a service charge.

When they had to do the same in 2017, it got even worse.

I went to the Discrimination Tribunal in January 2020 and then it got so bad that I was prosecuted for matters that were insignificant and that I had played again on Christian radio.

But other words that they have disputed sick leave they have also done before. Blue. in 2017 as a night of revenge and reprisals that I did not participate in their prank.

The actual sick leave that is disputed is only a small and ugly part of the whole picture. There are several reports of illness they have disputed, such as revenge, reprisals and retaliation against me!

The retaliation, reprisals and revenge have actually been going on since 2006 when I was summoned to a meeting with my then leader Tveit, which you can read about in the drawn-up service indictment.

See here for screenshot.

Since then, the management of Unibuss has behaved badly and armored towards me by convening meetings in the east and west.

Get service charges for everything between heaven and earth.

Pull them and give new ones.

It's completely wild as they go, and it certainly does not end. Now they are incited after the cruel verdict from the Discrimination Tribunal!

This is murder de lux as I have never played loud on the radio and the so called customer complaints are false accusations that may have been given by Satanists and or others who hate Christianity and Jesus !!!!!! ??????? !!!!!! ?????

Those people can be anyone and they are not invalid and credible.

There is no objective party, and blindly trust those who also complain about me anyway. Some of the customer complaints are loud, all of them otherwise have both sound and the Christian message they dislike.

No customer complaints go only on loud sound, therefore this is no credible and invalidity complaint. But obviously that goes on my faith and that I also play Christian radio programs with a license and am legal by the authorities here in Norway.

Such programs as P7, Ptro, Visjon Sverige, Joh.3.16 and other programs on the radio that have a license and are approved by the authority.

I get provoked by some passengers, Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal!

It is obvious that I have been subjected to discrimination and gangs

celebration of Unibuss!

They have put undue pressure on me for almost 15 years with false accusations, fabricated things and oversizing small trifles to the most "dangerous" incidents.

Everything is put out of proportion and I make the same mistake as others.

Others hardly hear it, I get more service charges for the same conditions.

This is not good

It's so bad that words do not suffice.

Something is documented, mostly not!

Unibuss has threatened service charges, given them, withdrawn them and given new ones.

In recent years since 2016, they have mostly given service allegations that I have played Christian radio programs if there have been complaints about too loud sound, no sound or just to threaten with dismissal that I play Christian radio programs muted and with the same volume as everyone other bus drivers.

I must be taken, it is so primitive and evil behavior that words do not suffice.

Look here:

I have then obviously been subjected to retaliation and revenge by the management of Unibuss for decades.

Here is an example from 2016 which is also included in the ruling from the Discrimination Tribunal:

04.02.2016 Meeting with the driver regarding customer complaint from 12.1.16. The customer reports devotion / missionary work and criticism of other religions played on the bus radio. The customer complained to the driver, but was told that "here it is I who decides"

Furthermore, I have had instructors on the bus many times, they have never complained about the radio volume.

But complained about other matters as a retaliation and if possible to find fault with me.

Now they make new service accusations every time they find out that I have played on Christian radio programs.

This is both a night of revenge and reprisals against me on all levels.

How mean and hateful must the Unibuss management be before the Discrimination Tribunal sees it?

This is what I anchor, and that they do not see what is obvious even for a 4 year old!

That I will be subjected to revenge, retaliation and retaliation all the way and for decades!

No one stands up and speaks my case, I am a Christian and must endure so fervently all the injustice that befalls me.

If, on the other hand, I had been a Muslim or belonged to another religion, "everyone" would have stood up for me.

Everyone knows that it is a lie and hesitation that I hear loud on the radio.

But a murder against a Christian, who will never use force or violence.

It is so harmless and "safe" that this is what everyone does today!

Isaiah 5. 20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own thoughts!

No. 1539: Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

No. 1539:
Supplementary explanation sent to the Civil Ombudsman regarding the persecution of Christianity I am now being subjected to!

Erna Solberg believes that it is Muslims who are persecuted in Norway, and need special protection.

From what I experience, it is the Christian who needs extra protection and who is persecuted.

Has now sent some additional explanations to the cases that have been sent to the Civil Ombudsman for processing. Pray for the cause.

Erna Solberg, our Prime Minister, also needs intercession as she obviously understands so little about what is really going on in the spiritual struggle in Norway. Yes, not only in Norway, but all over the world!

Here are the emails I have sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/314 with suspension!

The fact that this case is dismissed is based on both procedural errors, misconduct and an incorrect judgment in case 20/42 at the Discrimination Tribunal, which has been appealed to you as a lie as that judgment is based on circumstances that have not been documented.

Then it will be a consequential mistake with this closure.

It is clear from our side that when there have been instructors, managers and others from Unibuss' management on the bus with me.

Has it never once been pointed out that I play loud on the radio.

On the contrary, there are other things that they have tried to trap me in such as that I do not drive "well" enough ". Other claims that are largely fabricated.

The haughty Ivar Danielsen writes in his answer to me about closure the following:

The condition of "reason to believe" states that the complainant must refer to specifics

evidence or indications that discrimination has taken place, beyond a mere allegation of this. In this case, the allegations of discrimination are not

substantiated with documentation. "

There is a lot of documentation here.

But when one does not want to "see" and have to lie that I listen to the radio aloud, something that has never happened.

Then you can also think of writing as much visvas as Danielsen does here.

Documentation abounds, but when you always "turn" away from what we bring from documentation such as. On June 8, 2020, a manager was with me on the bus and quickly found out that I was listening to the radio with the same sound level as all other drivers. There is a wealth of other documentation that Danielsen is lying about saying that it is not!

It is solely because I have received complaints on the bus that I have played on Christian radio. This is also stated in the customer complaints that it is propaganda and that I am looking to missionize on the bus when I choose "wrong" channels in these Christian haters and who have an agenda.

Bullying, harassing, lying and discriminating against me for my Christian faith as no one can ever document once that I have heard on the radio louder than others.

In the Discrimination Tribunal, Unibuss had explanatory problems, and had to admit that it was probably not because I played pop music, but that I played Christian song / praise that some were more vulnerable and hairy according to Unibuss' lawyer Johannes Straume!

Furthermore, the strongly haughty Danielsen writes the following:

"The way the case is presented, it is the tribunal's assessment that it clearly does not give reason

to believe that you are exposed to discrimination / harassment / retaliation from Unibuss

because of your religion. ”

As I understand it all, the issue is that I then play too loud on the radio even though I do not like loud radio sound.

Then I will try at the end of this complaint to say something about this and attach attachments that go on this.

I take into account that there are other factors inside that are also important, as I mean and see it quite obviously that it is solely my channel choice that has made me really harassed by everything and everyone here!

This with false stories on so-called loud sound is something that those who want to hit me for playing on Christian radio hang on to the complaint for the simple reason that they should get a response for their false ankles. It is only and exclusively that I have played on Christian radio that is the "problem" for these.

When others from the management of Unibuss have been on the bus, reported or unannounced, this with radio use has never even been mentioned. Why? I have never in 15 years as a bus driver played a single loud sound so that some passengers have been disturbed.

My sound level has never been higher than others and what is normal for us bus drivers to have in terms of volume and volume.

I do not consider myself to be vulnerable in any way, but I just try to relate to the facts.

As well as in a normal and as objective way as possible relate to the false accusations that have been received against me.

It is without a doubt my relationship with Jesus and the gospel that is the basis here, as I love playing Christian programs that are broadcast over the air.

Channels like PTro, P7, Visjon Sverige, Joh.3.16 and others that I listen to during the working day on the bus.

It is highly discriminatory that I am not allowed to choose the channels that I want from Unibuss as all other bus drivers do.

I receive service charges and am summoned to meetings with the management to hear on Christian radio. Now they are also threatening to resign and fire me!

In other words, the case is basically about my working relationship and it is clearly proven that Unibuss does not have the next documentation from an objective party that I play loud on the radio.

All things against me I consider solely as discrimination and bullying.

That this is happening in Norway in 2020 is only deeply, deeply, deeply tragic and shows that Norway is in some respects on a par with the old communist states where all religion, especially Christianity, is not "stubborn".

Where it is allright to persecute those who believe under the pretext of other conditions that they belong in high light. This is shameful and on a par with what other countries are doing that we in Norway will not compare ourselves with, tacky and false of the entire public agency and Unibuss, really bad!

1.) I'm 56 years old, I'm over with adolescence a long time ago. That I would sit and listen to loud radio for an entire working day? It's so adventurous that it's ridiculous. I have never, ever heard of loud radio.

2.) No one in the Unibuss system has ever been able to complain about my radio use. Should they be like that, something it never has been. Then I had turned down the volume.

3.) Unibuss has no standard and training. Then giving me a service charge for playing loud on the radio is also contradictory. Now I have never heard a loud sound either.

4.) Oslo is a city with 700,000 inhabitants. Of them, there are probably many who have many and special opinions and views. That some of them do not like Christian radio and write lies, there is nothing special about this of such a large crowd! That some of them claim that I play loud on the radio is more for the reason that I stand out. There are probably not many others who do that? It is then not tolerated by some who dislike Jesus and Christian radio broadcasts. This is not abnormal for me who has been a Christian for so long and knows that many are provoked as soon as they only hear something from the Bible. But that I play loud on the radio? Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5.) It was a night of revenge that Unibuss continued to pursue my sick leave also until now the social security court. Unibuss has a completely sick behavior!

6.) Unibuss gave me a new service charge to listen to Christian radio. This is also completely sick and undocumented as no one can prove that I have ever heard loud on the radio.

7.) When someone has been with me on the bus, reported or unannounced from Unibuss, no one has ever during the 15 years I have ridden a bus pointed out loud sound on the radio.

8.) All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

All complaints that have pointed out that there have been Christian programs, it has been as an appendix in some of the complaints that there has been loud noise. This is of course with the intention of getting a response that I play Christian radio programs with people who themselves obviously have problems with me being allowed to listen to Christian radio.

9.) Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

10.) In an ordinary court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

11.) That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!

There is so much to go through in terms of documentation, that it's just a matter of getting started. Come up with questions, the entire Discrimination Tribunal, led by Ivar Danielsen, is nothing else in this case 

than a gang of liars and which allows Christian persecution and discrimination of pretexts of service prosecutions and retaliation and revenge that are both directly and indirectly protected and protected by the Discrimination Tribunal when they base all service prosecutions given are of a loud voice that no one can document or prove that I have listened to.

The Discrimination Tribunal with Danielsen is nothing more than a bunch of liars that I resent that such a thing is possible to do in Norway. Something that is on a par with North Korea and Congo, where you also make up stories to get the answers you want.

I, Jan Kåre Christensen have never driven loudly over the radio with passengers in the bus, it has never happened!

Regards

Jan Kåre Christensen

Krokstien 2 c

0672 Oslo

Tel: 99598070

2nd email sent:

Civil Ombudsman Oslo 1.10.2020

PO Box 3,

Sentrum, 0101 Oslo

Appeal against the Discrimination Tribunal's decision in Case no. 20/42!

I am both upset and sorry that now the lies of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal are posted as a "truth" on the Discrimination Tribunal's website.

https://diskrimineringsnemnda.no/artikkel/2814

Click one further and go to the link https://www.diskrimineringsnemnda.no/showcase/2020000042

Then it says, among other things. following:

"The case concerned the question of discrimination on the grounds of religion in that the complainant, who is a bus driver, was prosecuted for listening to Christian radio programs while driving. The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice. The tribunal also concluded that the complainant was not subject to retaliation from the employer after he complained to the tribunal. "

The tribunal came to the conclusion that it was the volume of the radio, and not the content of the programs, that was decisive when the employer gave the complainant service notice.

This is stated as a "truth". The real truth is that this is a blatant lie as no one can ever document or prove that I have heard on the radio sometimes at high volume.

And should something like this have happened, I would of course have adjusted the sound level accordingly.

But here it is a lie, a lie, a lie and another lie on the part of Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal.

The whole case is just sad, but I complain the case inside the Civil Ombudsman so that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal clear lies that I play loud on the radio is strongly proven back as untrue!

If a judgment is to be credible, it must in one way or another be substantiated and the judgment in this case has zero documentation of this.

Only some false accusations from some customers on the bus who have disliked that I have played on Christian radio programs.

That they claim that I play loud some of these, is nothing but a lie and only false and untrue accusations against me!

It is very sad to know that Unibuss and the Discrimination Tribunal can lie like this without any consequences!

All customer complaints about radio use that I have received, in 2016 and beyond, have been that I have played on Christian radio programs has been the main ingredient in the complaint.

All complaints that have pointed out that there have been Christian programs, it has been as an appendix in some of the complaints that there has been loud noise. This is of course with the intention of getting a response that I play Christian radio programs with people who themselves obviously have problems with me being allowed to listen to Christian radio.

Ivar Danielsen, who led the negotiations in the Discrimination Tribunal and Unibuss, here relies exclusively on some customer complaints that want to hit me for having played on Christian radio programs. Then one does not trust reality, but a fiction out of it all. What is a fiction? It is a lie when it is put together with reality and is put into a context where reality is crucial. Fiction does not belong in a straight and easy, but during a play or story. The facts of the case are the following, that no objective party has been able to prove any of the lies to which the Discrimination Tribunal or Unibuss attaches itself a little. In other words, fiction and lies build the whole case against me on, this is nothing but North Korea light that Norway is on a par with.

In a normal court, it should be so that the doubt benefits the accused (me here). Here it is the opposite, and that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal are on the same evil and dubious line as Unibuss, it is frightening and absolutely horrible!

That Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal no longer take into account what instructors and others in the management of Unibuss have experienced. As they have never once commented on my radio use. There have been exclusively other conditions, preferably that I have driven the bus very well and have received a ticket at least 10-15 times for good driving that you get when someone comes unannounced on the bus by instructors. In other words, they should have realized that I was playing loud on the radio. This is not the case. It is sad and really bad that Ivar Danielsen and the Discrimination Tribunal base this verdict against me not on facts, but on lies and fiction

. The verdict has zero credibility as it is an obvious lie from the Discrimination Tribunal!

Regards

Jan Kåre Christensen

Krokstien 2 c

0672 Oslo

Tel: 99598070