tirsdag 31. januar 2017

No. 1461: Jan Aage Torp "flower language", and his dealings with Torodd Fuglesteg and Ansgar Braut is well documented the three are together to reach their common goal!

No. 1461:
Jan Aage Torp "flower language", and his dealings with Torodd Fuglesteg and Ansgar Braut is well documented the three are together to reach their common goal!
Image of flowers from King David's city of Jerusalem.

Which is a markup language among other people, as it is rather obvious that Jan Aage Torp uses flowers languages .
Jan Aage Torp has a "flower language" online that is striking.
He writes posts, which are often crass and ugly.
Lar de lain out on the web X number of hours or days. Then he removes them.
He also has a very hatred in them.
They hate he added, he calls stalkers. Of course, these are people who are not stalkers. But they are called stalkers by Jan Aage Torp, it's his "flower language" online!
And hate Torp someone even stronger, so doctors he added this:
Has received feedback that Jan Aage Torp has not though the case has been appealed, and the appeal is upheld. Therefore new trial. Where the case will revolve around that it should be sent back to Oslo City Court for retrial when Oslo police have used / abused paragraph 390 a welcomed me.

Here are Brynjar Meling appeal write to Borgating Court of Appeal:
No. 1135:
Brynjar Melings appeal write to Borgarting Court of Appeal!

Sto today right next to Erna and Siv Radisson Blue Sas hotel in Nydalen in Oslo.

Thought I would tell them that I'm fair game for the criminal police at Manglerud in Oslo, through their representatives that they allow to do anything against me and my family.
But I thought, better to go to the Lord with this than the Prime Minister and
Deputy Prime Minister than to confront them with this. Yes, it's better to go to God with everything, than humans.
Psalm 118. 1. Thank the Lord, for he is good;
          his love endures.
     2 Israel say:
          His love endures.
     3 house of Aaron say:
          His love endures.
     4 Those who fear the Lord say:
          His love endures.
     5 I was in distress and cried to the Lord,
          He answered and led me out into open country.
     6 The Lord is with me, I fear not.
          What can people do to me?
     7 The Lord is with me, he helps me,
          I can look at those who hate me.
     8 It is better to take refuge in the Lord
          than to trust in man.
     9 It is better to take refuge in the Lord
          than to trust in princes.
    10 All nations surrounded me,
          in the name of I beat them back.
    11 They were around me on all sides,
          in the name of I beat them back.
    12 They were around me like bees.
          They extinguished that fire in thorns,
          in the name of I beat them back.
    13 They pushed me hard, I almost fell,
          but the Lord helped me.
    14 The Lord is my strength and my song,
          he has become my salvation.
    15 Listen, it is jubilation and victory
          in the tents of the righteous!
           Lord's right hand does valiantly,
    16 The right hand lifts up.
           Lord's right hand does valiantly.
    17 I shall not die, but live
          and declare the works of the Lord.
    18 Hard Lord has chastised me,
          but he surrendered me to death.
    19 Close righteousness gates up to me,
          I will go in and praise the Lord!
    20 This is the gate,
          here goes the righteous into.
    21 I praise you because you answered me,
          you were my salvation.
    22 The stone which the builders rejected
          has become the cornerstone.
    23 This is the Lord's doing,
          it is marvelous in our eyes.
    24 This is the day which the Lord hath made;
          let us rejoice and be glad in it!
    25 Lord, save us!
           Lord, give us success!
    26 Blessed is he that cometh in the name!
          We bless you from the house of the Lord.
    27 The Lord is God, he is illuminated for us.
          Bind party victim horns with ropes!
    28 You are my God, I thank thee,
          My God, I exalt you.
    29 Thank you Lord, for he is good;
          his love endures.

The Court of Appeal

SUPPORT FACE-TO APPEAL OVER OSLO THINGS BROUGHT DOM¬ In ITEM NO ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬15-073540MED-OTIR/02¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ Jan Kåre Christensen¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ against The Public Prosecution.

* *

Referring to the Oslo district court's judgment in case number 15-073540MED-OTIR / 02 dated 01/25/16 with so's judgment:
1. Jan Kåre Christensen, b. 03/08/1964 sentenced for violation of the Criminal Code of 1902 §3-90 a to a bid of 12,000 - twelve thousand - million going to sit in jail for 20 - twenty - days.
2. Jan Kåre Christensen acquitted of restitution claim.
3. Jan Kåre Christensen judged on to pay costs to the public by 3000 - three thousand - respectively.
The verdict is proclaimed by promoted preaching in Oslo District Court on Friday 01.29.16 at. 09:30. The verdict was appealed by the ministry. Support Written notification by appeal deadline. The appeal is therefore timely.
Anke object.
The appeal application of the law and evidence application the question of guilt.
The factual side
The facts are on the whole not disputed, however, that Christensen points out that he has not repeated the concepts to such an extent as indicated by the aggrieved party. It appears in his testimony before the district court that it is rebuttal from aggrieved to Torp and people who speak Torp case that things have been repeated and generated.
It is not disputed that Christensen comes with the statements reproduced in the indictment. The contested nor that this has been going on over time. The details of the period and scope has no bearing on the legal. The court has indiscriminately added Torp's explanation on this point basis and have focused on this in his guilt assessment. The correct according to Christensen is that he has referred the matters in significantly fewer times and in all material so this has come as a response to articles that affects Christensen.

Generally these statements
It noted that the terms used is normative and based on Christensen's perception rendered. It should be noted that the terms live in words, "immoral" and "prostitute" are terms used in Bible translations, as it was presented to the district court with specific Bible references.
It is pointed out that the term "leper" is also a Biblical expression that denotes it to be unclean and thus be excluded from society.
The reason for the conflict
It also pointed out that an item that background that Christensen "went to 'attack' 'on Torp, is a relationship that Torp in court acknowledged, where a young person, as Christensen perceive as" easy prey "should have given Torp everything he owned and had in terms of selling their house and at this render a donation consisting of almost 1.5 million. This was funds that Torp received and spent in their Christian, evangelical activities.
Christensen is clear that he can not find Torp living in accordance with its interpretation of the Bible. He believes that when Torp live by a form of double standards, where the life and teachings mismatched.
Deficiencies in the District Court's judgment
It may on occasion preceding paragraph mentioned that a defect in the Court's judgment is that the court does not have sufficiently emphasized that Torp is a public person, and must therefore have a higher tolerance limit for what he will accept the attack on his activity .
Moreover, neither the court paid sufficient attention that Torp acknowledged in court that he has called Christensen for "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer" on a few occasions and has called him demon, light guide, rumor spreader, etc. Based on the principle of provocation retorsjon this in itself circumstances that would warrant an acquittal. Victim's contribution to the debate has in no way helped to reduce the level of conflict in the debate, so that the matter is the statements that contribute to raise what Torp must withstand the attack.

Of law appeal.
It is noted, however, that the central argument - and that principle by appeal - relates to the application of the 1902 Penal Code § 390 a. It is argued that to apply them at the blog, regardless how extensive a blog business is - in effect that the provision be subject for an expansive interpretation.
It is established law that the freedom of speech area rather must interpret a penal provision restrictively, if this provision conflicts with the Covenant obligations. In this case, the criminal code. § 390 a conflict with freedom of expression. In addition to being protected by the Constitution, further determine the Constitution. § 100, as is the Convention attached to the ECHR Art. 10 and SP art 18 and 19.
The court takes its decision a correct starting point by stating that the provision aimed at those who "by frightening or distressing behavior or other reckless behavior that infringes on another's peace."
The court uses the legislative history wrong. Proposition 41 (1954-55) pp. 20-55 is itself a legal argument in favor of acquittal with a conviction. Referring to the allegations mentioned above, together with the legislative history says "the decision must be made concrete and circumstances of time, place and the victim's individual circumstances will affect the assessment". Moreover, it appears in the legislative history that "under the term 'nuisance behavior' go such vexatious phone calls.
It is a key element in both the legislative history that the relevant case law, it is pointed out activities aimed directly against a person; meaning that one call, send messages, or seek out people or its local area. This has not Jan Kåre Christensen made.
As shown by the Rt. 2014 p. 669 paragraphs 17-18, the "mind integrity" as protected by the provision and "only serious violations affected." The court discusses on page 5-6 defender's allegations that blog is not affected because it is not aimed directly at Torp. The court will still p. 6 that the posts are published on the Internet and concludes that this does not preclude the application of § 390 a. This is a formulation that would in itself may question whether or not involves a expansive interpretation of the wording of strl. § 390 a) and thus already at this point. Infringes clarity principle ECHR 7 and legality in grl. § 96.
Difficult it becomes when the court finds support for its view in the case law. Neither the Oslo District Court decision in 2013-111-859, RG 208-1499 or THEDM 2004-3964 may be cited for applying the criminal code. § 390 a on the blog. It's in both of these decisions, talk about actions that have just aimed more directly at people.
When the court additionally highlights that blog posts are open available for everyone and indexed so that they get hits on Torps one on search engines like Google, it shows precisely that one is outside the private sphere. It is not so that one can understand and interpret it as when "affected" can be considered to have received the message when it came to his knowledge - since the accused's activity has such a scope and intensity that Torp and Christensen's case.
Here are making the right not only an expansive interpretation of the penal provision but they are "enough" is also the fact, which can be an equally strict violation of the principle of legality. The court uses RG 2008 p. 1499 as the basis for its position without any discussion or in any way argue why this is relevant. From here noted that in RG 2008 p. 1499 had convicted hung hundred posters in the victim's community, where the victim was named and given information that he was convicted. The fact of the matter is therefore - unlike the present case - that the defendant has sought aggrieved community and hung him out in public bulletin. This is nothing but adding this openly in a blog.
Here it may be noted that the court has disregarded in the fact that Torp's own activities have helped to disseminate information. It may on that occasion declared that the first mentioned Oslo district court's judgment against Christensen was Torp in his blog. It shows that there is no privacy Torp is committed to protecting by reporting Christensen but he does this as part of their "struggle". It is argued here that the judiciary should be careful not to let himself be used. That is why isolation right when the police have dismissed Christensen reviews from Torp, but it is thus wrong to maintain other way.
The court also brings into matters related to Torp's spouse. As pointed out by the defender in court would possibly Torp spouse privacy had a greater right to protection than Torp itself. Torp's spouse is not a public person, it is Torp. This is, however, beyond the fine.
Relationship to free speech protection in the Constitution. § 100 and ECHR. 10, SP art 18 and 19 are not properly considered by the Oslo District Court. The court refers to LB - 2015-24004 which states that "it is certainly clear that utterances in isolation are not punishable, may under the Penal Code 390 a. The condition is that they occur in a number and at times makes it particularly distressing for the recipient ".
This shows once again that basically incorrect. When Borgarting Court of Appeal in the case points out the number and times that make it "particularly troublesome" shows once again that the basic premise is that the inquiries must abide directly against a person. Reference to Rt. 2010, p. 845 in the relevant Court of Appeal judgment shows that it concerns direct contact. In Rt. 2010, p. 845, we are facing a case where the chairman of the Immigration Tribunal received repeated SMS messages with insulting and threatening content.

Further details on the legal

It follows from the criminal code. § 1, 2.ledd, that the criminal law applies to any restrictions imposed by agreements with foreign states or of international law in general. Christensen has therefore protection as well ECHR 10 SP art 18 and 19.

His statements are also protected by the Constitution § 100. It follows already of Gujrat Judgment Rt. 1976 p.1. that the constitutional provisions governing the individual's personal liberty must have impact that is significant.

It is argued that the District Court's interpretation of the statements, means that the judgment result is contrary to the principle of legality, clarity principle and judgment result violates Jan Kåre Christensen of religion and freedom of expression.
The Court has in several decisions highlighted that freedom of expression is one of the absolutely fundamental elements of the basis for a democratic society. It is emphasized that this freedom not only includes the right to submit statements that are favorably received or regarded harmless, or minor, but also statements that are offensive, shocking or disturbs.
In Oslo District Court decision is not the stringent requirements of the grounds for restriction of freedom of expression met. Although there is only one remedy matters, there is no proportionality between the procedure and the purpose of this.
After EMD practice must exceptions speech subjected to a restrictive interpretation, see. That it must be "necessary". A central element of necessity assessment is whether there is an urgent social need for the procedure - "pressing social need". Referring to the so-called "Spycatcher" judge, Serie A # 216, judgment paragraph 60, and 217, the judgment section 50.
In Christensen's case must be weighed against all of the adjudicated claims are his views on theological issues, or provocations made against either him or his faith.
When the Supreme Court majority in Kjuus Judgment Rt. 1997 s 1821 finds that the statements are not protected by freedom of expression, this ia based on the following:
"I can not see that the right to form a political party can be inferred that groups that do this, and dons their positions form of a manifesto, should be free to agitate for any vision, whatever interventions it had to involve over others people."
For Christensen - as sites of their right to make statements, protected as well religious freedom as freedom of expression, this is different. He advocates a view that - though it is rare now - has stood for centuries, and that is not expressed that "he dons his stances form of a religion".
It is also argued that the statements came as part of a public debate. A debate that whoever statements frames also participated in, and reciprocated. Such a debate is protected by freedom of speech under the Constitution L-100 which weighs very heavily. Allowing the utterances of a party and deprive the victim of his remarks, the right to speak out will in itself be contrary to freedom of expression
Should criminal code § 390 a used in this case, it will only be done by an expanding interpretation of the law - which is impossible, cf. Legality of the Constitution § 96.
It is clearly evident in jurisprudence that interpretation must not only be based on how the general belongs will perceive the statements, see. Plenary ruling in Rt-1997-1821 (Kjuus). but one
"Must also see the statements in light of the context in which they have emerged."

It appears here that the statements are normative, emerged in a blog debate between people who share faith, and with references to external's perception of a common creed.

On the interpretation of the statements says Eggen Norwegian Law Review 1998 p 263:

"For utters becomes jurisprudence as little predictability whether one" relaxes "the criminal liability conditions or interpreting utterances freely so that they are aligned with these terms. One of the main objectives behind legality in Norwegian law, and in allfall law requirement ECHR is to ensure predictability in the application of law.

He continues later on the same page:

"When legality sets limits on how far the contextual interpretation of the Criminal Code it is acceptable to go, it would be inconsistent if the courts were to stand freely in contextual interpretation of utterances"

The consideration of both legality and freedom of expression implies that there are clear limits to how far one can go in if interpretation meaning and circumstances of the statements that are not directly stated or acknowledged.

Straight Safety, particularly ensuring predictability, is accented in Rt. 2002, p. 1618. consideration to freedom of expression implies
"That no one should be able to risking criminal liability by the statement attributed to a meaning that is not expressly stated nor with reasonable certainty can be inferred from the context"
Reference is also made to Eggen, Law and 1998 s 264 which gives rise to another consideration:

"A free interpretation involves besides less predictability of law also greater opportunity for censorship from the Court file of speech they dislike, perhaps for reasons other than those behind the penal provision"

Interpreted as religious expressions and interpretations of the Bible's view of remarriage, can not utterances judged. When court excludes the interpretation option, then "pushes" one statement outside the core area of ​​the Constitution § 100 of free speech.

Rt 2002, p. 1618 Boot Boys judgment is thus relevant. "Boot Boys" was a neo-Nazi fighting organization, as a Saturday morning on the square in Askim performed an appeal with support for Hitler on the occasion of Rudolf Hess's 100th day.

"Every day rob, rape and kill immigrants Norwegians, every day our people and country are being plundered and destroyed by Jews, who suck our country empty of wealth and replace it with immoral and un-Norwegian thoughts." The appeal ended with "Sieg full- and Hitler greetings. "

Boot Boys' leader Terje Sjølie was acquitted. The statements were found to be derived from a political program rather than being specific threats. Several of those in attendance were dressed in finland hoods, and the demonstration was a militaristic combat fascist nature. The statements fell in front of immigrants who made their errands in Askim. Christensen's statements come in response to the actions that he believes is in dtrid with God's word. Statements fall in Blog where most statements are in response to charges from persons Christensen perceive as mouthpiece for Torp. . Sjølis statements fell unprovoked against innocent people.

clarity requirement

Whether expanding the wording of the law, or the meaning of the statement, it will be in conflict with the clarity requirement and legality. The Supreme Court has the 02.08.2012 handed down a ruling in which clarity principle being discussed:

Clarity The requirement has been expressed in several decisions of the Supreme Court, including the decision in Rt-2011-469, in which the question was whether the provision in the Penal Code § 219 also applied in relation to former cohabitants, although the legal text only referred to former spouses. Section 9 states:

'Such an extension of the criminal liability, compared with what follows from the wording of § 219, must be authorized by law.

I refer to the Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7, ref. Rt-2009-780 Section 21. Penalties Dignity, or other real reasons that may justify to juxtapose previously cohabiting with former spouses, is not sufficient. '

Then comes something that is central to the Christensen case that are not sufficiently emphasized by the court

The Court of Appeal for its part, notes that the requirement for clear statutory basis for criminal liability not least will be significant in cases where penal provision implies a restriction of freedom of speech

Under section 18 comes the Supreme Court with his views.

As the Court of Appeal points out, have basically the assessment be a requirement for clear legal applicable in criminal cases, cf. The Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7. It appears to Rt-2011-469, section 9, quoted in the Court of Appeal ruling.

This is elaborated in Rt-2012-313 paragraph 29, which states:

"It is nevertheless not decisive what the legislature might have intended, when any legislator's intention has not been clearly expressed in the law. I refer to the law's requirement of the Constitution § 96 and ECHR Article 7, so this is understood partly in Rt-2011-469. Of particular interest are paragraphs 9 and 12 of the judgment, in which it emphasized that the criminality of need resulting from the law, and that a lack of support in the wording is not cured by that relationship is clearly worthy of punishment, and that the legislator undoubtedly wanted to frame it. "

Secondarily - restrictive interpretation of the provisions

It submits alternatively, that if the appellate court finds that the statements violate privacy, for a common interpretation of the legal provisions of the criminal code. § 390 A, and that the district court did not have extended interpretation of the statements in a way that is contrary to the ECHR 7 and Constitution. § 96, as follows from the criminal code. § 1, paragraph 2, that the interests of Christensen's rights - and our commitments - under ECHR and SP on the safeguarding of the individual's freedom of religion and freedom of expression, imply that the criminal code. § 390 a) in cases where religion and freedom of speech are violated, must be interpreted narrowly.

Emphasis for this down so
P to s t a n d:
Jan Kåre Christensen acquitted

Related links:

No. 1460: Gay marriage is bad, but remarriage among preachers, pastors, apostles, leaders and others with confidence is a hundred times more severe on the basis of God's word!

No. 1460:
Gay marriage is bad, but remarriage among preachers, pastors, apostles, leaders and others with confidence is a hundred times more severe on the basis of God's word!
Øyvind Benestad is a high-profile minister, resigned from the Norwegian church after the decision where one opened up marriage to a person of the same sex as yourself. But Benestad has been regularly on Vision Norway, he is clamming up about remarriage. The whole man makes me nausea that hypocrite so. Hanvold is the person rather than someone who should and should been warned against, why? He wants to be an apostle and preacher, and is re-married twice as a believer.

In other words, man is worse off than anyone else!
Jeremiah 30 18 Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I will bring again the captivity of Jacob's tents and have compassion on his dwellings; city will be rebuilt on its mound, and the palace will stand in its proper place. 19 And the sounding praise from them, and cries of happy people; I will multiply them, and they shall not be few; I will honor them, and they shall not be small. 20 And his sons shall be as of old, and their congregation shall be established before me, and I will punish all who oppress them. / 21 And his lovely to be of his own family, and his ruler issue from his midst, and I will cause him to come near, and he shall come unto me; for who would otherwise dare their lives and come near me?saith the Lord. / 22 And ye shall be my people, and I will be your God. 23 Behold, the Lord's storm, his wrath goes out, a furious storm; it whirls over the head of the wicked. 24 The fierce anger will not turn back until he fully accomplishes the purposes of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it.
Scripture says: "His glorious to be of his own family, and his ruler issue from his midst, and I will cause him to come near, and he shall come unto me; for who would otherwise dare their lives and come near me? says the Lord. "
To get to God is one thing. Then one must he "pure" flour in the bag. But living at a distance from God, is something else entirely. All will eventually be overtaken by his sin. But when it is rife with gjengiftede preachers who warn against the homosekuelle and lesbians, when things get totally turned on its head!
For all part of God's word speaks clearly against men lie with men, and women are with women as they are with men. This is sin in God's eyes!
But when high profile preachers are married again once, twice and repeatedly. In God's eyes this hundred traveling worse to speak.
God asks through his own words the following:
"His glorious to be of his own family, and his ruler issue from his midst, and I will cause him to come near, and he shall come unto me; for who would otherwise dare their lives and come near me? says the Lord. "
Who else wants to venture his life and get close to me? says the Lord
Yes, God speaks against these gjengiftede preachers, priests, pastors and leaders more than anyone else. There are those who, above all others, opens up this giant apostasy from the living and true Christian faith we see today among God's people in Norway.
Now it is a free-to marry in the Norwegian church, as a person of their own carbon black. But who are these then married off? It is not unlikely that they will be married by a priest who themselves are re-married. Looks a non hollowness in this? Then a spiritual blind!
Here is an article I wrote on this topic a while back!
No. 668:
The believers forsake the Lord , but are not aware of it and do not see it , as Samson was , and the church in Laodicea

There is a widespread nerve among the faithful , especially the Free Church , where one is not aware of its own spiritual standpoint. It is not enough to believe that grace covers it all , where God sees through everything. And they point out that this is either the Pharisees, judgmental, legalistic and where one comes with all sorts of excuses. At the same time do not love God's people further apart fervent heart . What is it ? That lawlessness is included not only the world , but God's church . But it was also Jesus said would happen :

Matt . 24: 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another and hate one another 11 and many false prophets will arise and lead many astray . 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love will grow cold most . 13 But he who endures to the end shall be saved.

Unfortunately did not Samson Delilah deceived him and deprived him of his strength . So do not know the church of God that the world has deceived them when they have been so dus the world. They live in many ways similar , if Jesus said that the world hates me and will also hate you, but it is because they no longer know him and he makes no Belja the Christians if it does not happen a big change and repentance . Lifting the Laodicean church remains unchanged even , even for a renegade and corrupted Christianity :

From my commentaries Revelation : 3 19 All that I hold dear , rebuke and chasten me. So be earnest , and turn again ! Is this done in love ? How is the love we read about in 1 Cor. 13? v. 6 It does not rejoice in iniquity, but his joy in the truth . It had to be serious and need to take it to heart that the message concerned them.

20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock . If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me . The entire congregation was very difficult to accept the message because they wanted it that scratched them in the ear. But it was about some possible acknowledge congregation that would take it to heart? They would experience the close fellowship and communion with Jesus all over again .

21 He who overcomes, to him will I sit with me in my throne , even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne . Again addressing the Lord to the victorious and who want to follow him. Once saved always saved is one of Satan 's lies. Salvation is something one must also grow and care for. For those who overcome will one get the same position and position himself. We will sit with Christ in the heavens. Eph. 2 6 In Christ Jesus he raised us from the dead along with him and seated us with him in heaven . ( end of quote ) .

Image of Samson and Delilah , painting by Anthonis van Dyck , until 1620.

Both Samson and the church in Laodicea thought that it was far better off with them than it really was. They lived in a powerful spiritual delusion where one was not aware that a set of spiritual bankruptcy . Tragic that this is also to grips with the Norwegian Christianity in a very large extent .

Samson failed in the moral and the church in Laodicea was selvbeskuende and Democracy Council and the word of God was set aside for that most opinions meant more than what God said in his own words !

There are two ways to become blind or visually impaired on . There are those who are born that way , or are they born sighted but by disease , accident or otherwise comes a sequence of events that makes them either partially sighted or blind . But the result is pretty much the same when one is visually impaired or blind. But what makes a visually impaired or blind in the spiritual realm as the apostle Peter mentions :

2 Pet. 1 3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us by glory and virtue 4 and thus has given us the greatest and precious promises , that through these ye may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust , 5 For this very reason make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and to virtue knowledge , 6 and to knowledge temperance , and to temperance patience , and patience godliness , 7 and godliness with brotherly affection , and brotherly affection with love for everyone. 8 For if these things are yours and abound, they make you to be not idle nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ ; 9 for those who do not have these things , he is blind , short-sighted , having forgotten the cleansing from his old sins.

The Apostle Peter mentions , " for those who do not have these things , he is blind , short-sighted ."

What is it that makes unfortunately it is a form of spiritual blindness and low vision that is becoming more and more councils of Christianity in the Western world ? Would like to mention briefly ten ( 10) things :

1 ) There is no climate or the ability of the congregation to debate and discuss things.

We read among the first Christians that they debated , researched and empty speaking to each other right. It was a good and healthy church environment to exchange views and opinions , when revival burned as hottest . We managed to communicate and discuss between us so falls the spiritual temperature.

2 ) What about looking through fingers with heresy.

We can not make light of anything, least of all when things break against God's word. I have no problem accepting that others think and believe differently than myself . But to accept infant baptism , gjengiftede among Christians , female pastors and elders etc. Then a well for a long way in accepting other faiths .

3 ) Than condone sin.

I have written against remarriage among Christians , and has also mentioned ministers with names like Jan Hanvold . And really heard them. He does so much good is said and more. It helps null and void if one accepts the sin in their own lives scripture says many, many places. See here: 1 Cor. 13 3 And if I give to feed others all my goods , and though I give my body to be burned , but have not love , it profits me nothing .

4 ) Spiritual Gifts are inoperative.

This with the gifts work is of paramount importance in God's church . It is the revelation we are led , without it we end in error or stagnation.

"The Lord went before them by day in a pillar of cloud that showed them the way , and by night in a pillar of fire that lighted them . "(2 Mos.13 0.21 to 22 ) .

So likewise gifts make a difference , where we are exhorted , comforted and encouraged. And by that spiritual gifts are in operation are sin and the sinner exposed and undressed and in the way he / she can find salvation in Christ Jesus.

1 Cor. 14 3 on the other hand who prophesies speaks to men for edification and exhortation and consolation. 24 But if all prophesy , and there come in one that believeth not, or one unlearned, he is convinced by all and judged by all 25 secrets of his heart made ​​manifest , and so he will fall on his face and worship God , and to testify that God is really among you .

5 ) The ability to judge not emphasized .

It is clear as it has been in many parishes and churches is not critical and healthy try everything on God's Word and Spirit sanctions , so everything is allowed and equally good. It is not, it is something that is right and which is wrong etc.

1 Cor. 14 29 But the prophets speak two or three, and let the others ! 30 and get another revelation while he sits by, let the first be silent .

It is clear that we should not despise or call heeding the prophetic voice , but what do the others do? "The others try it ! ". The secret that things will develop negatively , is that a try and control the whole time. I have built several houses and an apartment. What did we do? We did some work, so we controlled and leveled so all the time. What makes a church of God , especially in today? Have spends confidence so he or she can almost say , believe and preach it all. And prophesying the "great" man of God , then it must be from God. It is enough to mention some that are false through and through and as well not have come with a straight prophecy that the late Aril Edvardsen and Emanuel Minos , they are thoroughly corrupt but still think the majority of the Norwegian Christianity on such false prophets !

6 ) What about not respect God's word , eg may allow one female pastors and elders.

The women who will take over her husband's area is also an end -time signs . God's Word clearly states throughout the scriptures , both Old and New Testament that there are some areas that are reserved man. As example . being a teacher and shepherd of a congregation : The Bible tells us that a pastor is an elder ( 1 Tim 5:17 ) , and that the elder should be " husband of one wife " (Titus 1:5-7 ) . The Greek Bible says, " man to one woman ." Furthermore , Paul says in 1 Timothy 2:12-13 : " I do not permit a woman to teach , nor to have authority over men ; she must be silent . 13 For Adam was formed first , then Eve . " Since Paul joined this with the order of creation of man , one can not say that it has something to do with culture .

There are some weirdos like masses on the word that women should not speak in the church collection, but it comes to her skvaldring and cackling , not if she prophesy , pray or witnesses of God's grace. Here we must distinguish feasible from snowing !

7 ) An execution control gjengiftede preachers and those who live directly in striven with God's word , just "for" they do so much "good" !

Sin is sin , whether it's gay , lesbians , remarriage or marry a divorcee . It's not big and small sins before God . It proved to steal a pity that a big bank robbery . We must remember that all bank robbers began as a petty thief , therefore we can never qualify and measure the sin. All sin is dangerous and separates us from God , here we must not compromise and overlook anything.

8 ) Love is become lukewarm and cold , it appears one by one does not seek out those who fall without a past .

It amazes me that Christians do not care about the one, when it needs help. One leaves apart so fast to " Satan ." It's not good , we have a responsibility to take care of each other , they also troublesome and falling without passing A4 pattern .

9 ) The internal cohesion and respect is no longer intact .

Unfortunately, so is really Jesus' most clear commandments , including the commandment and the words that are most neglected and overlooked by Christians :

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; As I have loved you , you also should love one another . By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another . (John 13 v34 -35) .

This is easy .... right? If we are Christians , the church is filled with love for each other , we will show the world what Jesus has said and with the display light to a lost world . When we walk with Jesus , that you love Jesus and have a heart relationship with Jesus that is so strong that you hate sin , in such a way that sin pain when falls into sin (because you do ) .

But when a heart relationship with Jesus is so strong , it will rub off on others around you, because love is care and compassion. We love Jesus , because we are plugged into the vine that is Jesus. We are partakers of him. See John 15 v1 -17 .

Thus , - the love we have from Jesus is caring and compassion for all people, especially to faith own people ( Gal 6 v10 ) . Well, from what we read in John. 13 v34 -35 shall all men know that ye are my disciples , Jesus said . It will not say that all are saved, but all are confronted and demonstrated by Jesus' words . And Jesus said, Thus shall all men know who you are when you have love for one another . How will the world see that Jesus is real. So easy it was to get people to understand that Jesus is alive . The answer is simple how people should understand that Jesus is alive . The answer is so simple that we have overlooked it !

The Bible is easy to understand, we have in fact the author of Scripture in us through the Holy Spirit (John 14 v16 -17 + v26 ) . We do not have long Bible studies or theology complicated for people to see Jesus. No, the Bible is simple, down to earth and practical. I can not understand those who believe the Bible is hard to understand. The problem is perhaps that they never open it and read it. Well, Jesus said : If ye have love one to another , shall all understand. We have an obligation , by confronting the world with the gospel. Jesus said : Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel (Mark 16 v15 ) . There is also another thing I want to show you . It is that love for each other is not an option , it is a commandment ! A new commandment I give unto you, ye love one another (John 13 v34 ) .

How do we do it ?

Yes, in the way Jesus loves us , that is unselfishly where of others is the focus . Jesus says that we are able to love so , the whole world will see it! Because such does not exist in verden.Verden want it selfish , self-righteous and having mentality. When we love each other, thus this situation that society is rotten , get turned upside down. The world will soon see that they are Christians, they love - and this is quite unusual for the world. The unsaved , the early days of Christianity the time , said of the first Christians : " See how they love one another ! " Thus , what touched people the most, was thus the mutual love they saw demonstrated in the Christian community . Some of them dealing with the oldest church history , claiming that one of the key factors in the rapid growth in the early days of Christianity's time was just the community, which was characterized by love. Whether we like Jesus sitters do not go in the world by demonstrating love, what are we ? What are we as Christians - without love ? Well, nothing, worthless. See Matthew 5 v13 . We are plugged into the vine that is Jesus and receive love from there , but we must choose whether we will pass on this love .... Jesus says that this is a commandment .

So what are we when we do not use love for each other? Yes we are disobedient ! We disobey the commandment Jesus gave us: Love one another ! (John .13 v34 ) Well, we have two choices .

1 Love one another as Jesus loved us - when we are obedient. 2 Do not love each other - when we are disobedient .

I would like to " shove to you" and make you stop and think about this you just read ! I think we as a church in Norway is facing a new era, if we choose it! The people around us are looking for something meaningful they can fill your life with. People can not find peace until they find Jesus. As Jesus sitters we must act as good role models , we have plenty of love to us from Jesus to love each other and our neighbors, but we must thus choose to take this into use.

10 ) There is no alternative to the apostate and lukewarm Christianity is today .

Something that is very discouraging and sometimes dangerous, that makes apostasy and spiritual blindness will grow more and more, that there is an alternative to all that is good. We humans are social, and seeks to places where other people are. When there are few and little alternative to that is seductive and negative, then it is that even those who see much of what I teach about being dragged into the vast undertow . Therefore I pray the following:

God raise up preachers and churches throughout Norway and around the world who stand before God , his word, and he delights in and over!

Final Comment:

Norwegian Christianity has become so lethargic and without empathy , where one puts himself and his own ego in the center that are unable longer to see the spiritual realities . How to get ahead? Jesus says Tim Laodicean church that lack of spiritual vision should get eye ointment :

Joh . Obvious. 3 18b : salve to put on your eyes , so you can see.

What is eye ointment ? It can stand for several things , but the ointment in the Bible that God has even doing anything. That God Ointments us with his Spirit. And how is eye diseases ? There are several things that come into play , but eye disease can also be symptoms of other diseases in the body. It is therefore also like to indicate that you have problems with the eyes of another and greater problem. For a Christian is sin in all its forms and shapes always the biggest problem when it is our sin that create distance and separation between us and God !

Isaiah 59 2 But your iniquities have made ​​divorce between you and your God , and your sins have hidden his face from you, that he will not hear.

God's church stands today at a separation when so much of the world and its beings have become one with the church.

The complaints 1 9 Her filthiness is in her skirts, she was not thinking about what the end it would take with her, and she sank on wonderfully, no consoling her. O LORD, behold my affliction The enemy has triumphed . 10 The adversary hath spread out his hand upon all her pleasant things: for she saw pagan nations enter her sanctuary, whom thou didst command that they should not enter into thy congregation .

Her uncleanness clings to her today even with all the boasting , gjengiftede , divorced and other sins that are becoming more and more accepted and accepted. There is so much that soon it is abnormal, normal. Sin and verses are replaced with true fear of God and respect for God's word.

Where will it end ? There we determine at our option, either bad or good !

Related links: 

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/ http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2013/03/nr-471-peters-tomb-recently-discovered.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/11/nr-403-pauls-trip-to-spain.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-312-1-week-in-rome.html http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2012/05/nr-310-apostle-peter-was-never-apostle.html

lørdag 28. januar 2017

No. 1459: It should, inter alia, be a fabricated interview as "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp has been reviewed for which he either behind or it is his "poodles" or "straw men" behind!

No. 1459:
It should, inter alia, be a fabricated interview as "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp has been reviewed for which he either behind or it is his "poodles" or "straw men" behind!
Image of Torodd Fuglesteg which is Jan Aage Torp's "poodle" and "straw man" in along with Ansgar Braut, then according to themselves.

Jan Aage Torp is behind most and all the people he is trying to defame, call him stalkers. So it's very, very easy to reveal who he hated!


It should, inter alia, be a fabricated interview as "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp has been reviewed for which he either behind or it is his "poodles" or "straw men" behind! Heels are just as good as the thief called it, therefore if there is Jan Aage Torp, or his "poodles" or "straw men" who stands behind it. Then there January Aage Torp responsible.
Here we see January Aage Torp encourages these "poodles" or "straw men" to spread sickness, death and fabricate lies and imagination today.
§ 21.11.2016, at. 10:04 p.m. said Jan Kåre Christensen:
Torodd, only this says that you're a part of the evil trinity, you, Braut and Torp. 
Jan-Aage Torp Wed, 20/10/2014 at 4:02 p.m. said:
When this matter with JKC has reached its necessary end, Kjell Andersen, then I think you with wisdom is able to modere necessary debates about difficult topics such as divorce and remarriage. I'll be happy to help as best I can, only I do not have to moderate itself
Otherwise, it's interesting to Braut Fuglesteg etc. which engages tough and necessary in relation to a blog that is confused, cruel, vicious and stupid - through and through.
It should be shut down, in short.
This post is fabricated, as Jan Aage Torp has been reviewed for I have been informed of reliable sources.
Jan-Erik Hansen: Family Torp have stolen my property.

We have received a letter from Jan-Erik Hansen where he offered a bounty of 200 000 to anyone who could find his woman Angelina to him. We have the background of this letter interviewed a very close friend of Jan-Erik Hansen who has thrown new light on this matter.
What is the background to this case?
Saturday 9. April 2011 stole Jan-Egil Torp, nephew of Pastor Jan-Aage Torp, Angelina Jan-Erik Hansen. Angelina was his woman. He has ever since then been looking for her without finding so much as a trace of her.
How long were the two together?
She was my woman for two years where she obeyed me in everything and we were one.
What do you think happened?
Jan-Egil Torp has stolen Angelina, my property from me. Whether to have her for themselves or to give her to another man. Both are illegal when it is stealing and receiving stolen goods. The family Torp, behind Jan-Egil Torp is also disobeyed God when they do not see that woman is man's property. Jan-Aage Torp has even said that Angelina may have a free mind and can live their own lives. This is wrong when Angelina as all women are the property of men. She is my property as much as my car is my property.
What is your view of women?
Women are subservient and inferior us men in all. These are emotional immature beings who are unable to think rationally and smart. They do not know what is best for themselves and must be disciplined with physical agents when they act against their own best interests. I have often disciplined Angelina with the means I had at hand when she was naughty to me. Physical discipline is something that all women can benefit from.
Women are at all incapable enough to live independent lives. That is why we men have to make decisions for them when it comes to love and all the other challenges they have not mastered in their lives.
It is claimed that you have physically abused Angelina and that this was why she left you ..
Angelina left me not. She was my property and Jan-Egil Torp stole her from me. Women are often so immature dumb that they need to physically disciplined to understand his own good. This is not physical abuse. This is the discipline and regimentation.
What do you think of the police who have not responded to your tips and police reviews?
The returning property to its proper owners are police duty and task. That they have not returned Angelina to me just shows that police in Norway is both inept and criminally. We have a police force that does its job. Instead of doing their job, they are always keen to protect thieves Jan-Egil Torp and his uncle Jan-Aage Torp. I have nothing but contempt for the police.
What are your tips for other men?
Always have full control over what she does so you have full control of your car and your house. Women are easily mislead by other men so it is best to keep your woman indoors. But the main thing is to have complete control over your woman as these are treacherous and mischievous beings who must be kept under constant attention and discipline.
What is your word to your family Torp?
You've stolen my property and thus destroyed my life. For such thieves and liars I have nothing but contempt. Jan-Egil Torp deserves some years in prison for theft.
What will happen if you get left Angelina?
Anyone have tips on where Angelina is located can send me a message to janerik9april2011@gmail.com I'm going to take better care of my property after this experience and keep full control over her so that I will not be subjected to petty theft again.
Arne Ulf Breen Smyrna Church
Final Comment:
Is Jan Aage Torp criminal and should be punished? In my eyes, yes!
He has done so much, that prison and punishment should this criminal "pastor" is punishable by!
One thing is what you do.
Another thing is what you get others to do.
Both are equally bad!
Torp is wirepuller behind it all, so he is an accomplice in this!

Related links: