No. 1520: We have fought against the state and the public and won every time when all charges against us have been erroneous and constructed!

No. 1520:
We have fought against the state and the public and won every time when all charges against us have been erroneous and constructed!

Carl Fredrik Wisløff said that the truth always comes up, even though it has little bones to go on! So also in the cases that I have experienced with the state, the municipality, the police and other government agencies. They always lose when they go out with people who stand for God and the truth. Why? They sit outside the area they are set to manage, fight against evil, and for good. Not the opposite, as they sometimes do.
Scripture says the following:
Joh.e. 8. 44 You have the devil's father and you will do what your father wants. He has been a murderer from the beginning and is beyond the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
People if they are municipal employees, state employees, or whatever they are, are always the father there to be used and misled by the Evil One.
Therefore, the scripture says that we should take care of, or we can easily let ourselves be misled.
This is what scripture says and exhorts us to do.
1 Joh.b. 5. 18 We know that every one who is born of God does not sin. For he who is born of God preserves him so that the evil one cannot touch him.



Room. 13. 1. Everyone must be obedient to the authorities he has over them. For there are no authorities that are not from God, and those who are found are God-ordained. 2 Whoever opposes them, therefore, opposes what God has ordained, and those who do so will receive their judgment. 3 For those who rule shall not fear the one who does good, but the one who does evil. If you do not want to fear the authorities, do the good, and you will be praised. 4 The government is a servant of God, for your benefit. But if you do evil, you have reason to be scared. For the government bears no sword for no reason, but is the servant of God who will execute his punishment on the one who does evil. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to be obedient, not only for fear of punishment, but also for the sake of conscience. 6 Also pay tax for the same reason. For the authorities, God's servants are responsible for all such things. 7 Give everyone what you owe them. Pay taxes to anyone who is to have taxes, customs to those who are to have customs, show respect for those who are to respect, give honor to the one who will have honor.

The authority should be "For those who rule, shall not fear the one who does good!"

When it comes to me and my family, the authority has repeatedly done the opposite, so I know that this fight that we now face the authority we will win when we do the good, and the authorities are doing a regular lie and manipulation!

We have experienced, as said several times, being stepped on and almost bullied by the authorities here in Norway, who are little fun and okay.

Blue. when my father died and it was known that some money had been paid too much in retirement. Then the estate was up and settled. We had the Lawyer on the case all the time as they should have arranged everything up with. But they first went to my sister, when she didn't have the money they went to me.
Of course I paid back the money I had received too much.
What did they do then? Then they also demanded me for the money my sister owed.
I refused this of course, then they went straight to my employer and fetched over 30,000, - kr there.
This I strongly opposed, and won on all points.
They never came with a single excuse or I got some sort of tort and pain. Not a penny. This only shows again and again when the authority behaves like "bandits and robbers." So it is perfectly legitimate to watch from and make them aware of this.

In this case, NAV made many roars, to shorten to a few points.

1.) When Nav found out that too much money was paid out, the estate was up and down. The person who was then responsible for this was our lawyer Harald Hetland, which we paid just over 100,000 NOK, if not more when he also sold my father's house and made money in absolutely everything.

2.) When they demanded money from me, it wasn't okay. But that they also demanded money from me that my sister would pay. It was so ugly and criminal it is possible to do something. This was simply stealing, as I have nothing to do with her life and finances.

3.) Then NAV went through the Namsfogde here in Oslo to my employer and picked up the money my sister was going to pay. This is not rude, it is worse than rude and criminal. This is a form of "rape" and settle down that surpasses most things?

4.) Finally I got the money back and won in the NAV appeal body on all points, hallelujah! It will happen again also now to the Planning and Building Administration here in Oslo. They have also made as many and several serious mistakes as I will mention briefly here:

1.) They promised us to build masonry on old wall was not mandatory. And we built a lower wall than the neighbor's over on the other side as agreed.

2.) We have built a small storage room which should be some sqm2 over utilization the pitch on the plot. Others, also neighboring away in the road, have done the same and exploited the utilization rate of the plot over 57 times more than us. That we are told to demolish as PBE stands stubbornly testifies to such work that words do not extend!

3.) Our wall is located 1 meter from the paved road, and others lie several places 20 - 25 cm. We are instructed to demolish our wall as it is probably 18 cm into a regulated road surface and has a design that can under no circumstances be approved as it stands today, the letter from Oslo municipality says. While others have a wall that stands 1 meter into the regulated road surface. The difference treatment is so bad and ugly that words do not extend!

4.) We wanted to bring clarity to stairs that lie in regulated road surfaces and there is nothing difficult to cut it and lay it differently. Then we are told to tear it down and search again. Here, the chiefs have not cared about the stairs, but had focus on booth and wall. When we mention this as we have done before, they overdo us in the worst possible and undemocratic way. It is so bad that words do not stretch.

5.) Our whole thing is completely "sick" and is completely put out of all professions. It is really a small file case that PBE and the entire public Norway have been able to do the worst possible. What they are doing is like shooting sparrows with guns. Here, use far too strong instruments in relation to what is required to achieve a goal. In our case, the municipality should have convened a meeting and then inspection, and taken it from there. They were visiting - a hidden sight. When we asked if they would go to the inspection, we never heard anything. The way in which PBE here in Oslo has performed, words do not simply extend!

This goes to victory as it is so obvious that PBE here in Oslo argues and dangers with lies and fanatics stretching. Not something that is true, right or good!

One of the many emails we sent, it becomes too elaborate to bring all the emails back and forth. Adds someone who makes it possible to get an insight into the matter.

Complaint to Nav for refund of Case 14202170 - Case 232558

Want to complain once again on this decision as this is so unreasonable and it is pure mafia activity that hubs do in my eyes.

1.) You slap your mind with paragraphs, the more you make mistakes, the more paragraphs you throw at us. You demand things that we do not have control of, but as lawyer Hetland is responsible for, namely Karl Johan Christensen's estate. It is not right for you to run away with me and my sister. You suddenly find a mistake after two years, then it is completely wrong to loose our way in this way. It's not us you contact and pursue, but lawyer Hetland is legally responsible for Karl Johan Christensen's estate. Why don't you understand that?
2.) We have had a lawyer on this case since January 28, 2013. Why do you not understand it. As you see fit, you use these para graphs as you like at all times.
3.) You should only contact a person, this is our lawyer Hetland, but you just as well as you like.
4.) I will now be within 2 months. pulled half my wages, it is absolutely unheard of that you draw me when we have paid Hetland close to 80,000, for him to have full overview. This is cutting mafia business.
5.) That for which you are going to force me, the innocent part of the knee, lays you up that I am the only one. We are two heirs, but the mafia must have their money. This is unworthy, unperturbed and fraudulent to behave in such a simple way and would demand this money from me and not my sister, and that the amount is too large in such a short time and not least URET.
6.) That you first contacted us after a total of 3 years. It should have been good enough for you to have canceled the whole case.
7.) When you contacted all the funds in the estate were paid out. How can that keep doing that way and start demanding after the estate has long been settled, you spent far too long.
8.) I can continue writing, but as you are doing is more like a mafia business than what you expect from a democratic state !?

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen

New mail:

From: Jan Kåre Christensen <jk.chris@online.no>
Posted: Thursday, June 2, 2016 13.26
To: post@advokathetland.no
Copy: navi@nav.no; 'Henriette Nordås'; beritch-0803@hotmail.com; oslo.namsfogd@politiet.no
Subject: Case 14202170 and Case 232558

For Nav collection and Lawyer Harald Hetland!

Case 14202170
Case 232558

After my father died three and a half years ago, now hub requires us for money that is perceived as totally unreasonable and unprofessional!

Nav contacted us first 1 ½ years ago. So 2 years after my father's death to claim us for money. It's really 2 years late.

Then they started again six months ago.

The estate is up and down a long time ago, the money distributed and then demanding money that is so far back is experienced both unreasonably and incorrectly!

This should go to NAV's "taboo quota" and collar lapses against Karl Johan B. Christensen's estate. It is both my and my sister Henriette's opinion!

It is NAV's sommel and that the estate has ended which makes it only NAV that can be loaded for this, no one else!

Lawyer Harald Hetland and we two siblings cannot decide that NAV is really waiting for 2 years to send out claims, and then it goes 1 year to the next time they send out claims, then with interest so that the amount was not 20,000 longer, but over 23,000. This is uproff!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen

New mail:

Subject: Case 232558
Additional.
NAV Klageinstans Vest

PO Box 6245
5893 Bergen


1.) Following the procedure of NAV, where they have made all mistakes possible. So I mean that both me and my sister should get a redress!

SEK 50,000 each had been fit!

2.) We are not allowed to mail by our lawyer until almost the deadline has expired, then when NAV has drawn us into this case. Should we get a copy by mail.

3.) NAV has been criminals. The estate of my father has one that controls it. Advoy Harald Hetland. But they have, against all rules, gone straight into my salary account through the Namsfogde in Oslo.

The amount is SEK 10,892.00.


This is money that NAV has collected, which is obviously criminal since everything is going through the estate. No one can do as much as NAV does!


Feel free to ask to explain everything to the case officer!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen

The document that shows that the whole case did not belong to us anymore, but Lawyer Harald Hetland who did not respond to NAV's mailers. So they went to me and my sister to get money that we had nothing to do with.

Last mail to NAV, where I thank you to get my money back. But all the work I did, I got 0 kroner for.

Service complaint on Case 232558

Hi!

Got a letter dated 15.06.17

First of all, I'm happy that I got the money back as NAV stole from me without going to Linjeveien through lawyer Harald Hetland who has had and is paid to settle the death of Karl Johan B. Christensen from 28 January 2013 !

1.) Want to complain about the miserable and terrible service we have received from NAV.

2.) Want to complain about NAV who has not dealt with lawyer Harald Het-land in this case.

3.) Want to complain about NAV who will not pay me 9,000, - kr for having spent approx. 100 hours on this case.

4.) Would like to complain about NAV who try to excuse themselves to the degrees in the mentioned letter dated 15.0617.

5.) Want to complain about Nav who could take the liberty to go to the namsman in Oslo and get money before a final decision was made on the case.

6.) Want to complain about NAV that it took 4 ½ years this case, which is at least 4 years too long!

7.) Want to complain about the NAV that they brought money only from an heir, not 2 before a final decision was made!

8.) Want to complain about NAV who doesn't make any excuse but tries to justify itself after doing a mildly miserable job!

9.) If NAV wants to learn from this case. When we had a lawyer that we paid after all 80,000, - to fix our father's estate. That we should then have taken over the case without a written document for this. That Nav blindly trusts a lawyer who does not speak true is a mystery to me! We have it in writing that it is he, not us, who has governed this estate. Here, NAV is blindly relying on someone who lies without checking the facts. It's bad that a claim is taken for good fish without any facts or documentation being available. Then I can just send a letter to Nav and say what I want, and you act accordingly. Here NAV makes a classic mistake to rely on a condition without any kind of documentation. This is bad of someone who is set to manage that they blindly rely on a statement from an ad-vocalist who is partly corrupt. That gets 80,000 SEK for a case that I reckon he has spent a maximum of 2 working days on. Inconceivable!

10.) Want to complain about everything that NAV has done in this case, nothing is really good. The worst thing is that one does not come with an excuse, giving me 9,000, - which is only a symbol sum when we eg. have paid our ad vocate 10 times more to do the job I have done.

Do not want this to happen to the district court or anything. Only one service complaint in the NAV system. Is happy the case is over, as 4 ½ years is long enough! Half a year should have been max on such a simple matter as here, not 4 ½ years!
Then it should not be difficult to give me $ 9,000 for all the work I have put into this case!

Regards
Jan Kåre Christensen

No. 1519: Our response to PBE here in Oslo believes that we should not relate to the facts of the case that we have been granted permission to build a wall as they order to demolish!

No. 1519:
Our response to PBE here in Oslo believes that we should not relate to the facts of the case that we have been granted permission to build a wall as they order to demolish!

My wife, Berit Christensen got a word from the Lord that confirms what I have experienced in this matter. It is that we should be quiet, and the Lord will fight for us.
It is those who do not believe that public authorities cannot lie, make mistakes and other things that are negative.

Just think of Bill Clinton, he lied under oath that he had never had sex with Monica Lewinsky where they had done the opposite.
Even inside his office and in his home they had been doing.
Here it is, we have been promised that we should build a wall on our own property. We did it, then PBE can't come up with anything else in retrospect
Still pray for us and the case, that PBE makes sense so that we keep the nice and practical things we have built and that have been up for now for over 5 years.


 

Here's our answer:

Request for deadline - Krokstien 2 C Oslo 2 / 5-19

Questions!
1.) Nils-Henrik Henningstad promised we would have a meeting ahead of the new application, do we get it?

2.) How much is stairs out in the roadway that you claim?

Other things down the Stormyrveien if there are walls, stairs and other things are much more out in the road. Therefore, we want to know how much it is about how much stairs are in the road.

3.) We thought that by appointment we should get a new case officer, who would look at the case and we should get feedback from. This has not been done, there is again a breach of force in their side.

4.) Lena Catrine Amdal and Astrid Myhra are so aggressive and again with abuse of power towards us. We see this as completely different from Lena Catrine Amdal and Astrid Myhra, as we have on several occasions been promised to build the wall of our former case officer Kaja Aubert Lange. As it is built, albeit verbally. And that our booth is so "little" exceeded with regard to the degree of utilization of the plot, that there is more tile pickup from their side than relevant rejection. Therefore we hope for a completely different and better tone in from Lena Catrine Amdal and Astrid Myhra than what has happened until now! The threat that they are doing just seems like more abuse of power from PBE that has been done for us for years now!
NB! Aubert Lange performed very well and neatly, we want her back on the case. The case officers we have received afterwards have not been fair and factual.
We want to have Nils-Henrik Henningstad or Aubert Lange on the case, the only people in PBE that we trust.

5.) We complain about the deadline for refusal, that it should be until the whole case has been processed.

6.) Only thing we agree with you is that the stairs should be adjusted.

Therefore, we need the exact number. Although others down the Stormyrveien road are more in the road than our stairs, we think it is reasonable that we pull it in max ½ meter.

7.) It is you who have made trouble to first allow us to build the wall, without us being told otherwise. That you are now going so hard against us, it is unreasonable and abuse of power.

8.) Hoping for a dialogue with you, no more oversteer. The meeting we had on the 11.4 was very good, that you choose to send such a "scare mail" has no impact on us, as you weep, ravage, override and just engage in ill-manipulation and lies. We have received more than enough of this from PBE and the public agencies otherwise. Hope for a change of you!

9.) Meet the answers, we think the only reasonable thing is that the stairs are adjusted a maximum of ½ meter, and that the wall and storage room stands as it says, there is no booklet with this. You're just looking to make noise and show power, or abuse their power! Threatening and scary propaganda you are doing, it is stillborn to us. You have tried that for several years, and nothing has led to this.

10.) You write that the wall is in the roadway etc. Then many other walls and others have to do the same and who must be demolished. It is walled along the Stormyrveien road which is 20 cm from the roadway etc.

When we talked to Kaja Aubert Lange I asked her if the wall is 1 meter from the road, it is sufficient, which she answered yes to. That you have once again not understood that we do not relate to the statutes and other things that you come up with afterwards, as we have been given oral permission to build the wall. We relate to that, everything else is not relevant.

11.) You are again trying to ignore the facts and the truth, that we have been allowed to build the wall, and it is not a shame to anyone or excels in any way. It will be standing, and we will not relate to what you impose on us until we have had a dialogue and talked together as promised at the meeting of 11.4.19 with Lena Catrine Amdal and Nils-Henrik Henningstad.

12.) Do you think, especially Catrine Amdal and Astrid Myhra are unfit to have with us, because here it is a downside attitude. That's why we want others caseworkers. Preferably Nils-Henrik Henningstad and Kaja Aubert Lange.

13.) When it comes to the wall, we do not relate to anything other than what Kaja Aubert Lange has told us, everything else is not relevant and has something to do with our case.

14.) A response that stands in "style" to the meeting we had it 11.4. where you said that you want to meet us and get a solution to this matter. Not the hateful who stood in the mail from 29.04.2019 signed that the two very twisted and kverulantful people Catrine Amdal and Astrid Myhra. They do not want us to have anything to do in the future.

15.) Will also emphasize that Kaja Aubert Lange has been on our side all the way when she was in contact and case law, as opposed to the other kverulants we got later who only made nausea and misunderstandings.

16.) When neighbor Roar Telje cov- ered regarding rental, Mrs. Lange mated him fine. See here for mail of 20.11.2013:




17.) The wall is certainly 18 cm too far out, there is nothing to exaggerate that the wall should be removed. Others both in Stormyrveien and elsewhere stand much further out in the roadway. The traffic and everything else goes smoothly here, you just try to make that we have done so much "illegality" that is exaggeration to those degrees. We built the wall as agreed with Kaja Aubert Lange, and it is lower than the neighbor's over on the other side and stands much further inside than the neighbor's over on the other side which has a wall that is 20 cm from the road, ours is 1 meter, is perfect. You write the following: "The support wall is partly part of a regulated road surface and has a design that cannot under any circumstances be approved as it stands today."

If this is the case, then it becomes completely unreasonable to discriminate against us as our wall is considerably longer from the road than many others. And 18 cm is really in practice totally insignificant as it is 1 meter to paved road, far more than in many others. Mrs. Aubert told us in 2013 that 1 meter from the road was more than enough. That you change such opinions and other things, you get to take on their "race"!
What you are about to "scare" is like pissing in the North Sea and thinking that it is flooding, it is completely set out of all proportions and understanding of reality their reasoning and beliefs, they are completely, preferably beyond reality.

See picture.

18.) Completion certificate As writes the following in the application that with regard to masonry and everything else has worked fine, and the 18 cm is like a drop in the sea. It certainly has no impact on traffic or anything, and it is just the opposite of what you claim and dictate the scare propaganda. One thing we built the wall is all much, much better and before that the filler mass lay even farther towards the road than what it is now, you simply fabricate lies and once again lie. And trying to scare and that we should relate to real and fabricated falsehoods.

Completion certificate Byggesak AS, Pb 9385 Greenland, 0135 Oslo writes at Paal Løvaas:

"Concerning the wall has been standing for several years and is illegally built: For this reason, reference is made to items earlier in the letter. It is recognized that the wall is illegally listed according to. current requirements, and the wall in accordance with normal practice is therefore sent an application afterwards.

Regarding placed masonry over previous walls: According to the initiative gardens, the wall is located directly above a former low wall and fence. Since it is difficult to precisely specify this, it is difficult to estimate whether this is 100% correct on the millimeter. We note, however, that there has previously been a fence and a lower wall in sc. the relevant areas. This appears on the enclosed photo documentation.

Concerning the height of the wall: The height of the wall varies. It is not correct that the wall at the lowest is 1.75 m. However, it is true that by mistake it was written that the wall at the highest was 1.5 m in the warning. This was corrected on all alerts with the pen at the correct height, and is considered with it clarified. In fact, we do not fully understand what neighbor wants to achieve with this quotation. Height also comes clearly from both the drawing and the map.

Concerning the wall, negative consequences for road traffic and maintenance are: This point also seems to be necessary to point out that it is somewhat striking that neighbor in Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 has signed these statements. It is important to emphasize in this context that the promoter of this project does not in any way want to indicate his neighbors as he sees that some have done in this case, because he has misunderstood the regulations and the listed wall. But when all three neighbors Stormyrveien 4, 5 and 6 themselves have walls that are all close to or within regulated road boundaries, it becomes difficult not to mention this. In addition, when there are several other walls in the area with similar location, it must be said to be an established practice in the area in question with walls up to - and indeed also in - regulated road boundaries. In fm. Both Stormyrveien 4 and 6 also lie the walls all the way out to the paved road. In Stormyrveien 5 is a garage and wall with approximately the same ploading in ft. the roadway as the measure now being sought. We can hardly see that the wall in Krokstien 2c significantly affects the road surface more than these measures. The fact that 2 neighbor (s) have a continuous exit of more than 20 m, and that none of the 3 neighbors have a random access on their own grounds, is considered to contribute significantly more negatively with respect to. traffic conditions than the right wall along the road for which this is sought. But as mentioned - it is not the responsibility of the shipper to hang up in the neighborhood. You only want to get your order in order. Mht. This point is also obvious that the wall that lies right out in the road surface to some extent affects road technical considerations. However, after an overall assessment, the wall is not considered to have a significant impact on road technical considerations. Mht. Road traffic is affected to a limited extent since visibility etc. on the right stretch is not changed to any great extent. In this connection, it appears to the previous statement. Mht. maintenance, it is pointed out that the asphalt edge remains with sufficient distance to the wall, and that there is a road fault in the area in question, so that one can store some snow here. Otherwise, there is a considerable area where the wall goes to terrain where snow has been stored in recent years. Initiatives have never experienced this as difficult. As far as we understand, the City Environment Agency has not registered a single complaint or incident in recent years, neither with respect to the case. that the areas in question are hazardous to traffic or maintenance problems. We note that the wall has been standing for a long time without the road authority in the municipality - who manages and maintains the road - has not registered any problems, neither with regard to. use or operation. "

19.) When others in our neighborhood (and otherwise all over Oslo city) who are building at the same time with us get dispensation for far, far larger and more complicated conditions. Up to 57 times more than us regarding utilization rate (including Stormyrveien 9 c). Then it testifies that you want to make everything most difficult for us. Then again, there will be discrimination again, and once again the supervisory duty of theirs is over. It is leather argumentation you are doing to us, not root in reality and sensible and good solutions!

20.) Reading of so many so-called illegality cases we have gone through here in Oslo is the tone that you use so easily and easily. Do not understand why you are opposed to us, as we see it, so do you with differential treatment and then it will also be these difficulties that we now see. After all, we have received permission and guidance from you on how the wall should be built and the excess over the booth is so minimal. That we should then be treated so badly and unfairly testifies to discrimination and a desire to be difficult. Why are you treating us so badly? There is not a single reason for that, we have not been difficult or behaved badly in any way. You are looking to destroy us and let this cost us the "shirt". Too expensive the whole thing has become, and with their new order everything becomes even more expensive. This does not take you into account nor in this area that the case for us has become unnecessarily expensive and cumbersome!

21.) We have been constantly trying to meet you and live what you have wanted and demanded.

Then we also applied for cages and walls through Ferdigattest AS. Although we had been promised to build the wall. Even this didn't help.

22.) We have tried to get things in order, including stairs. You didn't even mention it before we picked it up at the meeting on 11.4. what do you do then? Running on with hardest shoots it should be demolished even though it has been up for now for over 6 years and never been obstructed or created any difficulties for anyone. Not even the bus that passes by here at least twice an hour throughout the day. It was we who mentioned the stairs that you are now exaggerating the "problem" with the witness only about which darkness is in it.

23.) We consider ourselves the honest and "professional" in this matter, to comply with the demands of people who promise something one day, and pull it the next day. We do not want that without a dialogue. You have "power," but that power abuses you. And this time and again! At the meeting on April 11, you said it was a search that we had experienced as difficult as we had a good meeting with you that we have not had since Kaja Aubert Lange was our case officer. Then comes the next mail as before, full of truing and abuse of power. No improvement, just as bad as it has been before, if not worse!

24.) That you are now starting to threaten with daily fines and will follow up as illegitimate cases etc. Witnesses and just tells you that you are trying to psyche us out and scare us to obey orders that are totally wanted. We have been allowed to build the wall and you have guided us. And the excesses on the utilization of the booth are so insignificant. That here is only one thing that is right, that one makes sense and uses the section on exemption. That is why it is given to be used in lesser excess conditions. Our booth is also very pretty and is only visible in on our property. As well as that our house is further down the road, therefore there will be no obstacle either to the distance to the road which was the "big" problem the first time we applied for the booth to remain, and not to be torn down as you have now agreed and wishes.

If not then we shall be threatened, forced and given daily fines to be intimidated and forced to tear down walls, booths and stairs. For us, there is a great darkness over PBE in Oslo, which means that here is the evil that prevails!
Sad that it is so, but it is the spirit of being able to grasp another mind and sensing and getting in touch with dialogue!

25.) Will emphasize that all we have built is not something that is a hindrance, shyness or obstruction to anyone. It is not something that "stands out" that is higher, bigger or anything other than what is otherwise here in Stormyrveien. That this should be a "monster" of a wall that you have claimed etc. Is so far from the reality it is possible to come, even the neighbor over the other side has a higher wall than us and it also lies much more in the road than ours. Everything that is built should and should be approved without any significant change if you want to add the "goodwill" and come to meet us!

26.) The wall is probably 18 cm too far out, but 1 meter from the road. Walls built after us just here in Stormyrveien are similar. That this should be the "big" problem of being too far out and having to be demolished. Is argumentation with level that it is a disaster to piss in the North Sea, it can become flood. The argumentation that you are doing is only to hit us, not at all solution-oriented!

27.) Complaints in from neighboring are also constructed. We have built everything on our own property, they even have one and the other that is "alike" with what we have built. Here is the argumentation that does not hold "water" at all. This is just "rail argument!"

28.) You believe that we should have knowledge of small houses etc. When we were supervised and Mrs Lange gave us recommendation how the wall should be built. Then the dwellings were not mentioned at all. That this is now being dragged in again and again is irrelevant as this is something that has never been mentioned before Mrs Lange was taken off the case. It is Mrs Lange's guidance that will be the basis for everything to be done in this matter, we have argued from day one even if you did not want to relate to the facts and the truth!

29.) Want a dialogue and a meeting, starting with a visit here on our property! So that one can by sight, can see that everything that is built is really in the most beautiful order.

30.) That we have received such different advice that one day is all right. As Mrs Lange wrote about this in mail that with us was only minor matters. That it is now "prohibitive" is not correct. And that the double communication is that has made the problems that you have come up with.

This is what Ferdigattest AS writes in our application regarding the guidance or misleading we have received:
«The municipality's duty to provide guidance:
 Reference is made to section 11 of the Public Administration Act. If it has not been communicated sufficiently clearly and clearly from the supervisory authority that the measures trigger an application duty and exemption from the current plan basis, then this should also be emphasized in an overall assessment of already implemented measures. The initiative owner must be able to trust that one can follow the advice that one applies with the relevant authority. This follows naturally from the Public Administration Act. For this reason, it is pointed out that the responsible applicant has only been described the oral communication between the municipality and the initiative owner on the part of the owner. We note that the municipality has failed to comment on this in its decision. ”

31.) Kaja Aubert Lange was very straightforward and understanding, and guided us in line with common practice here at Hellerudtoppen. Here it was "freely forward" for everything. The fact that we are about to demolish is just because PBE is running a "double game." Something legal one day, nothing legal the next day. This also pointed out to our responsible applicants Ferdigattest AS:
"By the way, not all the walls in the area were established before the house plan became applicable. Several of the walls in the area appear to have been established after 2006. From the point of view of the case, we cannot see that any cases have been registered in the Stormyrveien which concern explicit walls over the past 100 years. ”

Looks through what has happened here at Hellerudtoppen and especially at Stormyrveien. Then it looks like "everything" was allowed here before 2016. Afterwards then, everyone should be taken. Except for us, which is an "old" case that "compares" to the "standard" that is the basis of our affairs even though we were given guidance when "everything was allowed" here at Hellerudtoppen. Hopeless to relate to such people who change their minds all the way.

32.) Knowing it has become a lot negative, but our understanding of reality is so totally different from what comes out in PBE's decisions and orders at times. These are the ones in PBE that seem "normal" and straightforward. But in the next, you are the opposite. We had an uplifting and cone Structural meeting for the first time since Mrs Aubert Lange was the case officer. Then we get a mail as well as new decisions with threats. Okay, you have the power, but that power abuses you when we have been promised to build the wall of Mrs Lange on several occasions, and the booth's excess is minimal. The power you have, it abuses you towards us, it all reminds me of the "big" boy who knows he is strongest, and uses power to push down.

It is a form of bullying when it's all about such a great deal of difference you put in front of us in this case!

Regards
Berit and Jan Kåre Christensen
Crocodile 2 c
0672 Oslo

No. 1518: PBE back again with threatening us worse than ever!

No. 1518:
PBE back again with threatening us worse than ever!

Not surprisingly, but so was Jesus. They never gave up trying to get him out of the way.
The problem is just that they build their statutes and truing on lies and fabricated lies.
Picture of Jesus, whom they also lied to and fabricated lies. We, as his successors, will probably go through something of the same.

Date: 29.04.2019

Their ref .: Our ref .: 201510929-30
Please always be contacted by case inquiry: Lena Catrine Amdal Archive code: 536.1

Request for deadline - Crocodile 2 C
Reference is made to mail dated 11.04.2019 with an application for delayed deadline to comply with orders for rectification / reversal / removal of illegal conditions in the form of support wall, storage room and staircase.

Support wall against road

The support wall is partly part of a regulated road surface and has a design that can under no circumstances be approved as it stands today. It is noted that since your request was not answered until now - due to Easter - the deadline for complying with the order for the support wall is postponed to 01.06.2019. There will be no further exemption.

Exterior free standing storage room

Today's outside and stand-alone booths cannot, as it stands today, be approved by today's rules. It was in the meeting with you outlined that a smaller booth that could possibly be searched. However, it is pointed out that the fine is still dependent on the exemption from the regulation plans' degree of utilization. Postponement is granted until 01.06.2019. If a complete building application is submitted by 01.06.2019, the illegality case for the booth may be suspended pending the treatment.

Stairs down the road

The staircase as it is designed today is illegal. The staircase must be retracted so that it does not enter the road surface and is then searched. If there is no complete application for this measure by 01.06.2019, it will be subject to illegal follow-up.

Planning and Building Services
Technical department
Unit for Construction Inspection Open City
This document is electronically approved 29.04.2019 by: Lena Catrine Amdal - case officer
Astrid Myhra - group leader

Same letter sent to:

JAN KÅRE CHRISTENSEN, KROKSTIEN 2 C, 0672 OSLO, jk.chris@online.no

www.oslo.kommune.no/pbe
Postal address: Visiting address: Switchboard, tel: 21 80 21 80
postmottak@pbe.oslo.kommune.no
Box 364 Sentrum Vahls gate 1 The Customer Center, tel: 23 49 10 00
0102 Oslo 0187 Oslo Bankgiro: 1315.01.01357
www.byplanoslo.no
Order no .: NO 971 040 823 VAT

No. 1517: Have me as your role model - not "narreapostel" Jan Aage Torp!

No. 1517:
Have me as your role model - not "narreapostel" Jan Aage Torp!
 

Picture of narreapostel and scam Jan Aage Torp.


 

Picture of me, Jan Kåre Christensen, which of us two would you like as a believer to succeed?







Torp who is divorced and remarried as a believer, and who exploits others to get millions that are sick and in a very vulnerable situation.
Or me, who earns my own money and lives on it.
And that what we spend on our business is the emphasis of funds that my wife and I spend on our own income.
Unlike Jan Aage Torp who, as far as I know, has a single penny earned his entire adult life on his own work?
Only by getting funds from others, including a Serber he used to sell his apartment as Torp "tapped" for 1.4 million straight into his own pocket of this money. When he was asked to pay the money back that Torp had then spent. Did Serber be told to keep the money for himself that he had given to Torp, talk about being a crook!

Matt. 7. Take care of the false prophets! They come to you in sheep's ham, but inside are the voracious wolves. 16 Know the fruits of the fruits. Do you pick grapes from thorn bushes or figs from thistles? 17 A good tree bringeth forth good fruit; a bad tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth fruit, and a bad tree cannot give good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore you shall know them in the fruits.

When Jesus teaches his most famous spokesman and at the same time one of his most important talks - the Sermon on the Mount - then the main message is what role models do you have!

In many ways, Jesus constantly sets up opposites here in the Sermon on the Mount. Where it culminates in whether you build your house on sand (adventures, emotions, human acceptance, money, etc.) or on the rock (the word of God and Christ.)

But we humans are "sickly" concerned with having role models, therefore this personalization of sports stars, rock stars, business executives etc.

This with role models is much more "natural" and important than we actually regard as important on a daily basis. From childhood, our parents become our greatest and most important role models, and others come in as grandparents, teachers and others. Then it will be teachers, sports stars, rock stars, business leaders, publishers etc.

In the Christian area, it is without doubt our preachers, leaders and shepherds.
This is what Jesus really addresses here in the Sermon on the Mount.

Jesus sets "all and all" against each other. Here, there are no shades first and foremost, but "black and white" up against each other!
The whole Sermon on the Mount is filled with contrasts. There are very strong texts, and the intention is obviously that there are two kingdoms that oppose each other.
The Kingdom of God - or the Kingdom of Christ on the one hand. Against the Kingdom of Evil or this world, which one day will and will perish.

Let me take an example if I could take more.

Matt. 5. 2 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, 3 Blessed are the poor in spirit; for the kingdom of heaven is theirs. 4 Blessed are they that mourn; for they must be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek; for they shall inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst for righteousness; for they must be satisfied.

Here the poor in the Spirit are lifted up, for you are the kingdom of heaven.
Then a description further down on how they are. They now mourn, they are meek, those who hunger and thirst for righteousness.
While it is in the "cards" that you are not like this, you do not belong to the kingdom of heaven either.

Then, in fact, we come to some of what is most discussed in the Sermon on the Mount, which you will occasionally find in Luke's gospel. But you have the whole speech gathered in Matthew 5 - 7 chapter. It is that the shepherds - Jesus' followers - are role models for good or evil. They are either true or false shepherds, true preachers and teachers. Or false and illegitimate publishers and shepherds.

Jesus speaks of those who are "great" and true in Matthew 5: 19 and beyond. He continues on the same theme including in Matt. 7. 15 and beyond. And we find it embedded throughout the Sermon on the Mount that we carry either good or bad fruit, all because we are true believers or false.
I and Jan Aage Torp are both preachers and teachers for others, but it is really the only similarity we have except that we both are called Jan and are born abroad. He in Japan and I in Denmark.
But otherwise the similarities are gone, then it is the inequality that dominates whether we both believe in the word of God, Christ and speak in tongues.

Jan Aage Torp is divorced and re-married. I am not, here is the most important and greatest difference in terms of God's word on us. Why?

I have many, many other things to address that are different between me and Jan Aage Torp, but when one falls through in such an area as marriage. Then one is disqualified from being a preacher, pastor and shepherd. In many ways one can say that Jan Aage Torp is like King Ussia, who became leper and thus was excluded from Israel both as King and "member."

Is remarried and remarriage among preachers so important?
What does the word of God say?

We read that the scripture gives a clear testimony of the priest in the old covenant how he should live, who was in the same responsibility to God and his fellow men as the preacher and overseer stand in the new covenant. Leviticus 21:14: "A widow, or a divorced, or a dishonored woman, or a harlot, he shall not marry. Only a virgin of his people shall he take for a wife.
We read that God gives the same testimony and demands the same of the priest during the coming 1,000-year kingdom to serve the people of Jerusalem in Israel, where law and justice are to be adopted. Ezekiel 44:22: "A widow or a woman whom her husband divorced shall not take for a wife, but for the virgin of Israel only. But they can take a widow who is a widow after a priest.
When Scripture is so clear about the pastor in the Old Covenant and under the 1000th Kingdom, it is no less clear when it comes to the congregation's pastime, we who live under the most glorious and greatest privilege of all; "One woman's husband".
Just as Scripture says it is demonic and seductive to deny a preacher and overseer to marry (1 Tim. 4: 1), getting under the same negative conditions is accepting and allowing publishers to marry. new while the spouse is alive. It is only at death that it may be right for a supervisor to remarry again, and then with no one who is not divorced!

Slut Comment:

"Cardinal sin" to Jan Aage Torp is not only his misguided teaching, that he utilizes weak people to give Million amounts to him and that he reported to me, etc. Standing in the lead with obvious criminals such as Torodd Fuglesteg and Arnt Arnesen from Stavanger who have written under several "deck names" or psynonym names like Ansgar Braut are his most used and known.

This is supposed to be the image of Arnt Arnesen who has written under the name Ansgar Braut.

Picture of Torodd Fuglesteg who is the biggest webmaster I know of, who has been driving and running the fake Smyrna blog that I have become the nausea of ​​many once.
 


This is just the fruit of an unconverted life as a "believer", something he is not.

Who do you want as a believer to have as your role model?
Me who lives 120% clean, works and earns my own money.
Live and learn in accordance with God's word.
Or Jan Aage Torp who neither lives nor teaches as the word of God and who believes that he is "exempted" to follow God's word at such an important point as marriage.
Where he believes the so-called "innocent" party can marry again. But when I asked him who was the so-called "innocent" party of him and his first wife, he couldn't answer it when they were both re-married today!
The whole of Jan Aage Torp is viewed from the word of God nothing but a great "miss," it is so unbiblical life and he learns that scripture says of such as he follows:

2 Tim. 2. 26 And awake again from his intoxication in the snare of the devil, whom they are captured by, so that they must do his will.

2 Pet. 2. 10 Mostly those who go after flesh in unclean desires and despise domination. The self-righteous roller cocks! They do not tremble to mock the high powers, 11 but angels who are greater in power and power do not blaspheme the Lord against them; 12 But these, as well as unreasonable animals, born of nature to be captured and perish - they must, because they mock what they do not know, perish in their habitat 13 and receive the wages of injustice. They want to spend the day at the well-being; these abominations and stains, they betray in their deceit when they are guilty of you; 14 They have eyes full of harlotry and insatiable in sin; they endure unconfirmed souls; they have a heart practiced in sickness, the children of the curse! 15 They have forsaken the way and gone astray, following the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness 16, and was rebuked for his own righteousness; 17 These are waterless wells; The night of darkness is ready for them. 18 For as they speak boastful, empty words, they entice in fleshly lusts by the delusion of those who have just fled from those who go astray, 19 promising them freedom, those who themselves are the slaves of malice; for what one lies underneath, he is and has been slain by. 20 For if they have fled from the uncleanness of the world, knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and being caught up again by it, and subduing it, the latter is worse with them than the first. 21 For it was better for them that they had not known the way of righteousness, than that they knew it, and turned away from the holy commandment which was delivered unto them. 22 It is as if the true saying goes: The dog turns to its own vomit, and the washed sow falls into the mud.

This is an accurate description of "Pastor" Jan Aage Torp, not much to follow after you ask me.

How is my life and service?

I live in Along with my only wife, go to work and earn my own money with which I brought myself and my family and service.

Get some support, but the emphasis is on my wife and I.
Live as I preach and dedicate myself every day to the living God.
Reads God's and Prayer regularly. God directs and governs my life and service.
Everything is in the hands of God Almighty.

Here are some articles related to this article:

 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/12/no-843-should-jan-aage-torp-quit-as.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/06/no-1260-divorced-and-married-preachers.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/09/no-767-let-us-pray-for-pastor-torp-and.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2014/09/no-767-let-us-pray-for-pastor-torp-and.html

No. 1516: Kjell Andersen and Search Light claim that we lost the case to Jan because my lawyer Brynjar Meling did a bad job, but the truth was that the "Hat group" at Manglerud police station was on the side with hat-Pastor-Jan-Aage-Torp!

No. 1516:
Kjell Andersen and Search Light claim that we lost the case to Jan because my lawyer Brynjar Meling did a bad job, but the truth was that the "Hat group" at Manglerud police station was on the side with hat-Pastor-Jan-Aage-Torp!

From v. First-served Monica Lillebakken, police officers Stian Barmo and Lena Fjalestad and police lawyer Oda Karterud, who had the goal of getting me convicted, everything else in the case between me and Torp did not care.

This is what Kjell Andersen from Søgne writes on his searchlight website:
https://www.sokelys.com/?p=25186#more-25186

The celebrity lawyer Brynjar Meling is best known as a defender of the terrified Mulla Krekar. Meling was also the defender of blogger Jan Kåre Christensen when Christensen's freedom of speech was set against Pastor Jan Aage Torp's right to privacy. Although the day editor Selbekk stated that blogger Christensen's statement about Pastor Torp was unpalatable, Selbekk nevertheless wrote this: "Despite the prospect of more Christian mud breaking, we hope that this case will be appealed and end up in the Court of Appeal. We agree with Christensen's defender Brynjar Meling that this is a very important matter in principle. We believe that we will be quite clear about the following: Christensen's writings online are far from any decency and far beyond any Christianity. This is not how one should mention his next one. And that type of language definitely does not belong to home pastor colleagues.

But that is not to say that Christensen's blogging should be punishable. Judging utterances as criminals is in itself a very serious matter. And especially when it comes to religious utterances, as it is after all in Christensen's case, ”wrote Selbekk who also confirmed in an email to Christensen. Paradoxically, Christensen in his case regarding freedom of speech was defended by a lawyer who today attacks Vebjørn Selbekk because he believes that it is problematic that a state secretary in the government is pursuing pure activism to stop a medium that has a different viewpoint than the Sveinung Rotevatn and the Left itself has. When I read about the word war between Selbekk and Meling and see where Meling is, I understand very well why he lost the case for his client Jan Kåre Christensen. More simple defense jobs from a totally uninspired and unassuming lawyer should be looked for long after. Should the outcome have been different, Christensen had to have found a lawyer who either burned for freedom of expression or who needed matters to profile. Prior to the litigation, Meling was unusually silent and even to the newspaper Vårt Land delivered the profiled lawyer's answer which clearly indicates little commitment. After the posting of his verbal word war with editor Selbekk, we better understand why Meling ran a flat and toothless defense. I think lawyer Meling laughs all the way to the bank.
(quote end.)

The truth is, the police were facing evil in front of me, where they did everything they could to get me sentenced.

When I reviewed the evil Trinity, Jan Aage Torp, Torodd Fuglesteg and the man with psynonym name Ansgar Braut where his real name should be
Arnt Arnesen aka Ansgar Braut.
No matter what they wrote and wanted me dead and called me the worst and ugliest things that were possible to call someone here in Norway.
Blue. Anders Behring Brevik supporter, supporter, twin soul and successor. Anyway, they went free, but I was going to be taken.
Torodd Bird Bird is the one who created their own Smyrna blog to swear me and my family. He has written over 20,000 hate messages on the Searchlight website.
Arnt Arnesen aka Ansgar Braut has threatened my son, lied to him, same with me and my wife, and my employer and others.
He has written over 10,000 hate messages on the Searchlight website.

List is long, and although I reviewed these, nothing was done!
Everything was aimed at me and the heavenly blog.
Have so much more to comment on, to bring something.

1.) The defamation police let all the fuss, lie and write everything they wanted about me and my family. Under the pretext that I was the one who "started" it all. I have only written against remarriage among preachers and leaders. This managed Jan Aage Torp to be hate against everything and everyone!

2.) When Haddy N'jie was appointed by Rosland, Rosland was titled tens of times worse by Torodd Fuglesteg. He should have been in life for all he has been doing. But Rosland was punished and sentenced for hate speech. While the real hoodie, Trodd Fuglesteg who also aims to die, lives at its best today!

http://blog.janchristensen.net/2016/05/nr-1496-christian-rosland-i-retten-i.html

3.) The defamation police have been ruled by a tunnel view that only I should be taken and everyone else should not touch them.

4.) The defamation police at Hatkrimgruppen promised after mediation between me and Jan Aage Torp that they should have a conversation with each of us, and then put away the case. They did the opposite, they attacked me and the heavenly blog.

5.) That review welcomed me and they A heavenly blog was false accusations when it was my view of remarriage that Jan Aage Torp hated. They did not care, until it was hated against Jesus and the gospel too big and intense.

Taking a case against me and the heavenly blog was nothing more than a pretext from Torp's side if possible to remove me and the Heavenly Blog away from the web when Torp wanted me in jail and would fling me for the most money!

Does Torp succeed?
No, today he is both "Norway's" and "the world's" celebrity as the divorced and re-married "Pastor" and "Apostle", they laugh at him both saved and pagan!

Satan lets him go "untouched" among Catholics, politicians, and others.
The man today is nothing more than a so-called Christian "Gallons figure" of how bad a Christian life can end if not yet careful with sin and false doctrine!
Beginning is not complete, Torp started "moderately good", but is about to end as a disaster!

Here is one of many articles I have written on this topic.

You can read even more here on the blog Justismord that is just getting more and more read.

http://justismord.janchristensen.net/

No. 1258:
Nobody has been harassed more online than me and my family the last 3 years, by police, the press and all other warps it to be the opposite!

Image of Torodd Fuglesteg which I assume has written 20-30000 hate speech against me and my family along with the other hetsere and hatred nettrolene where Ansgar Braut has been as active as Torodd Fuglesteg. The two should have been caged too long ago and just got a little sunlight and water and bread rationing for the pain they inflict totally innocent people, especially my family as they should and should have been caged for and paid a hefty compensation in the millions who Torp should have done to their own children.

The fact that the two drives the false Smyrna blog they try even to explain away here:
Jan Kåre Christensen knows that he is lying when he writes that Torodd Fuglesteg and Ansgar Braut is the owner of this blog. None of these has ever written so much as a word of this blog. Ei is the involved Smyrna Church. The former live in Ireland and the latter claims he lives in Setesdalen.
(End quote).

I know that in this case I and my family exposed to grave abuses, but it is we who get the "hump".

We must see this matter with three actors. There are contrary one.
I've had those who have spoken my case, but I have said to them all, do not stand up and defend me. Because then you will be laid out with the life story online. Whether on Searchlight or the false Smyrna blog.

I have said that Torp is an adulterer and a psychopath, which there is not any doubt.

Torp has again called me stalker, bright liar Hate Blogs and Anders Behring Brevik supporter etc.

So is everyone who supports Torp, where two people stand out. It is Torodd Fuglesteg and Ansgar Braut who has written so much ugly and crap about a person I've never read about someone else online. I should have been lobotomized, I'm lobotomized. I'm autistic or Asperger syndrome or Tourette's syndrome. I'm crazy, Jan Kåre Christensen Mentally retarded person and I can write a book about all that my family and I have been called.

Well, if what I have written is 1 month. Prison which is the life sentence for these two and Torp should have been caged for its terrible parenting!

What I have been called by Ansgar Braut Torodd Fuglesteg, Bjørn Storm Johansen and others who hate me and my family? Something I have mentioned, but mentions nothing more here:

JKC understand only brute force. The purpose of these records has hosted aa give JKC enough rope to dangle in. Thus, the mission is complete.
In other words, these people have as stated philosophy aims to make me dead and killed!

Moreover, writes the following:
I should have been lobotomized, I'm lobotomized. I'm autistic or Asperger syndrome or Tourette's syndrome. I'm crazy, Jan Kåre Christensen one mentally retarded person. Christensen should be coercive and closed department. Christensen should confine applied madhouse. Christensen should be coercive when he is a danger to others etc.
Here it goes on that I am so dangerous that I should be admitted, then by force!

Moreover writing these thugs and nettrolene following about me:
I note that there is a marginal sect, consisting of his cowed wife, the founder of extremist party The Christian and a person who supports Jan Kåre Christensen!
 It would almost be strange if there were to be found three people in this country who share JKCs phoney-Christian considerations and is as confused and disturbed like him!

I've had one wife and she is anything but cowed, only this passage here is far above what I have spoken and written.

Furthermore, they write:
Jan Kåre; you're a loser, the madman JKC. Everyone will see that JKC is totally out of mental balance. I think he certainly should not get peace from their misdeeds.

Here we are at the crux, Jan Aage Torp writes on his blog that I'm Norwegian secure stalker and here printed by these two nettrolene that I will not get peace. In other words, I have never ever visited the January Aage Torp either privately or in a meeting context. I've only been to meet with him when our paths crossed in Pentecostalism. Otherwise never. But these people can come and see me, but not I them.
January Aage Torp has on several occasions made contact with me, but I never with him. It was exactly this that Brynjar Meling had as main argument during the trial that I just wrote and spoke to those who sought me and the Heavenly blog. Then I can not be judged and punished by the law, which of Polti user. The whole case against me is nothing but a plot from A to Z!

Furthermore, they write:

Anders Behring Brevik supporter, soul mate, successor and child murderer supporter! Jan Kåre Christensen has shown absolutely zero sympathy for the murdered youngsters and their families.
Much of this is probably reasoned that Jan Kåre Christensen Anders Behring Brevik instinctively know a kindred soul. A soul mate.
And when we see what Jan Kåre Christensen writes about themselves and others gives automatic associations with Anders Behring Breivik's manifesto.
It is the same man and the same view of themselves.
Much of this is equal and it is only the degree of personality disorder that distinguishes them.
Anders Behring Breivik lived out his narcissism with weapons. Jan Kåre Christensen with his blog.
The similarities in their respective severe form of narcissism is that both believe that they are great people and they require that the outside world will be looking at those great, great people. If not, there will be trouble. And both have made noise. Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 people. Jan Kåre Christensen has driven his blog where he has harassed the same number of people in their quest for admiration and status as a great man.
And yes, I see great similarities between these two individuals. Far more commonalities than things that distinguish them ad.

Further down than this, it is just not possible to sink!

Furthermore, they write:
Jan Kåre Christensen mentally retarded?
May 30, 2015 Smyrna Church in Oslo

We've got eight emails with exactly this question. Let me answer these eight people and others who wonder just this but have not asked us.
Is our very beloved pastor Jan Kåre Christensen Mentally retarded person?
He is reasonably good in practical matters like driving a bus and no one has complained about him there. He's actually a good bus driver, much popular among their Muslim and Catholic colleagues.
But intellectually he is what one might call for mentally retarded. He understands around 50 words. The rest of the words he uses in his blog and in his many posts in Searchlight blog is a pure guessing game on his part.
His understanding of the concepts of morality and ethics are also diffuse and unclear. He is a pastor because he has memorized Bible verses without fully understanding them. He understanding of the Bible is also diffuse and he survives by copying and stealing quotes and material from those who understand the Bible.
In a normal conversation he comes somewhat short when he did not quite know what he's talking about. We let him talk every Sunday and otherwise, we are keeping something away from him when his contribution to any conversation or discussion is, at best, very limited.
That he is mentally retarded is there no doubt. But it is just as innocent and mentally retarded who are God sent servants to us humans. It is these simpletons without any appreciable under top lid that best conveys the word of God. If you use a microphone, expect not that the microphone also works as a dishwasher and an oven. That's how Jan Kåre Christensen. A microphone without any other benefit to God.

Further down than this is not possible to decrease or to get!

Furthermore, they write:
This child killer supporter apostle. There is no doubt that Jan Kåre Christensen is Anders Behring Breivik supporter.
We have revealed you as the liar, thief, child killer sympathizer, cheats and self-proclaimed 'apostle' you are, Jan Kåre Christensen.
You are a tragic figure. He is a pitiful little figure.
Your spouse Berit Nyland Christensen picked up her husband from Denmark. Is she too, see yourself, a pimp?
We have revealed you as the liar, thief, child killer sympathizer, cheats and self-proclaimed 'apostle', Jan Kåre Christensen.
A man who has sympathy for a child killer and mass killing man.
YOUR NERVE AND IMPERSONATION KNOWS NO LIMITS !!!
I am very happy to not have to be present in a home where 'prophet' is more concerned about a mass murderer than he is concerned about all those people who were killed, injured or traumatized by the mass murderer.
Then we know that Jan Kåre Christensen believes that remarriage is a greater sin than murder. A pity he has downplayed and harmless made throughout this debate.

Here, I lied at the worst possible and imaginable way to belittle murder and claim that remarriage is worse than murder. This is soiled by Jan Aage Torp "poodles" and "lackeys" to assert.

These two, + any other printer on the following. All this I can document how and when it is written, but for it to be readable. So I write only phrases and words:

- Jan Kåre Christensen has admitted to having great sympathy with child murderer and terrorist Anders Behring Breivik.
- Jan Kåre Christensen has admitted to having being supporter and follower of Anders Behring Breivik.

This I have obviously never been near to think and argue!

Furthermore, they write:

We call the blog from the abyss. We call the blog hell blog.
We call the blog spam blog. We call the blog Anders Behring Breivik blog! Mentally tilbakestaaende sewage blog.
Finally, it appears to be an action against the blog of Jan K.
Glad that someone is trying to stop him.
I want to give an advice to this lady who defend Smyrna-man (Randi Ingwersen).
She sounds completely brainwashed out, manipulated and controlled by him, and I urge her to rely a little more on his own judgment. She dare not even answer a few simple questions, but withdraws after instruction from the Apostle.

You see, I've said to everyone who supports me in public. Do not write anything in defense of me when even Polti at Manglerud keeping with these thugs that show that they are on the same level!
Furthermore, they write:

Ultimately, he is not nothing but a pitiful man with megalomania and a mental illness that no medication or treatment can cure. A man who identifies himself with Anders Behring Breivik who have more sympathy for this heinous child killer than with his victims.
Whoever is preoccupied with sex and genital DU, Jan Kåre Christensen.
There is hardly anyone in Norway who have sex on the brain as you, and who loves to dig in other people's abdomen.

This and similar I hear again and again when I warn against remarriage. Talk about being ufin.
They also wrote the following:

Remarriage is worse than murder, theft, fraud and lyving cf. teachings of Jan Kåre Christensen. It is an original version of the word of God, one might say. Equally original Satanism.
I think you look very much this child killer in what you write here in your blog. The same type of reality perception, the same monomania, the same delusion of grandeur, the same insane tall thoughts about oneself and the same type of lack of empathy for children and others.
You know very well what you have written, Jan Kåre Christensen. I see no reason to repeat your hateful, monstrous opinions on Utøya and the government building. Those who know some of those who were innocent afflicted, who accidentally walked past, knows the evil spirit from your mouth.
Stripped to the skin for honor and dignity, it stands back a little puny and evil man. He steals, lie and cheat. He destroys the way of Allah, but unfortunately do not have the ability to see it.
You're crazy, evil, demon-possessed, nauseating, nasty, bright liar, psychopath etc etc. These are the stamps you sprinkles around you encountered and ever. Your blog is the filled with such designations of everyone else that you hate and spitting out your cursing. We understand of course that people can not bear to take up the discussion with you and therefore choose not to.
Christensen is a vicious, nasty, nauseating and demo affected fancy lies. Pimp he is also.
He is obsessed with women and want a new wife.
You look at the whole Christensen that he is influenced and consumed by unclean spirits of demons. Even facial expressions his reflect that he is under strong demonic and sinful influence. It's clear that he's tired of her old spouse and wants a new and younger wife.
He belongs to and serves one, Satan! It is evident when looking at the sunken eyes. Hen is looking for lamb, a new wife.
Christensen gets with this taste of their own medicine. His demons must be furious over everything written on this page. A true servant of God had taken signals and chosen to regret his demonic statement. But not this bitter, greedy self-centered jerk who has been stripped of all the world.
But we see a wounded, bitter, vindictive person who most of all need professional help from health care.
Your Jesus is not the same as the Jesus of the Bible. But what we've seen of you is an insight into the satanic bible. A Bible in which thefts, zero respect for children, homage of mass murderers, fraud, deception and the strongest right is claimed as good moral values. Just like your own moral values, Jan Kåre Christensen.

There are over 10-20000 hate speech to about me, should take with someone, not so many more. There is an ocean of hate speech by Jan Aage Torp and his disciples.
Look here:

You are out of date on my part. You're acting like a child. A bitter, childish heresies, without any kind of social skills. You are revealed. Everyone knows that the false prophet is you.
Bottom line; Ignore Jan Kåre Christensen entirely the way everyone else does it. Send either of concern to those who should receive it. And that's all the attention he deserves.
Jan Kåre Christiansen is as errant and hardened him think that he lives right with God, even though he demonstrably steal, thieves plunder unjustly money, abusing work time, etc. etc. etc.
It is pointless to say anything. The behavior he displays here on this thread demonstrates the value that we are dealing with a person who is not in his right mind.
He is unstable, and should certainly not ride the bus.
Jan Kåre Christensen, you are undressed again and again, and people will steer clear of the malicious blog. There is hardly a comment there, and the few comments on something makes it to ask you to keep up with the harassment. There is professional help available if you are unable to break free from the bad hat circle you are in.
For the record; what this scammer suffer from is in my view http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism
JKC is totally out of mental balance.
This mean psychology professor Aage Mattson at the University of Lund, Sweden.
"A man who has been a long-standing campaign against vegetable asparagus is too mentally ill to run the bus" has the same professor stated. He supports his view of all psychology professors at the University of Oslo. All of these have warned their friends and family to take the bus with Jan Kåre Christensen at the wheel.
In 2014 terrorized Jan Kåre the then dying preacher Bjørn Olav Hansen in the knowledge that Bjorn Olav could not defend itself against this terror. A common tactic Jan Kåre use against Christians.
Fembarnsfar attending court for online harassment against Pastor Jan Aage Torp.
Father of Sara Caroline Christensen, Jan Benjamin Christensen and Benedikte Rebekah Christensen met yesterday as indicted in an online harassment case as Jan Aage Torp has brought against him. This after several years of online harassment from this father of five towards Jan Aage Torp.

It says so many lies and defamation that it becomes a book about this if I have to write everything. Taking eventually something of what January Aage Torp has written and spoken against me:

What part of the story, which is the most important. Is that there is at least 10,000 hatmeldigner welcomed me there on the web that began at least three years ago!
This ignores police and Torp entirely proven, therefore what I write on his blog a response to this shit against me and my family!
Here runs the police with two sets of laws, everything I write and speak is a crime.
In their opinion, and the way they add up on opposite anyone and everyone!
Everything January Aage Torp and his disciples are not punishable, whether it goes what I have written and spoken verbally hundred times "worse"!

This stands in judgment:

The defendant has further explained that Torp has been at least as bad in their characteristics by him and his family, and ascribe Torp statements made under other names, possibly pseudonyms, and statements on a blog defendant calls "the false smyrnabloggen". The false smyrnabloggen should be created in the defendant's name, but the defendant denied he was behind it. Torp has denied that he has written about the defendant under a pseudonym, or on the false smyrnabloggen. Torp has acknowledged that he has black defendants, and called him "Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer" twice, that the blog is "idiocy", on one occasion referred to him as a "demon" called him "bright liar", the blogs of defendants is "shameful" that the defendant is a "rumor spreaders", the defendant has "lack of insight in English and Norwegian," that he is "naughty", "wicked and stupid" and that the blog is "a variant of social pornography."

The court believes after an overall assessment that it is not reasonable to award Torp pecuniary damage. The Court points out that Torp have contributed to escalate and prolong the conflict by his statements about the defendant and that he spent partly rough characteristics of the defendant himself. Court refers here also that he on several occasions has called him a Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer. Furthermore Torp aware that he is a familiar figure in the Christian community, and he has more followers who spins further on his statements and forward for sometimes coarse and insulting statements against the accused and his family.

Torp's behavior has probably helped to escalate and prolong the conflict, but this came as a response to the defendant eventually extensive writings about Torp and his spouse. The court has the assessment assumed that Torp as a public and prominent person in Christian-Norway have to endure more than a normal person would need. It must, however, a limit also for what public figures must tolerate, as the court thinks is violated in this case.

This, Jan Aage Torp written about me in many different forums and websites.

"Anders Behring Breivik sympathizer." "Roman Catholic view, but really much, much worse, nothing less than curses. Christensen has posted on its site a text that is just mind in "Two Shoes" »

"Should they wanted a" dream opponent ", as Jan Kåre Christensen" perfected ".

Furthermore writes Torp like I'm dirt, stalker, totally unintelligent, a Nolde "hat blogger", idiot, demon, fancy lies, vile blogs, outcast who lack the mind of Christ, common judgment and social intelligence. The rumors JKC and the truth is his understanding of English and Norwegian rather limited too!
I get knocked on the low level JKC acting on .... "

About the Heavenly blog, "which is confused, cruel, vicious and stupid - through and through. It should be shut down, in short. He also writes this about the Heavenly blog: "Jan Kåre Christensen developing Heavenly blog!"
One should probably be able to call it a variant of social-pornography "+ Much, much more!

Related links:
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2016/06/no-1568-why-no-one-is-commenting-on.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-946-looking-forward-to-trial-between.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-951-shall-meet-apostle-jan-aage-torp.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-956-as-manglerud-police-is-totally.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-955-brynjar-meling-appointed-as-my.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-954-pastor-jan-aage-torp-is-caught.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-952-freedom-of-speech-is-that-it.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-951-shall-meet-apostle-jan-aage-torp.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-953-dagbladet-and-vg-may-write-about.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-952-freedom-of-speech-is-that-it.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-946-looking-forward-to-trial-between.html

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2015/05/no-951-shall-meet-apostle-jan-aage-torp.html

No. 1515: Sokelys by / Kjell Andersen writes against my lawyer Brynjar Meling, but it is a "diversion maneuver" from the Onde when the real truth is that it was the judges in the case who did the most delicate job!

No. 1515:
Sokelys by / Kjell Andersen writes against my lawyer Brynjar Meling, but it is a "diversion maneuver" from the Onde when the real truth is that it was the judges in the case who did the most delicate job!

That my lawyer did such a bad job as Kjell Andersen wants it to be, is more hindsight than truth.
In many ways, the trial and charge were a "trap" when I was charged for one thing, the court dealt only two things.
What I was charged with as no-one in the head of the court was punishable.
And law enforcement that became the big, big theme.
What happened? I was convicted of a "ministry" that Jan Aage Torp (pictured) came up with that I had repeated things that were never documented X number of times.

Agree that in the name of hindsight, it turns out that Brynjar Meling did not do a good enough job!
He didn't even realize that I've been bullied much more than anyone else in this case. Much that can be mentioned here, but why "not" did Judge Malin Strømberg Amble in what she judged me for?
It was then not up to the court as a "subject" where the individual was asked about so-called "multitude writings" which became what I was convicted of.
It is the judges Malin Strømberg Amble and Øystein Hermansen who have the main responsibility that this matter between me and narreapostel Jan Aage Torp has become the ever-word of justice here in Norway!

Read here on the blog about this:
http://justismord.janchristensen.net/

Here's an article I've written about this topic.

No. 1739:It was not my lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake wrong that I was sentenced in the time of justice here in Norway, but the judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Court of Appeal!

With a beam of light from heaven about him, he fell to the ground and heard a voice that said to him, Saul! Saul! why are you persecuting me? He said, Who are you, Lord? And he answered, "I am Jesus, the one you pursue." This is what we read in the Bible. God can and will like to do with humans when he finds it good that those who oppose us believers will soon or later reap it again. In what way? I do not know, but everyone will sooner or later have to be responsible for their actions, or will I say the misfortune that the narrator Jan Aage Torp has done to me and the heavenly blog.
The one I discovered in the heavenly blog revealed the pardon of the apostle, made a fictional review of me and wanted me in prison that Saul wanted with the believers. It was obviously the same spirit that worked in both of them, the spirit of hatred against Jesus and those who believe and follow him.

After I have written a little about the case between me and the narrator Jan Aage Torp, the reactions have not disappeared. But I have my version of the case, the trial and everything. I must then be allowed to have, or shall every version be the same? I'll hear from the Searchlight website that I hate etc. just because I have a completely different version of the case than what they and others have. This is nothing but a form of ruling technique.

I have my version of the case, why this is a justice word and that this is not lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake. But judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Court of Appeal. Claiming this is my "right". Then hear that you are hateful, primitive and much more. There are fabricated liars then who come to me and the Heavenly blog.

This writes Kjell Andersen on Searchlight:
"The truth is that hatred and bitterness are the driving force of Christianity's life and work."

These are also lies, fabricated such. I have my version, secondly, claiming that there is bitterness and lies that is the driving force of my life is a form of narcissism and ruling technique that Andersen is doing. I have my version, secondly, interfere with hatred, bitterness and other matters is nothing but the derivation of the dialogue, the dispute and my presentation of the case.

That, in one year, that the case was terminated in the judicial system by reviewing all the judicial authorities, write a little about this and be blamed for both of them. Tells more about those who blame me than it tells me!

This case has been dealt with in Oslo Tingrett with a judgment that is completely, completely beyond.

This is where my anchor point No. 1 is against this verdict, which happened in Oslo Tingrett. And here's my point of view on this. Which I will shortly and repeatedly render without being called for one or the other.

I was charged with calling Jan Aage Torp, a narrator, for the following:

1.) He is a whore
2.) You write he is a psychopath and narcissist (then, in my opinion, not as a doctor or professional)
3) Self-directed
4.) Spedalism (this is the symbolic language of the Bible to live in sin)
5.) Old pig marrying her nanny as Todd Bentley

This is true, but in court this was strongly rejected by all "criminal". Anyway, I was judged why? Because things came up in court that neither my or my lawyer was confronted with. It was so-called "crowdwriter".

I was then convicted of a relationship that was neither in the trial nor was up for discussion in court. This makes the judgment against me at the times of justice.

Why did there be some writings about narrator Jan Aage Torp? It was a word shift that has been going on for a long time. Call this for crowd embedding etc. is so far away from the truth it's possible to come. Therefore, the court makes the fatal mistake of judging me for something that is neither true nor discussed in court, and again it says that judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Lagmannsrett which have the main responsibility for it being a lie against me and the heavenly blog.

Final Comment:

It is sad that Christians do not understand this. But we as believers in Norway are sleeping our "Tornerose sleep" and will not wake up to stand up for Jesus, the gospel and the word of God, so one can count on persecution here in Norway.

I have only argued that it is a pity to marry again after a collapse of faithful people. This hate the narrator Jan Aage Torp so profoundly that he did what he could to stop me and the heavenly blog if possible. We read about Saul who later became Paul and born again before he became a believer had a rage against the Christians. It is this rage and hatred that always shows up against the true believers as it really is a hatred and rebellion against the living and true God.

 Acts 9 1. But Saul continued to be threatened and murdered against the disciples of the Lord, and went to the high priest 2 and asked him for letters to Damascus, to the synagogues there, as if he found someone who heard the way of God, both men and women, He could then make them bound to Jerusalem. 3 But on the journey he came near to Damascus, and beamed a light from heaven about him. 4 And he fell to the ground, and heard a voice that said to him, Saul! Saul! why are you persecuting me? 5 He said, Who are you, Lord? And he answered, "I am Jesus, the one you pursue."

It's not me they're pursuing, but Jesus. It's not my narrator Jan Aage Torp hater, but Jesus. That's why I'm experiencing nothing but Christian prosecution.

 http://justismord.janchristensen.net/

No. 1739:It was not my lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake wrong that I was sentenced in the time of justice here in Norway, but the judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Court of Appeal!

With a beam of light from heaven about him, he fell to the ground and heard a voice that said to him, Saul! Saul! why are you persecuting me? He said, Who are you, Lord? And he answered, "I am Jesus, the one you pursue." This is what we read in the Bible. God can and will like to do with humans when he finds it good that those who oppose us believers will soon or later reap it again. In what way? I do not know, but everyone will sooner or later have to be responsible for their actions, or will I say the misfortune that the narrator Jan Aage Torp has done to me and the heavenly blog.
The one I discovered in the heavenly blog revealed the pardon of the apostle, made a fictional review of me and wanted me in prison that Saul wanted with the believers. It was obviously the same spirit that worked in both of them, the spirit of hatred against Jesus and those who believe and follow him.

After I have written a little about the case between me and the narrator Jan Aage Torp, the reactions have not disappeared. But I have my version of the case, the trial and everything. I must then be allowed to have, or shall every version be the same? I'll hear from the Searchlight website that I hate etc. just because I have a completely different version of the case than what they and others have. This is nothing but a form of ruling technique.

I have my version of the case, why this is a justice word and that this is not lawyer Brynjar Meling's mistake. But judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Court of Appeal. Claiming this is my "right". Then hear that you are hateful, primitive and much more. There are fabricated liars then who come to me and the Heavenly blog.

This writes Kjell Andersen on Searchlight:
"The truth is that hatred and bitterness are the driving force of Christianity's life and work."

These are also lies, fabricated such. I have my version, secondly, claiming that there is bitterness and lies that is the driving force of my life is a form of narcissism and ruling technique that Andersen is doing. I have my version, secondly, interfere with hatred, bitterness and other matters is nothing but the derivation of the dialogue, the dispute and my presentation of the case.

That, in one year, that the case was terminated in the judicial system by reviewing all the judicial authorities, write a little about this and be blamed for both of them. Tells more about those who blame me than it tells me!

This case has been dealt with in Oslo Tingrett with a judgment that is completely, completely beyond.

This is where my anchor point No. 1 is against this verdict, which happened in Oslo Tingrett. And here's my point of view on this. Which I will shortly and repeatedly render without being called for one or the other.

I was charged with calling Jan Aage Torp, a narrator, for the following:

1.) He is a whore
2.) You write he is a psychopath and narcissist (then, in my opinion, not as a doctor or professional)
3) Self-directed
4.) Spedalism (this is the symbolic language of the Bible to live in sin)
5.) Old pig marrying her nanny as Todd Bentley

This is true, but in court this was strongly rejected by all "criminal". Anyway, I was judged why? Because things came up in court that neither my or my lawyer was confronted with. It was so-called "crowdwriter".

I was then convicted of a relationship that was neither in the trial nor was up for discussion in court. This makes the judgment against me at the times of justice.

Why did there be some writings about narrator Jan Aage Torp? It was a word shift that has been going on for a long time. Call this for crowd embedding etc. is so far away from the truth it's possible to come. Therefore, the court makes the fatal mistake of judging me for something that is neither true nor discussed in court, and again it says that judges Malin Strømberg Amble in Oslo Tingrett and Øystein Hermansen in Borgarting Lagmannsrett which have the main responsibility for it being a lie against me and the heavenly blog.

Final Comment:

It is sad that Christians do not understand this. But we as believers in Norway are sleeping our "Tornerose sleep" and will not wake up to stand up for Jesus, the gospel and the word of God, so one can count on persecution here in Norway.

I have only argued that it is a pity to marry again after a collapse of faithful people. This hate the narrator Jan Aage Torp so profoundly that he did what he could to stop me and the heavenly blog if possible. We read about Saul who later became Paul and born again before he became a believer had a rage against the Christians. It is this rage and hatred that always shows up against the true believers as it really is a hatred and rebellion against the living and true God.

 Acts 9 1. But Saul continued to be threatened and murdered against the disciples of the Lord, and went to the high priest 2 and asked him for letters to Damascus, to the synagogues there, as if he found someone who heard the way of God, both men and women, He could then make them bound to Jerusalem. 3 But on the journey he came near to Damascus, and beamed a light from heaven about him. 4 And he fell to the ground, and heard a voice that said to him, Saul! Saul! why are you persecuting me? 5 He said, Who are you, Lord? And he answered, "I am Jesus, the one you pursue."

It's not me they're pursuing, but Jesus. It's not my narrator Jan Aage Torp hater, but Jesus. That's why I'm experiencing nothing but Christian prosecution.

 http://justismord.janchristensen.net/