fredag 14. juli 2017

No. 1578: Even dictator states had felt embarrassed to pronounce a judgment as it has been done in the case against me and the celestial blog, since it is undoubtedly false, miserable and lacking credibility as it is fabricated!

No. 1578:
Even dictator states had felt embarrassed to pronounce a judgment as it has been done in the case against me and the celestial blog, since it is undoubtedly false, miserable and lacking credibility as it is fabricated!
Do you want to support the appeal case? Then pay for the application to France?
Look here:
Here is the account number in DNB: 0535 06 05845
Picture of team owner Øystein Hermansen, who is probably one of Norway's most famous team judges, but at the same time he obviously must not be fit for the job when he can judge me without confronting what I should have done of punishable acts. Such judges fit better enough in North Korea, Congo or Saudi Arabia than in a free western democratic country.
Only wicked or unselfish people like candy, not anyone who can do the job and their job.



Notice that there has been a mood shift, in fact, more and more people realize that the way I have been treated is nothing else a Christian persecution and an justice word!
What Brynjar Meling wrote in his appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court, which they rejected without justification. It is only something that one finds in countries such as North Korea, Congo and Saudi Arabia. In fact, that is the level judgment against me, that's why I want to go to the Strasbourg Human Rights Court.
I have not been judged for what I have written, but the amount of what I have written. This is nothing but a jamy soup of 2 reasons.
  1. It's not been treated in court, either in the Oslo District Court or Court of Court of Appeal that the amount should have something to say.
The fact is that I have not received a single question about this, given an explanation about this. In other words, the whole case and the judgment against me are on par with what we see in North Korea, Congo and Saudi Arabia.
  1. N to r also to Brynjar Meling taking this up in its appeal write to Norwegian H ø Supreme, and they do not even want to let another right circular g to.
Then I mean that the only way out is to go to the Strasbourg Human Rights Court.
Because if possible, win ahead. Something that we are now aiming to do.
This wrote Brynjar Meling in his appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court:
Facts of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections in the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling errors, provocation and retribution
As stated at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his oppositions had to be subjected to punishment or judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the accused's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to withstand in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to Provocation and retribution in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward on both sides, it is stated that the decision of the Court of Appeal is insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is not sufficient to be able to determine the significance of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
From the majority of the characteristics through which the convicted person has behaved about the conduct of offenders, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's conduct and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be contrary to The word of the bible
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others on such a basis in Full publicity eventually is even more unusual than simply holding condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such issues are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - may be Basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "legitimate misery", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)?
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given the special theological context of both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the decision grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
(Quote ending). 
Final Comment: 
This judgment could have been deposited in any dictatorship, but it has been deposited in a democracy like Norway. It's not to believe since I've been convicted for not being discussed in court.
In other words, these are both fabricated and a word of justice!

Related links:
 http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/07/no-1573-case-against-me-is-direct.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/07/no-1567-we-aim-to-promote-appeal-to.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1563-works-if-possible-to-look-at.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1561-narreapostel-jan-aage-torp-and.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1560-when-sentence-says-that-what-i.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1559-even-kim-jong-un-had-been-proud.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/05/no-1558-i-am-particularly-pleased-with.html

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar