søndag 9. juli 2017

No. 1574: Thank you for all the pardon and ecumenical support for the appeal case of the Strasbourg Human Rights Court in France, it warms a lot and makes us feel like it all!

No. 1574:
Thank you for all the pardon and ecumenical support for the appeal case of the Strasbourg Human Rights Court in France, it warms a lot and makes us feel like it all!

Illustrative image of a Muslim, I would have been.
 Had nobody bothered the joke. But because I'm a Jesus believer, I'll be hated as Jesus was.
When Jesus was hated, we must expect to experience the same!


Just want to say something, what I experience is of course not something that has anything to do with me. That's because I have kept the gospel-what the word of God says about marriage!
Had I been a regular Norwegian pagan, Hindu or Muslim had VG, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and all media and everyone else in unison condemned the police and the appeal force for justice!
But when I have the Lord and so many beautiful and glorious Jesus-believing people who come along, I know that everything is possible!
Thank you for participating in prayer and financial gifts!
Just want to say this simple way to all who remember us, stand in prayer and contribute in every way.
Thanks!
We will do this - together!
Had I been a Muslim, Hindu or regular Norwegian Gentile, nobody was alone!
Everyday, it's written and spoken a lot, much, much stronger verbally than what I've ever written!
I have never sought Jan Aage Torp, but there has been a discussion online that has waves back and forth for a long time.
This has become a relatively large amount of substance, from both sides and sides, never been a topic in court. Neither in Oslo District Court nor in Borgarting Law, this is what they judge me for - the crowd! Although it has not been a topic that Brynjar Meling also points out in his appeal to the Norwegian Supreme Court.
Look here:
Facts of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections in the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling errors, provocation and retribution
As stated at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his oppositions had to be subjected to punishment or judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the appellant's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person have had to endure in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to Provocation and retribution in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward from both sides, it is stated that the grounds of appeal of the Court of Appeal are insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is not sufficient to be able to determine the significance of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
From the majority of the characteristics through which the convicted person has behaved about the conduct of offenders, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's conduct and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be contrary to The word of the bible
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others on such a basis in Full publicity in time is even more unusual than simply to hold condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such questions are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - may be Basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "legitimate harms", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)?
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given the special theological context of both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the decision grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
(Quote ending).
Here is the key issue:
"The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the grounds for the verdict are insufficient."
The verdict from Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagmannsrett builds both the same claim.
That I have written about Jan Aage Torp x the number of times both the one and the other.
Here are at least two factual errors!
  1. It is not at all documented what Jan Aage Torp p to st to r here:
"The circumstances the case applies to blog posts in the period January 2012 to March 2015. Torp has made a record of his posts and found that he has been mentioned in the blog over 3,000 times. His wife is mentioned around 900 times, including her name as a "whore" 167 times. Furthermore, Torp is referred to as an "old pig" over 30 times, "horebukk" over 110 times, "narcissist / narresist" over 30 times, "psychopath" over 200 times and "false pastor / prophet / apostle" over 400 times. The numbers are not contested, and the court is based on the evidence. The court further assumes that this is the total number of times Torp has been mentioned and that the figures need to be adjusted down somewhat to the time period the claim applies. The court nevertheless considers that Torp is featured on the blog very frequently in the current period, that the above characteristics are used frequently. In addition to this, Torp is repeatedly called "leprosy", that he "lives in horror" and is a "horkarl", "self-centered, nasty, rude and narcissistic", that he appears to be "sick, uncontrolled and depressed" That he is "blind and ruled by demons", that he is "an old pig who divorces and marries the nanny just like Todd Bentley" that people like Torp "are not led by God but by their flesh, And that the demons are given free space ", that Torp is a" sick man of power and acts as a reckless psychopath "and that he is a" loser ". Furthermore, the accused stated that "Should I get it if it had helped, I should take a pair of shoes or work my shoes and kicked Hanvold, Torp and all the others in the middle of the step for what they are doing does not bring revival or Progress with oneself. But their death and corruption! " Furthermore, he has posted a picture of a pig with wings and wrote that "Picture of pigs that aims at what people call a person marrying a lady who could have been his daughter. This is just an illustration of a relationship where one calls someone to be an old pig, but this is just an illustration. Even pigs can look "holy" but a pig is a pig! ". The above characteristics of the reviewer of Torp are derived from larger text entries that deal with Torp and various Biblical themes. Torp explained that in times it could be as much as 2-7 posts a week about him, while the average has been 1-3 posts. Intensity has increased after Torp reported the relationship in September 2014. Torp further explained that the massive negative mention of him, but also his wife and other family members, has been a great personal burden. "
Almost all of this is manufactured. For example, I have never mentioned his new wife to the extent that Jan Aage Torp claims. And the word horebukk is probably not mentioned, and everything else is only undocumented claims by Jan Aage Torp. Who is as little credible as a person who is notoriously criminal or charged in another way!
  1. What has been written against me and my family is not included at all. In other words, my verbal patron are as small to firecrackers against what Jan Aage Torp and his henchmen and poodles have come with.
Me and my family have got all the last four years to receive from either Jan Aage Torp, or his disciples who have allied him.
There Norway's 2 biggest and worst online roles, has been completely fooled by the Apostle Jan Aage Torp.
There have been document fakes, countless personal mail to me, my wife, our parent, employer, my son, and also created my own blog to swear me and my family.
Consider that those who oppose me and the heavenly blog have written about 300 articles against me and my family. Posted somewhere between 20-30,000 hate messages +++ much, much more!
Final Comment: 
The judges and the judges Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagret law show zero credibility, integrity and fairness.
Both judgments are based on a "fact" that Brynjar Merling writes as follows: "Whatever has been the extent to which abusive and suspicious opponents of the appellant's verbal assaults have been or what characteristics of the convicted person have had to withstand in return for their verbal attacks against Pastor Torp. »
In other words, here we are at the very core of the matter. And why then this is actually an attack on freedom of belief and expression.
Since the whole judgment against me is fabricated, ugly and shows the dark side of the Norwegian judicial system.
When both judges and two different judicial authorities are based on the same thing that has not been debated as attorney Brynjar Meling says. Then the whole thing against me and the heavenly blog will be a fake room! 
Do you want to support and join? 
Here is the account number in DNB: 0535 06 05845 
Related links:
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/07/no-1573-case-against-me-is-direct.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/07/no-1567-we-aim-to-promote-appeal-to.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1563-works-if-possible-to-look-at.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1561-narreapostel-jan-aage-torp-and.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1560-when-sentence-says-that-what-i.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1559-even-kim-jong-un-had-been-proud.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/05/no-1558-i-am-particularly-pleased-with.html

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar