onsdag 28. juni 2017

No. 1565: Our country goes to verbal assault on me, and I answer again and they remove it, talk about rotten newspaper!

No. 1565:
Our country goes to verbal assault on me, and I answer again and they remove it, talk about rotten newspaper!
 

Picture of Alf Gjøsund who thinks that when he comes with personal attacks, it is "inforbi".
 But when others do, it's "out of order". Talk about being mega-hypocrite!



This wrote the newspaper Our Country:
Sensible judgment about online violations
We can not expect people who fear unhappy online attention to emerge from the digital reality.
A COURSE case of great importance has reached its end station in the Norwegian judicial system. The Supreme Court has ruled the verdict of the Court of Appeal against Jan Kåre Christensen, who for several years has shed pastor Jan-Aage Torp on his blog. Borgarting Court of Appeal ila Christensen a fine of NOK 12,000, and this verdict is now enforceable.
CHRISTIAN'S RESPONSIBILITIES Brynjar Meling believes that there should never be an accusation under the Criminal Code, as no-one has forced Torp to read what is on the blog. Instead, Torp should have gone to court action if he felt violated by the statements, according to the lawyer. The Penal Code only affects "The one who, by frightening or disturbing behavior or other reckless conduct, pursues a person or otherwise violates another's peace (...)".
However, by virtue of his rejection of Christensen's appeal, the Supreme Court states that the relevant section of the Criminal Code may apply even if the statements are not addressed directly to the mentioned. This is a sensible approach and signals an updated understanding of a text that has roots back to a time when no one had heard about computers.
"USE OF blogs is common and there is a need to provide protection against ruthless behavior through the use of the internet", it is stated in the judgment that is now standing."The Court of Appeal emphasizes that a blog is publicly available on the internet for everyone. Christensen's blog was intended to spread within a particular religious environment. It must be assumed that Christensen was aware that his statements came to Torp's knowledge, as Christensen also wanted. "
"MAN NEEDS does not care at all about what is online, regardless of how low it is," stated Meling lawyer when the case went for the district court. Technically, he is right, but the reality is that what's written about you online will likely reach you sooner or later. We can not expect people who fear unreasonable publicity on blogs, Facebook or other online editorial sites to come out of the digital reality. Nor should it be the case that someone who, for good reason, suffers from massive offensive content in the unregulated part of the network must go to court proceedings instead of prosecuting prosecutors.
Published in Our Country June 28, 2017
I answer this and this will be removed due to personal attacks as the newspaper Our Country itself does:
Your comment was deleted
Your comment on the post was deleted by moderator due to policy violations. Cause: Claim for untruths is untrue. Please reload the post with notice that you disagree. Claims of lies and untruths when talking about an interpretation is not acceptable word usage.
If you violate the policy three times in a month, your profile will be closed for a month. In case of serious breach, the profile can be closed without notice. Read the guidelines here.
If you disagree with the deletion, take the matter up in an email to the editorial staff, not in the discussion thread at verdidebatt.no
Deleted comment:
Fully agree with you if the verdict had not been fabricated!

What Jan Aage Torp and his disciples have spoken about me are both verbal and in amount of 3-4 times more than what I have written.

I and my family have gotten 20,000 powerful messages against me, and I have written 300 articles to me and my family.

I have responded to this. This has not been dealt with by the court, as Brynjar Meling also writes in his appeal.

The judgment against me is so erroneous and reconstructed it is possible to stay!
Therefore, it is not the judgment I want to go on, but the way in which the court has dealt with me.

You have to put yourself in the case before writing, or you will come with untruths!


Sincerely, Our Debate Reaction Our Country.
Here is comment no. 2:
Your comment was deleted
Your comment on the post was deleted by moderator due to policy violations. Cause: Personal attacks.
If you violate the policy three times in a month, your profile will be closed for a month. In case of serious breach, the profile can be closed without notice. Read the guidelines here.
If you disagree with the deletion, take the matter up in an email to the editorial staff, not in the discussion thread at verdidebatt.no
Deleted comment:
This says Attorney Brynjar Meling in his ancestry:
"The Court of Appeal has made the district court's description of fact the case by citing the three most important sections of the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
(The Lieutenants of Narrator Jan Aage Torp builds this judgment, which gives it zero credibility!).
In other words, it's not been a few minutes either in Oslo District Court to ask me and let me explain what and why it's written so much about Jan Aage Torp online.
Neither in Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting Court of Appeal were done.
That is because we have debated the miserable life of Torp seen from being an apostle.
There what Torp himself and his disciples have both more chess higher than me in verbal words and expressions.
And the amount is definitely three times as much from the "other" page!
In other words, this is nothing but a word of justice!
Sincerely, Our Debate Reaction Our Country.
Fortunately, I get this comment:
Here everything is turned headed, the truth is the opposite!
Look here:
THIS INTRODUCED BY ALF GJØSUND OSER OF PERSONNEL AND HAT!
WHY DOES OUR COUNTRY THIS?
F, EKS:
Nor should anyone who, for good reason, be bothered by massive offensive content in the unregulated part of the network, go to court proceedings instead of prosecuting prosecutors.
For example, The newspaper Our Country with all its news news more unregulated than the heavenly blog?
It looks like the eyes that look and the ears that belong!
That is what this judgment is against me, so bad that it completely violates freedom of belief and expression!
I am convicted of having written "too much" even though my counterpart has written three to four times as much.
In other words, we are faced with an justice word if no appeal and further negotiations in Strasbourg are brought forward!

Related links:
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1563-works-if-possible-to-look-at.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1561-narreapostel-jan-aage-torp-and.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1560-when-sentence-says-that-what-i.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/06/no-1559-even-kim-jong-un-had-been-proud.html
http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/05/no-1558-i-am-particularly-pleased-with.html

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar