fredag 23. juni 2017

No. 1560: When the sentence says that what I have written is in Norwegian law, and one finds under the law that it is the amount of what I have written that is punishable without being addressed, this is a justism word de lux!

No. 1560:
When the sentence says that what I have written is in Norwegian law, and one finds under the law that it is the amount of what I have written that is punishable without being addressed, this is a justism word de lux!
The charges:

This says Attorney Brynjar Meling in his ancestry:
"The Court of Appeal has made the district court's description of fact the case by citing the three most important sections of the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
(The Lieutenants of Narrator Jan Aage Torp builds this judgment, which gives it zero credibility!).
Final Comment:
In other words, it has not been a few minutes either in Oslo District Court to ask me and let me explain what and why it is written so much about Jan Aage Torp in Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting Law Court.
That is because we have debated the miserable life of Torp seen from being an apostle.
There what Torp himself and his disciples have both more chess higher than me in verbal words and expressions.
And the amount is definitely three times as much from the "other" page!
In other words, this is nothing but a word of justice!
Almost all of this is manufactured.
For example, I have never mentioned his new wife to the extent that Jan Aage Torp claims. And the word horebukk is probably not mentioned, and everything else is only undocumented claims by Jan Aage Torp. Who is as little credible as a person who is notoriously criminal or charged in another way!
I was probably too naive and thought that when one came to a public dish, everything went right. 
But in fact, here it seems like being obscured in the back of the Norwegian judiciary.
Both the judge of Oslo District Court, which was Malin Strømberg Amble, and her judges who were regular laymen and I do not name them.
In Borgarting Court of Appeal there was judge Øystein Hermansen. Besides, it was team leader Bjørn Edvard Engstrøm and team leader Leiv Robberstad was a third man. These I name as they are public people.
What has felt me ​​in two courts is not what I have written, but the amount of it. This is from the judgment against me and the heavenly blog:
"It is a key point that defendants over a period of well over three years have published a hundred blog posts where Torp has been mentioned a very high number of times in terms such as" psychopath "and" leprosy ". The numerous blog posts and the review of Torp do not have the status of posts in a public debate, but appear as pure shikans without any purpose other than demeaning Torp. The situation has little commonality with the core value that freedom of expression must protect, namely the free word change, cf. Rt. 2012 page 536 section 38. »
This sounds so right, but it's all a lie and distortion of truth on several points.
1.) What is written about Torp is 98% written after his fictional review of me and the heavenly blog. Number and amount is something that has come as a main point rather than anything else after his fictional review. In other words, Torp has notified me to get rid of me and the heavenly blog from the web, no matter what he's just getting it done. Here's the word "goal sanctuary means"!
2.) That I have counted the last four years written about 300 articles against me and the heavenly blog.
I count on over 20,000 messages against me also in the same period, and over several years. It is clear that then there will be a large amount.
3.) The number of Oslo District Court as well as the Borgarting Court of Appeal. Is a fictional number that Torp mentioned in Oslo Tingrett, which is entirely uncritical.There is no other who has neither contradicted him nor counted the number of votes. The number is for me completely beyond it, it is fabricated and a lie number. Jan Aage Torp is a skilled narrator and he has a lively imagination - giving him a prestige and an opportunity to reach his goal. Get rid of me and the heavenly blog, then he must have a legitimate judgment has been his agenda and goals right from the start!
4.) The worst is not Jan Aage Torp, he is as he always has been. But the judges in Oslo District Court and Borgarting Court of Appeal. None of them has come up with a single question to me why it has become as it has become. About the number of votes and why I have written in as much amount as I have done. In other words, the judges of both of these two judicial institutions are in my eyes the door that judges me without wondering why it has become as it has become. Here we talk about a fabricated judgment, which does not stand out at all!
Related links

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar