In Borgarting Court of Appeal there was judge Øystein Hermansen. Besides, it was team leader Bjørn Edvard Engstrøm and team leader Leiv Robberstad was a third man. These I name as they are public people.
- What is written about Torp is 98% written after his fictional review of me and the heavenly blog. Quantity and amount is something that has come as a main point rather than anything else after his fictional review. In other words, Torp has reviewed me to f to remove me and the Heavenly blog from the Internet no matter only he managesto f to it. Here fits the saying "m to look justifies the means"!
- That I have, I expect the last four to clean written about 300 article against me and the Heavenly blog.
- The number b to the Oslo District Court assumed, and Court of Appeal. Is a fictional number that Torp mentioned in Oslo Tingrett, which is entirely uncritical. There is no one else who has neither contradicted him or tents on the number of votes. The number is for me completely beyond, it is fabricated and a l o gnantall. Jan Aage Torp is anaccomplished storyteller and he has a vivid imagination - it gave him prestige and an opportunity to n to be with their up goals. F to remove me and the Heavenly blog, then m to he have a final judgment has v æ rt his agenda and m to l from the start!
- The worst is not Jan Aage Torp, he is as he always has v æ rt. M one judges in Oslo District Court and Court of Appeal. Not one of them has come with a sole askedquestions l to me why it's been like it's been. If the number of votes and why I have written in an s to large amount as I have done. In other words, the judges in both of these two right bodies are in my eyes or gjennomr to tten as d ø mmer me without having renascen carr ied me why it's been like it's been. Here we are talking about a fabricated judgment, which does not at st to r off!