fredag 19. mai 2017

No. 1557: I am particularly pleased with Brynjar Meling's ancestor, as it means that the Supreme Court has only two choices if they are credible, either to free me or to run a whole new thing!

No. 1557:
I am particularly pleased with Brynjar Meling's ancestor, as it means that the Supreme Court has only two choices if they are credible, either to free me or to run a whole new thing!

http://the-heavenly-blog.janchristensen.net/2017/05/no-1558-i-am-particularly-pleased-with.html

Both judges who have sentenced me, respectively, in Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagmandrett have not asked me once why I have written such a volume of posts about fool Apostel Jan Aage Torp.
Torp's credibility is in my eyes far lower than anyone else I've hit. When attaching a little to this man, it's really an impossibility. One must support his explanation with credible evidence and that other credible witnesses and say the same. This has not been followed in any of the cases, hence to say that something is a fact, etc. It is really to believe the lie rather than the truth.
Picture of fool Apostle Jan Aage Torp and Aina Lanton who, according to God's word, are not his right wife. Trust such a man, it can not be good!
 

Attorney Brynjar Meling's ancestry, I am very pleased with, as it puts both the judgment from Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting out of court.
This writes Brynjar Meling:
Fact of the case
The District Court has made the district court's description of fact to its own by citing the three most important sections of the District Court's reproduction of the fact on pages 3 and 4 of the Court of Appeal's judgment. As far as it goes, this description must therefore be taken into account, str.prl. § 306, second paragraph.
Case handling error, provocation and retribution
As it appears at the bottom of page 4 and at the top of page 5 of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant stated in his defense that his judgments had to be subjected to a penalty sentence or to be judged mildly from the principle of provocation and retribution.
In spite of this statement, the Court of Appeal has, in any case, ignored the extent to which abusive and alleged opposition by the accused's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person have had to endure in return for his verbal assault against Pastor Torp.
As meaningful assessment of possible impunity or reduced punishment due to Provocation and retribution in relation to reciprocal verbal attacks presupposes both a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the arguments put forward on both sides, it is stated that the decision of the Court of Appeal is insufficient.
The Court of First Instance has - see first full section on page 8 of the judgment - in the present context limited to finding that Torp's counterattack against Christensen has helped escalate and prolong the conflict between convicted and insulted. This is insufficient to determine the significance of the "balance of payments", either for the sake of guilt or punishment.
The above-mentioned inadequacy of the Court of First Instance's premises is further related to Strl. (1902) § 250 is not mentioned at all in the court's premises, which in itself is also an additional inadequacy given the questions relating to the law of the court of law, see below.
Litigation, legitimate resentment
 
From the majority of the characteristics through which the convicted person has behaved about the conduct of offenders, it appears that Christensen has been moral - or moralizing if you want - upset over certain aspects of pastor Torp's conduct and behavior, things that purely objectively appear to be contrary to The word of the bible
Although literal and unconventional use of moral bans in religious allegedly sacred texts is no longer a common phenomenon in Norwegian social reality, especially when it is not a criminal offense in the secular sense, and even to attack others on such a basis in Full publicity eventually is even more unusual than simply holding condemnations on religious grounds, one must ask it about it - within the narrow circles where fundamentalist attitudes to such issues are still widespread and considered fully legitimate - may be Basis for considering Pastor Torp's conduct as a basis for "legitimate harms", cf. strl. (1902) Section 56, No. 1, point b)?
Can Christensen be considered to have acted in justified anger, given the special theological context of both convicted and insulted?
The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the ruling grounds in the judgment are insufficient. This even though strl. (1901) Section 56, No. 1, point b), was not explicitly invoked by the defense: The Court of Appeal is ex officio abiding by the law enforcement.
(Quote ending).
Here is the key issue:
"The fact that the Court of Appeal in its premises does not discuss the issue at all, is stated to mean that the grounds for the verdict are insufficient."
The verdict from Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting lagmannsrett builds both the same claim.
That I have written about Jan Aage Torp x number of times both the one and the other.
Here are at least two factual errors!
  1. It is not at all documented what Jan Aage Torp p to st to r here:
"The circumstances the case applies to blog posts in the period January 2012 to March 2015. Torp has made a record of his posts and found that he has been mentioned in the blog over 3,000 times. His wife is mentioned around 900 times, including her name as a "whore" 167 times. Furthermore, Torp is referred to as an "old pig" over 30 times, "horebukk" over 110 times, "narcissist / narresist" over 30 times, "psychopath" over 200 times and "false pastor / prophet / apostle" over 400 times. The numbers are not contested, and the court is based on the evidence. The court further assumes that this is the total number of times Torp has been mentioned and that the figures have to be downgraded somewhat as regards the time period the claim applies. The court nevertheless considers that Torp is featured on the blog very frequently in the current period, that the above characteristics are used frequently. In addition to this, Torp is repeatedly called "leprosy", that he "lives in horror" and is a "horkarl", "self-centered, nasty, rude and narcissistic", that he appears to be "sick, uncontrolled and depressed" That he "is and is blinded and ruled by demons" that he is "an old pig who divorces and marries the toddler just like Todd Bentley" that people like Torp "are not led by God but by their flesh, And that the demons are given free space ", that Torp is a" sick man of power and acts as a reckless psychopath "and that he is a" loser ". Furthermore, the accused stated that "Should I get it if it had helped, I should take my shoes or work my shoes and kicked Hanvold, Torp and all the others in the middle of the step for what they are doing does not bring revival or Progress with oneself. But their death and corruption! " In addition, he has posted a picture of a pig with wings and wrote that "Picture of pigs that aims at what people call a person marrying a lady who could have been his daughter.This is just an illustration of a relationship where one calls someone to be an old pig, but this is just an illustration. Even pigs can look "holy" but a pig is a pig! ". The above-mentioned characteristics of Torp's reviews are derived from larger text entries that deal with Torp and various Biblical themes. Torp explained that in times it could be as much as 2-7 posts a week about him, while the average has been 1-3 posts. Intensity has increased after Torp reported the relationship in September 2014. Torp further explained that the massive negative mention of him, but also his wife and other family members, has been a major personal burden. "
Almost all of this is manufactured. For example, I have never mentioned his new wife to the extent that Jan Aage Torp claims. And the word horebukk is almost not mentioned, and everything else is only undocumented claims by Jan Aage Torp. Who is as little credible as a person who is notoriously criminal or charged in another way!
  1. What has been written against me and my family is not included. In other words, my verbal patron are as small to firecrackers against what Jan Aage Torp and his henchmen and poodles have come with.
Me and my family have got all the last four years to receive from either Jan Aage Torp, or his disciples who have allied him.
There Norway's 2 biggest and worst online roles, has been completely fooled by the Apostle Jan Aage Torp.
There have been document fakes, countless personal mail to me, my wife, our parent, employer, my son, and also created my own blog to swear me and my family.
Consider that those who oppose me and the heavenly blog have written about 300 articles against me and my family. Posted somewhere between 20-30,000 hate messages +++ much, much more!
Final Comment:
The judges and the judges, Oslo Tingrett and Borgarting Law of Law, show zero credibility, integrity and fairness.
Both judgments are based on a "fact" that Brynjar Merling writes as follows: "Whatever the extent to which abusive and contradictory opposition by the appellant's verbal assault has been or what characteristics of the convicted person had to endure in return for his verbal attacks against Pastor Torp. »
In other words, here we are at the very core of the matter. And why then this is actually an attack on freedom of belief and expression.
Since the whole judgment against me is fabricated, ugly and shows the dark side of the Norwegian judicial system.
When both judges and two different judicial authorities are based on the same thing that has not been debated as attorney Brynjar Meling says. Then the whole thing against me and the heavenly blog will be a fake room!
Ask dear friends about the following, and the truth must come forth!
  1. That Norwegian H ø Supreme acquit me.
  1. Or that there are new proceedings in Norwegian H ø Supreme where I and the Heavenly blog is acquitted!
 
Related links:

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar