søndag 7. mai 2017

No. 1542: According to lawyers Jon Wessel Aas and Brynjar Meling, I have not done anything criminal, so it's totally wrong to abuse the justice against me and the heavenly blog!

No. 1542:
According to lawyers Jon Wessel Aas and Brynjar Meling, I have not done anything criminal, so it's totally wrong to abuse the justice against me and the heavenly blog!
If they are to judge me and the verdict becomes enforceable. Then one would only be able to take any law, take it and use it against one's will. One does not need to care what the law contains, to judge the one or the one you do not like, above all. In other words, Norway becomes "new" North Korea in other words!
Picture of North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un, who also judges the country's inhabitants as it suits them. Of course, that's not bad in Norway. But at the same time, they do the same as they do in North Korea. Settles over all and all, even God!
Should you not be allowed to warn against repentant preachers?
It seems that this is exactly what the Oslo police want to stop, prove or unconvinced? I do not know, but bad and terrible is what they do at least!
 

Questions and answers from ung.no.
What is a civil action?
Hi!
A civil lawsuit is when you sue one or more other persons, companies or government to determine rights and obligations in relation to these. Basically, all civilian individuals can file civil lawsuit. Civil litigation must be separated from criminal offenses involving offenses, and almost exclusively government is involved.
Regards the lawyer, ung.no
From an interview with lawyer Wessel Aas in from the newspaper Our Country:
Yes to the Supreme Court. 
Freedom of speech expert, lawyer Jon Wessel-Aas believes that the statements to Christensen are not criminal.
"The special thing in this case is that punishment is used for punishment, which in any case, historically and in its essence, will punish the more direct peace crimes," he said.
Wessel Aas believes it is more natural to assess whether blog posts are defamations?
He points out that the Storting has the intention that defamation should be a matter between the parties and therefore must be prosecuted through civil action with claims for compensation.
Such cases are no longer a matter for the police and prosecuting authorities.
In principle, the view of the Court of Appeal also implies that the general publications of the press can be prosecuted in pursuance of the provision on peace crimes.
He would like to see the Supreme Court address the matter.
- This fundamental issue of law-making should ideally be clarified by the Supreme Court, Wessel Aas believes.
(Quote ending).
If Jan Aage Torp had done the right according to Norwegian law, he would not have barred the Norwegian judiciary with such a case. But filed a civil lawsuit.
This answers Wessel Aas:
"He indicates that the Storting has the intention that defamation should be a matter between the parties and therefore must be pursued through civil action with claims for compensation. Such matters are no longer a matter for the police and prosecution authorities. "
If that is the case, all that is written on the web, and otherwise will be emphasized so much. Then the courts will be blown up with such things. Imagine, this little file case is about to come up for the Supreme Court. What has cost the Norwegian society of time, resources and money is not very small.
And all I have written and spoken is not punishable!
What will the outcome of a judgment against me and the Heavenly blog be?
Nothing but a fine, in other words, I can write and speak as before.
It's a civil lawsuit that Jan Aage Torp would have brought against the heavenly blog and me, but he lets others who obviously hate the Christian message do the job. Talk about being rotten!
«Pastor» Jan Aage Torp allows the police to run harassment and prosecution of Christians against me and my family to take a Norwegian law to use it. To achieve Jan Aage Torp's dirty intentions. It's getting a valid judgment against me and the heavenly blog. To go to Google and use this judgment against me.
Instead of repentance to start living in harmony with the word of God, it obviously costs too much!
Jesus was the opposite, he put himself in the "stench" for the others to go free!
Joh. E. 18. 2 But Judas, who betrayed him, also knew the place; For Jesus often gathered there with his disciples. 3 Judas had taken the guard and servants of the high priests and Pharisees, and came there with torches and lamps and weapons. 4 And when Jesus knew all that should come upon him, he went forth and said unto them, Whom are you looking for? 5 They answered him, after Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus says to them: It is me. But Judas, who betrayed him, stood with them. 6 And he said unto them, It is me, they returned, and fell to the earth. 7 Then he asked them again: Who are you looking for? They said: After Jesus of Nazareth. 8 Jesus answered, I told you that it is me. If that's what you're looking for, let them go! 9 - that the word should be fulfilled as he had said: I did not lose one of those you gave me.
Notice the words of Jesus: "I told you that it is me. If that's what you're looking for, let them go! "
Jesus allowed everyone to go to take the punishment. Jan Aage Torp «heier» on anyone who wants to take me and the heavenly blog. Even if they hate me, Norwegian law violates, breaks freedom of belief and freedom of speech and carries out pure harassment and prosecution of Christians. All means are allowed, only they get me and the heavenly blog!
Final Comment:
But when I read the sentence, I find that it is totally wrong at all levels.
Now I have been convicted in 2 courts and both judgments are based on undocumented lies by Jan Aage Torp.
Seems really this is not credible that no one has asked for documentation for this. As well, none of the judges have asked me this as they place so much emphasis on. In other words, they want me to be judged it looks like?
Why have I written what I've written? I have responded to my own blog where there are hundreds of articles written and at least 20,000 messages in defense of Torp and to get rid of me.
In other words, that with the amount is only fabricated.
As well as Borgarting's law of law, it is not contested. I did that!

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar