It is that they say I write is in front of freedom of belief and expression.
See for yourself you go to the Seven student, buy a coke. You do it again, ten times you buy a cola, then the police come and pick you up.
Media lawyer Jon Wessel-Aas reacts that violation of Penal Code's Paragraph 390a, "in case of unlawful conduct or other reckless conduct violating someone else's peace", is based on the case against pastor Jan Kåre Christensen.
"It is clear that bullying and harassment in social media over time can cause people not to be there anymore. However, I think it is important that the court does not extend the sentence to cover too much. There is a point to be as concrete as possible when one is going to restrict freedom of expression through legislation, "said Wessel-Aas.
Proposals like "living in horror" make it more common to use the right of injuries, the lawyer believes. Injuries are decriminalized in the new Penal Code and can thus only form the basis for civil litigation. It seems more relevant in this case, according to him.
It is strange that both judgments against me build unilaterally on Jan Aage Torp's fables with figures about what and how much I have written about him, none of which is documented. In other words, both sentences against me and the heavenly blog are in my eyes a miracle when nothing is documented! Tragic!
Why did I mention Torp often? Not as much as he claims, that's because I've probably answered 20,000 hate speech from supporters to Jan Aage Torp.
Psychopath is mentioned, I count on a fraction of the times of me, the rest of his supporters when they so-called have rendered me.
On the false Smyrnablog, my son is also referred to as a lie, which is a direct lie, if most are deleted. Then it has come to the conclusion that this is not punishable, neither I nor my family does anything out of it even though we have police it!
The case against me and the heavenly blog are three elderly gentlemen who embrace both God, Norwegian law, freedom of belief and expression, as I see it!
Ask dear friends that the appeal goes through to the Supreme Court and that I will be acquitted! For all of me, both in the district court and the court of law, are manufactured!
The verdict is uncharted, primitive and slightly reflected, as the case was about law enforcement. But here we conclude that there is a judgment that attacks freedom of belief and expression, and it has a fierce Christianity pursuit!